Apr 23 2009Kim Kardashian on Miss California
Okay, everybody, we can all relax now. Kim Kardashian is finally giving her two cents on the Miss California gay marriage debacle. Phew. For a minute there, I thought a national scandal would go by without the insight of a woman whose ass should be overseas protecting our troops from roadside bombs. Anyway, here's what Kim told People:
"I don't agree with her narrow mindedness and neither do a lot of people," Kardashian, 28, tells PEOPLE of Prejean's much-discussed response to judge Perez Hilton's query of her opinion the civil rights issue. "I'm not so narrow-minded so I definitely think a lot broader. Everyone has the right to be happy and be treated equally and I think not allowing gay marriage just kind of puts us back."
Adds Kardashian, "I believe you're in love with who you're in love with, and you should be able to marry them. No one should tell someone else how to think or how to feel."
Kardashian says she appreciates that Prejean was merely saying what she believed, but that may not have been the most tolerant of opinions. "I obviously have a completely different opinion but I think her answer was true to her," Kardashian says. "That answer represented her and how she felt. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. She stood up for what she believes in so she should be happy with that backlash."
For those of you with short attention spans, allow me to provide a condensed version of what Kim's trying to say:
"MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!"

Reader Comments
1. mikeock - April 23, 2009 6:02 PM
Big-assed retard. Hey, am I first? Do I get a BJ for that?
2. Justin - April 23, 2009 6:04 PM
She's so hot. Bootylicious
3. syn - April 23, 2009 6:14 PM
Quick recovery from that wicked sunburn. Looks like inexplicable fame is good for the complexion.
4. wags - April 23, 2009 6:18 PM
Umm, no, she wasn't talking about "meeeeeeeee". Her statement was one of those rare events where a celebrity says something intelligent about someone else, and not in an insulting manner. She was merely stating her own thoughts on Miss. California's "narrow-minded" opinions and tossed in some ideas about why she should think otherwise. To me, that is not a statement about herself, and is pretty well argued.
5. Mitch Haase - April 23, 2009 6:18 PM
That means a lot coming from a fat assed whore who likes to be pissed on and fucked in the ass.
Thenn again, I guess this fat assed bitch is open minded because Miss California probably wouldn't be caught dead laying in a pile of piss and shit.
mitchhaase.blogspot.com
6. Scooby - April 23, 2009 6:24 PM
Don't be so narrow-minded -- think exactly like I do.
7. Kaiser - April 23, 2009 6:25 PM
There is only one thing I want to hear from this bitch:
"Yesterday I got my ass stuffed by ten monster cocks and here is the tape."
8. Lugh - April 23, 2009 6:25 PM
Let's call a spade a spade here-- this is just another pseudo-celebrity weighing in on a topic that has nothing to do with her and her gargantuan ass. It's really unfortunate how Miss California has been attacked by the liberal media and liberal Hollywood for sharing a belief with most other Americans who feel that gay marriage is wrong.
America is far more conservative than most people think because it's always the more liberal folks who are spouting their mouths off. Just take a look at the gay marriage amendment in California-- passed by the same percentage margin as Obama's election (which was hailed as a "landslide"), so clearly MOST people in California agree that marriage should be between a man and a woman only.
Good for you Miss California, tough shit Perez Hilton, you disgusting example of a human being (and I don't mean that because he's gay, but because he's a gossiping, self-centered piece of excrement).
9. Flap-jack - April 23, 2009 6:30 PM
Wow...does this girl ever shut up?
Seriously. She really is quite boring.
10. Joe Melnick - April 23, 2009 6:30 PM
Miss California should just have said she shares the same opinion on gay marriage as President Obama, the Vice President, and the majority of California voters.
11. Amy - April 23, 2009 6:37 PM
I love how anyone who disagrees with a liberal opinion is narrow-minded.
12. liz4sale - April 23, 2009 6:38 PM
I think what she said is incredibly insulting. to call someone else narrow-minded because they agree with traditional beliefs is fucked up. I personally dont give a shit who gets married. I think everyone should have the right to be married because there are alot of benefits and it gives a feeling of true security, but just because someone else doesnt, i dont think that makes them narrow minded. everyone has their beliefs and their own rationale behind it.
