May 14 2009Natalie Portman's underwear
Here's Natalie Portman on the set of her new film Hesher, and yes, that's her underwear. Not exactly the prettiest of settings, but beggars can't be choosers. In the meantime, why do her legs always look like she just kickboxed Dolph Lundgren for 24 hours straight? They were the same way in Hotel Chevalier. Does she fight crime at night or something? I mean, besides in my head while wearing a Wonder Woman costume. That's invisible.

Reader Comments
1. LPB - May 14, 2009 11:36 AM
Her legs look that way because her boyfriend keeps dropping her on the ground.
2. GoGoGo - May 14, 2009 11:37 AM
This reminds me of Easter.
3. Reality check - May 14, 2009 11:39 AM
She is so damn overrated, i never thought this chick was hot. Ugly legs too.
She bores me.
4. lulwut - May 14, 2009 11:40 AM
Why is she wearing two pairs of underwear?
5. ROUGH--likes em natural - May 14, 2009 11:45 AM
Is this for the professional part 2? that was sickening hot!
6. dude - May 14, 2009 11:46 AM
I think it's nice that Portman reminds us the glam is an illusion. She looks like any ordinary girl here.
7. iddoher - May 14, 2009 11:49 AM
man, what a porker. she should lose some weight.
8. Max Planck - May 14, 2009 11:51 AM
Oy! Like this a nice Jewish girl should behave?
9. Salty Bob - May 14, 2009 11:51 AM
Granny pants!
10. cathy smith - May 14, 2009 11:52 AM
She is a se-xy girl
Recently I found a hot club
-- S e e k I n g t a l l. C o M --
Where U can find tall se-xy girls and hamdsome guys.I’m sure your love is there.
11. RichPort's Ghost - May 14, 2009 11:52 AM
From the back or the front, she doesn't look too different.
12. titsonsnack - May 14, 2009 11:53 AM
Weird underwear. Is her boyfriend a sixteen year old gnomeÉ
I can`t make a question mark on my keyboard this morning for some reason, they just come out like this É
deal with it.
13. guyacrossthepond - May 14, 2009 11:58 AM
better underwear shot of hers in V for Vendetta - thong
14. lizzy - May 14, 2009 12:08 PM
#3 -- yes you're so right!!!!
she's wearing spanx over her underwear, fyi. you can see her undwear underneath them.
15. mikeock - May 14, 2009 12:10 PM
"I did it for.....Matilda!"
16. Simon Barsinister - May 14, 2009 12:12 PM
What the hell is the little hand reaching up in picture #6?
Are they stepping on a midget or a baby?
17. Zanna - May 14, 2009 12:14 PM
Is this movie about retards because she's dressed like one and he looks like one. And there is a hand reaching up from the ground in the 6th picture.
18. Zanna - May 14, 2009 12:15 PM
@16- maybe it's a zombie 'tard.
19. Valerie - May 14, 2009 12:35 PM
15--I loved that movie! :D
20. chupacabra - May 14, 2009 12:37 PM
just remember: she was fucking devendra bernhardt.
http://www.devendrabanhart.com/
21. ohmy - May 14, 2009 12:39 PM
you people cant be this ignorant....those are light pink bike shorts over her underwear. she obviously wore them for the scene since her dress was going to ride up....sheeeesh
22. lulu - May 14, 2009 12:48 PM
since she started fuckin sean penn i lost all respect for her
23. mishi - May 14, 2009 12:59 PM
I live in new york city where this one lives and everyone knows this chick is a total ho-bag. she goes out at night and it ain't hard to get her to go home with you. i don't know why everyone thinks she is so fantastic. as long as he bumped into her out and about, any guy could bang her if he wanted to. i know plenty of guys who already have. bring condoms!
24. just some New Yorker - May 14, 2009 1:05 PM
i don't understand why some people are obsessed with this chick. she is ordinary at best.
I actually saw her at a cafe in NYC with her family. I passed by her and guess what: she is a midget 5'2''-5'4'' max. she looked just like any other girl on the street, even worse actually. if she wasn't famous nobody would bother to look at her, let alone stick their wieners in her
25. pockrocks - May 14, 2009 1:14 PM
wow, can't believe some people so angry over panties.
26. scatterflake - May 14, 2009 1:17 PM
Oh my you people are cruel. She looks like any girl you went to school with, pretty but normal. We don't all dress like Paris Hilton 24-7! Be comfy, Natalie. My legs have bruises on them too, guess why? LIFE! I garden, I play, I work. Maybe she does too. Normal stuff. I think she's lovely. And I don't car if she's got Spanx on over her undies, so what? Probably everyone in film wears them.
27. hell yeh - May 14, 2009 1:18 PM
23 & 24 -- you're both amazing and speak the truth!!!
28. chango666 - May 14, 2009 1:27 PM
With a spoon I would eat that . . .
29. mamamiasweetpeaches - May 14, 2009 1:31 PM
"Dolph Lundregn"????
Where ?? Where????
More pee pee shots, please!
* Two pairs of underwear WHY???
30. blah - May 14, 2009 1:37 PM
two pair so her butt cheeks dont hang out. cant blame her for being discreet
31. hershlag - May 14, 2009 1:56 PM
love her nailpolish!
those shoes with that outfit is terrible... she looks cute though in the last picture.
but behind all the fame, we know she's just an average long island jew.
32. Just Damn - May 14, 2009 2:00 PM
Eww.
Granny panties.
33. gotmilk? - May 14, 2009 2:03 PM
spanx, seriously? i don't think so. those are more along the lines of bloomers, like cheerleaders wear.
