Sep 22 2008Kim Kardashian, You're Not Fooling Anyone: An Open Letter
Dear Kim Kardashian,
Recently, you stated on your blog that you weigh "right under 120 lbs." Many commenters on The Superficial and on your site, before they were erased, rightfully cried "Bullshit!" (Including myself who, physically possessing half your mass, weighs 145 lbs). You soon added an update saying you would videotape yourself getting on a scale to silence the "haters." However, you've since edited that update to say you'd slide yourself into a pair of size 27 jeans instead then posted a video of yourself doing just that.
Kim, this proves nothing. (Except that you have access to butter.) So, here's my proposal to you to end these shenanigans once and for all:
I challenge you, Kim Kardashian, to walk into any department store and step on a scale in front of a random camera crew. I'd be more than happy to meet you there and show you how a scale works in case you're not familiar with the process. What can I say? I'm a gentleman.
Should you weigh 120 lbs or less, I will write a post encouraging folks to vote for you on Dancing with the Stars provided you don't get kicked off tonight. I will also concede that you don't wear a buttpad. (Even though we both know the truth. *wink*)
Should you weigh 121 lbs or more, you will walk around with "The Superficial.com" written prominently on your spacious rear while traversing downtown LA - in a bikini.
Or you could simply come clean and admit you're at least a buck forty. Ball's in your court - unless Khloe ate it, in which case, I'll FedEx over another one.
Sincerely,
The Superficial Writer
P.S. Thanks for reading the site!
RELATED STORIES

Reader Comments
1. joflo - September 22, 2008 5:24 PM
oh shit. challenge extended!
2. FRIST!!! - September 22, 2008 5:25 PM
Waitaminute? Size 27 jeans? Isn't that huge? I wear a 7, and I think I'm fat!!!
3. Rough Daddy - September 22, 2008 5:26 PM
This special post is brought to you, by bubblevision!!!!
4. Yank and Wank - they rhyme for a reason - September 22, 2008 5:26 PM
This is getting beyond ridiculous - I mean the buttpad, she looks as is she is wearing a nappy underneath those leggings.
5. nej22 - September 22, 2008 5:27 PM
I am a little less then 120, I am also about 5'8'' and am frequently called "a bean pole" or anorexic, depending on if you like me or not-- anyway-- there is no way she is 120 unless she is legit 4'11''-- then MAYBE i would believe that shit-- ps. superficial writer, you posts are hilarious you clever writer you!
6. Courtney - September 22, 2008 5:29 PM
There's no way in hell she weighs 120. I weigh that much and I'm a twig. Then again I don't have a big fat ass.
7. EvaV - September 22, 2008 5:30 PM
more expensive jeans run in different size than Jrs (if you are wearing an odd # sized pant then you are shopping in the jrs dept) a size 27 is about a size 4.
8. Rough Daddy - September 22, 2008 5:32 PM
If youre not built like kim you should be a size 0 Frist,,,
9. FRIST!!! - September 22, 2008 5:32 PM
She's a filthy fucking LIAR!!! And I'm going to take a hacksaw to those ridiculous looking sockemboppers
10. Adoration - September 22, 2008 5:33 PM
120lbs? That's because the gravity in L.A. is totally different from the rest of the planet right? I knew it! I blame HALO (the giant ass collider out there) I bet you she was 145lbs ++++ before that damn thing went online.
11. forrest hump - September 22, 2008 5:33 PM
I bet her ass by itself weighs 120 lbs
12. Mike - September 22, 2008 5:33 PM
SUPERFICIAL WRITER
What the hell you looking at? She got to be over 150. I am thinking like 155.
Ass nice has to go already, she is ridiculous already, she ain't fooling me or my horny dick. My dick doesn't even fall for that fake ass.
Come on, you could have at least in the challenge included, her wearing a thong, not just a bikini. One that has just a string up her ass crack so we can see that her ass is fake.
If her ass is indeed real then I might have to agree with Superficial just a bit. Part of her might weigh 145, and that would be JUST her ass. Then her tits could weigh 2 pounds, 1 pound each, everybody knows she got the ass but no tits. Then the rest of her body weighs at least 10 pounds. Making her about 157, just what I predicted.
13. Jessica - September 22, 2008 5:34 PM
Don't bother sending it Fedex, it won't show up and will be posted as "Delivered, left at door, not signature required".
14. RJR - September 22, 2008 5:35 PM
More proof that god is a cruel, malevolent, vindictive and violent bastard! Why else would this skank whore with a humongous fat lard ass be on the planet?
KK is a nasty, filthy, greasy, self-important, self righteous, lard ass, mudshark with no talent whatsoever.
There are better looking, more talented women with much better bodies everywhere! There is nothing special about this piss drinking whore!
15. debagger - September 22, 2008 5:36 PM
I'd like to preface this post by stating KK is a stupid tramp urinal cake.
Now, to the real issue: is she actually 120 pounds? It's possible, if you take into factor her height (only 5'2" or so). She does appear to be thick, but you have to also take into consideration that the disgusting fat blubber she possesses is less dense than muscle. So you, "in theory", you could actually appear to be much smaller than this walking ad for Planned Parenthood, and still weigh the same amount.
Thank you for taking your time to read this very scientific comment!
16. debagger - September 22, 2008 5:36 PM
I'd like to preface this post by stating KK is a stupid tramp urinal cake.
Now, to the real issue: is she actually 120 pounds? It's possible, if you take into factor her height (only 5'2" or so). She does appear to be thick, but you have to also take into consideration that the disgusting fat blubber she possesses is less dense than muscle. So you, "in theory", you could actually appear to be much smaller than this walking ad for Planned Parenthood, and still weigh the same amount.
Thank you for taking your time to read this very scientific comment!
17. Goblinkatie - September 22, 2008 5:37 PM
While I agree there is no way in hell she's 120, I honestly *almost* feeling bad for the gal. Folks have said some really nasty things on her site over the weight/pant size. (Yes I looked when it was first posted here, then I went and cried in the shower for an hour because the dirt wouldn't come off.)
Hell, most women lie about their weight or size at one point in their life and they were telling her she should die for lying to them. Creep-shows. On the other hand, why in the hell would you post your"measurements and weight" on an internet site and not expect people to freak out? It's like slamming your face on a red stove eye and then being shocked that it was hot. Has no one told her that the interwebs are made for Trolls?
I really, really, really hope she loses because dear God I'd love to see photos of her with the site name across her posterior. Why stop there though, there's ample room for the site slogan and shot-outs for Geekologie and IWS. :p
18. leah - September 22, 2008 5:37 PM
she's so full of CRAP! I'm 5'3" and weigh um a whole 105 and I wear a size 25, so her saying she can somewhat fit into a size 26 is unheard of. What a liar.
19. leah - September 22, 2008 5:37 PM
she's so full of CRAP! I'm 5'3" and weigh um a whole 105 and I wear a size 25, so her saying she can somewhat fit into a size 26 is unheard of. What a liar.
20. mag - September 22, 2008 5:39 PM
Her ass is huge, flabby and disproportionate. Plus I bet she stinks like a nasty slut who just fucked and sucked an entire football team.
Kim! Go away!
21. midge - September 22, 2008 5:39 PM
This is how she looks a lot of the time on her reality show - there are some shots from behind where she looks exactly like a Florida retiree. Just add the white low-cut tennis shoes.
22. Goblinkatie - September 22, 2008 5:40 PM
Um #10, Halo isn't in California. It's at the CERN facility on the Swiss / French border.
23. calypso - September 22, 2008 5:41 PM
I don't know. She looks like she's about 4'10" compared to that car. I don't see that monstrosity fitting into a size 27 though.
24. forrest hump - September 22, 2008 5:41 PM
#15 That is impossible. I know alot of girls in the 5'2 range and they are much thinner than her and weigh over 110 and some are even close to 120. At 5'2 she has to be at least 150
25. Jesse - September 22, 2008 5:41 PM
Check out the grease monkey staring at her ass! If he had a darker tan...who knows? Maybe he wouldn't have to walk all the way to the employee bathroom...
