May 14 2009Shanna Moakler to Miss California: 'Stop lying.'

Instead of letting sleeping fake breasts lie, Shanna Moakler went on the offensive this morning against Carrie Prejean. Shanna called into Ryan Seacrest to explain why she resigned from the Miss California USA organization and stated she has no ill will towards Donald Trump. Via Sawf News:

Moakler says she was in agreement with Donald Trump at the press conference on Tuesday, during which he announced that Prejean would continue as Miss California, but seeing how things were playing out afterwards she decided to quit.
"The turning point for me was watching the Today show," Moakler told Ryan Seacrest during a phone in to his Morning Show on KISS FM on Thursday.
"She [Prejean] was sitting there continuing to lie...it is obvious to everybody that the lying is still going on. I just couldn't stand behind her," Moakler added.

Okay, this situation is getting way out of hand. Fortunately, I've come up with a solution that should satisfy all parties involved. Long, story short: Shanna, Carrie and I have a crazy three-way while Donald Trump cuts me a check for $1 million. Our nation needs to heal, dammit! (I'll be in the hot tub.)

Carrie Prejean on Today 5/13/09:

Photos: Splash News

Related Stories

Previous Articles

Reader Comments

FIRST!

Just shut down the entire pathetic industry, dump all these bimbos and Trump in a rocket and fire it into the sun.

It's called spin control. Seriously, you think Shanna doesn't know about what this is? She has used it herself during her divorce. Remember when she got accused of being an unfit mother who drank and parties all night and slept in until 2pm all day? Didn't she fight it, even though perhaps it was true

Thing is, even if she is lying, what is the harm? Only people that care are those pissed about her same sex marriage comments. In other words, those with an agenda about Carrie and her political leanings. Shanna can suck it. This is America bitch, where even a worthless sack like Ms. Moakler can get a job after a reality show that portrayed her as lazy, a bitch, stupid and boring.

Delgo to Shanna Moakler: Do some tricep pushdowns.

Oh, bitch, please. The photographer snuck up on her and she had NO idea? And a week later we're just now hearing the word "sue" for his publishing them w/o a release? And the wind was blowing SO hard it just blew her clothes off and exposed her breasts - while leaving her hair perfectly coiffed? Riiight. While she looked right into the camera - that she didn't know was there? Bull Fucking Shit. She lies like old people fuck.

Shanna Moakler is a media whore.

Prejean made a comment, and the press followed/attacker her to the point where I have NO idea what the reigning Miss America even looks like.

Shanna Moakler wants a bit of that spotlight, too.

If you're going to quit, then quit. You are a media whore when you call a press conference, and publicize it to the world while doing it.

sounds like someone is jealous

"Just shut down the entire pathetic industry, dump all these bimbos and Trump in a rocket and fire it into the sun."

MJ-

What? And spew all that CO2 into the atmosphere?! Don't you realize you're killing the planet?!
Earth hater!

I continue to anguish over the thought that beauty pageant contestants aren't deeply moral philosophers but, rather, appear to be shallow hedonists. How can this have happened in America?

With that said, CAN WE PLEASE GET THOSE FUCKING PINK STARS OFF OF PREJEAN'S NIPPLES, SO THAT WE CAN FINALLY WHACK-OFF?

If that's not available, a naked picture of Moakler would do. Don't say that I'm not egalitarian...

Hey Michael Jackson,

As long as you tag along, I'm down with that.

Yes on 8.

Shannon, quit taking yourself seriously. Start your own Miss Gay America pageant and you won't have to face these people with opinions contrary to yours. Nothing like an intolerant person who demands tolerance. What a boob!!

...who is this bitch!?

Shannon, quit taking yourself seriously. Start your own Miss Gay America pageant and you won't have to face these people with opinions contrary to yours. Nothing like an intolerant person who demands tolerance. What a boob!!

She is such a f'n idiot.

This PR situation fell into her lap and she's really working it, exactly the way she's supposed to. Excellent job so far.

Just shut the fuck up you worthless nobody whore. Your only goal is trying to snatch a couple seconds of fame for something other than being a groupie or a fucking horrible mother. Pathetic whore is pathetic.

I find it hilarious when anti-gay rights advocates say that pro-gay rights advocates are intolerant when we get upset over their bigoted, third-world views. Hilarious. What's next, we should make inter-racial marriage illegal again?