13. Jesse - April 23, 2009 6:42 PM
Come on, are we really going to get worked up over what "I drink nigger pee" presents as her anal-ysis of the situation?
14. Randal - April 23, 2009 6:44 PM
Kim, your thoughts has raised your celebrity status in my books and no doubt in many others as well. You're a well educated young woman with a lot of poise. Mix that with deathly beautiful and you've got a spirit many wish they could only emulate.
Kudos to you my friend!
Randal
15. Mama Pinkus - April 23, 2009 6:46 PM
as vapid as she may be, she is 100% correct
16. Edna Bambrick - April 23, 2009 6:48 PM
#5 & #7 REPORTED
17. Jennifer - April 23, 2009 6:50 PM
@#8
Do you know what the difference is between a popular vote and an electoral vote?
18. Edna Bambrick - April 23, 2009 6:50 PM
Homosexuals will burn in hell.
19. dirk - April 23, 2009 6:54 PM
Well, Obama and the California voters disagree with FatAss, don't they?
20. no euphemisms - this is the actual topic - April 23, 2009 6:58 PM
He laid down on our pile of clothes and I crouched over
top him with my mouth at his erection and his at mine.
He was exactly my height, and there wasn't any way I
was going to let this chance slip by.
I gently licked my way down the length of his pole and
sucked on each of his balls. Then I stuck a finger in
my mouth and got it good and wet before I slowly
inserted this slowly into his anus. I heard him moan
around my penis as it went in.
He continued to suck on my dick as I put his back in
my mouth. With my other hand I stroked the length of
it as my mouth went up and down his erection. My
finger slowly slid in and out his hot little hole as
I sucked him.
Sam was doing a pretty good job on his end. He must
have had some lessons or else it was just beginners
luck. I knew I could keep from coming though. I wanted
to taste his load before I would come. I was really
curious as to who this "friend" of mine was, but I
would find that out later.
To make him come first, I picked up the tempo of my
finger thrusting in him and also my head and hand
motions. His dick was very slick with my saliva by
this time and my hand glided easily over his length.
I paused a couple of times to fondle his balls, but
then I would return to the stroking.
I could tell he was about to come when all motion on
my cock stopped. He just lay there breathing and
moaning as I worked him towards conclusion. He came
with a loud yelp and grabbed the backs of my thighs
as his semen spurted into my mouth. I swallowed it
all and then caught the last little bit off the head
of his penis before turning around to smile at him.
"Like that?" I asked.
"Oh, yeah," he answered, grinning.
Then he reached out and took my erection in his hand
and prepared to bring it to his mouth.
"I thought that should go somewhere else," I said.
"Where? Oh..."
"Yeah," I said. "Have you ever...?"
"No," he answered. "I'm not sure--"
"Don't worry, I know what I'm doing. It will feel
great," I said.
He still seemed a little uncertain, but he was willing
to roll over and prop up his ass for me to get a clear
shot. My dick was already lubricated with his saliva,
but I decided to add some soap and water from the sink.
Then I lined my erection up with his tight little red
hole and slowly inserted it.
Not hearing any complaints from him, I continued until
I was fully embedded. Then I began to slowly make love
to his hot virgin asshole. It didn't take long for me
to have an orgasm. I shot loads of fresh gay sperm
into his ass.
21. Dingleberry - April 23, 2009 7:02 PM
I agree. Nobody should tell anybody what they should believe in. Kim would never demand that everyone should adhere only to her beliefs on marriage . . .oh, wait.
Never mind.
22. Come-Honor-Face - April 23, 2009 7:06 PM
Randal, your a moron.
Imagine if she was forced to not get her brow wax for like 3days, that would be one f&*king hell of a uni-brow
23. Edna Bambrick - April 23, 2009 7:07 PM
#20 has been reported.
24. Nugaloopagus - April 23, 2009 7:24 PM
Killing kittens makes me happy. I guess that is ok too right Kim? Dumbass!
25. nikki - April 23, 2009 7:27 PM
I like how people think that not being open-minded to narrow-minded opinions... is the same as being narrow-minded. And refusing to tolerate intolerance is also intolerance, amirite?!
I'm looking at you, #s 6,11,12,21....
BTW, just because the majority of a population shares an opinion, DOESN'T EXEMPT IT FROM BEING NARROW-MINDED. Then it's just a widely-held narrow minded opinion.
