Oct 14 2009Pamela Anderson criticized for using child as fashion accessory
Pamela Anderson was simply following the hot, new trend of exploiting children when she used a nine-year-old girl to hold her dress at the Hollywood Style Awards. But it appears some child advocacy groups don't appreciate fashion. Page Six reports:
One guest told Page Six, "People were genuinely shocked. She didn't even have her own seat and had to sit at Pamela's feet, where people nearly stepped on her to get to the stage. The girl looked uncomfortable and kept tugging on her dress to get her attention, but Pamela waved her away.
"Pamela was telling people it was her daughter," the attendee said. "And, after she presented David LaChapelle with an award onstage, she shouted 'daughter' in front of the whole auditorium, and slapped her leg like she was calling a puppy. The girl rushed up to grab her train."
Adelaide is the daughter of makeup artist to the stars Sharon Gault, who was believed to be at the event.
A spokesman for the Child Labor Coalition said, "I would want to speak to the child to ask her if it is something she willingly did. Nine is very young, and an awards ceremony is a long time for a child to be out holding a dress." Anderson's agent, Chris Smith, didn't get back to us.
Ha ha! Child Labor Coalition thinks this kid survived. That's precious.

Reader Comments
1. Rebecca - October 14, 2009 10:29 AM
ha funny considering that pam anderson is all about peta and animal rights. forget about child labor or anything silly like that...
2. dubba - October 14, 2009 10:30 AM
.....but shes a rabid advocate for PETA
twisted diseased bitch
3. britneysucks - October 14, 2009 10:40 AM
That's how all of those PETA retards are. You ask them whether they would rather run their car over a baby turkey or a baby human and they will chose to kill the human. This question was posed and answered on Howard Stern. I would love to see one of those idiots get attacked or eaten by an animal or be in a situation where only a human can save their life.
4. Bmurphy72 - October 14, 2009 10:42 AM
She would have aged better being a porn star.
5. Meg - October 14, 2009 10:47 AM
That is a dress? Maybe the 9 year old made it ,and thats what she's is holding it.
6. Jimbo - October 14, 2009 10:49 AM
That is funny. The PETA freak treats a stray dog better than her own kid
7. marme - October 14, 2009 10:50 AM
That is fucked up. And that dude in the picture looks like some robot. Sooo fucked up. Thats all I can say. Just fucked lol
8. Keepcelineonyourside - October 14, 2009 10:54 AM
Little girl: Are you my mommy?
9. JADE - October 14, 2009 10:59 AM
She had to do something for attention. Pam tries to do the outragous so that all eyes are on her. If she dressed and acted normal no one would care and there would only be like one picture of her at the event. She is old and used up looking, normal will not keep her in the news.
10. ktb ( . )( . ) - October 14, 2009 11:22 AM
Pam is crazy.
That dress (?) is shitty.
That kid looks miserable.
Her real parents are idiots.
The End.
11. really? - October 14, 2009 11:23 AM
Is the kid supposed to carrying the "train" of Pam's "dress". It looks like she's shitting a swath of fabric. Not to mention, the rest looks like she rolled around on a sheet and then stuck it together with some chewing gum and safety pins. Moron.
12. c2422131 - October 14, 2009 11:25 AM
I wish the Hep C would start to catch up to this cunning stunt.
13. JoeyJoJo - October 14, 2009 11:26 AM
Pammy - I guess it's okay to exploit children rather than animals. Imagine the uproar if that was a trained chimp holding her dress!
14. Mr.KnowItAll - October 14, 2009 11:30 AM
What a BEEZY!!!!
15. JustSaying - October 14, 2009 11:45 AM
In the first picture the little girl is covering her nose and mouth because she can sell Pamela's nasty pussy and she is afraid it might be forced into her face.
16. Pam looks like trash.. - October 14, 2009 11:46 AM
Last week thought I saw you on the street
Turns out it was a bag of trash
Just a big ol' bag of trash
I thought you looked like a bag of trash!!
17. EK - October 14, 2009 11:56 AM
I'm all for not abusing animals and I'm even a vegetarian, but I effing hate PETA. Anyone that's dragging a child around after 8 should be slapped. Pam should be slapped a thousand times for this. What a self-centered, selfish, tard.
18. yawn - October 14, 2009 12:04 PM
her posing is becoming worse than heidi montag.. just smile pam.. smile.
