Aug 6 2008Lydia Hearst is lingerie-ery
When I wrote a post yesterday about Page Six columnist Lydia Hearst making out with Aubrey O'Day, I figured, "Hey, here's a chick I'll never write about again for the rest of my life." But then Lydia launched the new Myla lingerie ad campaign (above) and hosted National Underwear Day in New York last night. Wait, National Underwear Day? Now they're just making shit up. Our forefathers fought to make this a free nation, and I specifically recall that applying to the hanging state of my testicles. No, really, It was in the original version of the Constitution, not the compromised second draft.
RELATED STORIES

Reader Comments
1. Que - August 6, 2008 2:18 PM
Que googling.
2. playa - August 6, 2008 2:21 PM
2nd?
I'd hit fanta pants
3. Sergio - August 6, 2008 2:30 PM
Yucky!!! She's ugly
4. TOOL - August 6, 2008 2:32 PM
boo yahhh
5. JC - August 6, 2008 2:33 PM
Is this an ad for the positive side effects of meth.. or is this just the consequence of thinking you look good?
6. typical superficial loser - August 6, 2008 2:38 PM
She's ugly, fat and has a weird manly face.
7. literarycritic - August 6, 2008 2:39 PM
In pic 6, the retoucher forgot to airbrush her reflection!! She's clearly one of those skinny-fat chicks who are stick-thin and yet have no tone whatsoever. Ribs showing, yet the stomach's hanging out over the panties. WTF.
8. Homer Erectus - August 6, 2008 2:41 PM
She looks like a prepubescent boy.
9. Chris - August 6, 2008 2:43 PM
Cindy Crawford topless is a legit celeb-world story. The semi-nudity of D-listers isn't (Nereida Gallardo, Paz Vega, this chick).
10. RichPort - August 6, 2008 2:44 PM
You could stack a pack of peanut M&Ms in her cavernous belly button.
11. literarycritic - August 6, 2008 2:45 PM
@#10: LOL
12. jumpin_J - August 6, 2008 2:46 PM
No question the shots for the ads are terrible but she looks damn fine on the runway / carpet shots. Too bad a chick that hot has to write for Page Six. Guess she uses her assets to get the scoop. Oh did I say assets like a pun? Crap.
13. Jimmy - August 6, 2008 2:48 PM
Huge forehead.
Paris wannabe.
14. Ted Mosby - August 6, 2008 2:49 PM
Pasty Delight!
15. literarycritic - August 6, 2008 2:50 PM
@#13: I think it only looks that way because her facial features are all crammed into the bottom 1/3 of her skull.
16. Sheva - August 6, 2008 3:03 PM
fuck the homos, chick is slamin.
Not that there's anything wrong with homos. Just we don't need them criticizing what they don't like.
17. granada - August 6, 2008 3:09 PM
Thanks Fish, for posting those pics of her yesterday...because she looks NOTHING like this in real, candid, live shots. However, her dress is stunning.
18. JT - August 6, 2008 3:13 PM
Trannylicious
19. sierra - August 6, 2008 3:15 PM
I love that dress.
20. Robin - August 6, 2008 3:18 PM
Holy-digital-nip-tuck-and-airbrush Batman!
21. RichPort - August 6, 2008 3:23 PM
#16 - I'm sorry... should we call you Mr. Sheva?
22. ed. - August 6, 2008 3:31 PM
"chick is slamin" her trannycock up my ass.
*fixed*
23. penacka - August 6, 2008 3:41 PM
Seems like she really wants to be taken seriously as a journalist....
24. Score - August 6, 2008 3:42 PM
At first I didn't get why people on this website would dog an attractive woman other than it's the superficial website, but now I see it's just jealousy. Women on here especially, and men with mediocre girls or no girl are jealous that they can't be apart of this kind of beauty. Even after all the bad comments said about black women; I can honestly say that this is a pretty woman who has a nice figure. Now I get it so no reason to get butt hurt about any of these ironically negative comments.
25. rough daddy - August 6, 2008 3:45 PM
id like to pump that with some rough yogurt, isnt that the chick from yesterday doing the lezbo show?
26. der duh doye - August 6, 2008 3:46 PM
Wow, #24, I don't think anybody's EVER suggested that before!!!
27. Sheva - August 6, 2008 3:59 PM
Rich Port, you don't have to call me Mr. Sheva is just fine.
Now airbrush or not, I'm not taking back one word. She looks damn good.
She's also in today's New York Post kissing some other chick. But I digress...
Okay but to your tranny porn loving commenters. Fucking homos puke at the smell of a nice moist babe ready to go. But think we care what they think about chicks.
Get the fuck off and stay off.
28. costamar - August 6, 2008 4:04 PM
You could land a plane full of lezbos on her forehead.
29. costamar - August 6, 2008 4:04 PM
You could land a plane full of lezbos on her forehead.
30. Scott - August 6, 2008 4:16 PM
Yay! I'm the first to point out the subtle "Big Lebowski" reference! ('compromised second draft')
I find it hilarious that people who would never have a shot at a woman this attractive can sit here and eviscerate her based on small flaws. You know who you are, and you're all idiots.
31. sla - August 6, 2008 4:17 PM
She looks too made up, too retouched and too plastic. Does anyone see any personality coming through? She looks like a mannequin.
Everything, from the lingerie to her perfect photoshopped tummy, just looks so... predictable. Blah.
32. Dr. Phil - August 6, 2008 4:25 PM
Sheva, just come out already. All the anger and obsession about "homos" will go away, and you'll feel much better (possibly a little sore, but an inflatable donut will help).
33. literarycritic - August 6, 2008 5:00 PM
@#24 & #30: Apparently you never considered that your standards of beauty are not, in fact, universally accepted.
Allow me to explain what I mean.
The girl in these photos:
a) has been airbrushed into oblivion in the lingerie shots;
b) is almost frighteningly thin, with full ribcage and sternum showing through her skin;
c) has an objectively oddly-proportioned face, however attractive its individual features may be.
These are all FACTS.
Not everyone is jealous of people who look like things you personally consider attractive/beautiful. Some people -- I'm one -- are turned off by airbrushing, repulsed by the sight of women so thin they look like starving African children, &/or oddly-proportioned or unusual faces.
Can't believe that someone has to spell this out for you, but rantings like "You're just jealous!!!111!!" and "You rag on her because you're losers who'll never get a woman this attractive in real life!" are so incredibly ironic. YOU'RE the ones who are so insecure about a difference of opinion that you have to assign negative personal characteristics to strangers who don't share your definition of attractiveness.
34. Silvia - August 6, 2008 5:01 PM
Oh Shit, this is all we need - Another Paris Hilton!
35. Professional Photographer - August 6, 2008 5:04 PM
These pictures would have more impact if she were photographed in her coffin.
36. sara - August 6, 2008 5:08 PM
longest. torso. ever.
37. Nathiest - August 6, 2008 5:37 PM
She is one of the worlds most sought after model. Everyone wants shoot her for adds and magazine covers and for high fashion art.
You people that call her ugly no nothing about beauty and the world of fashion. You fucking inbreed assholes should all just go chock on your daddys dick.
38. CJ - August 6, 2008 5:42 PM
Tastefully done and over the top sexy.....surely no one can find fault in this!
39. Zane - August 6, 2008 5:47 PM
"She is one of the worlds most sought after model. Everyone wants shoot her for adds and magazine covers and for high fashion art.
You people that call her ugly no nothing about beauty and the world of fashion. You fucking inbreed assholes should all just go chock on your daddys dick."
Gay men pick the fashion models. That, plus your last sentence (one of your flashbacks), says it all.
40. Nathiest - August 6, 2008 5:53 PM
Really "ZANE" you're calling me gay "ZANE"?
shut up you little bitch.
41. Score - August 6, 2008 5:53 PM
@26 if that's a good thing then thanks. @ 33 ok I don't believe that everyone is going to be attracted to the same thing, and realize that just about every woman in hollywood these days gets photoshopped. BUT! in no way, shape, or form is this woman unattractive or even remotely fat. WTF does the fat on this girl's body reside? Seriously Im confused. She has a pretty face, beautiful eyes, and a fairly thin body Im sure. Even if she were over weight she'd be pretty. This is coming from a black woman, and believe me black women to the world are not even considered that attractive. I don't know why, but my point is it clear to me that she is attractive. Didn't anyone see her in the non photoshopped pic from earlier this week?
42. tp - August 6, 2008 5:53 PM
FAT ASS!!!!!!!!
43. Score - August 6, 2008 6:00 PM
#33 shame on you. Any person that has to say something negative about another person's outer appearance for personal gain is definately the insecure one. It takes a woman with confidence to compliment another woman, because many women are too catty to admit another woman is beautiful. Point blank, the woman is not ugly nor is she fat.
44. dogonabone - August 6, 2008 6:02 PM
She has the face of a RODENT .... can't even look at the body with that rat face staring at me.