26. Rough Daddy - April 23, 2009 7:29 PM
God damn, I dont believe Reggie own pillows in his house...
27. bob - April 23, 2009 7:31 PM
Hey Edna, aren't you due back at the nursing home?
28. Big Bad Johnny - April 23, 2009 7:35 PM
OK then, Kim, even though I'm 45, I'm going to marry both of my 12-year-old girlfriends. Hey, it would make us all so happy...
Yeah, it sounds pretty stupid coming from me too...
29. Jajajaja - April 23, 2009 7:36 PM
I don't think she has the right to even open her mouth since she's a camel whore.
30. Kitty says - April 23, 2009 7:38 PM
She is the only woman who makes me feel a bit lesbiany. Damn you Kim!!!
31. casualencounters.com/blog/ - April 23, 2009 7:38 PM
I would hit KK and I don't care who knows it.
32. Mike Oxbhig - April 23, 2009 7:43 PM
Uh, wow. Who cares what she thinks.
Although...Shed be hot if it werent for her propensity for dark meat. gross.
33. cavy - April 23, 2009 7:45 PM
Girlfriend is right. She has more sense in one of her "cheeks" than that Miss Cali has in her entire bigoted body!
Again, it's not about Miss Cali's beliefs, it's about the way she presented her response. And really....who is that hateful in this day and age? This whole thing is going to look scarily close minded in 100 years - I hope, in time, Miss Cali is embarrassed by her backwoods remark.
34. cavy - April 23, 2009 7:50 PM
#18 Edna Bambrick
Yeah, I'm sure that's exactly what Jesus would want (/rolls eyes). Way to show compassion. Do you really think your brand of hatred is going to get you a pass through the pearly gates?
If "Religion" is this hateful, mean and nasty, I want NO part of it!
35. Unknown - April 23, 2009 7:50 PM
She looks great :)..she's hot !
36. justifiable - April 23, 2009 7:52 PM
#25 It's the same as being outraged when people disagree - they start screaming "intolerant left", and "where's your respect for our rights"?
Listen up, people, you have the right to your free speech and your opinion. No one will delete your posts, virus your computer or refuse to let you speak - that's intolerance and censorship.
But there's no such thing as Freedom From Criticism.
People will tell you you're narrow minded when they think you are. People will tell you you're a moron if they think you're reasoning like one. People will call you a bigot if they think you sound like one. If you disagree with that assessment, you are also free to retort at length and in kind. That's what free speech is - if your opinion is unpopular, you'll hear about it, but you're still allowed to voice it no matter what.
It's not about everyone else respectfully shutting up when you voice what some feel are intolerant statements. Get it?
37. Sport - April 23, 2009 7:53 PM
Douche > Pond Scum > Randal > Kim K
38. saphkilla - April 23, 2009 7:53 PM
edna needs to get a life
39. Chester - April 23, 2009 7:55 PM
Im so sick of seeing fucking Kim and her retarded family on this site. Fish please stop posting about her, she has no positive value on society. Please just post on hot women or women with a reaonable amount of value or integrity, so that excludes Monthog and Hayden ( she lost all value when she turned 18 ).
40. Fatty Arbuckle - April 23, 2009 8:01 PM
I feel sorry for Kim. In picture 4 it looks like her legs are about to give out from carrying the weight of that ass.
If Kim dressed in primary colors and lay face down on the floor of a McDonald's, a whole bunch of kids could play on her ass, rolling around and bouncing off of it, etc. Hopefully a kid wouldn't fall in; Nancy Grace would have another missing child case to get hysterical about.
41. Adam - April 23, 2009 8:04 PM
"I'm not so narrow-minded so I definitely think a lot broader."
I've never understood why people give a damn about gay marriage. It just doesn't register. But given the number of idiots like this dumb skank who support it, I think I'm opposed to it now.
42. Galtacticus - April 23, 2009 8:04 PM
In this outfit she doesn't look that bad.It suits her exotic looks well.
43. Darth - April 23, 2009 8:07 PM
I don't think she's narrow minded as well.Look at the size of her head.
44. Who Cares? - April 23, 2009 8:15 PM
who cares?
45. Heidi Montag - April 23, 2009 8:16 PM
#41 Nothing like a well-reasoned decision, is there? Spencer and myself form our opinions just like you do! First I saw Britney was for it and that decided us right then and there! But if Miley changes her mind our publicist says that we'll have to reconsider for sure.
46. Lugh - April 23, 2009 8:20 PM
@17 "Jennifer"
Yes I know what popular votes and electoral votes are. Do you understand the concept of a percentage of the popular vote, like 52% vs 48%? Do you have anything substantive to add to the conversation or just more mindless idiocy?
47. Rossco - April 23, 2009 8:52 PM
Thank you, Fish, for the summary, as there's no way I was going to read that whole thing. It's like you can read my mind! O_o
48. 1moreidiotintheworld - April 23, 2009 9:00 PM
IT speaks!!!!!!
IT has opinions!!!!
I thought it was just a giant blob of ass grease starved for attention.......
Personally I would listen to my pet Iguana's opinions before giving a shit about that stupid cunt's skull farts............
49. liz4sale - April 23, 2009 9:40 PM
#25 I was simply saying that she shouldnt call anyone narrow minded because of their opinion and belief in traditional values. Calling someone narrow minded speaks of their intelligence and i found that to be insulting to call someone that based on their views. I think there are valid points on both sides and i'm not at all intolerant or narrowminded to either side of the argument. so yea fuck off.
50. Nightsage - April 23, 2009 10:30 PM
I think he summed it up pretty well. "MEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!" Haha, that made me lol...
51. Semen4Kim - April 23, 2009 10:32 PM
Kim is so gorgeous! I would ejaculate all over and in her all night and day. Peace!!!
52. PostmortemG - April 23, 2009 10:45 PM
"Miss California should just have said she shares the same opinion on gay marriage as President Obama, the Vice President, and the majority of California voters."
Agreed.
"If Kim dressed in primary colors and lay face down on the floor of a McDonald's, a whole bunch of kids could play on her ass, rolling around and bouncing off of it, etc."
You're a genius. =D
As for *YOU*, Kim... this is by far your most pathetic attempt at 'validity' yet; it's even more stupid than your supposed 'sunburn' incident. You worthless, worthless whore; it's obvious you're jealous of Miss California, because she's actually achieved something *ON HER OWN*, and without the aid of piss or porn. *GET TEETH KNOCKED OUT OF YOUR FACE, HOOKER*!!! I think Miss California should retaliate with a statement involving the words 'piss' and 'porn'. Please do this, Miss California!!! =D
That aside, and while homosexuality is the current subject, i recommend the following films:
Salo, Or The 120 Days Of Sodom [ 1975 ]
According to legend, this movie's misanthropic, gay director was murdered because of this film. It's about 4 respected, secretly homosexual aristocrats in Italy during WW2, who kidnap 9 virgin boys and 9 virgin girls, and basically torment them physically, sexually and mentally for 120 days. When they've had their fun, the aristocrats finally torture the kids to death. This might be my favorite film of all time, right next to Di$ney's Pinnochio! =D
Cruising [ 1980 ]
This is a classic, incoherent film about a homo-killer stalking the gay S&M scene of New York City. Paul Sorvino [ !!! ] puts Al Pacino [ !!! ] on the case, who is required to pose as a homosexual in order to infiltrate the gay nightlife. This film features some mean-spirited scenes of gay men getting hacked to death by a serial killer who is apparently gay himself, as well as butt-loads of authentic footage depicting gross, gay shenanigan after gross, gay shenanigan.
In A Glass Cage [ 1987 ]
This movie is about a pedophile Nazi who just can't stop molesting, torturing and killing little boys, even though WW2 is over and his new 'civilian' status doesn't require him to do so anymore. According to legend, this movie was screened at a gay film festival back in the day, and just about everyone walked out of it. Sadistic child-murder, sexual abuse and Hellish atmosphere abound.
Irreversible [ 2002 ]
Monica Bellucci gets raped anally by a bisexual pimp, and then he smashes her face into a cement floor until her beauty is irreparably destroyed; besides that, this movie also features an ultra-brutal 'death by fire extinguisher' murder scene, set in an actual gay S&M club somewhere in Europe. This is an abstract French film, so i won't bother with the actual plot.
