May 11 2009Miss California lying about topless photos

Ummm who cares?

So F-ing what? This is character assasination not pornography. Homos should learn to feel shame about this as well as their day-to-day behavior.

As with all women, what matters is not what comes out of her mouth, but whether or not she's hot enough to make you spurt into her mouth. I mean, honestly, who listens?

The smartest thing to come out of a woman's mouth is Einstein's cock.

THATS NOT HER...SHE HAS BOOBS IN THIS PICTURE!!!!!!! I CALL SHENANIGANS.... SHAME ON HER.... FAKE FAKE FAKE

(BIGGOT WHORE)

Carrie, thats gods answer.
:)

I agree, who cares? She's hot.

In these pictures she kinda resembles a female Hilary Swank.

Shes hot

Shes hot

Shes hot

Perez is a ugly fag, who is pissed because Cali voters TWICE have voted no to queers marrying. Others who vote no against queers marrying- President Obama, VP Biden and MUSLIMS - wonder when will fag Hilton will go protest Obaqma or at a mosque.

Shes hot

this is what happens when you have an opinion of your own...

The most important part of this pic is missing! one of the sweetest looking heinie from the pageant!

Yeah, the inarticulate cunt is entitled to her opinion, but when her opinion is based on bigotry disguised in hypocritical religious rhetoric, she shouldn't be surprised when she's called out.

The pics just prove that she's a hypocritical whore.

So to recap:

1) She's hot.
2) Who cares what she thinks about gay marriage?
3) Perez is a butt pirate.
4) They aren't really topless photos if you don't see nip.
5) She's hot.

Oh, and Perez is a butt pirate.

Carry on.

She looks gorgeous in these pictures.. so much better all natural then done up like a barbie. props to her

Well what do you know, I forgot to double clicked!

This used to be a funny, titty filled site. Now it's another left-wing political site, where liberals can opine how tolerant they are while crucifying anyone that disagrees with them. FUCK OFF! She's hot!

@16
Exactly.

It's like Palin preaching abstinence only programs work and then her fucking daughter gets knocked up.

"campaign against gay marriage"? since when is answering a question a campaign. since when is Perez Hilton relevant. how is he qualified to judge a beauty pageant when he's not qualified to judge his own taint. since when is posing for a modeling photo with your back turned a nude photo. you can see more skin in a victoria's secret catalog.

Isn't sort of odd, to see some vilify this Beauty Pageant Winner, who shares the same views on Marriage as the new President?

It seems some are stuck on a form of political bigotry...

If you are a Democratic Partisan, no problem, but if you are someone who isn't on the fashion train, you become a target.

Even the way these "others" are handled, implies they are stupid, ignorant, closed, etc.

But actually, it looks like the judgmental nature of the Fashion, is the hypocritical and contradictory.

Should they take Obama's Presidency away for being opposed to Gay Marriage?

I guess Jesus loves fake boobs.

#18, you realize the whole point is that these pics were taken AFTER her boob job - she was flat chested before...

So what part of this, exactly, conflicts with her views on gay marriage? She said it's God's will that a man marries a woman, and here she gives more visual evidence why, in some cases, a guy would be happy to do that. It would be a different story if they unearthed girl-girl nude pics, like with Vanessa Williams. Of course, even in that case, everybody realized that God made an exception for two hot women licking each other ("Jesus! Jesus! Get over here, check this out! I swear to Me, one of them looks EXACTLY like your Mom!").

Sorry #20 but you right wing retards just don't really matter anymore. Losers.

If I did her, could I still marry Perez?

Funny how liberals can slander and smear all they want. But when someone gives an articulate and respectful answer that may disagree with them they show their 'true' colors on how intolerant they are.

Liberals wanna kill babies, but don't want to kill a cow for hamburgers. Geeze!

Note to libs. The silent majority is starting to wake up, do you really want that?

Ya poor dumb childhood molestation victim! Fetuses aren't babies stupid. Abortion is logical considering the Earth is overcrowded and doesn't require any more humans. There are almost 7 billon now and the carrying capacity has been long exceeded. Repubicans sure don't have any troulbe sending our children overseas for the slaugters though, do they?
Cows are tremendous contributors to global warming - methane, CO2. You know, chemical disaster. oh yeah right wingers don't believe in science they believe in Jesus. Sorry, my bad.

Silent majority? Dems and liberals are running the show now fag. Back to your basement!

I guess its ok if you live in Rhode Island:
http://www.maxim.com/girls/girls-of-maxim/70316/new-england-patriots-cheerleaders.html#10

All she needed was to pose with a street ape or some ass raper and it would have all been just fine.

Yeah I like how the Dems win a majority in the general election for only the second time in 28 years and suddenly it's, "The Republican Party is for losers" and "The GOP is dead." All you unemployed dems with your liberal arts degrees, sleeping in your parents' basements enjoy it. You were briefly relevant for 1 day last November.

Fuck this bitch. Can we stop talking about her? Any opinion she has, liberal or conservative, is meaningless due to the fact that she's a beauty pageant contestant. Fake tits, fake hair, fake smile, FAKE. If she wants to objectify herself like that then I don't have to respect anything she says. Since when is the opinion of Miss California relevant in any way?

How can we have the word "fake" used so many times and not have Daisy from the Geekology board present? Obviously, the shadows are all wrong in these picts ;^P

how is this any worse than an AX or A&F photo?

Hope her 15 minutes end tomorrow.

"You were briefly relevant for 1 day last November."

The truth speaks volumes.

I love how pics she willingly took get released and everyone calls it character assassination. Here's a thought- if you don't want topless photos of yourself released, don't take topless photos.

Why the EXTREME heart-on for this girl? Who cares if she's not a perfect christian? People fuck up. I didn't hear the christians calling for throwing out that coke snorting whore from Kentucky after she won a couple years ago. The libs LOVE to jump on people who have religion in their lives. Bunch of freaks.

Perhaps you right wing wackos could please move somewhere else if you don't like freedom? Your ideas are all stale and your leaders (rofl) are mostly very pathetic - Limbaugh, Palin, Thievin' McCain,etc.
Hey nutjobs. where are the WMD in Iraq? Sure has been costly looin' for 'em hasn't it been?