19. Roody! - October 14, 2009 12:11 PM
Ugh. Pam Anderson you're gross. No one wants to see your cha-cha any more so put on a dress that covers it up, will ya? I mean, Tommy Lee isn't even hitting that any more and that says a lot. Also, that kid looks like she'd rather be at home watching Dora the Explorer or something.
20. Venom - October 14, 2009 12:11 PM
Yet another Pam Anderson post. It's official, you've got a thing for hepatitis-infected-50-year-old-tranny-looking-hags.
Oh yeah and PETA can go suck a horse dick.
21. Courtyardpigeon - October 14, 2009 12:12 PM
wow she has amazing legs
22. Tommy Lee Lee - October 14, 2009 12:18 PM
Pamela-san need itchy-tan sumbo kick to face!
23. Eva - October 14, 2009 12:33 PM
What the heck is she wearing anyway? It looks like rags, ripped and strung together with more rags.
24. So Right - October 14, 2009 12:35 PM
She's losing it. Seriously. She's all about protecting animals, but exploits a child without a thought. So typical. The truth is this -- if you really care about animals, then you should really, really care about children.
25. gotmilk? - October 14, 2009 12:39 PM
what i'm more concerned about is the fact that the poor child is face level with Pam's rotting vagina. who knows what kind of fucking diseases that kid has on her face now.
26. ONoNotHerAgain - October 14, 2009 12:48 PM
Not only has Pamela Anderson transformed herself into an ugly hag with manufactured sex appeal, she's totally revealed her ucking-fay erk-jay-ness underneath.
What a wilted scumbag.
27. tracy - October 14, 2009 1:08 PM
Hey, It's Stifler's mom!
28. heyyou - October 14, 2009 1:58 PM
actually PETA does not treat stray dogs well. They kill over 90% of animals that go into their shelter.
29. Max Planck - October 14, 2009 2:25 PM
Where's Randal?
Doesn't have something to say in affirmation here?
30. Mercy - October 14, 2009 2:48 PM
Who is the mannequin standing beside Pam? It's like Madame Tussauds loaned out some wax dummy that was dressed by toddlers.
31. Randal - October 14, 2009 3:03 PM
Because you asked I will comment.
Pam, it is so awesome to see you out trying to save animals. Had you been on watch, Jessica Simpson's dog would have never been snatched by that coyote. The coyote would have lain at your feet waiting for you to lie down so it could rub it's body on your snatch. Because as we all know dogs love to rub up in the nasty smells. It comes from way back when they hunted and the nasty smells would cover their smells and allow them to hunt without being noticed. Dogs everywhere want to know what beaches you will lie at so that they too can rub their fur on your smelly smelly snatch.
Happy dogs makes PETA happy.
Randal
32. GrammarMenshevik - October 14, 2009 3:07 PM
Allow me the 94000th person to mention how fucking hypocritical it is of Pamela "Hepatitis McSilicone" Anderson to shill for those numbskulls in PETA while doing something like this.
33. Jack Hanna - October 14, 2009 3:44 PM
srsly who keeps inviting Pamela to these shows!?!? It's like feeding an animal at the zoo. Don't do it people!!!!
34. AmberDextrose - October 14, 2009 3:53 PM
Oh for god's sake, people. It's only a child. They're two a penny in some African states. I'm thinking of buying some as foot rests. My only surprise is that she chose a white one. They're so whiny.
35. mel - October 14, 2009 4:07 PM
uhmmm thats a dress?
36. betsy - October 14, 2009 5:12 PM
I have had the misfortune of having to work with Sharon Gault and that woman is psychotic (she's a joke in the makeup world), it does not surprise me at all that she would allow her child to be treated like that. she bought Adelaide onto set one day (you NEVER bring your kids to set, it's a big no no) and paraded her around to all the crew like a doll. Sharon LOVES the whole celebrity thing and would have been foaming at the mouth watching her little girl up on stage. it's so pathetic.
37. WHORE! WHORE! WHORE! - October 14, 2009 5:51 PM
The stupid hep c infected leg spread slutty whore finds new ways to not only embarrass herself but show herself to be queen of the braindead dumbasses. Keep up the good work, you WHORE...
38. All Women Stalker - October 14, 2009 6:43 PM
Sheez, must have been on drugs. I can't believe the mom allowed this.