You have the rights to your retarded opinions, and we have the right to give you shit for being a cunt. Deal with it.

i would bang her

The Superficial Writer's solution is the only way to class up Shanna Moakler, attention whore (or just whore???). I think we should petition the Donald right away. But it needs to be videotaped and posted on YouTube. Don't be selfish, Superficial Writer. You said it is about healing, so we need to watch... over and over, if need be.

@13 Look up "intolerant" before you use it next time.

a: unwilling to grant equal freedom of expression especially in religious matters
b: unwilling to grant or share social, political, or professional rights : bigoted

Yeah, nothing like Prejean (intolerant) demanding that everyone accept what she says because her reason for denying rights to others is a religious one. She gets to say shit, people get to say shit back. What part of that don't you get? She's entitled to her religious viewpoint. No one is making her marry a woman. She's not entitled to anything else. My employer won't let me politic for gay marriage or the libertarian party or pass out religious literature at work, so she's goddamn lucky her douchebag employer (Trump) is letting her work for NOM and keep her title.

You gays have the right to your retarded opinions, and we have the right to vote to restrict marriage to a man and a woman. Deal with it.

Shanna moakler is a nobody piece of white trailer trash-i wish she would STFU. Where did she even come from? Rock of Love, lmao!

She is not my most fave person in the planet but she actually looks nice in these photos.

Je$u$ Chri$t. First we had the repulsive flaming homosexual, and now this 'not very attractive when compared to Miss California' lady. I think I'll go with Prejean, folks. I prefer her to all the above.

She's starting to look kind of rough...

#17 Yeah, because 'tolerance' and 'freedom of speech' to that bunch means you have the right to STFU and agree with them. If you exercise your own rights and oppose them you're "attacking" them. Maliciously. I've heard of lactose-intolerant -- but those guys are tolerance-intolerant.

Mr. Superfish Al:
Give the Miss Cali thing a rest. Why don't you cover how many celebutards have abortions each month. That will get your message board humming, I am quite certain.

Carry on.

#21 You have the right to restrict marriage in your religion (if you have one) to a man and a woman, and a right to your opinion. You don't have the right to vote on restricting anyone else's rights any more than the white south had the right to vote to keep blacks segregated, or keep them from marrying whites. Deal with THAT.

Honestly... Who really cares what some airhead thinks? It's a beauty pageant for Christ sakes! I highly doubt any bimbo who wins the Miss America title is going to do any good for the world and help create world peace. The only Miss America who actually had a career was Vanessa Williams, who ironically was stripped of her title for this same exact reason. She actually seems to have a fully functional brain.

Miss World Ksenia Sukhinova is a whole different ballpark. She's beautiful and extremely intelligent.

I'd suck her tits. Bag the face.

I'd suck her tits. Bag the face.

I'd suck her tits. Bag the face.

I'd suck her tits. Bag the face.

I'd suck her tits. Bag the face.

I'd suck her tits. Bag the face.

I'd suck her tits. Bag the face.

I'd suck her tits. Bag the face.

I'd suck her tits. Bag the face.

I'd suck her tits. Bag the face.

This is Shanna Moakler trying desperately to be relevant.

Stupid whore needs to go back to blowing guys backstage at concerts.

I dont think I've seen a worse liar than Ms. California. We all know Donald trump is trash, Carrie P. fits right in. I bet her gash smells like tuna as well.

I dont think I've seen a worse liar than Ms. California. We all know Donald trump is trash, Carrie P. fits right in. I bet her gash smells like tuna as well.

I dont think I've seen a worse liar than Ms. California. We all know Donald trump is trash, Carrie P. fits right in. I bet her gash smells like tuna as well.

I still haven't seen any topless pics of Carrie Prejean, but I have seen full nudes of Shanna Moakler, who accuses the former of being a lying whore.

Yeah.

Anyway, Superficial Writer, once again, until you can show me Carrie Prejean's nipples, there are no nude, semi-nude or topless pics, which continues to make this a non-story.

So.... who is this old flabby cunt and what is she famous for? She needs to make herself useful and go make some porn.