"Briefly relevent"? We won the election and will be in power for at least another 8 years. Long enough to not only reverse most of the stupidity of you capitalist pigs, but prepare for the rich to pay their fair share of taxes. I say tax the fuck out of the rich. Oh, like 75% should do.

The SEC needs to be subject to congressional oversight as well. Too much Wall Street crookedness (CDOing our mortgages put us in this mess for one) went on with your hero the dementedly stupid "Dubya".

We got us a leader now that won't hide with children when we are under attack like your poster boy did. You should be very proud.

@38
Good point Jackie. I could give two shits about what rattles in her hollow head, but when someone pulls the "holier than thou" card, fuck 'em. I'll call them on it every time.

I mean, what was better than Larry Craig getting busted for trying to blow a dude in an airport bathroom?

Same with this bitch citing her religion, when she gets a tit job and poses in her little panties. Fuck her too. And for the record, I could care less about gay rights, but nothing's worse than a fucking hypocrit.

@16 & 21

This would be a hypocritical move on her part if she said that she firmly believed that NO woman should be photographed naked.

She would be a hypocrite if she ran off to Iowa and married a woman.

This isn't hypocritical. In fact, she never claimed to be perfect - she just said that for her and her family, she believed marriage was between a man and a woman.

F*** her for having an opinion.

Wallow gloriously in your dreams of trickle up poverty.

When BO is finished using you for jock strap jam, cry loudly for nobody will be listening.

Embrace the doom that you have guaranteed your offspring, indeed.

Can we get a homosexual to comment on why they want participation in a bond set in religion, adopted into the tax code, and sanctioned by God?

Let's state the facts:

1) Homosexuality is a sin in Christianity, Judaism, and Islam.
2) Marriage has always been between a Man and a Woman.
3) Homosexuality goes against nature... no matter what you say or make yourself believe, it does. It doesn't produce offspring which is the cycle of life.

I've a few gay friends and I've told them what I believe.... do what you like, but your argument is incorrect. You should be arguing to remove marriage as something that the government recognizes at all.

In addition, Polygamy should be fully legal as well if we are going down this path.

Civil Unions is all there should be IMO.

She's such a hypocrite! Pretending to have Christian morals and values.
Girls with morals and values conduct themselves with respect and dignity. They don't take semi nude photos, get plastic boobs and other cosmetic surgery.
But her parents are divorced so that explains her lack of morals.

I'll stop laughing at her rambling, non-sensical defense of "opposite marriage" (LOL) , if she'd agree to take another round of photos with full body nudity. She may be dumb as a rock, and have a confused moral code (Jesus hates gays, but loves fake tits!) , but she sure does have a smoking hot body I approve of.

sexy story gets sexier!

http://www.polmachina.com/?p=77

I call it a draw. Religous hypocrite vs. Hollywood standards. Skin gets you noticed in Lalaland. So using the hypocritcal standard, are all gay celebrities hypocritcal since they only went "out" after the dollars were made? Elton John, Martina Navartilova, Clay Aiken, George Michael, Rosie, Ellen Degeneres, Portia d Rossi? Shouldn't they give back the money & try and make it honestly while clearly being out?

These photos aren't anything you wouldn't see in a fucking JC Penney ad in the newspaper. The dick-licking homos and their supporters are just using this shit as an excuse to get rid of someone who spoke out against a deviant lifestyle that they want us to accept. If you want to see intolerance in its purest form, just look at the fags. You don't dare say anything they don't like or you're labeled a bigot, you're discriminatory and.......what else? Oh yeah, intolerant.

@40

You are an idiot. The Rich already pay their fair share of taxes and more. A large percentage of people don't even pay taxes at all, yet they still get the benefit of federal money for schools, roads, defense, welfare, health care (medicare, medicaid, prescription drugs), etc.. etc...

Do you care to explain how else the 'Rich' should be forced to pay more for those that can't help themselves?

The path we are are on with these socialist bastards is a sinking ship. These people have no idea because they are not students of history. Take a look and read up about the Russian Gulags or the millions killed by Chairman Mao.

#50 -

You are not the stdent of history, apparently. Russia (during the Gulag period) and China (Under Mao) were communists, not socialists.

You want a soclialist model? Look at the Europoean models - you know, the countries with the lowest infant mortality rates, higher life span, and free healthcare and college. The countries were the populace scoe a much higher "are you satisfied with your life" poll numbers than in the us.

Having said this, noting against the bird-brained Carrie - she should stick around until her nude shots come out.

Yes on 8, you whining clowns.

50:US save Europe's ass. All Italy, France, England, etc. should be speaking German now cept for GIs come to Europe & chop suey Nazis. Most Brits with $ pay twice for good hospital stay now. Frenchys taxed much on everything. Also all Europe getting invaded by N Africa & other illegals now, much problems all over. go Chuck norris!

"lowest infant mortality rates, higher life span, and free healthcare and college"

This is proof that the marxist liberals have no clue.
Stupidity run am muck.

No one makes a fuss when someone promotes gay marriage stridently, but when one pretty woman agrees with what the majority of the country (and the VAST majority of the world) thinks is right, suddenly its Armageddon. She is a beautiful woman whose opinion is just as valid as everyone else's. Since when did speaking your mind (and agreeing with the law) become so taboo?

The rich do not pay their fair share jackfuck. That's why they have been given every tax break possible under the Dubya Adm. I say tax 'em to death. Let them know what it is like living paycheck to paycheck. If they say it is not fair for the services they perform (which is what most of us say anyway) we will tell em to dig ditches instead. All these greedy pigs who just didn't have enough money trusted their famous thief Bernie Madoff and Co. to make 'em more money. just by moving phony money around. Money for nothing while the rest of us work.
And then we deindustrialise. How can that work for the good of the nation. It can't. When a country turns to a service economy that demonstrates that it's concern are for the rich, not the poor.

Look. all I am saying is we should just take all the money away from the rich and redistribute it to the rest of us. That's all.
Once upon a time a person could have health ins., a permanent job, retirement, a home, and a country that invested in itself. Not anymore. Not when the bankers who funded communism and fascism have looted and plundered everything in sight have had their little feast.

Let's take it all back. Let the rich have nothing. Most of them have inherited their starting finances anyway so it was never really their money.

Ahhhhhhhhhhh.. got to love the opinions of 'tards who frequent blog sites. **sniffs** smell that? Smells like stupidity run amok.

TheDirty.com says they are releasing *sexually explicit* photos of this chick on Wednesday. Can't wait!

# 56 : You've got a nice cot waiting for you in sunny Venezuela! Idiota!

Your poor soul has been compartmentalized with fascism.

Government your savior will soon slap your face with reality, and it looks nothing like the picture you attempted to paint.

If the rich become poorer, your broke ass WILL become poorer also.

That hot air between your ears distorts all truth.

@12 Careful treading with your hate spewing there Armondo... California voters may have something up their sleeves for you as well.. Armondo.

She's a butterface. Too bad she got the boob job. Naturals are always better.

Armando, Armondo whatever.

Any guy who finds this prepubescant little boy body sexy is either repressing teh gayz or just a pedophile.

And if you're a girl who's into this body, you're either straight or experimenting with anorexia.

#50,

The Rich take in 75%+ of the money, and are the ones who MOST benefit from society's benefits, therefore they should owe more. Their taxes were 90% after WWII, and were higher under Reagan than now.

So STFU already, you don't know sh9t you teabagging douchebag.

I've heard of war crimes more entertaining than most of these comments. Jebus KKKrist on a sidecar eating Ben & Jerry's folks, try to be funny, try to be CLEVER. Just this once. For the children.

Sorry, my bad '51' I made the mistake of lumping socialism with communism because one NEVER leads to the other.. Yes, the European system works SOO much better where the standard of living is lower for everyone. Except that you get 'free' health care where people dropp like flies during heat waves and the government agencies all blame the other agency for the budget cut-backs and complacency in the system.

Why don't we try fixing the corruption in the system and enable capitalism to work correctly before we model the system like a different broken system. Or perhaps we can just ask the old to not take health care and simply die out so we don't have to pay for them.

And 56, great ideas.. I mean really. Because once your idealism comes true we will all live in perfect harmony; and greed, pride, ambition and everything else will simply go away. No one will want for more than what they need and we will all live in the forests and caves of the world peacefully and happy. Never will a person, group, or government harass or attempt to impose their will on some other person again.

Fake Tits.
Capped Teeth.
Bleached Hair.

=Perfect Spokewoman for the Religious Right!

"topless" usually implies being able to see ones rack. stop with the false advertising, these photos are PG-13 at the most...i see more in the Sears ad on Sunday morning

Reminds me of Joe the Pumber - conservatives pick some random idiot as their spokesperson, only to discover that they are a random idiot, who embarrasses the very cause they were propped up to support.

#67,

Just a reminderl, you lost. 2006 and 2008. You have no NE Senators, and are reduced pretty much to a regional (Southern) rump party of White Male Christians. Your party identification is at an all-time low, your previous administration may be tried for war crimes, and every demographic that isn't White Male Christians is growing, and growing Democratic.

In other words, STFU, it's going to be 20 years before anyone cares what you have to say, and that's assuming your party doesn't go completely cannibal.

Okay so according to the bible:

Gay marriage is no bueno. Topless photos are a-okay. Boob jobs are a go because Jesus loves big tits. Lieing is fine if your trying to save the crown you won in a vanity contest. Killing people is fine if you do it because people don't agree with you about God.

Religion is sooooo awesome!

Hear that....it's the whirr of the dollar bill printing press. We are so circlin' the drain on hyp-hyper-inflation. Buckle up for Nigerian-style dollars & economy. I'm guessing 4 and out for the Oboe main man and his NOT change Demo- limpy-domesto-bomber, tax-cheatin' posse. I'd put Vanilla flooded Iowa up against Chocolate New Orleens anyday.

@73 What?..........try learning english before typing. Sense you no make dumbass.

I smell something fishy: I think she's a closet lesbo. Both divorced parents accused each other of being gay, and it does run in the genes...

She'll come out a lesbo soon enough, and do a big public apology.

#38 Jackie - If this isn't an attempt at character assassination and to get her de-throned then why hasn't MIss Rhode Island been dethroned for her Maxim shoot where she was topless?

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,519813,00.html

Because it is character assassination and a lame attempt at that.

Feel the tolerance? All a beauty queen has to do is agree with the opinion of her state's voters and she is declared a bigot.

That's the gay mafia in action.

And the gay writer of this blog sucks.

#56, are you a fucking commie? If you want money, go out there and earn it. Don't try to take it away from people who DID work for it to support your lazy ass. God I hate people like you. I'm not rich, not even close, but I sure as hell don't think I deserve the fruits of someone else's labour.

Why do we pester beauty pageant contestants with questions? Do we yell “Show us your titts!” during the Nobel awards ceremony? Evening gown, swimsuit and then have them fire ping pong balls from their vags for distance, extra points if you can drop one in a fish bowl.
THAT’S America, Baby.

#44 - Hey, whacking off on a chick's face is completely unnatural too, as is doing it after you got her and her best friend drunk enough to go down on each other and massage your nuts simultaneously, since that too produces no kids and... wait... what were we talking about?

Seriously, faggots should not be allowed to comment on pictures of tits and ass.

Religious people don't hate faggots, they just want to convert them.

As for me....I HATE FAGGOTS!!!!

The temperature in hell? According to weather.com, it's currently 82 degrees in Mexico.

Barack Obama has the same opinion on gay marriage as Ms. Prejean and he appeared fully topless. Perez Hilton has no comment on that.

Yeah I am a commy. I am not you and scare you THEREFORE I am a commy. Or is that an extremist. Yeah that's what I am.

I say make the rich give back all the money they stole. That's all. And we all know they stole it and their musclemen in the world government let them.
I work hard you freaks, why can't I own my own planes and several homes and mistresses, etc. Oh so acting and singing and marrying perverted old men entitles a whore to million, right?
You really think it is fair that imbeciles like Tyson and Holyfield were worth 100s of millions for fighting? Really?
You think it's fair that there are about 1000 or more BILLIONaires now?

Go fuck yourself stooge.

@78 So if someone else "earns" millions by stealing and cheating, is that considered hardwork?

She comes from a nice family...of skinhead supremacists!!! (LOL) - her brother is a mohawk wearing, tattoed Aryan skinhead..

http://thedirty.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/dirty_phpodaqxs.jpg

@81... Nancy? Is that you?

Couldn't her tatted brother join the NBA & just fit right in? Booyah!

Hey 86. Look at just one of the bastard half brothers of your black hero. It's ok that you are jealous becuause you're a fat pig.

The people that are stealing the most money are your elected officials in league with the ultra elite that continue to allow the federal reserve (a private entity) print money without any approval from the people at all. Doing this is the same as stealing because it reduces the value of your money every day. Both parties allow it to happen (thanks 71 for lumping me in with a group that I don't vote for) because they want to retain power... and the people keep voting for them because they want to retain the favors that are provided to them. Small groups of wealthy want to keep them in office in order to maintain their own wealth since they are protected via special favors (i.e. Speaker Pelosi's Minimum Wage deal for American Samoa). You folks keep on voting the way you do and eventually you will destroy the people you love to hate.. unfortunately you will find yourself controlled by the people you can never bring down. Those that drive in the special lanes with the armed escorts while you yourself have no real freedom, only the freedom you are permitted to have as long as you behave and recite the party line..... otherwise you will get the treat Miss California treatment.

Useful idiots.

Wow, the hate against women who don't follow the leftist orthodox continues.

Nancy Pelosi lied about not being briefed on waterboarding = no issue

Miss Ca took some risque photos = end of western civilization

Her face seems a b it harsh.

Who gives a shit. Get off this girl's case. The intolerance of liberals, who are constantly preaching tolerance, is just too much. The girl is entitled to her opinion. Just because you don't like it you have to rip her to shreds? Guess what - the silent majority of Americans agree with her. Get over it.

Wonder if they develop a DNA gene test for fags if their parents would have aborted them. I say there is a 99% chance they would have before they bonded with them on earth. Now I like lipstick lesbians , so there stick that in your ass and smoke it!

So what? Some beauty queen doesn't believe that fags and lesbians should get married who cares?!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I don't believe they should be allowed to be adopt children either. if she shares that view also maybe I'll take her out to dinner! lol

Topless? You can see more in sears underwear ads.

she's a typical conservative hypocrite

#44 WTF, how about if we get YOU to look at the Constitution instead of your little "facts"? Guess what? BIG shock, but we aren't living in a theocracy or a fundamentalist religious country like Saudi Arabia - we live in a democratic republic and we don't get our laws from the Bible or any other holy writ. The government doesn't "sanctify" your marriage any more than it makes your gun purchase or your 1040 form sacred. The government deals with LAW - your religion and its leaders deal with sin and sanctity. So I don't care if Jesus or God does - or doesn't - like women voting, blacks not being slaves, gays having sex or my eating shellfish and pork on a Sunday. WE DON'T GET OUR LAWS FROM THE BIBLE OR ANY OTHER RELIGIOUS BOOKS, WE WILL NOT START NOW. GET IT?

Nowehere in the civil codes does it say you have to produce children for a marriage to be valid, and nowhere in law is fertility guaranteed. We will not soon be marrying dogs, our minor cousins or multiple wives if gay people can marry because it's against our CIVIL code of laws NOW to marry anyone but humans, humans who aren't minors, and humans who have a pre-existing marriage contract. Bigamy is a crime, as is child molestation and incest - marriage is NOT. No one wants to overthrow those laws, on the contrary. They want the existing law to benefit everyone, not have a "separate" and inferior law be enacted instead. GET IT NOW?

You don't approve? You have that right. You can move to Iraq or the Vatican and live under God's law there. Or stay here, where, under CIVIL law you can complain and protest and voice your "beliefs" all you want without being censored, stoned or burned at the stake. Just expect no protection from criticism just because you wave a religious book. And be VERY clear in future what authority gives you the right to do all of this - it's the Constitution, not Leviticus.

Her position on gay marriage is precisely the same as Barack Obama's. Odd difference in the reception it gets, isn't it?

Hey Hilton! She is more man than you will ever be and more woman than you could ever get!

#99 "Her position on gay marriage is precisely the same as Barack Obama's."

No, it's not. Man, if you have to outright lie to come up with an argument to support her, just go on home. Obama has sponsored Illinois legislation banning discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, and he's for civil unions with all equal rights and priviliges. Prejean "doesn't have all the answers", and so has no opinion that she's willing - or capable - of giving about civil unions.

Prejean can speak her mind all she wants as a private citizen but if she's doing it under the aegis of a title or position, that doesn't mean Miss CA USA has to suck it and let her do it on their dime or in their name. If - AS PRESIDENT- Obama were filming spots for NOM and lobbying to deny civil rights to ANY group of citizens I'd be screaming for him to be impeached. I think Obama's wrong since marriage is already a civil union so "separate yet equal" is inequal by definition. And personal opinion and recognizing the need to obey a law you're sworn to uphold are two different things

It's not the job of the president to interpret the Constitution for us and it's not the role of the voters in California to do that, either - that what the state and federal courts are for. Unconstitional laws and measures get put on ballots and pass with a majority vote all the time - and they're then overturned in the courts because they were unconstitutional in the first place. Reagan got elected Governor of CA on the tails of Prop 14, which allowed landlords to discriminate on who they could rent to. The Republicans and the John Birch Society loved that one and worked hard to pass it, just as the Mormons and others worked to fearmonger support for Prop 8. P14 was overturned 3 years later because it violated the 14th Amendment. So enjoy Prop 8 while it lasts - because it won't for long.

#3 Rick has never been laid in his life.

that's not topless

We the people need to take our world back from the criminals who are running the little puppet show. Everything is a lie. The law protects the rich (he who can afford the better dirty lawyer), money is fiat and inherently worthless now; a lever whereby a scrawny soft-bodied parasite controls the output of the producers and steals the profits, military hardware is evolving off the scale. The military wants robots! They will do excatly what they are told with emotionless precision, no matter how butchering the process (kind of like Israel with the Palestinians). Television rots the mind and the dirty scum at Fox make light of this and even admit it! Yeah they really are aliens. Look how ugly the media pigs are. They are not the 'rest of us".
\
None of this matters as it is not only almost too late but the majority of humanity is little better than an ape anyway.

But we the people need to take it all away from those who haven taken it all from us. That would be just plain fair.

As to the homosexual union thing. Nature produces our reality. Our brain interprets the data to the best of it's limited ability. The average IQ is 100. Not very smart. All of our senses are terribly limited. We are weak and designed to be healthy for more than 40 good years. If that. There are homosexual animals besides Homo sultus (fool) proving that this state of sexual preference is entirely N A T U R A L.

As these facts relate to the various bibles - who gives a fuck? The judeochristian/Islamic branches are acutely bloodthirsty and irrational and should be discarded if we are to continue evolving as a specie. Perhaps even certain genetic flaws as well. I personally feel that intolerance of variance is and index of a simple mind and should also be deselected. Certainly the Republican mindset is a terrible disease and must not be permitted to have a place in a civilised world of the future.

Hey # 98: Actually Abrahamic law is some of the actual foundation for many a country's legal tradition. Your position & right to assume certain inalienable rights- are given from Nature's God, not the state. Life, liberty & the pursuit of happiness, endowed by your Creator. Read your Declaration of Independence sometime.

The US start up is tied to theism, even tho some try to rewrite. You may not believe in a single God but many do and their fire to fight for justice & freedom are always tied to the belief that their rights are given by God, not the state. Your comments make it sound like you might fit better in China than here.

The precious Constitution can be altered by judical activism, legislating from the bench- seems like it's happening more now. That scares me.

Anyway, I'm in Utah/Arizona & I still would like to have my plural marriage, why can't I? I promise no kids in the marriage, won't that work? Why do you or anyone else get to define the arrangement? Don't discriminate now...

I am so incensed by all of this I am going to give her a spanking. That's right, right over the knee. 'Till her cheeks are glowing red. God I am angry.

Nothing like a little hypocrisy to ruin your day, eh, Prejean?

#30, you just proved my point. Thank you.

I gots knews for most of you idiots. Shes not "topless".

I gots knews for most of you idiots. Shes not "topless".

It was Jesus that made her do it...'cause in my country and my family, I believe that all women should have big tits.

Uh, I must be blind, but where's the Topless part? Or for that matter, the butt shot? All I see is some hot babe covering her boobs and wearing panties.

What am I missing here? Sears Catalogs show more than this crap.

Speaking of hypocrites, wasn't The Fish recently mocking Disney and alleged 'Jesus freaks' over photos of Miley Cyrus showing her back? Now we have pics of another girl showing just her back and it's some kind of scandal in this case? Funny how that works. Pot, kettle.

What the hell is with all the misogyny? Bunch of fucking idiots.

..........................is there a problem, HORNY & SICK AMERICANS?
(problem with controling your penis?)

#56---As the saying goes, you are entitled to your own opinion, but you are not entitled to your own facts. Virtually everything you wrote in your post is factually incorrect, which renders your opinion pretty much irrelevant via ignorance.

1. "The rich do not pay their fair share." I suppose we could argue about what "fair share" means, but the rich pay the vast majority of the taxes in the country and also use far fewer government services than the rest, so its hard to see what more would constitute their "fair share." I would agree they don't pay their fair, share, because they pay way more. The top 1 percent of income earners pay nearly 40 percent of the tax money.

2. "Let them know what it is like living paycheck to paycheck." The problem here is two-fold. First, most rich people already know what it's like to live paycheck to paycheck, because they did it before they became rich. (See more discussion below). Second, if the rich go paycheck to paycheck, the rest of us won't even have paychecks---because how are the rich going to pay us?

3. "If they say it is not fair for the services they perform (which is what most of us say anyway) we will tell em to dig ditches instead." Excellent idea---let's take the people with the brains and courage to be entrepreneurs, to invent and create things we all want, and let them dig ditches. Then we can all be poor.

4. "When a country turns to a service economy that demonstrates that it's concern are for the rich, not the poor." This might be the stupidest thing I have ever read---but then I read the rest of your post. An economy turning to service (which is actually turning to information) is a sign that service is what that economy does most efficiently. You should take the time to read (or have an adult read to you) some basic economics.

5. "Look. all I am saying is we should just take all the money away from the rich and redistribute it to the rest of us." Brilliant idea. Only a few problems. First, you cannot "redistribute" the money to the rest of us, because it was never "distributed" in the first place. Before wealth can be stolen from someone, it first has to exist, and that means it first must be created. Creating wealth simply means finding a higher-valued use for something than it is currently being used for. This is what entrepreneurs and inventors do. So the money you're talking about started in that person's hand---it was created by them, not simply "distributed" to them. Second, if you take all the money away from the rich in this country, you'd get enough to get the rest of the population through about half a year. And you'd never get any more, because what entrepreneur will bother creating any more wealth when he knows you'll just steal it form him?

6. "Most of them have inherited their starting finances anyway so it was never really their money." Not even remotely true. Less than one percent of the wealthy in this country inherited their money. Most of them got it the hard way---by creating something of value and selling it to other people. Names, you may have heard of, like Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, Oprah Winfrey, LeBron James, Michael Jordan, Steven Spielberg, Stephen King, John Grisham and so on and on and on. Not one of these people inherited his or her wealth.

You simply have no idea what you're talking about, and thus your opinion is worthless. Your only message is, "There's more of us than there are of them, and they have something I want, and I'm too lazy and/or stupid to earn it myself, so let's just take it from them." There is word for that. It's called theft. You're just common thief who is commonly ignorant of the facts.

#105 First off, I think you're referring to Mosaic law, because circumcision isn't the basis for any legal tradition in any country that I'm aware of. And sorry, but the polytheistic Babylonians and Egyptians had laws against murder, theft and perjury well before Moses came down from Sinai. Secondly, natural law and inalienable rights have nothing whatsoever to do with the Bible or any other religious writings.

The concept of natural and inalienable law are philosophical products of the Age of Enlightenment, derived solely from man's ability to reason for himself. Jefferson claimed these natural laws came from our "Creator" in order to help justify rebellion against an annointed king, and further did a belt and suspender approach - he said they were "self-evident" and then attributed them to "Nature's God", which Locke, Hobbes and Rousseau never actually did. Self-evident concepts need no divine provenance - they clearly exist in and of themselves, or they don't. They don't exist because of faith in any God or gods. You could argue that if that God created man, he also created his ability to reason and therefore the natural laws that are an integral part of that ability, but that's the extent to which we might owe God our rights. That God is not necessarily a Christian one, either.

Jefferson, being a Deist, would be first to state that Biblical law isn't the basis for our government, nor should it be. Like many of our founders, he believed the Bible and other texts were written and interpreted by men, and thus no indicator of any divine intent. He placed his faith in man's ability to reason, not follow theological dogma unthinkingly.

Our start is NOT "tied to theism" - we didn't fight a religious war with England. We broke from England due to improper taxation and lack of Parliamentary representation, among other things. Our government is based on the Age of Reason political concept of social contract, where gov't authority comes only from our consent to be governed - and we give up some of our rights in order to maintain social order Governments, churches and kings can impinge on our rights without our consent, but it's a violation of natural law and we have a natural right to rebel. That's the concept behind the Declaration and the American revolution, not because Jesus told us he loved liberty and freedom and it was OK to fight for them. You clearly know as much about this philosophy as you know about China.

The Constition can be amended because men aren't infallible and societies change and progress - and there are limitations to the powers of any branch to prevent an imbalance. If you want to overturn existing civil marriage and bigamy laws and have a bunch of wives, then bring it. But your argument better not be, "Abraham and Joseph Smith said I could." any more than the opposing argument should be "Jesus says no, just look at Solomon". In reality, it's illegal because the government can't keep track of multiple spouses and children. It can't figure out how to tax you properly, deal with community property in divorce or prevent the obvious abuses that can and have arisen.

History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil government. This marks the lowest grade of ignorance of which their civil as well as religious leaders will always avail themselves for their own purposes.

"Less than 1% of the rich have inherited their money". RIGHT! Where did you get that one?
As to the service economy. This is the worst thing that can happen to any NATION. Yes as in the welfare of the entirety of the populace. AS to your little information jobs - they are mostly in India you stupid babbling fag. Get your facts straight.
America has deindustrialized. We know longer manufacture jack shit here anymore. You and your rich Wall Street criminals now have been stealing our money by sending all of our work overseas to let oriental slaves work for us for next to nothing.
Asshole, have you ever read anything at all about economics? I am not referring to the stock market report either, thief. No nation that has degenerated to the point of a service economy has any real future. The money is all flowing out of the NATION into the other nation that performs the work for us. AND THEN to top it all off, we send even more money out of the NATION to buy the goods our little slaves have made for us.

This is all for the good of the rich. It destroys the middle class.

10 years ago I paid $7 a week for health insurance. How much now?
Everything is about lawsuits. The police are issuing tickets left and right purely for profit now, not to "serve and protect". Well, they are for the court system and their little lawyers and judges. Fat money.
Now if a person gets a DUI no matter how slightly impaired that person is it costs him thousands in lawyer fees.

30 years ago lovely little big nosed lawyer took a malpractice suit for my father. He won. He took 70% of the settlement from my dad. He was a thief and under my races ancient laws I would have been able to extrcicate his head from his torso as a trophy. I would have given it to you though as you talk like you need a new brain.

Get back to your filthy Wall street journal.

Hey tell the folks since you are the expert about the derivatives game. I will be waiting on that one. Crook.

She is rockin ! Who cares ! This is a message boeard to comment on the Ms California photo not spew your left wing rants...notice where you are idiots !!!!

She is rockin ! Who cares ! This is a message boeard to comment on the Ms California photo not spew your left wing rants...notice where you are idiots !!!!

That is how old the earth is. Get over it this is fact and says so in the bible. God chose a people over others that he preferred and told them to wipe out the 7 tribes living in what we call Israel and take that land and hold his covenant. Those 7 tribes had no purpose to God.
He sent his son to the cross for our sins because he loves us.
The crusades were a glorious epoch! Death and ruin and loot for the anointed! Halleleuah!

There was no evolution the earth is not old enough for such nonsense. Scientists have overactive imaginations.

Homosexuals mock the spirtit of the Lord and will burn in eternal Hellfire along with all liberals and democrats.

Amen.

Hey # 117: Your words "but it's a violation of natural law and we have a natural right to rebel ". So.... I can rebel against gay marriage- right? You were doing great till you got to the part about no plural marriage due to difficult taxing and community property issues. Lame. Same issues come up if you allow homo marriages. Easily managed. I thought you could do better. Your definition of "rights" don't mean much without a foundation. Just to say our right to freedom & pursuit of happiness are God-given doesn't constitute "theological dogma". I hope you aren't angry your whole life. Right on # 118!

TZ has new topless pics of her - with her nipples on full display (but before the boob job)

She a very hot girl. She's also a serial liar, but most social climbers are. She's a hypocrite, but it not uncommon for poor, uneducated people to spout religious beliefs as a default in the abscence of any true education - and therefore they have an inability to see the contradiction in their moral stances (fake tits, vainglory is ok; but gay is bad)

Bottom line: she's a horrible spokeswoman for what's morally correct, but she's one hot piece of ass. Put a cork in her mouth and drop those panties!

#68= fag

Obama said once that "he believes marriage is between a man and a woman" ... but theres no way this guy can believe this .. it was probablly a slip of tongue as he has outspokenly quoted that he is for gay marriage and supports the fight for legal partnerships between same sexes.

All you god loving right wingest crawl back into your hole .. GOD didnt write the bible .. how the fucking hell do you know he doesnt want gay marriages?! And all of you that grew up in a conservative, homophobic, sexist, racist community and have parents like that ....... take a second to think for your fucking selves.Carrie prejean is just a stupid little girl that listened a bit too much to her idiot parents and never thought for herself. grow up all of you.

Oh and #122 if im going to "burn in eternal hellfire" ... hope you have fun in heaven wiping gods holy arse and forever living as a virgin.

I don't think it's fair. she broke the rules. So, is this what we are encouraging here, that is ok to break the rules? Besides, Do anyone remember the vanessa williams photos. She was NOT allowed to keep her crown--HELL NO!

Ha ha fags! She keeps her crown!

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090512/ap_en_ot/us_miss_california;_ylt=AgrifNJ2nbGXZCmv.G40bays0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTJsbjQxMGRmBGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMDkwNTEyL3VzX21pc3NfY2FsaWZvcm5pYQRjcG9zAzEwBHBvcwMxNwRzZWMDeW5fdG9wX3N0b3J5BHNsawN0cnVtcHNheXNtaXM-

#123 No, *sigh* wrong again. You have no "right to rebel" against someone else having the same natural rights you have, any more than you can "rebel" because you think you should be allowed to deprive someone of their life. If you're honestly incapable of comprehending where your natural rights end and another's begin, you're truly too stupid to grasp this. Stop now before you hurt yourself. Marriage and other civil rights for gay people - or any other group that's different from you - take nothing away from your life or your personal liberties, and you're still perfectly free to pursue your own happiness. But that "happiness" stops at denying anyone else the same rights you enjoy just because you don't like how they look, worship, think or fuck.

You don't need to first believe in God in order to have inalienable natural and civil rights - so, yeah, they DO mean a great deal all on their own. If you want to believe they come from the God you worship because that makes them more meaningful to you, fine. But if your argument is that because of that 'divine' gift we now have to consider some theological teaching as part of our civil code of laws, that IS bowing to dogma. FAIL.

Since you also managed to misinterpret the entire body of Declaration, which is a list of civil and political grievances of why we broke up with England, it probably went right over your head that Jefferson deliberately avoided the traditional "Christian" forms of identifying God - he uses pretty generic terms of "Nature's God" (not even man's), "Creator", "Divine Providence" - no "Our Lord", "the Almighty", "God the Father" or indeed, even just plain "God". In other words, he saw you and your attempt to insinuate a specific religious doctrine coming from a mile away.

"Right on # 118!" So pleased you FINALLY see that religious doctrine and law have no place in a free civil government. See you in church.

Why is it that all these naked photos are taken by the lady herself?

Self-obsession....

I'm referring to Rihanna and Cassie too. And any other slut that has taken naked pictures of herself.

Yes, actually, I have read a lot of economics (unlike someone else in this discussion I could mention). That why (unlike someone else in this discussion I could mention) I have more than a grade-school understanding of the subject.

As for the statistics about inherited wealth, they are pretty easy to come by. Bureau of Labor Statistics, United States Abstract, and so on. Give it a try. I know it's easier to make assumptions, but aren't facts more useful?

I thought it hilarious that you assume I'm rich because I defend capitalism. I'm not rich by any measure. Then you "insult" me by calling me gay, which probably made all your third-grade classmates laugh so hard chocolate milk came out of their noses.

It's impossible to discuss economics with someone like you who simply doesn't know anything about it. And arguing with a fool like you is pointless.

#44 Here you go, Ill be the homosexual you so long to hear from....

Having opinions is crucial, and respecting others is even more crucial, but when its such a sensitive and important subject for so many right now, there is a little diplomacy needed. Marriage was ONCE for man and women. Just like dinosaurs ONCE walked the earth, Jesus ONCE came to earth to spread the meaning of God, Drinking ONCE was illegal....etc etc. Im assuming you are a smart enough person to agree that we as civilization evolve. Unless you still have a black man chained up in your basement....
I think ive made my point already...but if you ignorant people still need a lesson in tolerance...i hope these reasons why gay marriage is oh so wrong makes you feel a little like a fuck head!

1) Being gay is not natural. Real Americans always reject unnatural things like eyeglasses, polyester, and air conditioning.

2) Gay marriage will encourage people to be gay, in the same way that hanging around tall people will make you tall.

3) Legalizing gay marriage will open the door to all kinds of crazy behavior. People may even wish to marry their pets because a dog has legal standing and can sign a marriage contract.

4) Straight marriage has been around a long time and hasn't changed at all; women are still property, blacks still can't marry whites, and divorce is still illegal.

5) Straight marriage will be less meaningful if gay marriage were allowed; the sanctity of Brittany Spears' 55-hour just-for-fun marriage would be destroyed.

6) Straight marriages are valid because they produce children. Gay couples, infertile couples, and old people shouldn't be allowed to marry because our orphanages aren't full yet, and the world needs more children.

7) Obviously gay parents will raise gay children, since straight parents only raise straight children.

8) Gay marriage is not supported by religion. In a theocracy like ours, the values of one religion are imposed on the entire country. That's why we have only one religion in America.

9) Children can never succeed without a male and a female role model at home. That's why we as a society expressly forbid single parents to raise children.

10) Gay marriage will change the foundation of society; we could never adapt to new social norms. Just like we haven't adapted to cars, the service-sector economy, or longer life spans.

Evolve people! Society never got anywhere staying in one place.
And its women like this that simply hault the wheels that homosexuals have already put in place for us. Its wrong for two women to be together or for two men to spend the rest of your life....but buy boobs and post your naked body all over the internet....

Wow God must be sitting in heaven thinking...."Where the FUCK did i go wrong" waving his fist in the air wishing he could personally slap you ignorant fuckers off your ass for not having the least bit of EQUAL compassion for people.

#44 Here you go, Ill be the homosexual you so long to hear from....

