Oct 17 2007Kelly Brook is a gifted saleswoman

FRIST assholes! I love Veggi's cock too.

SWEET JESUS !!!! Those are some nice tits.

...superdrug? not nearly as clever as FCUK

shit i just noticed. nice rack mhmm but she looks really horrified of the perfume. maybe she accidentally poured some on herself... proceeds to strip naked and eat strawberries. bah.

It was yesterday not today:

http://celebslam.buzznet.com/kelly-brook-pics

Tig o' Bitties. But that face...mama ain't proud.

They're real as well. I love her.

Holy melons.

Finally, thanks, Fish, for someone worth looking at. Find bikini pictures if you really want to make my day.

fish, that joke just keeps getting older and older.

Who sold her those gifts?

I'd let her keep her bra on, completely ignore the boob, and work her ass with a dildo for an hour. You know, just to fuck with her head.

She couldn't get Steve Sanders Playboy ex to hook up with any Brits on her stupid reality show, so, she ain't worth much. Unless your ship is going down and need a flotation device.

That hot pink goes perfect with her Brown hair and rose coloring

she sort of looks like a young Marlo Thomas

I'll buy 6 or maybe 7, What is she selling?

I love her look in pic number 2, it says:

"Please don't ask me to spray any of this stuff on me. Have you smelled it?!"

I have the exact same boobs - and they're real!!!! It's so nice to see someone other than Salma Hayek has boobs like me and doesn't weigh a gazillion pounds...

she is sooo good looking! I cant believe she looks so good after celebrity weight loss..

#17- I thought Salma's were implants (before pregnancy anyway).

Looks to me like she forgot to harness up the right nipple... its pointing south... .. like britneys.

@16 Sara - I think she farted and it is a bad one. Some of the eel and pie she had last night for dinner

Here are some nice topless pics of her.

http://www.heaven666.org/celebs/kelly_brook_topless.php

Thanks #22, that hoisted the mainsail!

@22 CRAP!! Work blocked the link. This place blows!!! I guess they want me to work or something like that

#22, that made my day.

Your all welcome, yes they are nice tits.

She looks great.

isn't she engaged to billy zane, from titanic?

NICE FUCKING TITS & TEETH there honey...

make my penis solid really good. I CAN HAS SEX WITH YOU please?

...baby hungry

Wow, she is hot....why do photographers follow around Paris and not this chick?

19- nope Selma's were the real deal

That's the first thing I noticed and I'd know what to do with them. I may be an oaf, but step-aunt Audrey didn't raise no morons, except her half-son- Stew(pid).

Superdrug in London? Wonder if that's the equivalent of a Walgreens in America

Dude, who the hell is this!? C'mon. It just doesn't matter to you at all, does it? I mean, if you're going to post pics of people who aren't even famous just for their giant rack -and they even get to keep their clothes on- I'm sure I can round up a few friends of mine to stand there and pretend to hold stuff too.

In fact, I hear there are a lot of places you can go to see nonfamous women with their shirts still on. Like outside. Or navigating away from the porn sites for 5 secs. I know it's hard....

navigating away from the porn sites? what does that mean? can you..can you even DO that? that's crazy talk.

What a great salesperson! I'll take two!

PS Her breasts have done more for humanity than Spears, Lohan, and Hilton combined. They should strip that ignorant fuck Al Gore of his Noble Peace Price and give it to her breasts.

RELAX FRIST! No one navigates away from porn sites. Ript is just fucking with you. It's insane to even suggest such a stupid and foolish thing.

Ript - stop messing with people like that. You could hurt someone by suggestion they navigate away from their porn!

Oh yeah..."Price" should be "Prize" in my last fucking post. I was distracted by her breasts, wondering how much it would cost to suck them. Or at least one for half price.

hahahaha! You guys do know there are places online where girls actually get naked right? Like, 24/7? And then they do stuff... I don't want to say what, exactly, but I think it's a little more than standing there in a pretty dress. Well, that's what I've been told anyway. I've always been too busy ogling celebrities.

Ahem. Or attempting to.

AWWWW!!!! You guys!!! I was just joshin' ya! Please, be one with the porn.

And worship the Fish. I love him. He is my savior. I can honor nothing else in life but the Fish's wishes. If he was my man, I'd devote my entire life to sucking him off... but then there would be no gossip anymore. Do you think he would mind being that busy?

#37 whatever, OMG THANK YOU!!! I was so frightened for a second there.

Geh...I knew you couldn't do that...

Nice boobies. My stuffs better as far as content. Stop by.

That would be like making a 3 olive martini and walking away from it!!!

Mmmmmmm.

wow, she's beautiful

Not as beautiful as my porn, er I mean my martini...

I HOPE ALL GIRLS HERE READ THIS:

YOU LOSERS! SHE's MORE BEAUTIFUL THAN YOU. STOP BEING JEALOUS!
SHE HAS NICE TITS, YOU NOT.

sweet little girl this, really.

Johnny? Hmmmmm.... first stop yelling...

Next, no I'm defiinately more beautiful AND have a better rack.

Just sayin...

K, that may not be true, but I just love fucking with the idiots on here...

I NEED to impregnate this woman IMMEDIATELY. STAT!

God, where did I learn to spell?

DEFINITELY not here........................

@ 31- Iunno...
Before...
http://www.celebroundup.com/salma-hayeks-boob-job/
How the hell did this happen?

FRIST you're ugly frustrated little bitch

Ok now switching back my eyes at my sexy sweetheard in the red dress

Remember when "attractive" used to be the flat-chested no ass image.
Whew!! I AM GLAD THOSE DAYS ARE GONE!!!!

22, Thanks for the Link!

Giddy Up! Great rack.

Why is it that every minor celebrity who comes along has to market their own stinky chemicals? All these people get perfumes and then they get a clothing line of mundane crap they didn't even design themselves. No wonder everything looks and smells like shit anymore.

And if I'm not mistaken, these pics were taken before she was pregnant.
(Sorry for the multiple posts).

NIST Admits Total Collapse Of Twin Towers Unexplainable
Implicitly acknowledges controlled demolition only means by which towers could have fallen at free fall speed

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Tuesday, October 16, 2007

The National Institute for Standards and Technology has been forced to admit that the total free-fall collapse of the twin towers cannot be explained after an exhaustive scientific study, implicitly acknowledging that controlled demolition is the only means by which the buildings could have come down.

In a recent letter (PDF link) to 9/11 victim's family representatives Bill Doyle and Bob McIlvaine, NIST states, "We are unable to provide a full explanation of the total collapse."

A 10,000 page scientific study only offers theories as to how the "collapse initiation" proceeded and fails to address how it was possible for part of a WTC structure to fall through the path of most resistance at freefall speed, completely violating the accepted laws of physics.

In addition, NIST's own studies confirmed that virtually none of the steel in either tower reached temperatures hotter than 500 degrees. The point at which steel weakens is 1000 degrees and melting point is reached at 1,500 degrees, according to NIST itself.

"NIST'S 10,000-page report purports to explain what it calls "collapse initiation" -- the loss of several floors' vertical support," writes Kevin Barrett of Scholars for 9/11 Truth. "In order to dream up this preposterous scenario, NIST had to ignore its own tests that showed that virtually none of the steel got hotter than 500 degrees f. It had to claim that somehow the planes took out many core columns, despite the fact that only a direct hit by an engine would have been likely to do so, and that the chances of this happening even once are fairly low. It had to preposterously allege that the plane that nicked the corner of the South Tower took out more core columns than the one that hit the North Tower almost dead center. It had to tweak all the parameters till they screamed bloody murder and say that the steel was far weaker than it actually was, the fire was far hotter than it actually was, the sagging was far greater than it actually was, and so on. And so NIST hallucinated a computer-generated fantasy scenario for "collapse initiation"--the failure of a few floors."

