these bitches are uuuugggggglllllyyyy. it looks like the photographer went down to a local dive hick bar beside a trailer park and said to a couple of very underaged girls 'hey baby...wanna go outside and take some polaroids?"
nasty bodies - i don't care what ANYONE says, they are too thin to be attractive and they all have gross tiny little titties...perhaps with the except of the red head - she turned out to have a really nice body...but she has the child-crack-whore look about her face, like all the rest of them.
i HONESTLY would not touch a single one of these girls. not one. the only reason i would give any one of them a second look is because they are so strange looking. people just think their hot cause they are models...but anyone who says they would find them attractive if they weren't models is a LIAR.
The redhead has pretty hair. Otherwise, yeah, these girls look either way too young or way too thin and overall UNCOMFORTABLE being photographed like this. It's creepy.
What's up with the text tattoo's, does every whore in Hollywood have these? Tasteless crap. I like tattoo's, but that shit is terrible and they are all going for it like it was a roadmap to success(no ladies its blow jobs just like Miss Fox has perfected, she cups the balls!!!). This is like every porn star who gets a ho tag for the dudes to aim at with their spunk(kind of like color by number... now where's a little white needed..hmm).
But the redhead is hot with a decently proportionate body, I just wish I could see if she has red hair all over... he he.
Uh... she looks like a 12-year-old farm girl. Small breasts can be beautiful, but combined with her young looking face and boney chicken legs, it's like she hasn't hit puberty yet in that first pic.
And sloth. HA!
16. 1moreidiotintheworld - November 21, 2009 6:56 AM
Look at the smile on that Sloth's face!!! I guess a quick titty-fuck for the camera gives him some smack talk to lay on his cage mates back at the zoo.........
Hurry, someone save these girls from this bunch of perverts !!!!!!!!!
Nasty photographers, terrible pictures. You're under the impression that after these shots, they were raped, killed and buried somewhere in the jungle.
Man, I just don't see it. The red haired on has a cubby round face. She is a bit disturbing. Although, I would tend to agree. I am curious if she is a fire crotch, and has those red curly short hairs decorating her love tunnel. If so, I'd give her my schlong and dump my load of protein into her.
Two thirds of these picts looks like 12 year olds. These chicks are gross. You know they must be young because they haven't installed the high performance hooters yet and ruined their rack...give it time..
Anyway these anorexic little girlies are definately not hot. The one chich with the stupid foot tatt looks ridiculous.
Everyone is so fat now that people of proper weight are considered "too skinny". go look at what a true anorexic looks like and then look at the photo's again. Moron's.
I dont think they're to skinny, some chicks just naturally look like that and are still healthy and dont need to starve themselves.
What really is beyond disturbing is that she looks like a 6yr old. 10yrs at the most. Sooooo creepy, and this is what men find atractive???? Ew ew ew ew.
these bitches are uuuugggggglllllyyyy. it looks like the photographer went down to a local dive hick bar beside a trailer park and said to a couple of very underaged girls 'hey baby...wanna go outside and take some polaroids?"
nasty bodies - i don't care what ANYONE says, they are too thin to be attractive and they all have gross tiny little titties...perhaps with the except of the red head - she turned out to have a really nice body...but she has the child-crack-whore look about her face, like all the rest of them.
i HONESTLY would not touch a single one of these girls. not one. the only reason i would give any one of them a second look is because they are so strange looking. people just think their hot cause they are models...but anyone who says they would find them attractive if they weren't models is a LIAR.
"
Shut the fuck up, fag.. No one gives a fuck if you'd touch them or not, and the fact you would call them ugly, just shows that you're a fucking liar trying to show your ass on a msg board- that, or youre fucking gay. Period. Theres a difference between not finding them AS attractive as others, because you prefer thicker women, and being just plain ignorant. Shut your fucking cockholster - these women are beautiful, and you're irrelevant.
PS- The rest of you whining about them being skinny, need to get off your fat asses and stop believing the hype that 'chunky is healthy' and you're 'real women'....theres toned, and then theres piglets- I'm guessing you fall under the latter.
Keep hating though, stupid fucks.Your jealousy is so apparent its pathetic. Dont mind me though, you keep funneling those ho ho's into your nasty gape of a mouth!
Agreed wholeheartedly w 35 (and 34, now that I look at it)...I'm into chicks w meat on their bones as well and I'm not saying the chick HAS to be this skinny to be hot but to say they're ugly, or disgusting....well, fuck that nonsense.
yeah #5 you like girls who eat too many twinkies? Because there's nothing wrong with being that thin.
So go ahead and get off to pics of girls who don't take good care of their bodies and abuse them by eating too much junk food.
@5 your completely right and just voicing a valid opinion. Dont let it bother you that the people attacking you are into molestation, necrophilia and whores that are riddled with cancer and smell like tuna.... Everyone of these bitches needs to eat, workout and get their boobs done, period.
Everyone has their own ideas of what is attractive. Just because #5 doesn't find these anorexic looking chicks attractive doesn't make them gay or fat or some other immature internet attack word. If these twigs are your idea of hot that's fine, but why do you care so much if someone disagrees with you? Get over it, not that serious.
And for the millionth time I am so sick of comments calling the nay-sayers fat or ugly or whatever. I have learned that women tend to have a higher standard for gauging a fellow female's attractiveness. But even so, just because I don't think these girls are "gorgeous" or "smoking hot", doesn't make me jealous, fat, ugly, etc. The world has +6 billion people in it, not everyone is going to agree, but this internet bravery and bullying is the saddest thing to see.
ok so first of all, Miranda Kerr is not 6 years old or 10 years old like some of you seem to believe, so it's ok for men to like her if they want to, quit freaking out. Second, they are not too skinny, it's called being hot, more ppl should try it. And for the record, i'm a girl. I agree with #28, fat has become the norm, and what was normal weight is now considered super skinny.
You guys that are attacking people for saying these women are too skinny are crazy. Their bones are literally popping out. How is that healthy? If you put Miranda Kerr on the cover of National Geographic, every one of you would be talking about how horrible the effects of starvation are. I agree with #15. With the possible exception of the redhead, they look like they haven't hit puberty yet.
And I've gotta say that the fact Miranda is a VS model just goes to show you how far the publication has fallen.
I dont find any of them special, and imo only rosie and the last girl are sexy, but theyre not ugly.... just im not a fan of the boyish, modelesque shape
http://thesuperficial.com/2009/08/miranda_kerrs_camel_toe_and_ot.php
this pic alone should shut everyone up - hot. Anyway that says different needs their freakin head examined...
Ok.. There are people who are naturally skinny. I'm 5 ft tall and weigh 80 pounds. I eat cheeseburgers, fries, chinese food, and I love brownies! I just can't get fat.
Also, a body that is considered "average" in the US is actually "obese" in many other countries.
Haha fat people can talk about skinny people all day but skinny people can't talk about fatties. It's just mean.
anyone who thinks miranda kerr isn't hot has been looking at too much porn and has forgotten what real women look like. sorry folks, not every chick has dd's.
Whoever thinks these girls are in shape is delusional -- these girls have outright muscle wastage! If they in fact worked out, they'd have more muscular legs and asses worth looking at. At the moment, they appear skinny-fat and sickly -- not fit or in shape.
These women really do look nasty...I mean I am looking at them and suddenly feel the need for a 5 course meal, and I just ate not to long ago and was not hungry at all before this. Seeing these types of women will make our obesity problem worse.
Lily Cole looks lovely (especially in the chest - she appears healthy as well) but a few of the others have the legs of someone in a concentration camp (cough, cough - Kerr). Starvation isn't sexy.
It's kind of disturbing....like a 30-year-old woman trying to look like a 10-year-old girl.
the fact that being overweight has become normal does not make being underweight any healthier. according to mirandas bmi she is severely underweight which is why she looks like she hasn't finished going through puberty.
40 years ago no one would say these people are 'too skinny' or 'starved'. It's only because the average girl is fat that we now think of these tall, thin body types as 'too skinny.' And obviously, most guys would be more than happy to drill any/all of these models.
@48- Shut the fuck up already- stop trying to sound all edumucated and stuff....muscle wastage? You're out of your fucking gord. And since 80% of those posting find them attractive, I guess how YOU think they appear means jack shit, eh? Like I said - its one thing to say its not your thing.....its another to talk as if you're a certified medical professional and start throwing out jargon like 'muscle wastage'..if you knew in fact what it was, you'd know that insinuating that they're suffering from it is just plain silly....so they arent as fat as you'd like and lack what you consider acceptable muscle mass? too fucking bad- until they appoint you their personal physician, your ridiculous prognosis means shit..it does, however, make it painfully apparent of how jealous your fat ghetto ass is. I'm sure they're far healthier than you- and fat doesnt = healthy no matter how you slice it.