26. steve - September 22, 2008 5:44 PM
The "Oh Mr. Slave!" guy looking at her in the top pic is typical of the type of "man" who still finds her attractive (well, in addition to all the subhumans).
27. Bertha - September 22, 2008 5:49 PM
I am the same height and build as Kim, but my breasts are real, and I just went to the doctor for a physical. I use to weight 145 but now I weigh 155 pounds, so Kim must weigh around 155 pounds. Kim's big ass alone would not allow Kim to pull up size 27 inch waist jeans. I know I eat too much and I have a big fat ass and wear girdles like Kim so my ass looks perky, but I'm not going around lying about my weight or denying I wear a butt girdle. Some guys find me sexy and it works for me.
28. Mia - September 22, 2008 5:51 PM
Everytime I see Kim in her butt girdle; I am relieved that I know when to push myself from the plate and do not have to rely on a butt girdle like Kim. Poor no talent worthless media whore Kim and her butt girdles and lying about her weight and having to do porn to become famous. Kim is a sad pathetic big fat loose ass celebrity.
29. CaptainMorgan - September 22, 2008 5:53 PM
She won't get voted off Dancing with the Stars. Her partner will have something 'snap and pop' during their routine. At the hospital, it will be realized that he's in critical condition due to massive internal injuries. His only comments to the press will be this, "210." Cryptic? Mysterious? Truthful? Hollywood legend.
30. Camilla - September 22, 2008 5:54 PM
I wonder: why are you americans that obsessed with weight?
Maybe because you have to hide your own shame of being the fattest nation in the planet? Is this the reason why you keep looking at famous people's asses? Does it make you feel better, to know Kim has a giant ass?
31. debagger - September 22, 2008 5:54 PM
#24 DO YOU?!
Well... shit.
We can't know for sure, only speculate! And since when is it fun to take the obvious side?
32. Nancy - September 22, 2008 5:54 PM
#21 lol!
So true! So true. The only females I see wearing the obvious butt girdles are old ladies or ladies that had 2 or more kids lol!
33. PunkA - September 22, 2008 5:55 PM
If Kim manages to stay on Dancing, my guess is that she looks pretty hot in 6 weeks or so because of all the exercising she will be forced to do. But as of today, I bet she weighs about 135+. She is short after all, and she would weigh less minus the massive butt pad. I mean, who knew you could have a butt pad placed inside spandex. Wonders never cease....
34. desk dancer - September 22, 2008 5:55 PM
oh, this is awesome of you... SERIOUSLY...
35. AirMail - September 22, 2008 5:56 PM
You guys have to stop putting thoses Kitty snacks out on the back steps. I know shes a cute little thing, but one day it will be cold out, and you will let her in. The next thing you know, the bed smells like piss, and you have something itching you that may or may not be fleas...
36. FAT! - September 22, 2008 5:57 PM
I hate to get into the whole "let me post my weight/height on this site to prove kim k's a fat whore" thing, but I really don't think she weighs 150. She sure sure as hell doesn't weigh 120 or less, for sure, but taking it to 150 is going overboard. And, to join in the clan of stating sizes and such, I'm 5'7" and weigh around 150 or so (FAT!), and I know if she weighed 150 at 5'2" she'd look way bigger than she looks in those pics.
I'm guessing she weighs around 130-135? But 117...no. Just no. I watched that stupid video of hers where she's squeezing into these 27 jeans and all I could think is, "This bitch is famous for what again?" Seriously, to have to post a lame video of yourself trying to fit into these tiny ass jeans to prove you're not a fat slob is fucking stupid. And pointless. Pointless because, no matter what size you wear, Kim, you're still fat to us.
FAT!
37. jerZeygirl - September 22, 2008 5:57 PM
I am 5'4 btw 120-130, all muscle. People assume I weigh no more then 110. I wear a size 25 in some jeans (sevens, citizens) and a 26 in others (Hudson) so I would have to say that A. Kim is lying 2. She is trying to stretch jeans cuz she could NEVER fit into a 27 Citizens or Seven or Hudson D. Who really cares how much she weighs? Her fake tits and fake ass alone weigh at least 80lbs. You have to admit that she is skinner then 90% of the American woman population.
38. jerZeygirl - September 22, 2008 5:59 PM
I am guessing she is about 135 with no muscle what so ever.
39. Doc - September 22, 2008 6:02 PM
#37
70 percent of Americans are 30 pounds or more overweight like Kim. The word skinnier does not fit when using Kim's name in the same sentence. Kim is a large woman or plus size woman and she weighs around 155-160 pounds. Kim has proved that she has no problem lying and does it very well.
40. fuck - September 22, 2008 6:02 PM
Wonderful. Now all the preachy fat girls who were braying about "respect!" on the Barker broiled wiener story and "racism!" on the Dutch monkey story will be disclosing their personal body-image stories, in great detail, for the entire overnight. It's not like they'll be interrupted by getting laid, although they might take a short break to replenish the Häagen-Dazs or clog the toilet.
41. republicant - September 22, 2008 6:02 PM
Dear Kim, you are soooooooooooooooooooo boring! Just think, if you didn't have that giant ass, no one would know who you are. You're famous because you have a huge ass...wow, congratulations, what an accomplishment to be a big assed media whore. And no, I'm not jealous of you. I'm just sick of seeing your stupid face everywhere along with those tards Heidi and Spencer! *BARF*
42. toe - September 22, 2008 6:05 PM
I just don't understand why anyone would even want an ass that big? Curvy girls are hot, I got that, but that just ain't right. Does she think she gets attention cause people think she has a nice ass? I think maybe everyone, including myself, just wants to know what the hell she stores back there? A small family is my best guess...
43. toe - September 22, 2008 6:05 PM
I just don't understand why anyone would even want an ass that big? Curvy girls are hot, I got that, but that just ain't right. Does she think she gets attention cause people think she has a nice ass? I think maybe everyone, including myself, just wants to know what the hell she stores back there? A family of four is my best guess...
44. toe - September 22, 2008 6:07 PM
sorry had to correct the small family to family of four...minimal.
45. Bill Clinton - September 22, 2008 6:08 PM
She's 120 KILOS!
not pounds!
46. tara - September 22, 2008 6:08 PM
am i the ONLY one who noticed the crazy cameltoe?!?
sorry if that got posted multiple times, it didn't seem to be working.
47. FAT! - September 22, 2008 6:09 PM
#42
That's 'cause she's into black guys. Black guys like humonguous/weird-shaped asses. Kim likes black cock so she had to find a way to attract 'em.
48. Kim's fart - September 22, 2008 6:09 PM
BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAPPPPPPP!!!
Oh good lord, thank goodness I finally made it out! I've been trapped in that thing forever. What fucking year is it, anyway?
49. Mike Oxbhig - September 22, 2008 6:10 PM
Shes so beautiful.
Too bad she has such a propensity for dark meat.
50. Subby - September 22, 2008 6:12 PM
On the video of her trying on jeans:
Size 27 my ass.
Sue, there's no editing tricks in that video, but what about sewing tricks? Just buy a few pairs of size 27s, bust out a needle and thread, and voila, your size 500s just became size 27.
Case closed. I support the department store scale challenge.
51. Liz - September 22, 2008 6:26 PM
Maybe her ass weighs 120 lbs.
52. Bummer - September 22, 2008 6:30 PM
If the Turks had just eradicated the Armenians, we wouldn't be having this conversation.
53. Guy - September 22, 2008 6:34 PM
Why do you Americans care so much?
54. m-1 - September 22, 2008 6:37 PM
...gets "lbs" & "kilos" confuzzzed.
55. Runnergal - September 22, 2008 6:42 PM
This is sad. Us women have it so hard anymore. You have to be a size 0 and you have to have boobs and you have to have a butt, but don't be heavier than 120 lbs. Give her a break. I told someone I weighed 135 the other day even though I really weigh 145. Leave us chicks alone.