-meream
39. lola - October 14, 2009 6:50 PM
All for show. Sounds like a joke
40. Galtacticus - October 14, 2009 7:58 PM
This must be totally akward through the eyes of an innocent kid.
41. Darth - October 14, 2009 8:15 PM
Instead of a child using a midget for this would have made it a curiosity circus.
42. Elle - October 14, 2009 9:44 PM
This pic speaks volumes, the only one in this pic with any good sense is the child. Pam looks stupid and ridiculous clinging to her 20's in a sheet she rolled out of bed in and the dude looks like a dumbass. If I was that little girl I would be holding my head in shame too.
43. Hotbox - October 14, 2009 11:23 PM
There's few people on this planet I've ever wanted to punch harder than THAT guy.
44. hateyoufornoreason - October 14, 2009 11:30 PM
Poor, pathetic Pammy.
45. Dread not - October 15, 2009 12:25 AM
She should be criticized for it. Angelina Voight was doing this shit like, how many years ago? And somehow people just kept stepping over the little girl to get their awards, without doing anything to help her. Typical Hollywood reaction. Somebody is exploiting, abusing, manipulating another person who is incapable of helping themselves. Nobody lifts a finger to stop it. Why does that sound familiar?
46. cartouches d encre - October 15, 2009 6:32 AM
The kid looks miserable. Why would someone consent to letting their daughter hold the train? This is the weirdest story I've read about Pam in a long time.
47. Girl Unimpressed - October 15, 2009 7:10 AM
methinks the woman was making a PETA point, treating a child the way people treat dogs - slapping her leg to call her over? hilarious the way people and orgs took the bait so quickly and unthinkingly, lol.
48. Narcissist - October 15, 2009 10:32 AM
Get that kid a HazMat suit. Kid Rock has been up in there.
49. Sabrina - October 15, 2009 12:56 PM
Obviously there´s something increadibly wrong with her! This just isn´t right!
50. ToRiMiLi - October 15, 2009 3:11 PM
That poor little girl looks miserable. WTF were her parents thinking? Why didn't Pam get one of her own kids to do it? At least then she could have thrown in the whole " look at me spending time with my kids" angle too.
51. Zoe - October 15, 2009 6:56 PM
Does anyone even care what this dried up old bimbo does anymore? She has no talent and this rock-metal-slut-trash look she's been clinging onto for over 10 years is TIRED AND DATED! The dress is ugly, Pam is ugly and old and she's a whacko PETA fanatic with nothing interesting going on in her life besides sleeping with a string of loser-junkie rockstars. This and her bad outfits are the only reason she gets any attention these days. She hasn't done any 'acting' (well technically she never 'acted' because her acting sucks!) and she has not done any good for PEOPLE, yet she seems to think she is some kind of saint just because she is a vegetarian and supports PETA....WELL I AM NOT FOOLED! Pam is an idiot, she is trashy and she is just out for publicity. I never meet any men under the age of 30 who still think she is hot. I also work in the movie industry and I HAVE NEVER heard anyone say that Pam is nice, or smart or down to earth. Most say she is a sad, insecure person, off in her own little world, trying desperately to cling onto the last bit of youth she has left. She must have something wrong with her mentally if she thinks this is an attractive dress! It looks like someone saftey pinned a bunch of old drapes together. And the idea of having a little girl there to carry her train shows just how out of touch with reality Pam is! WHAT WAS SHE THINKING? The kid idea is tacky but not as tacky as Pam or this horrid dress!
52. Debbie Vickers - October 17, 2009 8:52 AM
It seem as if that is all she does is use people but a child come on what was she thinking
53. Susan - October 17, 2009 9:37 AM
I think if that is the only way Pamela Anderson can get attention it is pretty pathetic and she should give it up.
54. Gail - October 25, 2009 1:24 PM
Please stop insulting retarded people and whores by honoring this amoeba with those titles. People with different mental abilities deserve better than to be lumped in with that... THING. And whores have way more class that it does.
55. links of london - October 28, 2009 4:25 AM
It was a very nice idea! Just wanna say thank you for the information you have shared. Just continue writing this kind of post. I will be your loyal reader. Thanks again.
56. Unknown - November 6, 2009 2:58 AM
All I have to say is "People in Fashion are f***in idiots". End of story.