@50- You're an idiot.
And you fucks wonder why our country is so god damn fat, because sorry bastards like you think anyone whose under a buck eighty is 'waif like' and 'too skinny'....just because they have a different body type and metabolism than you do, doesnt make them unhealthy.
They are not too skinny. They're practically perfect, but I hate these pictures. I'm all for sexy or freaky sexy or disturbing or interesting pictures, but these are just tasteless and incomprehensible.
Well I actually think Daisy Lowe is kind of goofy looking, but that's a matter of opinion.
These chicks have nice tight little pussies. That is natural, and that is how it's meant to be. Tight is good. Loose and sloppy is not so good, but still doable.
Oh, yes... @40 - Please keep in mind, the website you are on is www.thesuperficial.com and not, let's all be indepth, intelligent beings that treat everyone in an educated, fair, decent fashion considering the the health and well being of the entire universe as we know it. www.thesuperficial.com
Also, I agree with 42 about the VS catalog. What happened to the shapely models they had like Tyra Banks and Heidi Klum? Miranda Kerr can't hold a candle to Heidi Klum. Heidi Klum is thin, yes. But she looks healthy and like a real woman. The models they use nowadays look too much like boys than real women with beautiful curves. But I guess nothing sells thongs and panties like a 12 year old boy's ass, huh?
Guys they are too thin. Not everyone on this board is a fat hater to say that. There's being skinny naturally and being forced skinny like these chicks and it's like find a medium between it. This calendar sucks. First thing I stare at is the twig legs. Jennifer Lopez used to do Pirelli, what happened. It's not like models should be plus size, size 0 is ok, it's like eat 500 calories sometimes. Food is good! I agree with you VS needs its old women back pronto to replace these bone hangers.
@56 - you're a giant twat so shut up. What people are saying here is that these girls are only super-hot in one context: the catwalk. Their limbs are really long and they seem stretched out and because they have such low body-fat they have got no ass (except for Kroes) and no streamlined curves like the models used to have (think Cindy Crawford, Elle McPherson). Truth is they would not be saught after to pose in men's magazines merely for their twig-like bodies, and it is true, they look like children.
And to those saying that becuase of obesity we have forgotten what normal looks like, blah blah, I would just say that it is always easier to be thin than it is to be fit & healthy. Thin is easy - you don't eat. Fit means that you actually have to work out, all the time. There's a difference and FIT is always hotter than thin.
I can't get around the fact these chicks look like they're all 12 years old...I couldn't get past the first few. Just really uncomfortable. Wonder how old the people are who say they'd do them.
Anyway, I'm going back to the lingerie picts of Keely Hazell and Victoria's secret. At least they aren't jail bait like Miley Cyrus or these grade schoolers.
I don't know, dude...they kind-of suck : (
There are prettier chicks out there with more curves..like the old Victoria's secret in the 1990's..Laetitia Casta, Daniella, much more..
They had bodies!
JMO
@ Smarm/#56:
Just because a term like "muscle wastage" is outside of your clearly limited lexicon doesn't mean these girls don't have it. They are clearly underweight -- if you would like to refute that, please feel free to dispute it with facts. For now, however, medical science indicates that for their height, they are underweight -- and no, 80% of the people on this site do NOT find them attractive. Re-read the posts.
Finally, not liking underweight women in no way implies that I'm fat -- it merely suggests I might like the healthier, more curvaceous models of yesteryear. I think we can all agree that Cindy Crawford, Stephanie Seymour, Tyra Banks, etc. had beautiful bodies. These malnourished girls don't. Go to your local gym and I'm certain you'll see plenty of women with far more attractive bodies.
One last thing -- Here's an example of a girl who clearly works-out and has a sculpted, sexy physique. Her legs, abs and glutes all are well-developed and have beautiful musculature, but she is not so ripped as to look unfeminine:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jrh4QBq_WEk
THIS is what many people point to when we say the girls above look unhealthy and need to eat/exercise more.
Girl no 1 ain't Miranda Kerr (she's too big time to do crappy little tyre calender). What's boring is they are all trying to find the next Miranda rather than a new hottie. Variety people.
If I'm not mistaken, the photographer is Larry Clark who was the director for movies like KIDS, Bully, Kent Park. This is the style of his photography.
79. Fas(c)h(ion)ist(a) - November 21, 2009 11:29 PM
Wow. Incredibly ugly, underweight with the body of a 13 year old boy.
So NOTE hot.
I think my dick just crawled back up into my abdomen.
80. Fas(c)h(ion)ist(a) - November 21, 2009 11:29 PM
Wow. All of them are incredibly ugly, underweight with the body of a 13 year old boy.
So NOT hot.
I think my dick just crawled back up into my abdomen.
i think its hilarious how the majority of the folks here are critiquing these girls are women, whereas the dudes think they're hot. These are gorgeous girls, with a unique look, the type that you can spot from a crowd of average looking chicks, and yeah they're skinny but that doesn't make em any less hot. It's nice to see a change from thunder thighs and saggy tits.
Modeling agencies love their alien headed coke whores with boy bodies...
84. skinny minis 2 cents worth - November 22, 2009 1:38 AM
To all these people who state the "fact" that these girls are medically severely underweight, where are you getting your "data" from?
I'm 52kg and average height, yup pretty dam skinny, much like these girls. I have had my BMI etc tested lots of times during my life and doctors tell me I'm healthy, and I fit into the range of what is considered normal, (albeit near the bottom).
I'm sick of being made to pay for the fact the the population is getting unhealthily big and feels bad about it. Just say it like it is, it's a preference issue, so you like bigger women? Good for you but it doesn't make any of these girls above unhealthy. You have to be a lot thinner before you hit anorexic proportions.
I love my body and I'm not going to apologize for it
PS Miranda Kerr is f**kin hot and you know it, she just looks a bit young in that picture because of her styling.
“Cleanse ProX Review” – CleanseproX is proven to help you boost your metabolism and stimulate your bodies’ fat burning process. Cleansepro X contains Green Tea and EGCG which assist the body to burn fat. This blend is full of Antioxidants and combats the breakdown of cells which can lead to free radicals in the body. CleanseProX also contains advanced Pro-Biotics which then creates an inhospitable environment for harmful bacteria, parasites, and worms. Diseases have taken more humans than all of the wars in our history, and with reports of widespread diseases across the globe, your body may be home to ravenous creatures that feed on flesh.
Is it really? I never heard of that! Frustrated by being still single and not finding your Mr. Right? I know a hot and interesting place for wealthy people and their admirers named Billionairepal.com where I have met my boyfriend. You may take a look.
: 79. Fas(c)h(ion)ist(a) - November 21, 2009 11:29 PM
Wow. Incredibly ugly, underweight with the body of a 13 year old boy.
So NOTE hot.
I think my dick just crawled back up into my abdomen."
Well that shouldnt have taken long.
And stfu, already....these chics are far beautiful than anything you'll ever get within ten miles of, and just because theyre too skinny for your fatfuck taste, doesnt mean they're anywhere near disgusting. Fucktard.
I don't think any of these girls are too skinny, they really just look normal skinny to me (maybe I didn't look hard enough...). But maybe they should eat some more calories to grow some normal breasts. Isn't that what you guys want to see?
And none of these pictures are good- either that or all these girls are ugly
@40. Agreed. Maybe some women are just 'jealous' and being mean because they are fat and ugly, but the rest of us really just notice all the details more.
You guys saying they look too young are crazy. I live in asia and the 25 year old women here look younger than most of those girls photographed. Some people just naturally look younger. And by the way, most of the asian women are naturally as thin as these models too, and they eat enough. You Americans pig out too much on junk food, and smoke and drink too much, of course your women look older and fatter.
You guys saying these girls look too young are crazy. I live in Asia and most of the 25 year old women here look younger than these models. Some women just naturally look younger. Oh and by the way, most of the women here are as slim as these models and they eat enough. Your American women pig out too much, and smoke and drink too much, so of course they look fatter and older.
@ 104. WTF? Who says they live in "Asia?" Asians look younger because they never grow anything... boobs or butts. They look like kids until they are 25 and then when they hit 30 they look about 60. asian women age terribly!
107. Rough don't dance - November 22, 2009 12:21 PM
Let me put the end to this nonsensical musical chair, thats going on here...
I looked at your web site rough, they don't look much different to me, and the photos that were placed on here were photo shopped.
109. farty mcshitface - November 22, 2009 12:50 PM
these broads are gross. anorexic is not hot. they have no muscle tone on their emaciated little frames. i'd take a babe like a college cheerleader over ANY of these things ANY time. college cheerleaders have the best bodies on a consistant basis. for you losers out there who try to rip on the critics like me i don't like fat women but would rather she have a little softness over skin and bones. those of you out there who think these braods are hot are probably fapping their 2-inchers to these chicks and sniffing their grannies crusty panties too.
these broads get an F for epic FAIL.
that's it, the debate is over and i have won!!