45. cranky - August 6, 2008 6:08 PM
I'd eat a bucket of shit to get at her bunghole.
46. somuchbetter - August 6, 2008 6:08 PM
I'm sorry but the majority of everyone that has commented on here is simply jealous. I'd love to be half as beautiful as her. Yes, she has a long torso and she may not define your image of beauty, but I think she's beautiful. They don't just pick random people to be *lingerie models*.
47. Score - August 6, 2008 6:09 PM
Ok lets try a different aproach. Rather than me disagree with you all's personal opinions I have a question instead. What women do the men currently on this thread consider attractive?
48. Zane - August 6, 2008 6:23 PM
lmao@"Really "ZANE" you're calling me gay "ZANE"?"
...from somebody with a lisp-name: "Nathiest"
49. literarycritic - August 6, 2008 6:27 PM
@#41&43: You said this:
"BUT! in no way, shape, or form is this woman unattractive or even remotely fat. WTF does the fat on this girl's body reside? Seriously Im confused. She has a pretty face, beautiful eyes, and a fairly thin body Im sure."
And this:
"Point blank, the woman is not ugly nor is she fat."
You didn't even read my comments, did you?
In my first comment I said that this girl is "skinny-fat," by which I mean that she is very skinny but lacks muscle tone (i.e., has a high percentage of body fat relative to her size, EVEN THOUGH she is skinny). I even added the bit about muscle tone in the original comment, if you had read past the word "fat," which apparently you didn't.
In my second comment I said REPEATEDLY that she is frighteningly thin. I also said REPEATEDLY that her features, while individually attractive, are oddly proportioned. The only one using the word "ugly" is YOU. What is wrong with you? Learn to read before you shoot your mouth off at someone about shit they didn't say.
You also said this:
"Any person that has to say something negative about another person's outer appearance for personal gain is definately the insecure one."
What in the world would I have to "personally gain" from saying anything negative about this girl's appearance? Absolutely nothing. All I'm doing is saying something about her appearance that you personally don't agree with, which YOU can't deal with, which apparently makes ME jealous and insecure. Hmm.
"It takes a woman with confidence to compliment another woman, because many women are too catty to admit another woman is beautiful."
Take a look at yesterday's post about Paz Vega. I said that I was jealous of her good looks and her body, but that I could admit it, appreciate it, and move on. This girl, however, I simply do not find attractive. PERIOD. Your opinion is not objective fact, and if you have an issue with that, I suggest you deal with it.
50. blah - August 6, 2008 8:13 PM
shes so pretty and classy...hope shes bi!!
51. Score - August 6, 2008 8:38 PM
#49 get a clue, because the world doesn't revolve around you ok. I wasn't the only one to use the word "ugly" either. Read everyone elses posts and you'll see what I mean. How did I know you were a woman? Makes perfect sense to me. I don't care how you put it you were still judging this woman in a negative way point blank. Saying her features are oddly proportioned is not factual at all,it is a stinking opinion. It's just like an azzhole, and everyone has one. Im glad to know that you are confident enough a woman to compliment another woman. I can literally say without sarcasm that that's good for you, but who but God is to say that one's features are oddly proportioned? HE MADE EVERYONE'S FEATURES, get over yourself. Maybe you are an attractive person, but would you honestly want people commenting on your look in this way? I tell you what's wrong with me...Im more into godly things rather than earthly things such as looks, social status, and life style. Im perfectly normal in other words. My original post went out to everyone who posted on here in general, and so I wasn't singling you out. I said you were insecure in my response post, because you were judging this woman as if anyone is perfect in the looks department. I sure hope you have the perfect percentage of body fat to muscle composition, because you sure seem to know what a perfect woman should look like. BTW... that doesn't exist.
52. Giggles - August 6, 2008 8:55 PM
I wonder if this is what her mother dreamed about while she was held hostage by the SLA.
53. Ferdinand Narcos - August 6, 2008 9:04 PM
That's a donkey punch candidate if I've ever seen one...
54. Mike - August 6, 2008 9:12 PM
She would be a good Daisy Buchanan in a Great Gatsby film. She has a vintage 20's kind of creepy beauty, all moths and moonlight and mint juleps.
55. shutup - August 6, 2008 9:51 PM
anyone who has a comment longer than a couple lines has way too much time on their hands. also anyone who is having a cyber fight on this thing needs to shut the hell up. good lord.
56. britney's weave - August 6, 2008 9:53 PM
you guys sure fight a lot. we make fun of people here. that's why it's called "the superficial." end of discussion.
moving right along...
aren't boobs supposed to go IN the bra? (first pic)
57. Fasc(ion)ist(a) - August 6, 2008 10:35 PM
She looks like an insect, with her mother's lantern jawline. Nice six-head, Lid-ia.
58. Nathiest - August 7, 2008 12:01 AM
cannot believe you people are haten on this beautiful girl. You are all just sad.
59. Nathiest - August 7, 2008 12:03 AM
click my name post above
60. someoldguy - August 7, 2008 3:14 AM
I went to high school with this girl. I never thought she was all that attractive and still don't, but hey, good for her for making some money. I would expect more from her than designing lingerie with the kind of education she was able to afford.
61. RZRBILL - August 7, 2008 6:57 AM
You have got to be kiddin me. Are all of you people a bunch of TURD BURGLARZ. This chick is F@#$ Hot as Ballz.
62. wha? - August 7, 2008 7:12 AM
That is an insanely long torso.
63. gerard Vandenberg - August 7, 2008 8:16 AM
As long as she lays down on the bed, NO ONE WILL BE "HURT"!!
64. pass - August 7, 2008 9:12 AM
#15. EXACTLY. Retards isn't it plainly obvious that this skank is an aquired taste. Some women are a type that the majority will find attractive, but this woman with her fair skin, facial features, and very elongated body is not a woman that every guy would find attractive. I could picture her married to Marilyn Manson. The fact is their is a science to beauty, it's all balance and proportion. Her body and face are not proportionate and she will start to age horribly if she doesn't start working out a little, she is thin, but not remotely toned, this ghastly palor ain't helping. She has the modern day twiggy look and not every guy wanted to bone twiggy.
Bar Rafielli and Sophie Monk trump this weird looking woman so right here on this website there are better looking celebs. Her looks simply do not appeal to everyone, she looks like she stepped out of a Tim Burton movie and not everyone wants to nail that shit.
Plus she's an heiress and you all know what that means.
65. Nathiest - August 7, 2008 9:40 AM
Pass,
You know dick about modeling and about beauty. It's NOT! all about balance and proportion. GFC you people are all a bunch of inbreed retards what you all think you know is correct is actually 100% wrong. dipshits the whole lot of you.
66. literarycritic - August 7, 2008 10:36 AM
@#64: THANK YOU. "Acquired taste" is exactly fucking right.
67. P-Mat - August 7, 2008 11:02 AM
#65 - You actually think people on here care...LOL! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
68. HuckyDucky - August 7, 2008 1:50 PM
Guhhhhh.... I LOVE this chick.
69. HuckyDucky - August 7, 2008 2:06 PM
#64 is right, she's an acquire taste. But one that I've acquired.
70. meh - August 7, 2008 2:56 PM
It's all good people, we all have different taste, some appreciate her looks some don't. There has been plenty of scientific studies of beauty and it has shown the importance of proportion, but beauty is like art it can't fully be explained. The fashion industry has it's own vision of beauty, Hollywood does too, so does the adult film industry, men's magazines, the dance world (where a toned body is valued), different cultures have visions of beauty, the list goes on. The fact reamins this woman is different looking and to some that's not appealing.
While I like elegant classic beauty like that of Audrey Hepburn and Grace Kelly today we know the importance of fitness and someone who looks like they have no interest in being healthy (no fat is fine, tone and strength is important). Looking anemic, like you have oesteroperosis and a vitamin D deficiency is not HOT to some people.
Also unique features, a very large rounded forehead and extremely long torso is something that some will love and others will dislike. It doesn't mean they have no class or can't appreciate refined beauty. If she had a more balanced face and features, a smaller forehead, shorter torso and a little color and health, better posture and a little more strength to her physique she would be lovely like oh say Claudia Schiffer or Daniele Pestova so it's not about not appreciating beauty it's that certain extreme looks are less universally accepted as beautiful which to some makes them fantastic and special and to others makes them bizarre and unappealing.
71. HuckyDucky - August 7, 2008 3:47 PM
I agree with Zane?
72. RichPort - August 7, 2008 3:48 PM
#70 - All I got out of that is that she's a funny looking bitch.
73. missE - August 8, 2008 2:08 PM
Too much of torso means too short legs.
74. Score - August 8, 2008 3:00 PM
Okay fine people. I will let by gones be by gones. Sometimes at work I do have too much time on my hands. I work in an office. What was I thinking anyway. Im not the one to judge any of you. My apologies.