I just finished watching that video, and it's apparent you just can't argue with The Trump. Go Carrie Prejean and Donald Trump - and *TO HELL WITH THE REST OF YOU*!!! =D I'm confident we won't be seeing that vulgar cock-sucker Perez Hilton on anything Trump related, anytime soon. And congratulations to Miss U.$.A., despite the fact that no one knows her name...

Justifiable; In this case, since Marriage goes and screws with taxes and legal control over other people, property and etc... the people should have the right to vote on any topic that messes with that.

The problem here is that Marriage should be removed from the law all together and commitments should be made in a personal religious or non religious setting.

Marriage as I define it based upon my own religious and spiritual ideas is between a man and a woman... but just because that is the truth that I hold evident, does not mean that we should be integrating that into our lives.

That being said, I want someone that can comment on polygamy. Where does it stop if you claim that marriage is a civil right under the law with special benefits granted to those that enter into this contract? If 10 people all love each other and want to commit there lives to each other, then why can't 10 people claim to be married and have marital rights as they stand today?

Who the fuck is Shanna Milfer and why should anyone care?

Shanna Moakler is the ugliest Playboy model ever.

Gay marriage is nothing more than gays wanting to be princess for a day and lesbians wanting to get in everyone's face. Any gay would alienate those rights in a second for a Madonna ticket and a D&G banana hamock. Any lesbian would alienate those rights for a poetry book deal.

Is this the same Shanna Moakler that got in a drunken fistfight with Paris Hilton at a nightclub? The one that slept all day on her reality show because she was perpetually hung-over? Yeah, she's resigning from Miss USA to set an example for her kids...

Yes on 8. Still.

This has nothing to do with anything, but Moakler has just the prettiest face ever. I love her makeup.

Homosexuality is a filthy, disease-ridden practice explicitly condemned by God.

Can this woman get any more of a whore in front of the media, Miss California said it was her opinion and only hers that it should only be a man or woman , she didn't say everyone should believe in her opinions. When cowboy ass wrangler "Perez Hilton"set that question up he probably new that she was going to say her personal opinion that it would be a man and woman marriage. Just let it be Moakler. Maybe that's why Travis Barker decided to be on that plane when it crashed he new if he had to be married to that lock-jaw woman with chipped teeth from sucking on vibrators , i would have gone down and crashed with the plane too.

Rule for all you kiddies out there: When a liberal tells you they are all for diversity and inclusiveness, just remember: ONLY WHEN YOU AGREE LOCKSTEP WITH THEM.

Otherwise, you're #^&*!).

Take it to heart, you'll thank me later.

#54 No, Bill, you're confused AGAIN. That's YOUR side that demands that. Try and keep up, you'll thank me later.

We're the side that's all for diversity because we don't want you to be denied any rights we have. We're the guys who will defend to the death your right to make an ass of yourself and spew whatever hate-filled sewage your narrow mind can generate. We will not censor you and we will be goddamn inclusive because we won't hunt you down and kill you or demand your pouty whining ass be stripped of the rights you want to deny others because we don't like how you roll. But no power on eath can compell us to agree with you, or thank and bless you for your intolerance, bigotry, ignorance and outright stupidity. And if you think they go hand in hand, you're a fucking infant.

what the hell does a miss california even do?

#47 WTF: I DON'T think married people should get a break on their taxes. Like Mussolini giving benefits to those who had more than 7 kids because it built a better fascist state, it discriminates. You're basically being rewarded by the gov't for finding someone you can stand to live with. The only time this could ever be fair is if the person you're married to is Kate Gosselin.

If you think the gov't shouldn't be licensing marriage, guns, drivers, collect fees and give tax breaks - by all means try to put a measure on the ballot . But there's a big difference between that and arguing that only straight people can marry, only white people should have guns, only Christians should get tax breaks, and only men should be able to vote. Any measure that denies civil rights to any group you don't like is unconstitutional, it violates the 14th Amendment . The electorate doesn't get to vote on how to interpret the law - the courts rule on that.

Our democracy works through social contract. We agree to be governed by a central authority - that consent is what gives the government its authority; we benefit by having social order, That's why civil law, whether you like it or not, takes precedence over your right to a religious belief when those beliefs infringe on the civil rights of others. Your beliefs may tell you it's OK to marry a child of 10, that you must mutilate your daughter's genitals to make her a good Muslim wife, or that your child is possessed by a demon and you need to cut his stomach open with a sacred knife to cure him. But your right to religious freedom has limits - the government will still arrest and try you in civil court for child molestation, assault on a minor, child endagerment, and murder.