34. Vince Lombardi - May 14, 2009 2:05 PM
Anyone who's ever given a horsey-back ride to knows you have to reach back and grab the girl's ass and hoist her up higher -- which is why I'm guessing the second wave of hosiery is present. Clearly pussy-boy there has technique issues, which explains the MMA marks all over her legs. Poor Nat needs a crash helmet at this rate.
As for her height being 5-02 to 5-04, that is a normal chick. And given some of the midget leading men in Hollyweird, she's actually tall for a female actor.
35. megan - May 14, 2009 2:07 PM
ouuu. kudos, superficial writer, for sneakily letting us know you watch cool movies. i preferred her legs in Mars Attacks!, but that's just me.
36. megan - May 14, 2009 2:07 PM
ouuu. kudos, superficial writer, for sneakily letting us know you watch cool movies. i preferred her legs in Mars Attacks!, but that's just me.
37. megan - May 14, 2009 2:08 PM
ouuu. kudos, superficial writer, for sneakily letting us know you watch cool movies. i preferred her legs in Mars Attacks!, but that's just me.
38. megan - May 14, 2009 2:08 PM
ouuu. kudos, superficial writer, for sneakily letting us know you watch cool movies. i preferred her legs in Mars Attacks!, but that's just me.
39. megan - May 14, 2009 2:08 PM
ouuu. kudos, superficial writer, for sneakily letting us know you watch cool movies. i preferred her legs in Mars Attacks!, but that's just me.
40. megan - May 14, 2009 2:08 PM
ouuu. kudos, superficial writer, for sneakily letting us know you watch cool movies. i preferred her legs in Mars Attacks!, but that's just me.
41. megan - May 14, 2009 2:08 PM
ouuu. kudos, superficial writer, for sneakily letting us know you watch cool movies. i preferred her legs in Mars Attacks!, but that's just me.
42. megan - May 14, 2009 2:08 PM
ouuu. kudos, superficial writer, for sneakily letting us know you watch cool movies. i preferred her legs in Mars Attacks!, but that's just me.
43. megan - May 14, 2009 2:13 PM
i did not mean to post a million times, sorry superficial!!
44. Jay - May 14, 2009 2:21 PM
Totally bizarre. From IMDB, "Hesher" is the story of a family struggling to deal with a loss (the mom) and the anarchist (Hesher) who helps them do it. Portman plays a friend of the son. I wish she'd do another Pirates or maybe a spy thriller.
45. sonny - May 14, 2009 5:13 PM
I would eat her poo. such a hot jewess.
46. bah, i hate you all - May 14, 2009 5:36 PM
i don't know why you guys think you're so cool talking crap.
I'm guessing you aren't aware that on a film shoot, even the underwear is chosen by the COSTUME DESIGNER. she's wearing two pairs because one are tights cut like biker shorts, as you can see the sheer fabric, and the little roses on it, its part of her outfit for her character... so obviously they're not hers.
47. spinal - May 14, 2009 5:37 PM
I think her legs look pale, skinny and bruised because of her veganism - iron deficiency anemia is common with that sort of diet.
And I always thought she was a ho-bag. Sean Penn is just one in a string of dirty, STD-ridden dudes she has 'dated' (remember the pube guy?) Still love her in "Leon" though.
48. Danny - May 14, 2009 7:09 PM
Are they acting there? Is that what that is? If so, she should get an award for her portrayal of Lisa Loopner.
49. kisjijoe - May 14, 2009 9:31 PM
so fukin ugly
50. War Horse - May 14, 2009 10:03 PM
Forget Natalie, check out the yellow Stang in the background. Man, that thing looks mint from 1992!
51. The Laughing G-D - May 14, 2009 11:43 PM
They got this all wrong, the male is suppose to be the one mounting the female, dragging her to the ground.
52. Spooge - May 14, 2009 11:48 PM
What the hell are spanx? Her underwear is beneath some sort of nylon outerwear or something. And it looks great. Nice to see a girl wear real underwear instead of butt floss for a change.
53. gerard vandenberg - May 15, 2009 12:52 AM
........................GRANDMA WAS THERE, folks?
54. Funny entertainment - May 15, 2009 1:49 AM
Two underwears
wow
more pics click on name
55. Sloppy Hand - May 15, 2009 4:36 AM
OMG! That's granny's pantie...
56. SoTe - May 15, 2009 8:13 AM
Yeah, granny panties, plus she's wearing like some mini short and panties underneath those.
What exactly is she trying to do in these pics?? I don't get it.
57. Darth - May 15, 2009 8:24 AM
Ahem,what's going on there?
58. Nero - May 15, 2009 8:31 AM
At least her underwear is matching with her socks?
59. herbiefrog - May 15, 2009 5:17 PM
ok we havent
looked at the photos
... no need
she's one of our babies
shhh...
60. Larry Jones - May 15, 2009 6:11 PM
Scott from Austin Powers looks pissed off. If I had Natalie Portman jumping on my back I'd figure out a way to get a hand or two down her pants in the confusion.
61. t back patrol - May 15, 2009 7:12 PM
we have a problem. why is she wearing a circus tent for underwear. she is neither 8 years old or 80. therefore, it should be thong or nothing. she needs an assistant to be sure he does not go out into public like this again. maybe she pissed her assistant off or something.
62. freber - May 15, 2009 10:18 PM
#61 - That isn't Seth Green (Scott from Austin Powers) and #61 - it's a movie set. She's in COSTUME filming a scene, people. Geez.
But I always thought she was overrated too...
63. Natalie Porkme - May 17, 2009 4:38 AM
#7 is right. That fat bitch is at least 105lbs.