Apr 29 2009Sarah Jessica Parker & Matthew Broderick will shut you up. With twins!
In response to rumors they're getting a divorce, Sarah Jessica Parker and Matthew Broderick have announced they're expecting twins. Via surrogate that is. The AP reports:
Parker, 44, and Broderick, 47, "are happily anticipating the birth of their twin daughters later this summer with the generous help of a surrogate. The entire family is overjoyed," said a statement from the publicists.
The couple has a 6-year-old son, James Wilkie Broderick, and will mark their 12th wedding anniversary next month.
Details about the surrogate or her pregnancy were unavailable, the publicists said.
Because nothing proves a couple's undying love for each other than not even having the required sex to procreate. God, what devotion.

Reader Comments
1. firsty - April 29, 2009 10:56 AM
first
2. Huckleberry Hashimoto - April 29, 2009 10:57 AM
They're such a cute couple. If you're a horse, that is.
3. rachel - April 29, 2009 10:58 AM
with the sideburns he looks like he is trying to be wolverine. FAIL
4. Deacon Jones - April 29, 2009 10:58 AM
That look in his eyes says it all....
5. Goblinkatie - April 29, 2009 11:00 AM
So... surrogate or knocked up mistress?
6. Ebony Tan - April 29, 2009 11:01 AM
Way to Go!! I love this couple..Congratulations!!
7. Sarah - April 29, 2009 11:02 AM
she's 44, she probably CAN'T have kids on her own anymore, sheesh.
8. gosyco - April 29, 2009 11:18 AM
Men, we've got to band together and save one of our own. Can't you read the screeeeeaming cries for help across Matt's pitiful face? Great Scott!!
I'll stay behind and guard the ship.
9. ph7 - April 29, 2009 11:22 AM
he looks like the unhappiest man on earth - and rightfully so.
10. sam - April 29, 2009 11:23 AM
He has come a long way. From spunky Ferris Beuller to this... sad, sad shell of his former self. Lose the sideburns and and at least try to look happy, Matthew. You are an actor, right? For inspiration, watch how Brad Pitt is doing it.
On second thought, maybe Brad isn't doing it so well. They both have the same look of despair and hound-dog eyes. Like trapped animals.
11. sam - April 29, 2009 11:26 AM
And as for Sarah, sporting bed-head hair isn't enough to make people think all is well in the Broderick-Parker boudoir. And the raccoon eye makeup can look really sexy when you are in your twenties. After forty, not so much. Seen Pamela Anderson lately? She and SJ both look like they could cackle really convincingly.
12. ishi-san - April 29, 2009 11:28 AM
*haha* the happiness in his face!
13. Zanna - April 29, 2009 11:35 AM
Yup. He's got the look of a man who is "trapped". And she's got the look of a woman who got her way. I'm guessing the "surrogate" is the chic he cheated on her with.
14. Jim - April 29, 2009 11:36 AM
They wouldn't have need a surrogate if they wanted a pony.
15. Leslie - April 29, 2009 11:36 AM
I think it's so funny her husband doesn't even want to bang her! Haaaaaaaaa! Ugly horse face!
16. Rick - April 29, 2009 11:37 AM
That's the look that was on every guy's face who was dragged to the "Sex in the City" movie.
17. Deacon Jones - April 29, 2009 11:38 AM
lol, seriously.
This guy needs to dump her ass, move to Miami, develop a coke habit, and bang college dance club groupies. He's fucking Ferris Bueller for christ sake.
18. mamamiasweetpeaches - April 29, 2009 11:40 AM
I remember reading in a gossip rag many years ago before they were married that she was hell-bent on getting him to marry her and was even gonna "get preganant so he'd HAVE to marry her". I believed it then and I believe it NOW. She will do ANYTHING to keep her hooks in him and - like others have pointed out - he looks like he's in his own personal living Hell. Remember what a cute kid he was? He's aged 50 years since meeting this broad!
19. Nero - April 29, 2009 11:40 AM
Congrats to them! Only am not sure if the kids will be happy with their ugly parents!
20. Darth - April 29, 2009 11:43 AM
Money makes up a lot but still.Uglyness is a big problem in the world.
21. Barbaro - April 29, 2009 11:43 AM
That's the look of every man who's with a "liberated" woman.
22. norton - April 29, 2009 11:44 AM
Could you imagine being married to horse face? Especially now after he got caught banging some other chick...... ugh.
I bet her mouth goes a hundred miles a minute given her Jewish American Princess background.
Somehow I'd just love to punch this broad right in the face.
23. Crabby Old Guy - April 29, 2009 11:50 AM
I seem to recall that he was responsible for a car accident which left one or two people dead while he was vacationing in GB. Long time ago - pre marriage to Mr. Ed.
If so, makes you think that Karma truly does exist and he's the poster child.
Fuck. Talk about your "Dead Man Walking" look.
24. mikeock - April 29, 2009 11:53 AM
I bet she'd be a nice ass fuck
25. mamamiasweetpeaches - April 29, 2009 11:53 AM
Hios hair and sideburns combo makes him look like Bob Cratchitt from SCROOGE.
26. this says it all - April 29, 2009 11:58 AM
Carrie: "Later that day I got to thinking about relationships. There are those that open you up to something new and exotic, those that are old and familiar, those that bring up lots of questions, those that bring you somewhere unexpected, those that bring you far from where you started, and those that bring you back. But the most exciting, challenging and significant relationship of all is the one you have with yourself. And if you can find someone to love the you you love, well, that's just fabulous."
Yes, excellent, by all means fall in love with yourself. That makes you such a wonderful person to be with. Just look at what happened to Bueller.
27. GuyHolly - April 29, 2009 11:58 AM
Dude-- grab your jar and run!!
28. Mike - April 29, 2009 12:01 PM
FAIL
29. Paul - April 29, 2009 12:10 PM
That is the look of a man who has surrendered. Poor sod.
30. naas - April 29, 2009 12:27 PM
I agree with just most of you, he looks weathered & his speedometer needs some rollin back
31. Mr. Jones - April 29, 2009 12:47 PM
Not to say Ferris looks like the Squire of Gothos, but...
YOU BROKE MY SWORD!!
32. Deva - April 29, 2009 1:14 PM
I wonder if anyone will consider if her new kids look like the same brand of shoe that is her face?
33. Normal - April 29, 2009 1:25 PM
You are all VILE people. She looks very pretty here - her eyes are stunning and that dress is absolutely fabulous. And of course his sideburns are odd but I'm assuming that's for a role. And guess what - HE'S NOT FERRIS BUELLER. He's aged because he's older, and life is not a movie. I'm sure their relationship isn't perfect but who the fu** are you people to comment on it.
Why am I here? Jesus Christ you're all disgusting.
34. suzee - April 29, 2009 1:29 PM
hoping it is neither her eggs or his sperm.
35. ToTellTheTruth - April 29, 2009 1:34 PM
He looks like he wants to stab the fuck outta her.
36. pappy smeary - April 29, 2009 1:34 PM
It's so obvious, after broderick killed those two girls in the England car crash a settlement was reached in which broderick would be married to a horse chosen by the victims' family, as die hard fans of the fim "Hocus Pocus" it was a given that Broderick would be married to the horse-witch SJP
37. Richard McBeef - April 29, 2009 1:35 PM
@33 - take your righteousness, wad it up into a little ball, and shove it right up your tight ass.
38. MustangSally - April 29, 2009 1:35 PM
OMG is BAR Rafaeli cheating on LEO?
39. Detmolders - April 29, 2009 1:47 PM
Weird looking people need to stay together in order minimize the OMGness of the universe.
40. Ralph - April 29, 2009 2:23 PM
Giver her a carrot and while she is occupied, maybe he can escape!
41. E - April 29, 2009 2:26 PM
wow, could they look any happier?
geez, they look miserable.
42. Migz - April 29, 2009 2:32 PM
Gee, don't Neil Young & Mr. Ed make a lovely couple?
43. CC - April 29, 2009 2:35 PM
You're all ignoring a very important fact here: Matthew Broderick is gay as the dya is long. Goes a long(er) way towards explaining that expression...
44. Debbie31 - April 29, 2009 2:43 PM
Who is SJP kidding? Is she honestly looking into her husband's eyes? He looks dead and uninterested. Matthew has checked out.......how sad, isn't it just like a couple who are on the verge of a divorce to think about having another kid???? I give it 6 months.
45. Shawn - April 29, 2009 3:03 PM
Her bod is rockin' in those pics.
...but that head....
46. Obama Khan - April 29, 2009 3:06 PM
It's the case of the dog that didn't bark, as our time-traveling Moriarty knows all too well. #44 is correct - having a kid is often the way couples on the verge look to rekindle their relationship, and when you're rich like these two, I guess you just hire someone else to do all the labor. Mazel tov!.
47. jt - April 29, 2009 3:15 PM
yeah, nobody has kids in order to save their marriage.