You define marriage as strictly a spiritual or religious thing. Fine - the gov't isn't telling you who, or how, to marry when it comes to your religion. But it won't recognize your religious ceremony without a license because anything that changes your status in this country is a LEGAL or civil matter first.

BTW, there's nothing "self-evident" about a religious belief. The philosophical truth that Jefferson deemed "self-evident" is that as humans, we're all entitled under natural law to the same rights. I don't get more rights than you if I'm smarter, you don't get more than me if you're stronger. Jack doesn't get any more because he's male, Nancy doesn't get any more if she's a Christian, and Stan doesn't get any less because he's gay. Oh, wait...shit,. Sorry, Stan. Nancy, Jack and WTF there say you can't have the same rights they get to have because they disapprove of the gender of the person you love and want to marry. Welcome to your status as a second class citizen, Stan. And sorry, you still have to pay the same taxes as Nancy, Jack and WTF even though you have less rights than they do.

Polygamy? Our civil marriage contracts are between two people, not more, because of western tradition. Some claim it's strictly due to Biblical tenets and that's why it shouldn't be extended to gay people. But OT kings and patriarchs had multiple wives, and in the NT Paul demands only church leaders have one wife. In Christ's time Rome controlled the western world and their laws allowed one wife. Judeans were allowed to adhere to their religious beliefs, so Herod kept his wives, but if you were a Roman citizen like Paul, you followed civil law. What Byzantine and medieval Europe added to that code, claiming as Biblical doctrine centuries afterwards, was also an extreme religious reaction to what Muslims embraced - and that meant leaving multiple wives to the heathen Turks and feeling righteous about monogamous unions, claiming NT scripture decreed it.

There isn't any real reason prohibiting multiple marriages - but our civil contracts and legal system aren't set up that way. You could claim a second or third spouse can't have the same status or rights as the first, that it encourages abuses and fraud, and makes divorce with multiple community properties a legal nightmare. But it's an entirely different argument than gay marriage - they're prohibited from having the civil right that exists between two people NOW.

Now you do it again, shanna!!

miss california


nice


want some more nice

click name

It's rare beauty and politics go together.People are always getting angry when they hear something they don't like to hear.They're denying other opinions.What makes them no better or worse than others.Or maybe it's worse because they suppose to know.Let the one who never lied before cast the first stone!

Damn on the things!


World to Shanna Moakler: 'Stay away from cameras.'

Whats the point of the questions section in a beauty contest anyway? So they can pretend its not about how hot they look in a bikini and nothing else?
Usually if they can speak a couple of sentences without mangling their words they get 7/10 and then they move on. Does anyone remember any of the questions or answers of any of the other contestants - they mean nothing unless they stuff up in some way like the one that messed up on her geography a coupe of years ago

"Gay marriage is nothing more than gays wanting to be princess for a day and lesbians wanting to get in everyone's face."

Princess for a day? That's the funniest thing I've read in this thread. =D And Carrie Prejean is fucking hot - *NOTHING* arouses me more than powerful women.

This Shanna chick is way too much...media whore..yep.....hypocrite...you bet......I couldn't care less one way or the other about the Miss California "situation", but Shanna Moakler is using it to try desperately to maintain some kind of relevance and convince us she actually has morals...
after her past exploits, it's a little late don't you think?.....

Feeling desperate for attention since your ridiculous so-called husband, once covered with ridiculous tattoos, is now covered with yummy scar tissue?
Miss Prejean has more class than you ever will, you pathetic attention whore.

Go back to oblivion now, dingbat.

To Kodos aka # 66 what does her ex being badly burned have to do with Moakler's politics? I hope you are or NE 1 you love are not in a disfiguring accident or mishap. Maybe you could using avoid a stove, planes, cars or wistfully walking down the street, or even having kids since life is like russian rollette. And its people like you that are the moral compass of the world?

Post a Comment

Please keep your comments relevant to the post. Inappropriate or promotional comments may be removed. Email addresses are required to confirm comments but will never be displayed. To create a link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments.