January 29, 2007
Rachel McAdams is a 12-year-old
It takes a talented person to make Rachel McAdams look like crap, so congratulations to Mr. Person who did her up for the Screen Actors Guild Awards. She looks like Jared Leto playing the role of Rachel McAdams in some futuristic Japanese kid's show.
Previous Entries
» Paris Hilton gets molested by Joe Francis» Sharon Stone "forgets" her bra
» UPDATE: Pamela Anderson and George Clooney might be dating
» Kathy Griffin wants attention
» Joel Madden and Shifty Shellshock fight


Comments
1. Posted by missdavis on January 29, 2007 4:16 AM
1st?
2. Posted by missdavis on January 29, 2007 4:17 AM
very excited! have no idea who this is but she looks like crap, sly. her dress is quite cute though, not with the shoes, they look cheap.
3. Posted by huegwagn on January 29, 2007 4:25 AM
Who the hell is Rachel McAdams?
4. Posted by bellaparis on January 29, 2007 4:25 AM
She looks like an Olsen reject.
5. Posted by hellcat1983 on January 29, 2007 4:31 AM
Oh my god and there I was thinking it wasn't possible for this woman to look bad! She looks liek someone just stuck some retro wallpaper on her! For those of you who don't know who she is, she was in "Mean Girls", "Wedding Crashers", "The Hot Chick", "Red Eye" but is barely recognisable here.
6. Posted by keys open doors on January 29, 2007 4:35 AM
she does look like a 12 year old lol
damn you're up earlier than normal
7. Posted by WhoTheFuckCares on January 29, 2007 4:39 AM
I feel like hitting her with a pillow, then after she is down, I would do her. That's rape right?
8. Posted by Mandy on January 29, 2007 4:40 AM
lol . . . Jared Leto playing Rachel McAdams . . .
You're right on the money.
Anyhow, it's the pink shit in her hair and the shoes that ruin the whole look. Mostly the shoes ruin it. Some strappy silver shoes woulda pulled it off . . .
Maybe.
9. Posted by Niecy on January 29, 2007 4:45 AM
Rachel McAdam's to-do list:
1. Fire stylist
2. Buy glasses so I am able to see when my stylist makes me look like crap
10. Posted by katzie on January 29, 2007 5:20 AM
oh whatevv guys this girl is gorgeous, some fucked up hair and a retarded dress cant kill her overall image, just a bad day, and her and ryan gosling are probably the cutest couple everrrrr.
11. Posted by MrSemprini on January 29, 2007 5:44 AM
Dress? Bad, just bad. Looks like somebody had too much leftover Christmas wrap and dumped it on top of her.
Hair? Looks OK. Better than any woman I see walking into or out of Wal-Mart. Wait... Why am I at Wal-Mart?
Legs? Oh, my. What beauty. I've seen very few that compare. She, my dear fish, has a good leg. The shoes just accent it like a fine coffee accents a good meal. But, who's the dork?
12. Posted by F-Sucker on January 29, 2007 5:50 AM
Simple fix:
1. Remove Dress
2. Bend her over a table
Problem solved.
13. Posted by NicotineEyePatch on January 29, 2007 5:53 AM
If I can't smell her cooze just looking at her picture, and I haven't seen her sex video, she automatically has some of my respect.
And she totally upstaged Lohan in Mean Girls, so I'll forgive the amorphous sack she's sportin'.
14. Posted by BigJim on January 29, 2007 6:55 AM
I wonder how much she charges for babysitting.
15. Posted by RichPort on January 29, 2007 7:18 AM
Well the hard on I had since my Mean Girls marathon is now officially gone, and somewhere in Hollywood, a stylist will have to die. Violently.
16. Posted by Lowlands on January 29, 2007 7:29 AM
I've seen dressed up poodles spotting with pink in their fleece.But i must admit the dress what she's wearing is different.
17. Posted by Spindoc on January 29, 2007 7:37 AM
It's amazing, it's always the really pretty girls that aren't satisfied being really pretty and have to fuck up the way they look. Hey Rachel, Leave looking "Interesting" to warthogs like Kelly Osbourne.
18. Posted by ImaCracka on January 29, 2007 7:46 AM
really... who is she? The notebook chick?
19. Posted by hamjachok on January 29, 2007 8:07 AM
who the hell is she. and what an awful dress.
20. Posted by monday on January 29, 2007 8:14 AM
what a silly look, she's such a gosling
21. Posted by Pointandlaugh on January 29, 2007 8:15 AM
#12 - yes. My thoughts exactly.
Love the dress length. very sexy.
22. Posted by elizabeththewellread on January 29, 2007 8:18 AM
This woman rminds me of how my retarded little sister used to dress up her Barbies.
23. Posted by jrzmommy on January 29, 2007 8:22 AM
I'm assuming her stylist went to the Helen Keller Academy of Fashion Design?
24. Posted by SonJaSpiCe on January 29, 2007 8:25 AM
I don't know... usually when people wear dresses like that it's to hide a babybump. I'm just saying is all.
She's still adorable.
25. Posted by 86 on January 29, 2007 8:35 AM
I don't care what she wears, I still want to be her.
26. Posted by meee on January 29, 2007 8:39 AM
i'm in love with her (in a straight sort of way...yes...) but whats with the pink streaks in her hair? god it's not 1997-2001 anymore!
27. Posted by Jim Treacher on January 29, 2007 9:25 AM
Okay, so she looks like she just woke up from a coma she's been in since she was 7 and the last thing she saw was a Rainbow Brite cartoon, but with legs like that she can wear a potato sack for all I care.
28. Posted by Jason The Barbarian on January 29, 2007 9:33 AM
If that's a 12-year-old, then prepare to see me getting busted on "To Catch A Predator".
29. Posted by Me on January 29, 2007 9:36 AM
Ummmm.......SO she and Young Herculese are still together huh? Weird.
30. Posted by N'Arianne on January 29, 2007 9:41 AM
The Olsen twins look constantly spooked. I mean, really freaked out. Why is that? And why do they insist on making in worse with smokey eyes? They remind me of that blur girl from the grudge...Yeah, that's right, the dead one. Except they're twons, so they're twice as scary...that's some fraky shit.
31. Posted by jrzmommy on January 29, 2007 9:41 AM
she's just a little teeny tiny too close to resembling Lohan for my comfort.
32. Posted by sol on January 29, 2007 10:10 AM
i would wait for a gust of wind then rush in and bite her hiney.
33. Posted by carpemundus on January 29, 2007 10:40 AM
agreed. shes real pretty, but not here
www.carpemundus.com - judgemental
34. Posted by Miss Skyline on January 29, 2007 10:44 AM
31. Agreed muchly! What a hideous dress.
35. Posted by UNCLE NED on January 29, 2007 11:10 AM
Never heard of her. Nice legs, though.
36. Posted by Wild Rose on January 29, 2007 11:34 AM
Beautiful Legs!!! She needs to wear short dresses more often. Treat us to some class and gams that are truly worth showing off! Compare hers to Britney's---Gahhhh!
37. Posted by Craig & "em" on January 29, 2007 11:44 AM
She's one of my favorite actresses, BUT WTF?
You should attach a streaming music file to these pics. I'm thinking Cindy Lauper's famous 80's song "GIRLS JUST WANNA DO CRACK!"
38. Posted by 4DPants on January 29, 2007 11:48 AM
This dress looks like it was designed by Vincent from last season of "Project Runway."
39. Posted by fame is funny on January 29, 2007 12:05 PM
Sigh. I love her.
40. Posted by jc7676 on January 29, 2007 12:08 PM
#17 nailed it.
I hate it when really pretty girls ugly themselves up trying to be fashion forward.
41. Posted by ambrosia on January 29, 2007 1:35 PM
I think she looks fine mini balloon dresses w/o tights, high waisted skinny pants, highwaisted balloon pants,are in right know pick up a vogue she just needed to pull hair back and have wisp bang to the side the dree would look better on someone who is taller it is supposed to elongate the legs. It looks fine she should be confident and not let the dress wear her the except for the aforementioned hair the first mini pic is a good pose to complete outfit. Also the shoes i think some wedges , or more toe sleavage definetly more heel would of done it.
www.myspace.com/sashambrosia
42. Posted by Depraved22 on January 29, 2007 3:47 PM
Except for that God-awful hair, the dress, shoes & the makeup, she doesn't look half bad.
43. Posted by metaphor on January 29, 2007 4:12 PM
What is she wearing, wallpaper?
Great legs though.
44. Posted by dk on January 29, 2007 5:27 PM
WOW WHAT IS GOING ON WITH ALL THE YOUNG ACTRESSES THESE DAYS?!
45. Posted by kathleen170 on January 29, 2007 5:51 PM
She may as well have worn a paper bag.
46. Posted by The-Guslet on January 29, 2007 7:38 PM
Apparantly the pink streaks were for a role... I dunno - just one of the rumours going around.
Agree with the comment re: dress, shoes and legs.
(Though those shoes - in every colour - are big in Japan at the mo...)
47. Posted by FecalPellets on January 29, 2007 8:34 PM
Anyone else have the Jem theme running through their head??
48. Posted by FecalPellets on January 29, 2007 8:37 PM
BTW she's adorable, but REALLY needs to slice that cancerous shit off her chin.
49. Posted by drowningfool on January 29, 2007 8:56 PM
Looks like she's trying to hop on the pedafile (sp?) bandwagon...a la Olsen twins pre-18 years old...that's so yesterday. Get with the times. Its all about young BOYS now, not young girls. Sheesh.
50. Posted by licklick on January 29, 2007 11:30 PM
So that's what it takes to be a celebrity...lumpy legs and taste up the ass.
51. Posted by fame is funny on January 30, 2007 12:56 AM
oh, i get it...she's a fem-bot
52. Posted by killeristic on January 30, 2007 3:39 AM
some over-grown kid. ha
53. Posted by BarbadoSlim on January 30, 2007 4:09 AM
Rachel McWho?
anyway, she looks like a reject from some 70's variety show.
54. Posted by Cherry on January 30, 2007 6:49 AM
Oh my ...
What was she thinking?
55. Posted by miyechan on January 30, 2007 7:42 AM
rachel either has no mirrors, or no friends.
with this train wreck, i'm guessing she has neither.