Miranda Kerr actually DOES have a nice face in her UN touched up photos such as signings..I think they go overboard with the airbrushing, making them look too young, too smooth, and too thin.
119. Eun Young Tao Fuk Wang - November 22, 2009 5:42 PM
foto has skinny girls, look like me cousin before migration to USA
the background in the 1st picture looks really nice! that is it, everything else about these photos were not done too well. I am surprised because he is a real professional and usually does a great job. Maybe the models he was working with this time around weren't the greatest.
I do have to wonder if it is the intention here to make these people appear like starving 1 year old refugees. Wow. This could be a poster for reasons not to get in to the business.
I do have to wonder if it is the intention here to make these people appear like starving 13 year old refugees. Wow. This could be a poster for reasons not to get in to the business.
129. Fas(c)h(ion)ist(a) - November 22, 2009 10:12 PM
@smarm:
Since I lay actual women, not bony ugly clotheshangers (who look better with the clothes on, although still not attractive), I will fart in your general direction.
And while it took only a few moments to crawl up, getting the 9 inches back out of my abdomen is more fun, and for my ladies to do.
She's not "shockingly thin". She's in shape and that's the type of body which i want for a woman. Leave it up to the fat asses to go on a rampage because a woman actually cares about her looks.
As a female who has never been over weight (always within a medically recommended range for my size) I have to say that the thighs in these pics do confuse me a little but I do have a butt and thighs that guys after petite girls don't really go for.
I agree that it's not right to condemn these girls for how they look. There are many girls who are just naturally that shape. This only becomes an issue when other girls start to believe that they can't be beautiful in all shapes and sizes.
Let's not do a 180 degree turn and start abusing thin people. Everyone has their own tastes, and it's a good thing too, because everyone is a different shape. Lets all try to respect one another.
132. Oh shit!! that's my daughter!! - November 23, 2009 2:38 AM
Gavin Rossdale must be proud. Somebody needs to drive miss daisy to get a shirt.
Lily Cole (the redhead) is just as thin as the rest of the models. Everyone saying that she looks healthier because her boobs are bigger needs to realize that fat distribution is different on everyone. Even if Miranda Kerr ate a cheeseburger, she wouldn't magically sprout bigger boobs. If she gained weight, it would be all over, and the breasts would stay the same proportion. And Lily Cole having bigger boobs doesn't mean she has a healthier appetite or takes better care of herself.
that fat distribution is different on everyone. Even if Miranda Kerr ate a cheeseburger, she wouldn't magically sprout bigger boobs. If she gained weight, it would be all over, and the breasts would stay the same proportion. And Lily Cole having bigger boobs doesn't mean she has a healthier appetite or takes better care of herself.
@106:
Nope Asian women don't suddenly look 60 when they turn 30. They don't 'age terribly' like you said, that's crazy, they always look light years younger than American women their age. Thank you to 111 for spotting that too, I thought everyone knew Asian women look really young. They don't just have youthful thin bodies, but really young-looking faces. I'm white and damn glad I date an Asian chick--she's always getting gawked at and white people ask if she's like 17 even though she's 28. Your average American white woman is a laughingstock in the world, don't you realise that?? Bad genes or bad lifestyle whatever, somehow they look really old and fat in general. And then they hate on the models, who somehow manage to look more normal, more youthful and slim. But even your models can't compare with Asian wome--look at some of the Asian celebrities
white women by far age faster than oriental women dumbass!
150. Love these models, hate these photos - November 23, 2009 8:20 PM
How dare you call Georgie (the girl with the sloth) ugly? She is completely natural, and her face is pure, high-fashion art. Those heart-shaped, pillowy lips and those boobs are totally natural and wonderful--if anything should convince North American women to lay off the silicon/saline, it should be photos like these. Also, she is far from anorexic. If you think those legs are too skinny, you must be fat. I think these Richardson pics are a little sucky, is all. Here are some better pics below of Georgie and some of the other gals:
I'm a woman and I would LOVE to have those legs! 10 miles long and not an ounce of fat! I'm not condoning anorexia if any of them are anorexic, I don't know that. As for them looking young, well, that's just the culture we live in. Youth is considered beautiful. It always has been and always will be. I had my time when I was young. We all do. These girls are just enjoying their moment.
This really feels like child porn to me... like really.... not because of her body, but because of her face! She look like she is two! They should have used makeup on her face! I feel like child predators are going to have a ball with this!
Miranda Kerr doesn't look so young in real life, it's airbrushing and digital-editing. Like someone earlier pointed out, photos taken of her which aren't for publicity, like at signings, show that she looks in her 20s.
But like I said, Asian women her age look younger than she looks in these photographs. When I first moved to Asia for work reasons, I thought all the women looked like teenagers or even kids (by American standards). It's amazing, they look like jailbait but they're legal, FANTASTIC combination!! I think these models may look young to Americans because Americans have warped standards--the women are fat and look older than their age, compared to Europians and esp Asians. My girlfriend's 28, britney's age, and she looks younger than britney did in her baby one more time video
Looool omg I thought that was Dakota Fanning on the front photo , I had to look no less than 6 times and still didn't believe it. Okay I am officially freaked out.
Looool omg I thought that was Dakota Fanning on the front photo , I had to look no less than 6 times and still didn't believe it. Okay I am officially freaked out.
This is Terry Richardson's work. it's supposed to be f*cked up, weird, and kinda disturbing. You guys are all idiots, try getting to know alternative culture a bit.
P.S. Half these girls are Victoria Secret Angels .. yah ... those bodacious beauties you pervs all think about when you're fapping off.
This is Terry Richardson's work. it's supposed to be f*cked up, weird, and kinda disturbing. You guys are all idiots, try getting to know alternative culture a bit.
P.S. Half these girls are Victoria Secret Angels .. yah ... those bodacious beauties you pervs all think about when you're fapping off.
The problem with fashion directors is they are aging old women who are so obsessed with youth that they think children are sexy, and gay men who don't argue with the battle axes. 999 out of 1000 men with ZERO experience in print media could cast better models and pick better shots for a calendar than this. Utterly pathetic. I'm about ready to go to Pirelli and demand the job for next year or work for someone else. WOW. CRAPOLA.
The absolute cutest thing about this shoot is the sloth. Only the sloth. The women however... dont give me the urge to want to grab any of their body parts. That would be like grabbing a bunch of twigs off a tree. Where are the women that are Sophia Loren-esque, or the girl from La Dolce Vita?? Those are Pirelli material.
VS has gone downhill. They've replaced the Anna Hicks, Tyra Banks, Danielle Pastova? and the curvy swimwuit models with girls who look like Miranda Kerr--wide-set eyes, the bodies of 12yr-old girls--not sexy anymore.
Hey VS, get ready of the skinny, UGLY high fashion girls and bring back the sexy line-up.
VS has gone downhill. They've replaced the Anna Hickmans, Tyra Banks, Danielle Pastova? and the curvy swimwuit models with girls who look like Miranda Kerr--wide-set eyes, the bodies of 12yr-old girls--not sexy anymore.
Hey VS, get ready of the skinny, UGLY high fashion girls and bring back the sexy line-up.
VS has gone downhill. They've replaced the Anna Hickmans, Tyra Banks, Danielle Pastova? and the curvy swimsuit models with girls who look like Miranda Kerr--wide-set eyes, the bodies of 12yr-old girls--not sexy anymore.
Hey VS, get ready of the skinny, UGLY high fashion girls and bring back the sexy line-up.
Miranda Kerr is amazing! all you people are way to picky! shes cute thin and doesnt have several hundred layers of plastic overt he top! all you people just like milfs with huge breasts and massive asses, well thats not what modelling is about anymore is it? and I'm glad its changed because if all women looked similair to Miranda this world would be heaven!
The Superficial is a celebrity gossip site which publishes rumors and conjecture in addition to accurately reported facts. Information on this site may or may not be true and The Superficial makes no warranty as to the validity of any claims.
Note
All images that appear on the site are copyright their respective owners and The Superficial claims no credit for them unless otherwise noted. If you own the rights to any of the images and do not wish them to appear on the site please contact us and they will be promptly removed
Reader Comments
1. Titties - November 21, 2009 1:23 AM
Itty bitty titties!! I like.
2. SLOTHS! - November 21, 2009 1:30 AM
hahaha That sloth is LOVING those titties.
3. The Clap - November 21, 2009 1:56 AM
A sloth..... Really?
4. whatever - November 21, 2009 1:57 AM
What is she? Like 10 feet tall?
The golly tittie giant.