Having opinions is crucial, and respecting others is even more crucial, but when its such a sensitive and important subject for so many right now, there is a little diplomacy needed. Marriage was ONCE for man and women. Just like dinosaurs ONCE walked the earth, Jesus ONCE came to earth to spread the meaning of God, Drinking ONCE was illegal....etc etc. Im assuming you are a smart enough person to agree that we as civilization evolve. Unless you still have a black man chained up in your basement....
I think ive made my point already...but if you ignorant people still need a lesson in tolerance...i hope these reasons why gay marriage is oh so wrong makes you feel a little like a fuck head!

1) Being gay is not natural. Real Americans always reject unnatural things like eyeglasses, polyester, and air conditioning.

2) Gay marriage will encourage people to be gay, in the same way that hanging around tall people will make you tall.

3) Legalizing gay marriage will open the door to all kinds of crazy behavior. People may even wish to marry their pets because a dog has legal standing and can sign a marriage contract.

4) Straight marriage has been around a long time and hasn't changed at all; women are still property, blacks still can't marry whites, and divorce is still illegal.

5) Straight marriage will be less meaningful if gay marriage were allowed; the sanctity of Brittany Spears' 55-hour just-for-fun marriage would be destroyed.

6) Straight marriages are valid because they produce children. Gay couples, infertile couples, and old people shouldn't be allowed to marry because our orphanages aren't full yet, and the world needs more children.

7) Obviously gay parents will raise gay children, since straight parents only raise straight children.

8) Gay marriage is not supported by religion. In a theocracy like ours, the values of one religion are imposed on the entire country. That's why we have only one religion in America.

9) Children can never succeed without a male and a female role model at home. That's why we as a society expressly forbid single parents to raise children.

10) Gay marriage will change the foundation of society; we could never adapt to new social norms. Just like we haven't adapted to cars, the service-sector economy, or longer life spans.

Evolve people! Society never got anywhere staying in one place.
And its women like this that simply hault the wheels that homosexuals have already put in place for us. Its wrong for two women to be together or for two men to spend the rest of your life....but buy boobs and post your naked body all over the internet....

Wow God must be sitting in heaven thinking...."Where the FUCK did i go wrong" waving his fist in the air wishing he could personally slap you ignorant fuckers off your ass for not having the least bit of EQUAL compassion for people.

#135

Nothing made sense behind any of your points, you just wasted 20 minutes of your life typing that...

#135 haha. i love you,

#124, haha, i love you even more.

#122, your still a fag. jesus may love you, but i think your a prick =D

AND JESUS HOLY MARY MOTHER OF FUCKING GOD.. you call them's tits? =S

Oh and #136 ... its called sarcasim .. he was making a funny :D
but also making completely understandable points as well. which make sense to everyone on the planet with half a brain..

yes I love to insult those I hate! I have also studies contemporary history and some economics. How can you defend the current system that has socialized the fortunate by giveing them every tax break imaginable.
Time for the rich to cough up the stolen goods!
Time to get rid of central banks as they are all private and steal the wealth of nations.

I think the faggots and weirdos should shut the hell up and slither back into the AIDs infested gutters where they reside. If you don't want someone's opinion, don't ask for it. Moreover, if you don't like what you hear the problem lies with yourself.
Marriage is to protect children...not the pride of gross asspumpers.

Guess what...
dear #122...We will all face judgement in the end. ALL of us. You and your fucking ignorant words included.
No one was put here to be the voice of God and no one can say what it is God wanted for society. The bible was written far too long ago to take it as contextually as you christian extremists do. The one line in the bible that directly mimics the negativity towards homosexuals is that Man should not lie with another man, it is considered an abomination. HOWEVER in that same bible chapter it says man should never walk bare foot on grass, or man should never eat raw fish....all of these are too an abomination. So surprise surprise, you ignorant fucks take the one thing you WANT to believe, and make it fact. But if you have ever walked on the grass without your shoes on, i hope you burn in eternal hellfire with all the democrats and liberals sodomizing you daily.
So for now #140, its easy to call us faggots and weirdos (i wont even comment on the AIDS comment cause thats a whole other level your attempting to climb)
but when YOU face judgement....then we will see just how tolerant God is of us "faggots" and how tolerant he is of people that called us "faggots".
If you really think you and your hurtful biggetry is more respected by the Lord then me liking boobs....you will have quite the rude awakening come judgement day.

Oh and marriage is about family. If you think its not possible for a gay couple to have that then you are naive. Gay couples give a family to children that may not have one otherwise. And you think that makes us gross asspumpers!?

Do you have ANY idea what kind of actions your words produce. Did you hear about the 12 year old boy who hung himself by a power cord off his balcony because he lived every single day in constant torment about being "gay". Do you hope hes burning in eternal hellfire as well?

One day the gays will rise above!! muahaha

She is entitled to an opinion.

Perez is a talentless rectum ranger.

End of.

This woman is a huge bore. The more she speaks, the uglier she gets. Do you religious whack jobs realize that it took the colorado river more than 500,000,000 MILLION YEARS to cut the Grand Canyon. So, while you type our religious dogma, the world will keep spinning long after you turn to dust. You are all so self important when you actually mean NOTHING in the larger context of the world. Who am I to say that a gay person shouldn't have the same right to be unhappy in marriage that the rest of us have? It's equal protection under the law. Either we are all equal or we are not. We need to evolve people. The world is different, people are different. So, we evolve. Is it so hard?

This woman is a huge bore. The more she speaks, the uglier she gets. Do you religious whack jobs realize that it took the colorado river more than 500,000,000 MILLION YEARS to cut the Grand Canyon. So, while you type your religious dogma, the world will keep spinning long after you turn to dust. You are all so self important when you actually mean NOTHING in the larger context of the world. Who am I to say that a gay person shouldn't have the same right to be unhappy in marriage that the rest of us have? It's equal protection under the law. Either we are all equal or we are not. We need to evolve people. The world is different, people are different. So, we evolve. Is it so hard?

I wonder if she can gap on command. Now there's something for the talent competition!