"But how do you get from the failure of a few floors to total collapse at free-fall speed of the entire structure? The short answer: You don't. Anyone with the slightest grasp of the laws of physics understands that even if all of the vertical supports on a few floors somehow failed catastrophically at exactly the same moment--a virtually impossible event, but one necessary to explain why the Towers would come straight down rather than toppling sideways--the top part of the building could not fall THROUGH the still-intact, highly robust lower part of the building, straight through the path of most resistance, just as fast as it would have fallen through thin air."

"Thus total free-fall collapse, even given NIST's ridiculous "initiation" scenario, is utterly impossible. The probability of it happening is exactly equal to the probability of the whole building suddenly falling upward and landing on the moon," concludes Barrett.

NIST have yet to properly address the sudden freefall collapse of WTC Building 7, which imploded on the late afternoon of 9/11 despite not being hit by a jetliner.

In August 2006, NIST promised to scientifically evaluate whether explosive devices could have contributed to the 47-story building's collapse but no answers have been forthcoming.

In August of this year, James Quintiere, Ph.D., former Chief of the Fire Science Division of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, called for an independent inquiry into NIST's investigation of the collapse of the twin towers.

Quintiere said NIST's conclusions were "questionable", that they failed to follow standard scientific procedures and that their failure to address Building 7 belied the fact that the investigation was incomplete.

#57 means: NICE TITS!!!

too many words TOO MANY

My poor insignificant brain! It's about to explode!

Seriously, too many words, I didn't read it.

@57 OK only bothered to read the first and last two paragraphs, but I will grant you, deftly handed CNTRL C and CNTRL V you twat. Stick to the funny.

I may be frustrated, but I'm not ugly!!! Asswipe.

Anywho... WTC binky!!! ENOUGH!!!

Here...I have a martini with Binky's name on it. I don't have a bong hit, but I know people who might...

I do have a xanax though

My sources (can't tell you who they are) CIA (you didn't here that from me) say that Paris Hilton is a distraction for WW3

In other news, someone keeps stealing my mail. I think they want to take over my identity. I don't know why someone would want a credit rating of 3 but whatever...

god in heaven what a great set of tits. and finally a british honey with decent teeth!

#34 and anyone else who doesn't know who she is.

She was no.1 in the UK FHM 100.

They have properly beautiful women in the UK. No fake tan, no peroxide hair, no fake tits. Just naturally gorgeous.

She is actually really nice, too.

My husband wants me to get breast augmentation. After looking at her I can see why. Nice.

she is the friken tit's queen

http://www.spymac.com/details/?2279410

69

This is the kind of white chick I dream of banging until she is wiped out. I would tit bang her into oblivion. I would blow so many loads on her chin that she would look like a rabid dog.

#57 - you are fucking retarded. Wrap your head in tin foil and go wait for the aliens to arrive.

@71 You believe in aliens? Now that's some crazy shit! You need help!

#72 nice try but you aren't fooling anyone with your "aliens don't exist" smokescreen. now step away from the cow.

You can see this gal real easy here

http://www.kellybrook.org.uk/

2 sec google turned it up -- enjoy.

she is talented but I am too busy looking at her chest!

I just noticed! She has a HEAD! Wow, wankers! Lookit that!!

Big titties (yawn). Big whoop!

I admit, I do love a good probing, but I have to narrow that down to humans. Not too keen on the inter species erotica.

Pic 2, the headline pic is awkward. The others are nice, though.

Billy Zane is a lucky bitch to be fucking her

Her rack belongs in the Titty Museum hall of fame.

NATURAL TITS RULE!

That is a pretty dress and she certainly fills out nicely. I would love to see her in a lingerie shoot.

AAaaaah Billy Zane, mmmmmmmmmm.

JESUS CHRIST, DO YOU REALLY THINK IT'S WEIRD?
Give those FLASHY TITS a good look please. People, mainly men though, will buy everything from that girl!! Just to give those wonderful TITS another close look!!

uhm, #66... i thought britain's fav was that tranny meth ho jordan... she is disgusting and completely unatural looking. her tits are too big and she has to wear granny bras, and she has no ass ( jordan NOT this girl). this girl is good though

i like big, but im not gonna lie... i might like her alil better if they were alil smaller. they kinda drop like an older woman who has breast fed a lot. i like them really perky looking. shes pretty tho.

are those real? Cuz fakers are just plain tacky and SO 1990.