5. what? - November 21, 2009 2:13 AM
these bitches are uuuugggggglllllyyyy. it looks like the photographer went down to a local dive hick bar beside a trailer park and said to a couple of very underaged girls 'hey baby...wanna go outside and take some polaroids?"
nasty bodies - i don't care what ANYONE says, they are too thin to be attractive and they all have gross tiny little titties...perhaps with the except of the red head - she turned out to have a really nice body...but she has the child-crack-whore look about her face, like all the rest of them.
i HONESTLY would not touch a single one of these girls. not one. the only reason i would give any one of them a second look is because they are so strange looking. people just think their hot cause they are models...but anyone who says they would find them attractive if they weren't models is a LIAR.
6. maeby - November 21, 2009 2:28 AM
she looks ten years old. gross
7. Vagoo - November 21, 2009 2:29 AM
I see vagoo
8. Blech - November 21, 2009 2:32 AM
Um, ew, photograph #11 made me nauseous.
The redhead has pretty hair. Otherwise, yeah, these girls look either way too young or way too thin and overall UNCOMFORTABLE being photographed like this. It's creepy.
::Shudder::
9. Pizza - November 21, 2009 2:35 AM
Lol that picture #2's pepperoni nips are'nt fully covered by the star
10. RtSS - November 21, 2009 2:36 AM
Nice! Just in time for thanksgiving. I love breast meat. I'll take another helping, please.
11. shvlhd - November 21, 2009 2:56 AM
This is without a doubt the worst Pirelli calendar I have ever seen in my 48 years.
12. Leena - November 21, 2009 3:00 AM
These girls are drop dead gorgeous. Just flawless. Women are the most beautiful thing who ever's out there created.
13. Tad Bit Tipsy - November 21, 2009 3:06 AM
What's up with the text tattoo's, does every whore in Hollywood have these? Tasteless crap. I like tattoo's, but that shit is terrible and they are all going for it like it was a roadmap to success(no ladies its blow jobs just like Miss Fox has perfected, she cups the balls!!!). This is like every porn star who gets a ho tag for the dudes to aim at with their spunk(kind of like color by number... now where's a little white needed..hmm).
But the redhead is hot with a decently proportionate body, I just wish I could see if she has red hair all over... he he.
14. Rupert - November 21, 2009 4:53 AM
These dudes sure are insensitive to androgens.
15. Brooke - November 21, 2009 6:18 AM
Uh... she looks like a 12-year-old farm girl. Small breasts can be beautiful, but combined with her young looking face and boney chicken legs, it's like she hasn't hit puberty yet in that first pic.
And sloth. HA!
16. 1moreidiotintheworld - November 21, 2009 6:56 AM
Look at the smile on that Sloth's face!!! I guess a quick titty-fuck for the camera gives him some smack talk to lay on his cage mates back at the zoo.........
17. kay2 - November 21, 2009 6:57 AM
AUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE!
18. kay2 - November 21, 2009 6:58 AM
AUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE!
19. EuroNeckPain - November 21, 2009 7:29 AM
Hurry, someone save these girls from this bunch of perverts !!!!!!!!!
Nasty photographers, terrible pictures. You're under the impression that after these shots, they were raped, killed and buried somewhere in the jungle.
20. RtSS - November 21, 2009 7:37 AM
Man, I just don't see it. The red haired on has a cubby round face. She is a bit disturbing. Although, I would tend to agree. I am curious if she is a fire crotch, and has those red curly short hairs decorating her love tunnel. If so, I'd give her my schlong and dump my load of protein into her.
21. Jay - November 21, 2009 8:01 AM
Thanx Fish!! You rock!! Love them titties!!
22. Erica - November 21, 2009 8:08 AM
The sloth... just awesome.
23. who? - November 21, 2009 8:28 AM
PLEASE - give those girls a cheeseburger!
24. Turd da Third - November 21, 2009 8:40 AM
Two thirds of these picts looks like 12 year olds. These chicks are gross. You know they must be young because they haven't installed the high performance hooters yet and ruined their rack...give it time..
Anyway these anorexic little girlies are definately not hot. The one chich with the stupid foot tatt looks ridiculous.
NNNNNNNNNEEEEEEEEEEEXXXXXXXXXXXTTTTTTTTTTTTT!!!!!!!
25. iammambo - November 21, 2009 8:47 AM
Comment #5 is obviously a fatty.
26. Duchess Of Dork - November 21, 2009 8:52 AM
I think it's really saying something when more than 50% of the comments on The Superficial are complaints that the girls photographed are too skinny.
27. Dave - November 21, 2009 8:58 AM
Wow, so that's what the real one look like.
Huh.
They're not so bad after all.
28. Sir Mix Alot - November 21, 2009 9:59 AM
Everyone is so fat now that people of proper weight are considered "too skinny". go look at what a true anorexic looks like and then look at the photo's again. Moron's.
29. WTF - November 21, 2009 10:32 AM
@28
It's "morons," moron. No apostrophe.
And yes, they are too skinny. Far too bloody skinny.
30. farty mcshitface - November 21, 2009 10:38 AM
very true number 29. they are far too skinny. i see nothing but a bunch of bony-assed stick-legged women. a big bag of unimpressive.
31. just sayin' - November 21, 2009 10:52 AM
better skinny than fat
32. ew ew ew - November 21, 2009 10:55 AM
I dont think they're to skinny, some chicks just naturally look like that and are still healthy and dont need to starve themselves.
What really is beyond disturbing is that she looks like a 6yr old. 10yrs at the most. Sooooo creepy, and this is what men find atractive???? Ew ew ew ew.
33. Parker - November 21, 2009 11:25 AM
Anyone who says these chicks aren't hot are out of their minds. I would bttfuck any one of them---or all of them---any time, any place.
34. @what? - November 21, 2009 11:33 AM
" 5. what? - November 21, 2009 2:13 AM
these bitches are uuuugggggglllllyyyy. it looks like the photographer went down to a local dive hick bar beside a trailer park and said to a couple of very underaged girls 'hey baby...wanna go outside and take some polaroids?"
nasty bodies - i don't care what ANYONE says, they are too thin to be attractive and they all have gross tiny little titties...perhaps with the except of the red head - she turned out to have a really nice body...but she has the child-crack-whore look about her face, like all the rest of them.
i HONESTLY would not touch a single one of these girls. not one. the only reason i would give any one of them a second look is because they are so strange looking. people just think their hot cause they are models...but anyone who says they would find them attractive if they weren't models is a LIAR.
"
Shut the fuck up, fag.. No one gives a fuck if you'd touch them or not, and the fact you would call them ugly, just shows that you're a fucking liar trying to show your ass on a msg board- that, or youre fucking gay. Period. Theres a difference between not finding them AS attractive as others, because you prefer thicker women, and being just plain ignorant. Shut your fucking cockholster - these women are beautiful, and you're irrelevant.
PS- The rest of you whining about them being skinny, need to get off your fat asses and stop believing the hype that 'chunky is healthy' and you're 'real women'....theres toned, and then theres piglets- I'm guessing you fall under the latter.
Keep hating though, stupid fucks.Your jealousy is so apparent its pathetic. Dont mind me though, you keep funneling those ho ho's into your nasty gape of a mouth!
35. Duke Nukem - November 21, 2009 11:47 AM
Smoking hot. And NO, DONT feed them a cheeseburger. The last thing we need is more fat chicks.
36. Smarm - November 21, 2009 11:55 AM
Agreed wholeheartedly w 35 (and 34, now that I look at it)...I'm into chicks w meat on their bones as well and I'm not saying the chick HAS to be this skinny to be hot but to say they're ugly, or disgusting....well, fuck that nonsense.
37. SOS - November 21, 2009 12:00 PM
yeah #5 you like girls who eat too many twinkies? Because there's nothing wrong with being that thin.
So go ahead and get off to pics of girls who don't take good care of their bodies and abuse them by eating too much junk food.
38. dk - November 21, 2009 12:11 PM
@5 your completely right and just voicing a valid opinion. Dont let it bother you that the people attacking you are into molestation, necrophilia and whores that are riddled with cancer and smell like tuna.... Everyone of these bitches needs to eat, workout and get their boobs done, period.
39. mel gibson - November 21, 2009 12:17 PM
#5 fuck you homo
40. Luz - November 21, 2009 12:38 PM
Everyone has their own ideas of what is attractive. Just because #5 doesn't find these anorexic looking chicks attractive doesn't make them gay or fat or some other immature internet attack word. If these twigs are your idea of hot that's fine, but why do you care so much if someone disagrees with you? Get over it, not that serious.