56. Jamie's Uterus - September 22, 2008 6:42 PM
In addition to the vile, horrid, duo Spencer and Heidi, maybe the Superficial Writer gets paid by the human urinal's publicist to post endlessly about her fat ass and weight, which has to be at least 150.
57. Eddy - September 22, 2008 6:43 PM
I'm 5'2 and have a moderate to large ass but a fair sized waist (32/28/40). Some jeans styles I wear a four, others I have to size up (low rider jeans always size up on me because of the hips, generally I don't wear those.) I am 130 lbs and have a little extra weight on me. So she's not totally unlikely to actually be 120lbs if she's a similar height, though I imagine the breasts might add some weight I'm not carting around? I dunno. It doesn't seem *too* far off to me though.
58. Jason - September 22, 2008 6:43 PM
If there's a a "hall of fame" for Superfical.com posts, I nominate this one. This was entertaining, educational, and just downright damn funny. Way to go SFW!
P.S. I'm going to bet 145 lbs, size 14. To be fair, I'd say sans buttocks she'd probably be a size 8.
59. buttqueen - September 22, 2008 6:45 PM
I'm 5'4 and weigh 120. I'm slightly on the curvy side, a size 4. My ass isn't anywhere NEAR Kim's size, not even by half, and there is no way that girl is gonna fit into some size 27 jeans. That should mean she has a 27 inch waist, and on low rider jeans that means your upper hips, not your natural waistline. She definitely has over 36 inch hips (mine are 36 and my waist is 27) and honestly a real 27 wouldn't even go over her ass.
This is all about vanity sizing on name brands! let's see her fit into a pair of 27 inch slim-fit Levi's!
60. jesus christ! - September 22, 2008 6:47 PM
#2 - wtf! there are 2 kinds of sizing for woman, you know, which makes me wonder if you are a woman, or if you are a woman who has ever bought jeans that aren't wal-mart brand. there are 3, 5, 7, 9 sizing and then there is sizing by inches. At a size 7, you are probably about a 27/28.
as for the others who commented about how she weighs more than that. She is so short! that makes all the difference. 120 is anorexic for you are 5'9", but pretty thick at 5'2".
61. Candice - September 22, 2008 6:57 PM
She's probably not lying (much) about the weight. Her frame isn't terribly "small", though. You need to factor in her height. I weigh 120 or so, and wear size 27 or 28, but I'm also 5'9". My BMI is about 18. That's small. At 5'2", her BMI is more like 22. That's average.
62. jugga43 - September 22, 2008 7:00 PM
Who cares about weight, it's whatchoo look like. I weigh 215 but look like 175.
BIG BONES IS REAL MUTHAFUKKKAZ!!!!
Gnar
63. Runnergal - September 22, 2008 7:01 PM
#58 Jason: I weigh 145 and fit into size 29 jean. Your size 14 guess was way wrong. Stop being such an ignorant guy. You are not funny.
64. Lauren - September 22, 2008 7:12 PM
She's gorgeous. Also, she showed her ass on the show -- no butt-pad, genius. This little tiff makes the 145 lb Superficial writer (Is he manorexic or just really short?) seem even uglier now.
65. not first! - September 22, 2008 7:21 PM
120lbs on each cheek (and I am not talking about the face... just in case some1 missed it)
66. not first! - September 22, 2008 7:22 PM
120lbs on each cheek (and I am not talking about the face... just in case some1 missed it)
67. not first! - September 22, 2008 7:22 PM
120lbs on each cheek (and I am not talking about the face... just in case some1 missed it)
68. Sierra - September 22, 2008 7:22 PM
Wow..I hardly believe this. I am a 26/27 & my waist size is the same as hers but my hips are like... 4-5 inches smaller ha. And 26s are tight on my non-ass anyway. Whatever.
And is it just me or does her bum look a little less ginormous than usual in the vid?
69. Hey - September 22, 2008 7:24 PM
Don't dis on the 'Fish. I'd marry him just for his wit.
70. JJ - September 22, 2008 7:25 PM
#64
Kim showed her ass on the show and used her jeans as a girdle while trying to pull her pants up. Kim's saggy lower part of her ass was purposely not shown on the show.
71. buttpad - September 22, 2008 7:25 PM
btw she does not wear a buttpad for the simple fact that no woman wants her ass to be that big.
72. Mud Shark - September 22, 2008 7:30 PM
Wow, i bet her bowel movements are the size of an elephants. In all fairness to her, she is a man, with a large penis. I would venture a guess that she weighs 150-160lbs. She could play pulling guard for reggie.
73. That Kim K Guy - September 22, 2008 7:37 PM
Take in mind that 27" waist only means you have a small waist. It's got NOTHING to do with how much you weigh. Someone should tell that Kim Kardashian guy to man-up and step on a scale. I have a friend who probably weighs 120 lbs with a smaller ass than Kim's....and she's ONLY 5'1! Kim, admit it....you're ass looks like 50 lbs of chewed bubble gum.
74. will - September 22, 2008 7:39 PM
I bet the honky in pic 5 could tell us what crackhead nigger piss tastes like.
75. Van - September 22, 2008 7:41 PM
I could no longer resist the urge to ask...
What the HELL is a butt gurdle/butt pad?!
This stuff actually exists!?
76. Livi - September 22, 2008 7:43 PM
She's tiny in person. TINY. I'd be surprised if she weighed MORE than 120.
77. the sysop - September 22, 2008 7:46 PM
yo i don't really get why everyone hates on this chick, granted i don't watch the show but she looks pretty damn hot in all the pictures, big ass and all
ask me http://howtolosegirls.com
78. Ass Detective - September 22, 2008 7:47 PM
Soooooo, this is amazing!!! Superficial rocks my world. I would also like to point out, that many jeans have stretch in them, aka lycra/spandex. SOOOOOOOO I would like to see her try on a pair of jeans with NO stretch and I am pretty positive there is no way she would fit into a 27. It doesn't mean she is fat at all, she has a great body. She just has hips and an ass!!! I don't give a crap what size you wear, as long as you wear your size!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I believe that she can wear a 27, but it looks like a process to put them on. Also, you are advised when you purchase jeans with stretch to buy them possibly a size smaller because of the stretch factor. In other words, there are so many loop holes to jeans these days that a person's size depends on so many factors. Bottom line: she isn't lying, she IS just very petite.
But I still find this so funny!!!!!!!!!!! And Khloe is AMAZING. Don't make fun of her, she is hilarious!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
79. ddp - September 22, 2008 7:55 PM
I don't think she is fat, but unless she has absolutely zero muscle in her entire body, there is no way she weighs 120lbs. I think the real question is why was she silly enough to even start this discussion in the first place?
80. Encyclopedia Brown - September 22, 2008 7:57 PM
The answer to this brainteaser is that her ass pads are filled with helium, offsetting the unaccounted-for 20 pounds.
-E.B.
81. Realist - September 22, 2008 7:57 PM
All you women spouting off your statistics are dumber than shit stains. Seriously. This is the internet. No one can know whether it's true. And if it is, no one cares. This site is supposed to be superficial, light celebrity fodder. Not a club for lonelyheart narcissists to talk about themselves. Shut the fuck up.
82. HorribleJudgment - September 22, 2008 8:04 PM
She visits this site? Hmmm...Take the challenge Kim! Plonk your ass on that scale! Do it! You don't weigh 120 pounds, fatty! Deal with it!
83. Marnie - September 22, 2008 8:06 PM
There's those "chicken legs" of hers that she was going on about the other day.
And by "chicken legs" she, of course, meant "ham hocks".
84. wat - September 22, 2008 8:06 PM
i'm not a faggot, i'd hit it
85. LauraR - September 22, 2008 8:10 PM
I'm 5'3", and based on my weight, size, and shape, there's no way she's 120 or a 27. With that butt I don't know how she'd be smaller than a size 10.... i know the camera adds weight, but it doesn't had like 25 pounds
86. LauraR - September 22, 2008 8:13 PM
oh, and i think she's thinner than she used to be, which just makes her ass look the crazier. probably gets the fat professionally sucked out of everywhere but her butt.