48. hollywood_hillbilly - April 29, 2009 3:39 PM
His eyes are screaming!!!
49. justifiable - April 29, 2009 4:03 PM
Matthew, it's Guy Ritchie on the phone for you. He says "Run! Run NOW!"
50. Maggie From Buffalo - April 29, 2009 4:45 PM
He looks thrilled!!!
51. bean - April 29, 2009 4:47 PM
sweet chops, man.
52. just - April 29, 2009 5:13 PM
best. picture. ever
The eyes say more than ANY, ANY, ANY words could. Or perhaps they are simply saying... "fucked".
53. sam - April 29, 2009 5:22 PM
#33 -- He's aged because he's older, and life is not a movie.
For an example of how to age well, google some picks of John Stamos. Still as smokin' hot as he was over 20 years ago. Sure, he's probably had some help, but if so, it was great help, and who cares when he looks like he does?
Of course, a smile and some life in the eyes can do as much or more than all the botox/surgery/facials in the world.
54. HilsShootsHilsScores! - April 29, 2009 5:52 PM
#42 !!! So right!!! I never saw Neil look so sad, though.
55. Sammy 2 - April 29, 2009 6:11 PM
I read the whole thread, and am more confused than ever.
56. SlowMonkey - April 29, 2009 6:13 PM
@4 No Shit. This has aged him ten years and he didn't even have to pork her. It's not like he has a choice: she has all the money.
57. Jamie's Uterus - April 29, 2009 6:24 PM
I saw her in a broadway show once. I actually like SJP, I met her too afterwards. In person, she' s much softer looking and prettier. In photos she looks a bit jagged and harsh, but she's really cool though.
58. Tracey - April 29, 2009 6:58 PM
Matthew always looks so fucking unhappy in every photo with her.
59. devilsrain - April 29, 2009 10:14 PM
You have to give him acting credit. Here Mr. ED is all smiles completely oblivious to the fact that her husband is gay.
60. Courtney - April 30, 2009 1:06 AM
James WIlkie Broderick? That's dangerously close to James Wilkes Booth
61. uh what? - April 30, 2009 3:34 AM
Clearly none of you have ever actually seen a movie with Matthew Broderick in it. He's always had sort of a deadpan look to him. More so when he's exasperated by something. Let's see, he just had the press go nuts over his alleged cheating (OK, he probably did it, but none of us were there, were we?), and he's got a camera shoved in his face at the moment. His expression could just as much have something to do with those facts as with the woman who's draped all over him.
And you know what? That business about a woman "sticking her claws in" a guy is just nonsense. Welcome to the world of no-fault divorce, where you can ditch the wife simply because she snores too loudly. It's not like he's a blue-collar guy who never knows when he will have work. He can afford alimony and child support. People in Hollywood get divorced all the time. For that matter, if he's gay, who cares? How many famous people are openly gay now, and we like 'em in spite of that? Nathan Lane, anyone? There's no reason for Broderick to stay with Parker if he doesn't want to.
I think people just want to say nasty misogynist things without being called on it, that's what I think. I was kinda hoping to see people outraged that here's another famous couple legitimizing using a woman as a brood mare, but apparently not. Why is that?
62. Rae - April 30, 2009 3:51 AM
Poor bastard. His eyes are crying out for help.
63. Urbanspaceman - April 30, 2009 5:35 AM
So what's the big deal? The child they have now isn't "theirs". SJP faked a pregnancy and they adopted him.
64. gerard vandenberg - April 30, 2009 6:42 AM
I'm sure there will be pretty some "NOISE" indahouse!!
65. RichPort's Ghost - April 30, 2009 8:56 AM
When asked for comment, Ms. Parker couldn't respond, as she was a little hoarse...
66. k - April 30, 2009 9:23 AM
ferris can't handle sara jessica's success & money so like most other celeb men with super successful wive's, he has resorted to cheating. so sara jessica isn't the prettiest (that's not the point), she is a far better catch than her husband-- smart, iconic, and classy & private about her life. so leave sara jessica alone!
67. Maritza - April 30, 2009 11:42 AM
Yeah, that's just what they need, twins will make everything all right again! Like they have so much time to attend two newborns, please its obvious he is just not that into her anymore he is just pleasing her to shut the rumors that's all!
68. Nomad - May 3, 2009 8:50 PM
Interesting couple, i can't help wondering how they get along since they don't seem to have very much in common
69. obzelite - May 7, 2009 2:04 AM
oh fuck, ferris bueller just died in my heart.