And for the millionth time I am so sick of comments calling the nay-sayers fat or ugly or whatever. I have learned that women tend to have a higher standard for gauging a fellow female's attractiveness. But even so, just because I don't think these girls are "gorgeous" or "smoking hot", doesn't make me jealous, fat, ugly, etc. The world has +6 billion people in it, not everyone is going to agree, but this internet bravery and bullying is the saddest thing to see.
41. Dj - November 21, 2009 12:52 PM
ok so first of all, Miranda Kerr is not 6 years old or 10 years old like some of you seem to believe, so it's ok for men to like her if they want to, quit freaking out. Second, they are not too skinny, it's called being hot, more ppl should try it. And for the record, i'm a girl. I agree with #28, fat has become the norm, and what was normal weight is now considered super skinny.
42. kitty_kat - November 21, 2009 12:52 PM
You guys that are attacking people for saying these women are too skinny are crazy. Their bones are literally popping out. How is that healthy? If you put Miranda Kerr on the cover of National Geographic, every one of you would be talking about how horrible the effects of starvation are. I agree with #15. With the possible exception of the redhead, they look like they haven't hit puberty yet.
And I've gotta say that the fact Miranda is a VS model just goes to show you how far the publication has fallen.
43. mehh - November 21, 2009 12:53 PM
I dont find any of them special, and imo only rosie and the last girl are sexy, but theyre not ugly.... just im not a fan of the boyish, modelesque shape
44. Dj - November 21, 2009 12:58 PM
http://thesuperficial.com/2009/08/miranda_kerrs_camel_toe_and_ot.php
this pic alone should shut everyone up - hot. Anyway that says different needs their freakin head examined...
45. zulu - November 21, 2009 1:13 PM
Ok.. There are people who are naturally skinny. I'm 5 ft tall and weigh 80 pounds. I eat cheeseburgers, fries, chinese food, and I love brownies! I just can't get fat.
Also, a body that is considered "average" in the US is actually "obese" in many other countries.
Haha fat people can talk about skinny people all day but skinny people can't talk about fatties. It's just mean.
46. saywha? - November 21, 2009 1:14 PM
anyone who thinks miranda kerr isn't hot has been looking at too much porn and has forgotten what real women look like. sorry folks, not every chick has dd's.
47. lisa - November 21, 2009 1:26 PM
wow, lovin' the lily cole pic #3
48. jamillah - November 21, 2009 1:28 PM
Whoever thinks these girls are in shape is delusional -- these girls have outright muscle wastage! If they in fact worked out, they'd have more muscular legs and asses worth looking at. At the moment, they appear skinny-fat and sickly -- not fit or in shape.
49. ChEF - November 21, 2009 1:38 PM
who's the redhead?
50. Hungry - November 21, 2009 2:09 PM
These women really do look nasty...I mean I am looking at them and suddenly feel the need for a 5 course meal, and I just ate not to long ago and was not hungry at all before this. Seeing these types of women will make our obesity problem worse.
51. Betsy - November 21, 2009 2:26 PM
Miranda Kerr looks like a regular effin' Huckleberry Finn. What a waif.
52. Jibbly Biggins - November 21, 2009 2:30 PM
Lily Cole looks lovely (especially in the chest - she appears healthy as well) but a few of the others have the legs of someone in a concentration camp (cough, cough - Kerr). Starvation isn't sexy.
It's kind of disturbing....like a 30-year-old woman trying to look like a 10-year-old girl.
53. wosh - November 21, 2009 2:33 PM
the fact that being overweight has become normal does not make being underweight any healthier. according to mirandas bmi she is severely underweight which is why she looks like she hasn't finished going through puberty.
54. saywha - November 21, 2009 2:33 PM
I'm not bothered as much with the praying mantis chicks - much more so with the pervy male crew that seems to be surrounding them. Ugh.
55. Duke Nukem - November 21, 2009 2:36 PM
40 years ago no one would say these people are 'too skinny' or 'starved'. It's only because the average girl is fat that we now think of these tall, thin body types as 'too skinny.' And obviously, most guys would be more than happy to drill any/all of these models.
56. Smarm - November 21, 2009 2:39 PM
@48- Shut the fuck up already- stop trying to sound all edumucated and stuff....muscle wastage? You're out of your fucking gord. And since 80% of those posting find them attractive, I guess how YOU think they appear means jack shit, eh? Like I said - its one thing to say its not your thing.....its another to talk as if you're a certified medical professional and start throwing out jargon like 'muscle wastage'..if you knew in fact what it was, you'd know that insinuating that they're suffering from it is just plain silly....so they arent as fat as you'd like and lack what you consider acceptable muscle mass? too fucking bad- until they appoint you their personal physician, your ridiculous prognosis means shit..it does, however, make it painfully apparent of how jealous your fat ghetto ass is. I'm sure they're far healthier than you- and fat doesnt = healthy no matter how you slice it.
@50- You're an idiot.
And you fucks wonder why our country is so god damn fat, because sorry bastards like you think anyone whose under a buck eighty is 'waif like' and 'too skinny'....just because they have a different body type and metabolism than you do, doesnt make them unhealthy.
Have a great day, fatties!
57. um - November 21, 2009 2:59 PM
They are not too skinny. They're practically perfect, but I hate these pictures. I'm all for sexy or freaky sexy or disturbing or interesting pictures, but these are just tasteless and incomprehensible.
Well I actually think Daisy Lowe is kind of goofy looking, but that's a matter of opinion.
58. RtSS - November 21, 2009 3:21 PM
These chicks have nice tight little pussies. That is natural, and that is how it's meant to be. Tight is good. Loose and sloppy is not so good, but still doable.
59. RtSS - November 21, 2009 3:30 PM
Oh, yes... @40 - Please keep in mind, the website you are on is www.thesuperficial.com and not, let's all be indepth, intelligent beings that treat everyone in an educated, fair, decent fashion considering the the health and well being of the entire universe as we know it. www.thesuperficial.com
60. Hungry - November 21, 2009 3:36 PM
I am so upset that someone on here thinks I am an idiot for sharing my opinion.
61. Bigger is Better - November 21, 2009 3:40 PM
I strongly agree with hungry..these types of "girls" make our obesity problem worse...please show healthy models!!!
62. Cinnie - November 21, 2009 3:45 PM
Haha gross skinny legs and a face only a skinner could love.
63. MissZ - November 21, 2009 3:48 PM
Miranda Kerr's picture made me feel like I was looking at kiddie porn. Not attractive. Not cool.
64. becca - November 21, 2009 3:49 PM
looks like kiddie porn to me. sad. so so sad.
65. MissZ - November 21, 2009 3:54 PM
Also, I agree with 42 about the VS catalog. What happened to the shapely models they had like Tyra Banks and Heidi Klum? Miranda Kerr can't hold a candle to Heidi Klum. Heidi Klum is thin, yes. But she looks healthy and like a real woman. The models they use nowadays look too much like boys than real women with beautiful curves. But I guess nothing sells thongs and panties like a 12 year old boy's ass, huh?
66. Jessie - November 21, 2009 4:22 PM
They all look far too young and far too thin. Ultimately, these pictures are unsettling and creepy.
67. phil - November 21, 2009 4:29 PM
What a bunch of chubsters.
68. Heidi - November 21, 2009 5:17 PM
Guys they are too thin. Not everyone on this board is a fat hater to say that. There's being skinny naturally and being forced skinny like these chicks and it's like find a medium between it. This calendar sucks. First thing I stare at is the twig legs. Jennifer Lopez used to do Pirelli, what happened. It's not like models should be plus size, size 0 is ok, it's like eat 500 calories sometimes. Food is good! I agree with you VS needs its old women back pronto to replace these bone hangers.
69. Sally - November 21, 2009 5:36 PM
@56 - you're a giant twat so shut up. What people are saying here is that these girls are only super-hot in one context: the catwalk. Their limbs are really long and they seem stretched out and because they have such low body-fat they have got no ass (except for Kroes) and no streamlined curves like the models used to have (think Cindy Crawford, Elle McPherson). Truth is they would not be saught after to pose in men's magazines merely for their twig-like bodies, and it is true, they look like children.
And to those saying that becuase of obesity we have forgotten what normal looks like, blah blah, I would just say that it is always easier to be thin than it is to be fit & healthy. Thin is easy - you don't eat. Fit means that you actually have to work out, all the time. There's a difference and FIT is always hotter than thin.
70. Willie Dixon - November 21, 2009 6:12 PM
I can't get around the fact these chicks look like they're all 12 years old...I couldn't get past the first few. Just really uncomfortable. Wonder how old the people are who say they'd do them.
Anyway, I'm going back to the lingerie picts of Keely Hazell and Victoria's secret. At least they aren't jail bait like Miley Cyrus or these grade schoolers.
71. Buddha - November 21, 2009 6:41 PM
I don't know, dude...they kind-of suck : (
There are prettier chicks out there with more curves..like the old Victoria's secret in the 1990's..Laetitia Casta, Daniella, much more..