87. TheJoker07 - September 22, 2008 8:18 PM
I don't care if she weights 200lbs man she's smoking hot.
88. Go away KK - September 22, 2008 8:18 PM
That fat disgusting ass is a turn off.
Most of her body is average, but her ass is not proportionate, it's more like a sumo wrestlers.
It would be nice if she would just ride away into mudshark heaven and stop being a publicity whore.
89. Dawna - September 22, 2008 8:24 PM
Ya know, in Kim's defense, I've known and seen a lot of girls who are teeny yet slightly pudgy and still able to fit into jeans my amazon self couldn't imagine wearing without oodles of grease.
I'll also note that she is obviously pear shaped and that is a hard shape to hide. No matter what you do- the booty pops out.
Without knowing her height, I'm eager to call "bull shit" on her 120lbs. I'd say 130-140 in all seriousness.
Oh, and seriously guys... the woman is beautiful. Stop calling her "fatty". It just makes it harder for any girl to be accepting of her size. You want Kim to own up to her weight? Lay off the fat jokes. If anything we should be applauding the fact that she's gorgeous and curvy and doesn't look like a sick twig.
90. KK = A stunted amazon - September 22, 2008 8:26 PM
So she takes a pair of size 27 jeans to a seamstress and the seamstress turns them into 44s around the ass and 25 in length.
The tag still reads 27.
Nice try freak show.
91. meee - September 22, 2008 8:27 PM
#39 i hope you're not really a doctor as your name would suggest. the target healthy weight for a 5'2 female (keep in mind she's not even caucasian & different races DO have bearing on body types) is around 125. although i don't think she's exactly 120 (if she has no muscle she could be) she's certainly not 30lbs overweight.
& everyone else, have you ever heard "the camera adds 10lbs?" everyone looks slightly bigger in pictures than they do in real life. IF YOU'VE NEVER SEEN KIM IN PERSON, SHUT THE FUCK UP.
why does everyone care how much she weighs anyway?
92. BIG SLOPPY ASS - September 22, 2008 8:27 PM
Okay, I admit it: that is not a buttpad.....
....it is just one GIANT SLOPPY ASS.
Take off those spandex and that obese cottage cheese ass will slide down like a meat pie thrown at a wall. Look at that ass naked and it won't look beautiful, it will look like Ernest Borgnine after a heroin binge. ICK.
And speaking off her big ass, can you imagine how much hair is in there? This is not a petite little blonde girl with soft fair hair, but a hairy momma. Damn, I hope she is reading this. That fat sloppy ass is disgusting!
93. Dick Clark - September 22, 2008 8:32 PM
Obviously a lot of guys will screw anything that has a pulse.
She lowers the bar.
94. Rasputins Liver - September 22, 2008 8:46 PM
*
Hahahahaha!
*
No way is Kimmy below 120! Just her humongous, grotesque ass has to weigh in pretty heavily!
*
I'd bet money each ass cheek must weigh a good fifteen pounds each!
*
She's a lazy-assed, literally (you don't get an ass like that doing exercise), porker.
*
"Under 120 lbs....MY ASS!
*
95. jo - September 22, 2008 8:53 PM
I think her ass might be real - as she's got hips as a wide as a barge. She just has some weird genetics is all. Maybe she should be in fat ass porn - i think there is a whole sub-category of porn devoted to girls like her. But she shouldn't be in mainstream media - too freakish
96. OJ SIMPSON - September 22, 2008 9:03 PM
I'm pretty confident that if Robert Kardashian were alive today he would kill himself out of embarrassment.
97. FAT IS FAT IS FAT IS FAT. - September 22, 2008 9:14 PM
Kum Fatassian, you have chicken legs and a f*cked-up, FAT ass. You are FAT. Accept it. You do not weigh 'under 120 lbs. ' We ALL know that, because you are FAT. Your butt weighs 100 lbs alone. "I weigh 117." AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
98. nj - September 22, 2008 9:20 PM
ok, so, I am Kim's height, and my measurements are 34-27-40 (hers are supposedly 34-26-39).. very similar build... yet somehow I weigh 25 more lbs than her? wtf?
I've seen her at an event in LA. She is actually quite slim in person & looks great (camera adds a lot of weight to her), but I really really doubt 117 lbs. Maybe 127.
#94: I work out 4 days a week and my ass is huge. My boyfriend said to me last night "lord knows where that ass came from" (he's not black, either, but he loves it). Seriously.. sometimes a huge ass just happens. And it's certainly been an asset. (pun!)
Although I don't understand this butt girdle business... mine sits great on it's own. Why would one need to lift it? Do they start sagging?
99. Buhagden - September 22, 2008 9:24 PM
140? No way. I know girls who weigh 140 pounds. Unless she's about 4'8 we're looking at 150, 155 easy.
100. simplicity - September 22, 2008 9:29 PM
What's up with pic #6?
Seriously that's a freaky looking camel toe
101. I am watching dancing with the stars right now - September 22, 2008 9:34 PM
She is drop dead gorgeous facially. Like more beautiful than any woman I can think of at the moment. It is sad but true, because she is a useless idiot, but I just saw her on t.v and she is SO beautiful it is shocking. She makes pretty girls look homely and plain.
That being said, her ass is TOO BIG! And I like big butts.
102. britney's weave - September 22, 2008 9:43 PM
i'm 3'8" and weigh 756 pounds and can fit into a size 00 jean. yackety schmackety. nobody cares.
good post, fish. but i'm sure if she dared take you up on this it would be on her terms, which means she's rigging every scale within a 500-mile radius of wherever she decides to do this. which she won't. oh, and i'm tuning in to dancing with the stars just so i can vote for every couple other than hers. :P
103. Give it up Kim - September 22, 2008 9:44 PM
I don't mean give up Dancing With The Stars or the pursuit of fame or money, I mean walking. Give up walking, Kim, and just fucking roll down the street.
104. Reyce - September 22, 2008 9:46 PM
#14, I totally second that!!
Why is this chick famous anyway? She has no talent, and a fat ass... If it weren't for her being born into wealth she'd be a cancer stick sucking, welfare bum with 8 illegitimate children..
Oh snap! Was that a burn!? I think it was!
105. nancy - September 22, 2008 9:49 PM
Busty McButt is not gorgeous in the face. The only way you can appreciate her beauty is if you stand behind her on the escalator. Or if you're a tiny person. Either way, you shouldn't stand too close. How does she clean a crack that deep?!
106. L - September 22, 2008 10:02 PM
Who cares if people has said nasty things about her? She let someone piss on her! Right there....never expect anything better than what you put forth.
Second of all, the video...ummm...ok. When I wear a 28. When I put my jeans on, I slip 'em on, and they're on. It doesn't take me 4 minutes to try on 2 pair of jeans. Why? Well, probably because I don't have to force and tuck my ass fat into them. Look! No muffin top here! Haha....what an idiot.
"Hey mom do we have a scale?"
"No. We all know how much you cry when you get on it."
"Guess I can't prove my weight then! Yay!"
Get a life Kim. Bring on the piss!
107. yourmom - September 22, 2008 10:04 PM
does it really freaking matter what she weighs? women lie about their weight all the time.
108. dude_on - September 22, 2008 10:07 PM
"Except that you have access to butter." - classic
109. Rational Rick - September 22, 2008 10:09 PM
common is this site all about this old biatch !!! ?????????????
u gotta be kidding me
XOXO
110. kdawg in e minor - September 22, 2008 10:17 PM
her ass is absolutely disgusting. fat people are gross. it's sad that there's so many fat people that it is now considered socially acceptable.
111. kdawg in e minor - September 22, 2008 10:17 PM
her ass is absolutely disgusting. fat people are gross. it's sad that there's so many fat people that it is now considered socially acceptable.
112. kdawg in e minor - September 22, 2008 10:17 PM
her ass is absolutely disgusting. fat people are gross. it's sad that there's so many fat people that it is now considered socially acceptable.
113. SexyVixenSF - September 22, 2008 10:22 PM
Wow...watching Dancing with the stars I notice she keeps being in the camera shot in the back room behind the Dancers shoulders...and she keeps POSING?! Honey...you can do makeup, you have fashion, thats no doubt, but the camera aint on you and hell accept your real weight! Aint no shame in having a little curve! Bite the bullet and be a role model for curvy women w/o rolls!
114. Laura - September 22, 2008 10:46 PM
Yeeeahhhh.
I would like to know how tall she actually is. Cuz that can make a big difference in someone's weight. However, I can tell u for sure that she is NOT 120. I am 5'6 and 1/2, and am a dancer so I have a lot of muscle, and I am anywhere from 130-135. I dont even have any fat on me! Actually, if I lost 15 pounds, I would look disgusting. If Kim is, let's say 5'2, I'm going to say say that she is at least 135 at the bare minimum, but probably more like 140. That being said I don't think she's fat at all. She just has a curvy body type, and is never meant to be 120. Its so sad she has to lie about that. Get over yourself.
115. Laura - September 22, 2008 10:46 PM
Yeeeahhhh.
I would like to know how tall she actually is. Cuz that can make a big difference in someone's weight. However, I can tell u for sure that she is NOT 120. I am 5'6 and 1/2, and am a dancer so I have a lot of muscle, and I am anywhere from 130-135. I dont even have any fat on me! Actually, if I lost 15 pounds, I would look disgusting. If Kim is, let's say 5'2, I'm going to say say that she is at least 135 at the bare minimum, but probably more like 140. That being said I don't think she's fat at all. She just has a curvy body type, and is never meant to be 120. Its so sad she has to lie about that. Get over yourself.
116. zuzuspetals - September 22, 2008 10:49 PM
I weigh almost 130 and my ass is nowhere near that size. She must weigh at least 140. I think she must have just been talking about her ass- it weighs 120 alone.
117. meee - September 22, 2008 10:49 PM
Yeah, she's probably not 120 lbs, but.. so what? Who honestly cares? And why are all of you so excited to be calling her fat? She looks great, she's curvy, and not skinny.. what is so wrong with that? Yes, some women HAVE curves.. why are you guys acting like that's unheard of?
118. sally fields - September 22, 2008 10:52 PM
ok so shes gross bc...well she just is.. she does have a pretty face and some parts of her seem to be thin
BUT...
is there anything wrong with weighing over 120 pounds? i mean are ppl enraged about her supposed weight but the truth is that her body fits the build of an average woman.
Is it wrong to weigh 140 pounds? should i be embarrassed as a 5'6 woman who weighs around 156?
119. joxer the mighty - September 22, 2008 10:54 PM
there is an old interview with john mccain stating: "i'd most definitely go down on her!"
120. HorribleJudgment - September 22, 2008 10:54 PM
#115 I gotta disagree. She is fat. She is FATTY FAT FAT! Her ass is totally repulsive. And anyone who finds her or her ass sexy, or has been making sexual overtures towards her in these comments is either mentally defective or either so ugly and hard up they don't know what to do with themselves. The cottage cheese cellulite on the ass and legs of that monstrously fat girl could smother someone to death. She is insulting the intelligence of EVERYONE by saying she weighs 120 pounds. HOW DARE SHE? KIM-NO ONE--REPEAT: NO ONE--BELIEVES YOU! Get it into your head once and for all: you are repulsive, disgusting, cellulite-ridden, cottage cheesy, and hugely, monstrously FAT! Deal with it.
121. THAT_GIRL_JENN - September 22, 2008 10:56 PM
JUST BECAUSE ALL YOU FAGGOT HOMMO WHITE MEN WANT ANOREXIC BOBBLE HEAD DOLL (12 - YEAR OLD BOY BODIES) DOES NOT MAKE THIS WOMAN FAT!
IF YOU WANT TO DATE SOMEONE SHAPELESS, DATE A 12- YEAR OLD BOY!
122. zuzuspetals - September 22, 2008 10:56 PM
No, you shouldn't be embarrassed because you weigh 156. But because Kim Kardashian LIES about her weight, she is implying that you should.
Her ass is fine- it's her lies that disgust me.
123. God of Hellfire - September 22, 2008 11:03 PM
check out the dude in 5th pic, tripping off sidewalk after getting hypnotised by that fat ass.
124. Just_As_It_Is - September 22, 2008 11:07 PM
I don't care about her weight. My girlfriend has the exact same build as her, including the buttocks. Anyone saying that is a butt pad/fake/etc. is just jealous. Either a fat fuck that will never know how it feels to make love to a body like that, or a female fat fuck wishing she was down to at least what she really weights.
She is not fat, she looks really nice, she is pretty and has what she wants. A lot of photographers around her. Enough to make lots of fat fucks posting in here jealous.
125. M - September 22, 2008 11:13 PM
to Frist
27 is a waist size in inches not pant size and thats not that big most Designer Jeans and Premium jeans use waist sizes IE: 7 for mankind
yes Kim has a big old butt and maybe needs to tell us shes smaller than she might be to make herself feel better.....
who cares
126. butt-spew - September 22, 2008 11:25 PM
It's funny how this whaleass thinks she's so fucking hot. Ugghhhhh!!!!! Maybe if she went down to San Antonio and passed for Latina and all the Tejano bars, and if the wetbacks that showed up were fucked up on Mescal, MAYBE one of those guys might think she's hot and hit on her. I think she looks like a pro lineman for some NFL team....only with tits and a cell phone.
BBBBBBBBBAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRFFFFFFFFFFFF.
I just puked in my mouth and all over my dick, I hope it rots off....
127. mrs. christian tan - September 22, 2008 11:56 PM
lol exciting
128. Anna - September 22, 2008 11:57 PM
I believe her...maybe not 120, but no more that 130.
I'm 5'1 and 130 puts me in the "overweight" category on a BMI chart. At 120lbs I'm curvy as hell.
129. Aidas - September 23, 2008 12:06 AM
150?! Are you kidding?
This girl may have a large ass, but she is TINY everywhere else (little arms, waist, and legs).
120 lbs at 5'2" is totally believable, and infinitely healthier than most of the starved women in Hollywood.
You are all complete misogynistic idiots.
130. celebritesarefunny - September 23, 2008 12:10 AM
haha, wow, i personally think she's lying and besides she literally had to squeeze those things on. she didn't walk very far in them. But to her defense I think she might just be more fat than muscle. I wear 27 and I'm 140, but I'm really muscular. she may weigh less than me but it takes up more space.
http://www.onemorebite-weightloss.com/images/fat-v-muscle.jpg
i'm gonna go be a nerd now.
131. Buck Futter - September 23, 2008 12:11 AM
What is she, spanish, indian? What the hell is this lard ass?
132. Abbe - September 23, 2008 12:15 AM
bahahahahaha oh camel toe...
133. Hulya - September 23, 2008 12:22 AM
You people are really, really sad and terribly close-minded. She can easily be 120 lbs and a size 27 in jeans. How do I know? I have the same freakin' measurements!!!
She said that her measurements are 34-26-39. At 5'2, they sound realistic. I have a butt of exactly 39 and I can totally fit in size 27 jeans (or US size 4). Yeah, I don't have that much muscle (neither does Kim) so 120 is not that thin, actually.
I don't know what planet you are coming from, but on Earth, people are different, they have different shapes and sizes. 120 might look thin on some, but heavy on others. Get over it!
134. TurkeyButt - September 23, 2008 12:26 AM
It looks like someone stuffed the Thanksgiving Turkey down her pants. You could fuck her doggy style and not even penetrate!
135. dude - September 23, 2008 12:30 AM
my whole body could fit in her fuckin hairy armenian ass crack and I weigh 200. Do the math.
136. stupidfatho - September 23, 2008 12:32 AM
ALTERED JEANS
137. stupidfatho - September 23, 2008 12:32 AM
ALTERED JEANS
138. eliz - September 23, 2008 12:33 AM
the size 27 refers to WAIST, like on men's jeans. DUH. it doesn't mean "super fat wal-mart lady" who has to shop in the "20's" after she busts outta 18's...in europe they size this way instead of our 3/4, 5/6, 7/8, 10/12...etc etc
she's at least a 10 or 12, i'm gonna have to say 14 or 16 w/ tailoring to accommodate her short legs
she MAY fit into the euro (waist size) 27 inches, b/c she does have an hourglass figure, but as a previous poster said, it would HAVE to include spandex. i've tried many a pant on that would have fit me in the waist (mine is small too despite my chunky thighs) but i couldn't get them over the top part of my legs...UNLESS they had spandex/lycra in the fabric , in addition to denim
i think Kim is ABSOLUTELY beautiful, certainly the prettiest of her sisters, and should feel no shame for being over 120 lbs. it's hard though--people do judge you--esp in hollywood
who wants to admit "i'm 5 ft 2 and weigh 137 - 155 pounds, depending on how much chocolate i've been eating?" when you're competing with waifs like Keira Knightly and Kirsten Dunst for flatttering press photos?
ain't no grown ass woman SUPPOSED to weigh less than 120-130 lbs...
hold your head high kim and wave that fat pretty ass! be proud of who you are! most women would KILL to look like you...
little in the middle but she got much back!
139. The ball part was the best - September 23, 2008 12:35 AM
Oh Superish you have made my day. What I wouldn't give to have your job.
140. Willie - September 23, 2008 12:39 AM
I think she could be 120. She's only 5'2" according to most sources - a few inches makes a huge difference.
141. The ball part was the best - September 23, 2008 12:43 AM
She had a mighty hard time getting into those jeans on they would rip in an instant and she has a smallish waist hence the ass loooking huge, plus it is huge, but it wouldn't be noticeable on Rosie it would just be her fat ass.
She's 135 on a good day after she's pinched off one hell of a bowl filling turd. What bug s me most is what a vapid whore she is to be so self involved she has to make video's about what kind of pnats she can fit her hugeass into and then her pathetic little "we don't have a scale bit" was obviously fake. She may actually believe she is 120, maybe she hasn't weighed herself since highschool.
142. Venus - September 23, 2008 12:48 AM
No way in hell...I am 5'1" peptie figure but I have a little perky butt and thick thighs and legs.... But if you look at me, I'm like half of Kim's size, as a matter of fact, Im the size of one of her cheek...and I weight 115 lbs! I wear a size 27 in Citizens, Joes, Sevens, etc...That is about a size 3 in some other jeans. There is no way she is a size 27... or even weigh 120 lbs...NO WAY...I dont understand, she is a pretty girl, but when you're dumb, fake and a lie, it really makes the beauty in you not so beautiful, but ugly Kim... Just admit if something is not given from God and bought from a surgeon, it's ok...really...
lol
143. bullshit - September 23, 2008 12:48 AM
i am 5'3" and weigh 145lbs and i look skinnier than she does in photographs. i call MAJOR bullshit.
144. T.I. - September 23, 2008 12:52 AM
Kudos to Superficial writer for publicly expressing the thoughts we all have. :) You make them much more entertaining...too bad Ms. Kardashian won't have the courage to accept this challenge.
145. brittani - September 23, 2008 12:59 AM
Bitch says she's 120 pounds... bitch im 5'1 and 130 pounds and this is what i look like... You are by far no where NEAR 120... your ass weighs 20 at least.
146. brittani - September 23, 2008 1:00 AM
Bitch says she's 120 pounds... bitch im 5'1 and 130 pounds and this is what i look like... You are by far no where NEAR 120... your ass weighs 20 at least.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v603/BrittaniCorban/DSC00247.jpg
147. TRULA - September 23, 2008 1:10 AM
Why do you people think that everybody must be like you???? Everybody is different, damn it! You can be thin and not fit in size 27 and you can be thick and fit in 27!!! I'm thick and I fit in 26!!!
It depends on so many factors, how can you possibly think that everyone is just the way you are? It depends on:
1. height
2. body type - pear, apple, hourglass...
3. muscle versus fat
4. body frame: big, small, middle - Kim's got a small body frame and that's why the weight is more noticeble on her
5. density /weight of your bones - if you've got delicate bones (and Kim does, judging by her ankles, wrists), you look puffier than a person at the same weight with strong bones.
IS ALL THIS SO HARD TO BELIEVE?????
148. wowie - September 23, 2008 1:12 AM
I totally call bullshit on that too. Her height, built and ass coupled with her breast size alone will make her 135 to 140+ pounds.
149. ramona putz - September 23, 2008 1:39 AM
She needs a big ass to accomodate those long black poles she gravitates toward. Pissing isn't the only activity she engages the black sausage in.
Really, though, who gives a fuck about this indignant cur's weight or anything else for that matter?! Everything that comes out of her mouth is bullshit.
This is the last thing I will post about this insipid prat.
150. eliz - September 23, 2008 1:56 AM
good points, trula...
151. McCain/Palin 2008 - September 23, 2008 1:59 AM
Um hum. So on a good day at 5'5 and 115 pounds, I wear a size 27 or 28 jean. I have stood next to her and she is not only seriously big boned, but her ass is almost twice the size of mine.
A size 2 or 4? What color is the sky in her world?
152. gigi - September 23, 2008 2:06 AM
She made a video of her fitting in size 27 jeans and size 26!!! It's on her blog, you can check it, she fits in them - now what are you gonna say, that she changed the labels?
Here's the video:
http://www.kimkardashian.com/2008/09/see-i-told-you.php
153. Anon. - September 23, 2008 2:09 AM
Oh kim, i would like to see this as well. I don't believe you for a second, although if you can show us up then kudos!
154. long-dong-silver - September 23, 2008 2:11 AM
She is so fucking HOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!
155. friendlyfires - September 23, 2008 2:43 AM
She is 147, and not a pound less.
I'd still bounce off that.
No really, I'd would, honest, no foolin'.
Would she let me, though?
Probably not.
I still think O.J. did it, with a big knife, with fiendish delight and laughed maniacally and bellowed like Jack Nicholson on testosterone shots.
Oh, and Jewel says hi !
156. Apple - September 23, 2008 3:12 AM
HAHAHAHA, this is so funny, love reading your site!!
157. sup. - September 23, 2008 3:15 AM
shes not under 120. my cousin is 5'2" and weighs 110 and is super slender. shes probably between 120 and 130.
158. bohs - September 23, 2008 4:11 AM
The fact is she is only 5'2" which would make sense that she would weigh 120. 5'2" is friggen tiny...not an average height. models weigh 120 and much taller at at 5'9" to 5'11" . I have a friend who is 5'2" and weighs 98lbs and looks normal..not skinny not chubs but if she gained 20lbs im sure she could have an ass like Kim.
159. bohs - September 23, 2008 4:12 AM
P.S. Although I do believe her about the weight I'm still not convinced that she's no wearing a buttpad.
160. bohs - September 23, 2008 4:13 AM
P.S. Although I do believe her about the weight I'm still not convinced that she's not wearing a buttpad.
161. bohs - September 23, 2008 4:13 AM
P.S. Although I do believe her about the weight I'm still not convinced that she's not wearing a buttpad.
162. (=☛♊☚=) - September 23, 2008 4:15 AM
Imagine her pushing 10 lb shits out of that sweaty, hairy crevasse. I feel sorry for her toilet.
163. Linny - September 23, 2008 4:25 AM
Amen.
164. lola - September 23, 2008 6:23 AM
laughed my ass off while reading this post =]] it would be awesome if she answered the challenge but she's lame anyway so she won't do it
165. mytwocents - September 23, 2008 6:33 AM
I def think she is crazy enough to go to someone and get a TAG put in larger jeans.
I am 5'7 125 and hellla thin like bones ( I run a lot) and I have size 28 in seven jeans and my fat is def not that shapely.
There is no way under the sun she fits into 27 anything sorry.
I think she is a liar and a weird liar she is going OUT of her way to post her weight and size why???
I mean no celeb in the world is doing that
even if she is short i think she weighs like 140ishWhat a self absorbed liar
166. mytwocents - September 23, 2008 6:38 AM
Oh and isn't it weird that she is always wearing spandex. HONEY spandex went out in the 90s please stop wearing that.
It's funny because every single thin girl is wearing regular pants but the girl with the huge back side is wearing spandex??? dont get it . i mean she wants people to stare and comment. But then she takes to her "blog" and says she is more than a butt. But i mean then wear real pants like um every other person in the picture and people won't comment as much.
Anyone notice she never wears a pair of regular jeans EVER?
167. kim kardashian's anal leakage - September 23, 2008 6:49 AM
her shit weighs 120lbs
168. Sasha - September 23, 2008 6:58 AM
mytwocents (165), you are a dumbass. You are 5'7 and she is 5'2. A fat short person will still usually wear a size less than a skinny tall person because they are smaller. That's why size 0 clothing is cut with a small inseam than size 6.
169. Mr. T - September 23, 2008 7:12 AM
"A couple in South Africa who were having sex on a railway track in Mpumalanga Province have been killed by a goods train, police say."
I pity the fools.
170. joss - September 23, 2008 7:16 AM
either
a. she's under 120 and a lot more than just her butt is padding
b. she's over 120 and it's not padding
c. she's under 120 AND it's not padding because she's actually only 2'10" tall.
171. cordell walker - September 23, 2008 7:19 AM
i can actually believe it..
looking at her standing by that car, she is somewhere between 4'7" and 4'9" .. in addition, buttpads are usually made of light-weight materials like foam, etc...
172. gerard Vandenberg - September 23, 2008 7:23 AM
I seriously wonder:
- AMERICANS LOOOVE NO-BODY'S?
- AMERICANS ARE ATTRACTED BY NO ACHIEVEMENTS AT ALL?
- AMERICANS DON'T CARE FOR OTHER HUMANS?
173. jessy - September 23, 2008 7:28 AM
Can somebody tell this rich girl that leggins are not made 4 her body shape!!! CAMEL-TOE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
174. gerard Vandenberg - September 23, 2008 7:45 AM
MOST AMERICANS ARE MASTERS OF FOOLING OTHER PEOPLE!!
175. kerri - September 23, 2008 8:53 AM
i am 5'5" am very SLIM (my friends roll their eyes when I say i feel fat...yes i am one of THOSE girls) anyway - i weigh around 115. there is NO WAY in HELL she weighs a couple of pounds more than me. please just go away. everyone hates you - you complain about the 'haters' but what did you think would happen? you are famous for NOTHING, you are hairy and chubby (I wouldn't call you fat), you are obnoxious, you are rude, you are just a horrible human being inside (blocking emergency crews??? REALLY??? wow.) and clearly, out. did you think north america would love you? do yourself a favour and go away. just because people take your picture doesn't mean you have fans - they are making FUN OF YOU. i'm afraid you're going to eventually kill yourself when all of this sinks in. seriously. ps. superficial - this was one great post - hahaha, nice work.
176. mZ.mANDI - September 23, 2008 8:54 AM
LMAO! Yeah...I agree, she's beautiful but 120 lbs.! Like others have said, maybe in each butt cheek! I am 5'5 and I weigh 120 lbs. I am half her size! Camera's don't add that much weight! The real question is...why does she feel she has to lie???
177. Tina - September 23, 2008 9:10 AM
HA-HA! I'm 5'5" and weigh 106lbs and I am a size 24! And if she can "really" fit herself into them, I am starving myself!!! That's just embarrassing. I used to not have a problem with her thinking she was happy with the way she was-- but now it's just a joke to me.
178. face is stunningly beautiful - September 23, 2008 9:23 AM
all of these comments talking about how much they weigh compared to her... you all have just outted yourselves. It is girls who think she is "fat" and "ugly" what you don't know is that despite what your friends tell you and what you think, you don't look better than her. Some of you have smaller butts, but thats prob about it. By the way, she is so beautiful it is unbelievable. There isn't really anyone more gorgeous that comes to mind.
179. losers - September 23, 2008 9:30 AM
okay she has a flat ass stomach get over her weight why woiuld she lie when shes in the public eye none of you have seen her in person so how would you know anyway
180. Nick - September 23, 2008 9:39 AM
It looks like she's smuggling 2 Christmas hams down the back of her pants!
181. just call me gay - September 23, 2008 9:47 AM
How could anyone look at those pictures and say, that she is beautiful. Yeah, her face might be nice but what does that even matter when you see the rest of this thing. No class, no style and totally dispropotioned (not fat though). I can't eat as much as I want to puke.
182. just call me gay - September 23, 2008 9:59 AM
Oh, in case you are also into puke KK, I was not trying to hit on you with my last remark.
183. tikki tokki - September 23, 2008 10:10 AM
Kim, when somebody asks you how many pounds you are it doesn't mean how many pounds it takes reggie to blow a load all over you greasy face
184. jo - September 23, 2008 10:13 AM
Lard ass. Cute face maybe, but even her mouth is huge. Her legs are fat, her feet are like hooves.
Her mouth is 8 inches in diameter when it's open. Fat ass loser trying to pretend she's important. Fuck her.
185. Justine - September 23, 2008 10:19 AM
there not more to comment than: LOL
186. J - September 23, 2008 10:23 AM
I´ve never seen an ass that big!! It can´t possibly be real or...is it? :-/
If not, what the hell was she thinking when getting it????
187. Ted Mosby - September 23, 2008 10:23 AM
I swear that thing sank the Titanic.
188. HMMMM - September 23, 2008 10:27 AM
A TRUE LADY NEVER REVEALS HER WEIGHT!!
189. zuzuspetals - September 23, 2008 10:46 AM
#127-
Thanks for your thoughts, Kim. I still think you need to get that scale fixed.
190. zuzuspetals - September 23, 2008 10:48 AM
That was supposed to say #178. I suck.
191. Gina - September 23, 2008 11:05 AM
#179
It looks like she has a flat stomach because of her girdle, but I've seen her tummy flab when she wears outfits that bind around her stomach. She is a big loose fat ass mess with no talent and no personality. Her only hope is to do another porn flick with a man that loves big fat loose butt females like her ex boyfriend Reg. Reg said in an interview that he loves fat chicks like Kim.
192. Samantha - September 23, 2008 11:09 AM
One of Kim's butt cheecks is still bigger than my entire tight ass! Poor Kim and her saggy big butt and poor Kim has to wear girdles to make her butt look perky.
193. Jed - September 23, 2008 11:10 AM
It is amusing because at one time Kim acted like she was happy with her body and telling people she is not a skinny girl. Now she's trying to tell people that she is a skinny girl by claiming she weighs 120 pounds lol!
194. Fitness Guru - September 23, 2008 11:15 AM
#30
It is sad Kim has a big ass and lies about wearing a girdle. Kim represents FAT America and hopefully we can change this problem in the near future by having more fit healthy kids and adutls, unlike Kim's big fat ugly untoned butt.
195. Heather - September 23, 2008 11:38 AM
Who cares????????? There are much bigger problems out there!
196. bmar - September 23, 2008 11:39 AM
The Superficial Writer and Kim should get married already...