Fake tits are like segregation: Separate and not equal.

I.e., that nasty flat stretch of skin between two hard round soccer balls (e.g., Victoria Beckham) is SOOOOOO nasty

OMG!

Those are some pretty...

...straight teeth for an english woman.

yes, she has big intelligence..

@87 These look like the tits of an older woman who has breast fed a lot? Seriously, how old are you?

Nice blog, very informative contents. I also got similar to this one, would you mind if I ask you for a link exchange? Regards...

Her face in the top pic is so odd - not exactly selling it, imo. Nice body, though - damn her.

91- im 23. why do you ask?

shes looks good, but here is a question.
why do girls with big boobs naturally a D or higher always seems to have big guts, no waist, and concave square asses.
im not talking about celebs... cause those type of bodies aren't attractive enough to make it to being a celebrity.
im talking about everyday women with really big boobs.
i really feel this is true.
i've seen women with C cups that have small waists and butts... but usually women with naturally big boobs like D and plus have ugly shaped bodies. and they usually have skinny arms and legs.

thats why is someone made me pic which is better boobs or butt, i might pick butt, cause if you have a GREAT butt ( not too fat or flat) usually you will have a small waiste and shapely legs and overall good body.

personally, although not at all opposed to nice breasts, I am about the legs and ass, because they are the frame for what it is that a person is really there for.

but none-the-less -- YAY TITS!

Yeah Kelly is well pretty, she is VERY big in UK and taking part in Strictly Come Dancing, which is the original show for your US version Dancing with the Stars.

Check out my blog for info about it if you like:)

She is a Brit chick. Great from the waist up, not too impressive from the waist down. It is like the Brits think having shapely legs and a nice butt are against the law. They must really love pears in the UK.

maybe i wanna see her in a bikini, and maybe i don't. legs stomach and butt are most important for bikinis. and i don't know what is goin on below the big mammis.

Why are you people saying Kelly is only Boobs http://imagecache2.allposters.com/images/pic/MMPH/235828~Kelly-Brook-Posters.jpg that is a world class ass she has also,

there is nothing wrong with her legs either http://laceillusions.com/lingerie/kelly-brook-pink-slip.jpg

BABY WANTS MILK!

BABY HUNGRY!

BABY WANNA SUCK!

kirsty gallagher makes here look like an old worn out hag..!!

55 - so agree with you, just a way to keep people forgetting them and their so called careers.
67 - you should have married someone else. Even if you get bigger tits, it won't make you happy. Ask him to get a bigger dick, oops sorry I forgot, he is one already.
70 - classy bloke. Wish I wasn't married already. I so would love to be with you...
95 - what a crock of shit! Open your eyes. Some of us have big boobs, small waists, gorgeous cute butts and nice teeth that haven't been neon whitened, capped and americanised. What happened to individuality and not succumbing to going under the knife?

Im not to sure who this is, but i must say she gorgeous.

wow.

#72 - no, you believe in aliens. They're the ones who helped Bush destroy the towers, right? That's the kind of conspiracy theory bullshit you believe.

Oh, what, no aliens in your little theory? I guess that makes it so much better :-/

Show me a conspiracy theorist like Blinky...and I'll show you someone with an IQ below room temperature.

107: you suck

did you ever hear abut the reichstagsfire that hitler used as excuse to invade poland and set of his enabling-act (or patriot-act under the bush-agenda)?

dictatorships like bush-administration have always setup false-flag op's to get their thing through.

nothing different with 9/11. with all the evidence around the scandals & things this administration passed, the iraq-invasion, nsa-spying, patriot-act. it's all the same, same, same...

bush-senior himself told reporters in front of the wtc-towers a while before 9/11: "wouldn't it be fun to blow 'em up?"

gorgeous girl! i saw her profile on a datng site called sugarcupid.com. i think she may delete it.