They had bodies!
JMO
72. Jamillah - November 21, 2009 6:42 PM
@ Smarm/#56:
Just because a term like "muscle wastage" is outside of your clearly limited lexicon doesn't mean these girls don't have it. They are clearly underweight -- if you would like to refute that, please feel free to dispute it with facts. For now, however, medical science indicates that for their height, they are underweight -- and no, 80% of the people on this site do NOT find them attractive. Re-read the posts.
Finally, not liking underweight women in no way implies that I'm fat -- it merely suggests I might like the healthier, more curvaceous models of yesteryear. I think we can all agree that Cindy Crawford, Stephanie Seymour, Tyra Banks, etc. had beautiful bodies. These malnourished girls don't. Go to your local gym and I'm certain you'll see plenty of women with far more attractive bodies.
73. Jamillah - November 21, 2009 6:47 PM
@ Smarm/#56:
One last thing -- Here's an example of a girl who clearly works-out and has a sculpted, sexy physique. Her legs, abs and glutes all are well-developed and have beautiful musculature, but she is not so ripped as to look unfeminine:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jrh4QBq_WEk
THIS is what many people point to when we say the girls above look unhealthy and need to eat/exercise more.
74. Jibbly Biggins - November 21, 2009 7:25 PM
73 - your youtube model puts all of the Victoria's Secret women to shame. Oh my god, it's glorious.
She is fit, slender, appears healthy and she has not been morphed into a little kid by some overzealous diet.
75. ollie - November 21, 2009 7:41 PM
Girl no 1 ain't Miranda Kerr (she's too big time to do crappy little tyre calender). What's boring is they are all trying to find the next Miranda rather than a new hottie. Variety people.
76. Pet Society Help - November 21, 2009 9:23 PM
These girls need to smile and relax.
77. Michael - November 21, 2009 10:16 PM
Now we are talking!
admin
http://invetrics.com
78. Oud - November 21, 2009 10:22 PM
If I'm not mistaken, the photographer is Larry Clark who was the director for movies like KIDS, Bully, Kent Park. This is the style of his photography.
79. Fas(c)h(ion)ist(a) - November 21, 2009 11:29 PM
Wow. Incredibly ugly, underweight with the body of a 13 year old boy.
So NOTE hot.
I think my dick just crawled back up into my abdomen.
80. Fas(c)h(ion)ist(a) - November 21, 2009 11:29 PM
Wow. All of them are incredibly ugly, underweight with the body of a 13 year old boy.
So NOT hot.
I think my dick just crawled back up into my abdomen.
81. Nadia - November 21, 2009 11:34 PM
i think its hilarious how the majority of the folks here are critiquing these girls are women, whereas the dudes think they're hot. These are gorgeous girls, with a unique look, the type that you can spot from a crowd of average looking chicks, and yeah they're skinny but that doesn't make em any less hot. It's nice to see a change from thunder thighs and saggy tits.
82. Zoey - November 22, 2009 12:33 AM
Modeling agencies love their alien heads with body bodies...far out.
83. Trev - November 22, 2009 12:35 AM
Modeling agencies love their alien headed coke whores with boy bodies...
84. skinny minis 2 cents worth - November 22, 2009 1:38 AM
To all these people who state the "fact" that these girls are medically severely underweight, where are you getting your "data" from?
I'm 52kg and average height, yup pretty dam skinny, much like these girls. I have had my BMI etc tested lots of times during my life and doctors tell me I'm healthy, and I fit into the range of what is considered normal, (albeit near the bottom).
I'm sick of being made to pay for the fact the the population is getting unhealthily big and feels bad about it. Just say it like it is, it's a preference issue, so you like bigger women? Good for you but it doesn't make any of these girls above unhealthy. You have to be a lot thinner before you hit anorexic proportions.
I love my body and I'm not going to apologize for it
PS Miranda Kerr is f**kin hot and you know it, she just looks a bit young in that picture because of her styling.
85. ANGRY - November 22, 2009 1:45 AM
NO THESE WOMEN ARE NOT WOMEN AT ALL
86. Joseph - November 22, 2009 1:48 AM
No one cares what a skinny mini has to say..go eat whore!!
87. kitty_kat - November 22, 2009 1:58 AM
@81 - How can you even tell whether it's men or women making the comments? You can't. So your "observation" is nonsensical.
88. skinny minis 2 cents worth - November 22, 2009 2:34 AM
update
*Skinny mini currently eating a pie and having sex*
Thanks for the suggestion this is great
89. skinny minis 2 cents worth - November 22, 2009 2:36 AM
update
*Skinny mini currently eating a pie and having sex*
Thanks for the suggestion this is great,
90. Pie Eating Sex Freak - November 22, 2009 2:47 AM
ummm...that's nice Skinny Mini I am doing the same thing
91. Gadget Sleuth - November 22, 2009 2:49 AM
Agreed with a number here: too young, uncomfortable with themselves and just plain too wire thin to be sexy in any real way. Yuck.
92. RtSS - November 22, 2009 2:54 AM
Once I got done with the model that has 10 on her panties, her panties would be looking more like 1.0
93. puma shoes - November 22, 2009 4:08 AM
puma shoes online store - Top brand name shoes, enjoy discount price and the best service at http://www.pumaforever.com
94. Ryan the Canadian - November 22, 2009 4:42 AM
That Sloth is interesting.
95. Ryan the Canadian - November 22, 2009 4:48 AM
@ 56 - you're yelling at 15 year olds.....
96. indoChick - November 22, 2009 5:45 AM
I love her, she is cute like teen
97. ghazan - November 22, 2009 8:06 AM
acai force max
98. ghazan - November 22, 2009 8:10 AM
(including http://acaiforcemax.biz
99. Chryztianna - November 22, 2009 8:24 AM
“Cleanse ProX Review” – CleanseproX is proven to help you boost your metabolism and stimulate your bodies’ fat burning process. Cleansepro X contains Green Tea and EGCG which assist the body to burn fat. This blend is full of Antioxidants and combats the breakdown of cells which can lead to free radicals in the body. CleanseProX also contains advanced Pro-Biotics which then creates an inhospitable environment for harmful bacteria, parasites, and worms. Diseases have taken more humans than all of the wars in our history, and with reports of widespread diseases across the globe, your body may be home to ravenous creatures that feed on flesh.
100. Chryztianna - November 22, 2009 8:28 AM
cleanse prox
101. sexchill - November 22, 2009 9:38 AM
Is it really? I never heard of that! Frustrated by being still single and not finding your Mr. Right? I know a hot and interesting place for wealthy people and their admirers named Billionairepal.com where I have met my boyfriend. You may take a look.
102. Smarm - November 22, 2009 10:28 AM
: 79. Fas(c)h(ion)ist(a) - November 21, 2009 11:29 PM
Wow. Incredibly ugly, underweight with the body of a 13 year old boy.
So NOTE hot.
I think my dick just crawled back up into my abdomen."
Well that shouldnt have taken long.
And stfu, already....these chics are far beautiful than anything you'll ever get within ten miles of, and just because theyre too skinny for your fatfuck taste, doesnt mean they're anywhere near disgusting. Fucktard.
103. hahaha - November 22, 2009 11:06 AM
I don't think any of these girls are too skinny, they really just look normal skinny to me (maybe I didn't look hard enough...). But maybe they should eat some more calories to grow some normal breasts. Isn't that what you guys want to see?
And none of these pictures are good- either that or all these girls are ugly
@40. Agreed. Maybe some women are just 'jealous' and being mean because they are fat and ugly, but the rest of us really just notice all the details more.
104. henry - November 22, 2009 11:10 AM
You guys saying they look too young are crazy. I live in asia and the 25 year old women here look younger than most of those girls photographed. Some people just naturally look younger. And by the way, most of the asian women are naturally as thin as these models too, and they eat enough. You Americans pig out too much on junk food, and smoke and drink too much, of course your women look older and fatter.
105. henry - November 22, 2009 11:15 AM
You guys saying these girls look too young are crazy. I live in Asia and most of the 25 year old women here look younger than these models. Some women just naturally look younger. Oh and by the way, most of the women here are as slim as these models and they eat enough. Your American women pig out too much, and smoke and drink too much, so of course they look fatter and older.
106. hahaha - November 22, 2009 11:19 AM
@ 104. WTF? Who says they live in "Asia?" Asians look younger because they never grow anything... boobs or butts. They look like kids until they are 25 and then when they hit 30 they look about 60. asian women age terribly!
107. Rough don't dance - November 22, 2009 12:21 PM
Let me put the end to this nonsensical musical chair, thats going on here...
http://www.uniquesexygirls.net/sexybones.html
you spot the difference...
108. Charlie - November 22, 2009 12:41 PM
I looked at your web site rough, they don't look much different to me, and the photos that were placed on here were photo shopped.
109. farty mcshitface - November 22, 2009 12:50 PM
these broads are gross. anorexic is not hot. they have no muscle tone on their emaciated little frames. i'd take a babe like a college cheerleader over ANY of these things ANY time. college cheerleaders have the best bodies on a consistant basis. for you losers out there who try to rip on the critics like me i don't like fat women but would rather she have a little softness over skin and bones. those of you out there who think these braods are hot are probably fapping their 2-inchers to these chicks and sniffing their grannies crusty panties too.
these broads get an F for epic FAIL.
that's it, the debate is over and i have won!!
110. ME - November 22, 2009 1:10 PM
thank you farty mcshitface I think you are my idol!!
111. wanks - November 22, 2009 1:59 PM
@106 are you crazy? white women by far age faster than oriental women dumbass!
112. His Huge Greatness Himself - November 22, 2009 3:51 PM
Why are these creatures skinny like hell?!
113. Soft on - November 22, 2009 3:53 PM
these girls look really weird.
114. Darth - November 22, 2009 3:57 PM
Shouldn't Orlando Bloom get his eyebrows a wax job in pic 7?!
115. Boogeyman King Dong - November 22, 2009 4:00 PM
#114
Da girl isn't Miranda Kerr.
116. Darth - November 22, 2009 4:03 PM
Starved people are all look-a-likes.Never noticed?!
117. Meh - November 22, 2009 4:31 PM
Yeah...I might have found them pretty in junior high. They don't do anything for me now. I'm gonna go look at pics of Laetitia Casta.
118. Stephanie - November 22, 2009 5:34 PM
Miranda Kerr actually DOES have a nice face in her UN touched up photos such as signings..I think they go overboard with the airbrushing, making them look too young, too smooth, and too thin.
119. Eun Young Tao Fuk Wang - November 22, 2009 5:42 PM
foto has skinny girls, look like me cousin before migration to USA
~Eun Young Tao Fuk Wang
120. photographer - November 22, 2009 5:48 PM
the background in the 1st picture looks really nice! that is it, everything else about these photos were not done too well. I am surprised because he is a real professional and usually does a great job. Maybe the models he was working with this time around weren't the greatest.
121. wow - November 22, 2009 7:20 PM
Miranda Kerr is fugggglyyyy. How is she a model??
122. bondage - November 22, 2009 8:00 PM
topless chicks make the baby jesus happy! and we all want the baby jesus to be happy.. right? more topless chicks please.
and what is with the artistic critique of these pictures? they are topless chicks!
123. ek - November 22, 2009 8:11 PM
Wow, Miranda Kerr's legs are looking a little Auschwitz-y. Yuck.
124. Mama Pinkus - November 22, 2009 8:19 PM
I don't know who these gals are but they have homely faces - and that first one looks like a walking stick
125. nikky - November 22, 2009 9:30 PM
holy shit,
that woman has the face of a 6 yr old
kinda feel like a pedophile looking at that main pic
126. buy cheap puma shoes on puma store - November 22, 2009 9:35 PM
It was a very nice idea!I would like to be the supporter of yours. Thank you for sharing such a nice article.
127. Dannii7 - November 22, 2009 9:40 PM
I do have to wonder if it is the intention here to make these people appear like starving 1 year old refugees. Wow. This could be a poster for reasons not to get in to the business.
128. Dannii7 - November 22, 2009 9:40 PM
I do have to wonder if it is the intention here to make these people appear like starving 13 year old refugees. Wow. This could be a poster for reasons not to get in to the business.
129. Fas(c)h(ion)ist(a) - November 22, 2009 10:12 PM
@smarm:
Since I lay actual women, not bony ugly clotheshangers (who look better with the clothes on, although still not attractive), I will fart in your general direction.
And while it took only a few moments to crawl up, getting the 9 inches back out of my abdomen is more fun, and for my ladies to do.
130. wii accessories - November 22, 2009 10:50 PM
She's not "shockingly thin". She's in shape and that's the type of body which i want for a woman. Leave it up to the fat asses to go on a rampage because a woman actually cares about her looks.
131. MsM - November 23, 2009 2:33 AM
As a female who has never been over weight (always within a medically recommended range for my size) I have to say that the thighs in these pics do confuse me a little but I do have a butt and thighs that guys after petite girls don't really go for.
I agree that it's not right to condemn these girls for how they look. There are many girls who are just naturally that shape. This only becomes an issue when other girls start to believe that they can't be beautiful in all shapes and sizes.
Let's not do a 180 degree turn and start abusing thin people. Everyone has their own tastes, and it's a good thing too, because everyone is a different shape. Lets all try to respect one another.
132. Oh shit!! that's my daughter!! - November 23, 2009 2:38 AM
Gavin Rossdale must be proud. Somebody needs to drive miss daisy to get a shirt.
133. Sickitten - November 23, 2009 3:33 AM
the one with the Sloth is ugly. Too weird looking to be posing for any pictures besides her own personal shots
134. Meh - November 23, 2009 5:11 AM
Lily Cole (the redhead) is just as thin as the rest of the models. Everyone saying that she looks healthier because her boobs are bigger needs to realize that fat distribution is different on everyone. Even if Miranda Kerr ate a cheeseburger, she wouldn't magically sprout bigger boobs. If she gained weight, it would be all over, and the breasts would stay the same proportion. And Lily Cole having bigger boobs doesn't mean she has a healthier appetite or takes better care of herself.
135. UGG Classic Cardy Boots - November 23, 2009 6:12 AM
Boots
136. person - November 23, 2009 7:17 AM
quick someone give her some food! she is sooo thin she looks starved. Very unattractive
good face though
137. ugg boots sale - November 23, 2009 8:23 AM
that fat distribution is different on everyone. Even if Miranda Kerr ate a cheeseburger, she wouldn't magically sprout bigger boobs. If she gained weight, it would be all over, and the breasts would stay the same proportion. And Lily Cole having bigger boobs doesn't mean she has a healthier appetite or takes better care of herself.
138. ugg sale boots - November 23, 2009 8:24 AM
the one with the Sloth is ugly. Too weird looking to be posing for any pictures besides her own personal shots
139. joho777 - November 23, 2009 9:48 AM
These underdeveloped bodies look like 12-year-old methheads, complete with numb blank stares.
Whoeveer put this collection of piglets together has a serious child fetish.
140. OJ's Mom - November 23, 2009 11:00 AM
I love Pic #7 !!!
"SLOTHS!!
SLOTHS!!
SLOTHS!!
SLOTHS!!
SLOTHS!!
We sleep 18 hours, but we always party 24!
Hunt in packs, and we eat algae off our fur!
SLOTHS!!
SLOTHS!!
SLOTHS!!
SLOTHS!!
We got 3 toes, but we'll pound down 3,000 Bud Lights!
Break your nose, and kick your face in a punch fight!
SLOTHS!!
SLOTHS!!
SLOTHS!!
SLOTHS!!
We eat bamboo, but prefer your girls' ***********!
Shank your mom, with a pterodactyl ********* bone!
SLOTHS!!
SLOTHS!!
SLOTHS!!
SLOTHS!!
Hire a dog, to burn down a hospital!
Eat cocaine, off America's gravestone!
SLOTHS!!
SLOTHS!!
SLOTHS!!
SLOTHS!!
Don't call us slow
Don't call us slo-o-o-o-o-o-o-owwwwww!!
Kill all of your friends, and ride their corpses like a carousel!
Put your ****** inside our *****, and kill you if you ever tell!
141. Hei - November 23, 2009 11:24 AM
Should put women in there with more womanly shapes.
142. henry - November 23, 2009 12:02 PM
@106:
Nope Asian women don't suddenly look 60 when they turn 30. They don't 'age terribly' like you said, that's crazy, they always look light years younger than American women their age. Thank you to 111 for spotting that too, I thought everyone knew Asian women look really young. They don't just have youthful thin bodies, but really young-looking faces. I'm white and damn glad I date an Asian chick--she's always getting gawked at and white people ask if she's like 17 even though she's 28. Your average American white woman is a laughingstock in the world, don't you realise that?? Bad genes or bad lifestyle whatever, somehow they look really old and fat in general. And then they hate on the models, who somehow manage to look more normal, more youthful and slim. But even your models can't compare with Asian wome--look at some of the Asian celebrities
white women by far age faster than oriental women dumbass!
143. qjgayv - November 23, 2009 12:38 PM
$30 nike jordan prada timberland supra,lacoste,gucci shoes
$25 CHANEL, GUCCI, LV, COACH, FENDI, BURBERRY, D&G, JUICY, Ed Hardy handbag
$30 coogi jeans,armani,Crow Holder,D&G,Evisu jeans,Diesel,Christian Audigier,Rock,True Religion,Affliction,Ed Hardy,RMC jeans etc
$35 Coogi,Crow Holder,D&G,Evisu,Bape,BBC,Diesel,Christan Audigier,Rock, True Religion, Affliction, Ed Hardy, RMC hoodies
$15 Michael Jackson, Armani t-shirts,Affliction,Coogi,Ed hardy,LRG,Crown older,Evisu,G-star,Polo,Christian Audigier t-shirts
$40 ed hardy ,Coogi ,Christian Audigier ,Gucci Hoodies
Top quality! Free shipping!Free returns!No any extra cost!
Please visit -------------netsowntown.com
144. shudder - November 23, 2009 1:46 PM
the guy in the glasses creeps me out.
145. lana - November 23, 2009 5:21 PM
apparently due to the photoshop, miranda kerr is knee-less.
146. guineapig - November 23, 2009 6:15 PM
MIRANDA KERR LOOKS LIKE DAKOTA FANNING IN THIS PHOTO.
that is all.
147. Philip Pines - November 23, 2009 7:52 PM
Joanna Krupa > than all of these models (including miranda kerr) put together
IMO
No questions asked
148. Philip Pines - November 23, 2009 7:52 PM
Joanna Krupa > than all of these models (including miranda kerr) put together
IMO
No questions asked
149. Philip Pines - November 23, 2009 7:55 PM
sorry for the double post =3
150. Love these models, hate these photos - November 23, 2009 8:20 PM
How dare you call Georgie (the girl with the sloth) ugly? She is completely natural, and her face is pure, high-fashion art. Those heart-shaped, pillowy lips and those boobs are totally natural and wonderful--if anything should convince North American women to lay off the silicon/saline, it should be photos like these. Also, she is far from anorexic. If you think those legs are too skinny, you must be fat. I think these Richardson pics are a little sucky, is all. Here are some better pics below of Georgie and some of the other gals:
http://kbcita.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/calendario-vogue-2009-septiembre-georgina-stojiljkovic.jpg
http://www.imagebam.com/image/c5fdd056825083
151. girlluvr - November 23, 2009 10:51 PM
I'm a woman and I would LOVE to have those legs! 10 miles long and not an ounce of fat! I'm not condoning anorexia if any of them are anorexic, I don't know that. As for them looking young, well, that's just the culture we live in. Youth is considered beautiful. It always has been and always will be. I had my time when I was young. We all do. These girls are just enjoying their moment.
152. UGG Bailey Button boots - November 23, 2009 11:34 PM
UGG Bailey Button boots
153. pete - November 24, 2009 1:25 AM
Can you imagine what a wet sloth smells like?
154. Whoever - November 24, 2009 2:37 AM
This really feels like child porn to me... like really.... not because of her body, but because of her face! She look like she is two! They should have used makeup on her face! I feel like child predators are going to have a ball with this!
155. Captain - November 24, 2009 9:50 AM
Pic #1: first time I've ever seen a skinny chick with cankles.
156. henry - November 24, 2009 10:32 AM
Miranda Kerr doesn't look so young in real life, it's airbrushing and digital-editing. Like someone earlier pointed out, photos taken of her which aren't for publicity, like at signings, show that she looks in her 20s.
But like I said, Asian women her age look younger than she looks in these photographs. When I first moved to Asia for work reasons, I thought all the women looked like teenagers or even kids (by American standards). It's amazing, they look like jailbait but they're legal, FANTASTIC combination!! I think these models may look young to Americans because Americans have warped standards--the women are fat and look older than their age, compared to Europians and esp Asians. My girlfriend's 28, britney's age, and she looks younger than britney did in her baby one more time video
157. henry - November 24, 2009 10:35 AM
To #154:
If this looks like child porn to you, my advice is not to ever go to asia cus you'd get a heart attack
158. female. - November 24, 2009 3:15 PM
Looool omg I thought that was Dakota Fanning on the front photo , I had to look no less than 6 times and still didn't believe it. Okay I am officially freaked out.
159. female. - November 24, 2009 3:16 PM
Looool omg I thought that was Dakota Fanning on the front photo , I had to look no less than 6 times and still didn't believe it. Okay I am officially freaked out.
160. female. - November 24, 2009 3:19 PM
But isn't/wasn't Miranda Kerr hot?? If not then who was it that was dating Orlando Bloom? Because she was hot.
161. lori - November 26, 2009 4:58 AM
This is Terry Richardson's work. it's supposed to be f*cked up, weird, and kinda disturbing. You guys are all idiots, try getting to know alternative culture a bit.
P.S. Half these girls are Victoria Secret Angels .. yah ... those bodacious beauties you pervs all think about when you're fapping off.
162. lori - November 26, 2009 4:59 AM
This is Terry Richardson's work. it's supposed to be f*cked up, weird, and kinda disturbing. You guys are all idiots, try getting to know alternative culture a bit.
P.S. Half these girls are Victoria Secret Angels .. yah ... those bodacious beauties you pervs all think about when you're fapping off.
163. balhder - November 26, 2009 3:59 PM
What the fuck does this have to do with tires? Lowest common denominator much?
164. Jackson Wallace - November 27, 2009 8:09 PM
The problem with fashion directors is they are aging old women who are so obsessed with youth that they think children are sexy, and gay men who don't argue with the battle axes. 999 out of 1000 men with ZERO experience in print media could cast better models and pick better shots for a calendar than this. Utterly pathetic. I'm about ready to go to Pirelli and demand the job for next year or work for someone else. WOW. CRAPOLA.
165. Weeble - November 27, 2009 8:51 PM
Number 7 is an amazingly beautiful girl.
166. fr - November 28, 2009 3:09 AM
The absolute cutest thing about this shoot is the sloth. Only the sloth. The women however... dont give me the urge to want to grab any of their body parts. That would be like grabbing a bunch of twigs off a tree. Where are the women that are Sophia Loren-esque, or the girl from La Dolce Vita?? Those are Pirelli material.
167. göğüs estetiği - November 28, 2009 10:00 AM
I hate red stars..
168. ของใช้โรงแรม - November 28, 2009 11:54 AM
Agree, I also hate red stars.
169. paul smith - November 29, 2009 7:32 PM
well. good .
http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-shoes-c-518.html
170. Hell - November 30, 2009 12:05 PM
Yuck.
VS has gone downhill. They've replaced the Anna Hicks, Tyra Banks, Danielle Pastova? and the curvy swimwuit models with girls who look like Miranda Kerr--wide-set eyes, the bodies of 12yr-old girls--not sexy anymore.
Hey VS, get ready of the skinny, UGLY high fashion girls and bring back the sexy line-up.
171. Hell - November 30, 2009 12:06 PM
Yuck.
VS has gone downhill. They've replaced the Anna Hickmans, Tyra Banks, Danielle Pastova? and the curvy swimwuit models with girls who look like Miranda Kerr--wide-set eyes, the bodies of 12yr-old girls--not sexy anymore.
Hey VS, get ready of the skinny, UGLY high fashion girls and bring back the sexy line-up.
172. Hell - November 30, 2009 12:06 PM
Yuck.
VS has gone downhill. They've replaced the Anna Hickmans, Tyra Banks, Danielle Pastova? and the curvy swimsuit models with girls who look like Miranda Kerr--wide-set eyes, the bodies of 12yr-old girls--not sexy anymore.
Hey VS, get ready of the skinny, UGLY high fashion girls and bring back the sexy line-up.
173. Arnold - December 3, 2009 2:59 PM
Those boobs are so sexy and i could marry her
174. Arnold - December 3, 2009 2:59 PM
Those boobs are so sexy and i could marry her
175. will - December 12, 2009 7:44 AM
Miranda Kerr is amazing! all you people are way to picky! shes cute thin and doesnt have several hundred layers of plastic overt he top! all you people just like milfs with huge breasts and massive asses, well thats not what modelling is about anymore is it? and I'm glad its changed because if all women looked similair to Miranda this world would be heaven!
176. GucciKid - December 12, 2009 6:32 PM
Wow I like it
177. GucciKid - December 12, 2009 6:34 PM
I don't like stars either..
178. GucciKid - December 12, 2009 6:43 PM
anyone have the uncensored version?
179. Donk Donkerson - December 16, 2009 6:47 AM
Miranda Kerr looks hot as hell in these pictures. Tits don't need to be big, just proportionate and free from defects.
@178 egotastic has them. Just look for Miranda Kerr's name down along the right side.
180. IMG Models - January 22, 2010 12:23 AM
Miranda Kerr is represented by IMG Model.
IMG Models on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/IMG-Models/289901810271
Become a fan now!
181. puma shoes women - January 25, 2010 9:50 PM
thank you for share