197. Bunnie - September 23, 2008 11:42 AM
OMFG. Im just under 120... and according the mirror and others i look emaciated something personally id like to change another story all together.. if im under 120 and i look like this.. Kim i say is pushing 150... at least.. her ass and thighs are something found only under the big top.. im talking circus not even Layne Bryan.
and no 27 in European or designer jean sizes isnt big but small
24, 25, 26, 27... Im 25 IMPOSSIBLE she is a 27... In the world where Heidi is a virgin, Jessica Simpson is smart is where Kim is a size 27 under 120
198. Bunnie - September 23, 2008 11:49 AM
Maybe to work out and loose some of that lard ass she should make another sex tape.. i hear sex is a great work out... ..
grab fame like you grab for a doughnut, go for your dreams like you give dome aggressively, relentlessly, and without any pride or class.Go for it Kimmy! She is someone to admire folks. fame whore.
199. Stiles - September 23, 2008 12:03 PM
Who's Kim Kardashian?
200. Cigarette Ink - September 23, 2008 12:28 PM
I went to her site to see her fit into these jeans and if you notice that when she pulls up her dress to show you her jeans, he ass is actually a lot smaller than shown in these pictures. This reinforces my thoughts on her wearing a buttpad. Its very obvious now.
201. HELLO? - September 23, 2008 12:29 PM
so how has no one commented on the fact the the superficial writer is a tiny little man? he is (presumably) male and weighs 145? he is either 5'5" or is PAINFULLY thin. either way, what a little pansy! no wonder he feels the need to insult everyone constantly and prefers women who are tiny little waifs.
and kim probably is lying. she looks good from the front but from behind - EW.
202. pistolita - September 23, 2008 12:30 PM
bahahahaha... i wear a size 27! i'm 5'5" and i weigh 117-118 lbs, and my ass isn't nearly anything like kim's... this bitch is 5'3", 120 lbs, has an ass the size of jupiter and we are supposed to wear the same pants size! HAHAHA no way.
203. Regina - September 23, 2008 12:30 PM
I am the same height as Kim but I really do weigh 120 pounds. If I woke up one morning and noticed I had a big fat saggy butt like Kim, I would be in severe depression. There is no way Kim weighs 120 pounds. My friend has a figure similar to Kim's and she weighs 161 pounds, and she wears a girdle too.
204. lmfao - September 23, 2008 12:32 PM
kudos to the poster who called all these bitches posting their heights/measurements narcissistic. nobody gives a fuck about the numbers - they care about how good you are at sucking cock.
205. Penilopi - September 23, 2008 12:35 PM
she might be light boned
206. Terry - September 23, 2008 12:36 PM
#201
You need to remember that men do not need to lie about their weight unless they are fat like Kim. I suspect the writer looks good for his body type. He makes me laugh and this is what counts. I also suspect the writer is attracted to fit females and not skinny females like Paris Hilton or fat chicks like Kim. Kim is a big fat ass liar about her weight. We now know for sure that Kim hates her body, but she cannot do anything about being fat because she is addicted to food.
207. hep - September 23, 2008 12:53 PM
She literally squeezed herself into her pants. They weren't new unstretched pants either. When you put on pants, you don't have to fight with them and give yourself major muffin top and a headache. I usually don't even have to unbutton my jeans to get them on or off.
I suggest she take Kristin Davis' advice: know your body type. Kristin Davis is very pear shaped, but would you know it from the way she dresses? She knows she doesn't look good in pants SO SHE DOESN'T WEAR THEM.
208. Redd - September 23, 2008 12:57 PM
all u idiots hatinq on kim kardashian are fuckinq retarded. there is a possibility that she weighs 120 . she's not tall either. just becuz she has a huge ass doesn't mean that she's fat & a size 27 jeans is equal 2 a size 3. you guys are so jealous that u feel the need 2 criticize cureves and bodaciousness...fcukinq idiots.
209. Redd - September 23, 2008 12:57 PM
all u idiots hatinq on kim kardashian are fuckinq retarded. there is a possibility that she weighs 120 . she's not tall either. just becuz she has a huge ass doesn't mean that she's fat & a size 27 jeans is equal 2 a size 3. you guys are so jealous that u feel the need 2 criticize cureves and bodaciousness...fcukinq idiots.
210. Allison - September 23, 2008 1:19 PM
WHO CARES. I feel bad for her if she feels like she has to give a number to prove to the world she isn't "fat". I feel even worse for the people on here hating on her because she is curvy and famous. If she lost all the weight you would be screaming eating disorder. It proves how idiotic americans when all they are concerned with is the weight of KK. She isn't overweight. If she weighed 145 pounds it doesn't matter, she looks fine.
211. starbucks - September 23, 2008 1:21 PM
If she doesn't have much muscle mass, she probably does weigh close to that.
Still think she's ridiculously beautiful, whether she weighs 120 or 150.
212. TJ - September 23, 2008 1:25 PM
#210
No person hates Kim because she is fat (curvy to be polite) and famous. We hate liars and self absorbed no talent media whores. Kim looks fine according to fat American standards, but according to fit and healthy people, Kim is fat. Kim lies about her weight and lies that she does not wear a girdle when it is very obvious. We all know fat females like Kim that have a girdle butt. Kim would never ever be able to lose her weight because she loves food too much and it shows. She has no muscle tone and cannot even maintain balance while dancing. Kim is a big fat ass joke. Kim must weigh around 160 pounds.
213. Reagan - September 23, 2008 1:28 PM
#211
I have no doubt you are fat like Kim and the negative comments about Kim make you take it personally. Go buy a new girdle and feel better about yourself and you and Kim can walk around with a girdle butt. Kim weighs around 155-160 pounds.
214. Bianca - September 23, 2008 1:31 PM
wow she's a terrible liar!! kim and i have the same build and i weigh 143lbs. I can also squeeze into sz 27-29 jeans but honestly that means nothing. she should have lied and said 130lbs, i say it all the time and that's slightly more believable.
but 120lbs?? not by a long shot.....
215. haterade - September 23, 2008 1:46 PM
After shes done wiping her Toilet paper ways 120lbs.
216. Racer X - September 23, 2008 2:44 PM
KiKa's ass is two thumbs, up. Fine holiday fun.
217. Bob White - September 23, 2008 4:50 PM
This girl is beautiful. No doubt about it. You can bet half the dumb cunts on this site posting their wieght would never turn heads like this chic.
The writer is a friggin worm. What a joke. No wonder he likes little androgynous waifs. Manorexia much.....
Also who is the damb bitch or fucked up dude posting on this site under KK topics with such hatred? I know you are the same freak b/c thought you post under different names repeatedly use of the word girdle and the phrase "wear a girdle like Kim", I don't have to wear a girdle like Kim....etc. Give it up...your ugly as shit.
218. Bet your boyfriend looks;) - September 23, 2008 4:56 PM
Hey Leah, Bianca, pathetic douche bags etc...I bet she gives your man a rise.
219. JD - September 23, 2008 5:20 PM
217
You poor fat pathetic chick trying to act like a guy. You have serious anger issues that probably stem from being fat like Kim. Try going to Weight Watchers, lose weight, exercise, and feel better about yourself. I am also sorry that you have to wear a girdle like Kim. Good luck dear.
220. Mistik - September 23, 2008 5:22 PM
SHORT & FAT!!
Can anyone tell me why is she famous..??! I mean seriously lol.. wow..
221. Chip - September 23, 2008 5:25 PM
Kim's big fat ulgy ass looks like she gained too much weight during pregnancy and had triplets! Jessica Alba recently had a baby and her body looks great and no big fat ass like Kim and they are both short people.
222. Toni - September 23, 2008 6:11 PM
She's famous for letting some unknown retard piss on her in a sex tape. So, now she gives head to the paparazzis and Superfish writer and lets them piss on her for the attention. She's a whore.
223. Will - September 23, 2008 6:24 PM
#222
Kim's porn sex partner said he has a fat fettish.
224. suzy - September 23, 2008 8:09 PM
No way. I'm right under five feet tall, have a full C cup, and an ass that is reminiscent of hers, and I weigh right under 130. She has got to weigh at least around 140.
225. M - September 23, 2008 9:34 PM
People have got to stop lying about their weight - seriously. I'