53. Charley Kane - April 23, 2009 10:49 PM
Yes Ms Kardashian is very attractive but i couldn't give a flying fuck about her views on society. Nor for that matter do i want to know what a beauty queen thinks, but at least she was asked on stage and she had to answer or seem rude, she didnt go out of her way to let everyone know what she thought. For the record, i think gays should be allowed to get married - if a straight marriage is threatened by this then it is already in big trouble, if you know what i mean.
54. Bud - April 23, 2009 10:52 PM
Well….. My Mom and I have a thing going on outside of our normal Mother/Son relationship. She’s hot and she’s romantic…. My Mom makes me feel like and real man when we have sex…. We’re also best friends AND she’s my Mom to boot……
Some people call it incest….. I call it love!!!! Don’t you “dare” judge me!!!! Who are any of you to judge me. It’s special to us….
Are you going to tell me our love is some how "less than" in some way than those of others...????
55. Huckleberry Hashimoto - April 23, 2009 11:01 PM
"Kim Kardashian on Miss California"
I wouldn't pay to see that, but I might watch a free clip.
56. jEnsmo - April 23, 2009 11:08 PM
So...people that love dogs/horses/children a little too much should be allowed to marry them w/o "narrow minded' people saying they do not agree with it?
57. gerard Vandenberg - April 23, 2009 11:28 PM
This way of waving reminds me to my GRANDMA, folks!!
58. Knee Ya Ha Ha - April 23, 2009 11:30 PM
Knee Ya Ha Ha : Well personwoolly at first I find this story a little bit 'gay'.(Sorwee Kim) But then I read a few comments - above this one here.
And then think. Hummmm. #20. What you twying to say here exaxctwee ?
Sounds like some sort of ...you know...Inside job ?
'Frank' from 16th Floor : So.... 'Land of the Free - Home of Torture.'
'Torture - you can believe in'
'And You Thought Pirate Bay was Hot ? Walk the Plank With Johnny Depp'
Knee Ya Ha Ha : WTF 'Frank' ? What you say here ? Exactwee ?
'Frank' from 16th Floor : Just running by a few my idea ads for Chong's Buffalo Hot Wing Shop - 14rh Floor. Johnny Depp wings have that Somali 183 suicide sauce (tm)
Knee Ya Ha Ha : Oh,
59. Nikki - April 23, 2009 11:56 PM
@49
When your "traditional values" are bigoted and hateful (yet unsettlingly steadfast) opinions based on a 2,000+ year old book that's been translated and retranslated countless times over the centuries based on the whims of kings and the prevailing ecclesiology of the times, a book which can and should not have sway in the political arena... Yeah, not so much intelligence or thoughtfulness going on there.
@54
Incest is generally frowned upon for an actual reason. Children who are the products of incest have a high chance of genetic defects that lead to illness and/or death. The less you mix the gene pool, the worse the outcome.
@56
Dogs, horses and children can't enter contractual relationships, rendering marriage with said individuals a non-issue. However, two mentally sound adults can, but it seems that this one particular legal contract is denied to two people of the same gender.
60. Sarah - April 24, 2009 12:04 AM
god that dress is hideous.
61. I CALL LINDA A WHORE IN THE BODY OF THIS MESSAGE - April 24, 2009 12:34 AM
lol knee ya ha ha you always crack me up!
62. meee - April 24, 2009 12:39 AM
#13, you're a piece of fucking shit & i'm ALMOST embarrassed that i just acknowledged you.
that said, go kim. yes, everyone is entited to their opinion. but if what someone else wants to do doesn't harm/hurt/damage anyone else, let it go.
it's like, i look back at the time when blacks were still severely supressed even in the 50s/60s. this is the EXACT same issue, except with sexual orientation instead of race. regardless, half of you fuckers are going to feel like assholes in the end.
63. Truth Doctor - April 24, 2009 12:41 AM
Adds Kardashian, "... No one should tell someone else how to think or how to feel."
Wait, isn't that exactly what you're doing to her, Kim? She didn't push her beliefs on anybody, she simply answered a question truthfully. You're the one telling people how to think and feel, you fat assed hypocrite. Drink bleach please.
64. e to the c - April 24, 2009 12:50 AM
She sounds like a frickin' retard.
65. TheJoker07 - April 24, 2009 1:09 AM
I'll like to stuff her pretty mouth with you know what.
66. boholove - April 24, 2009 1:11 AM
Why do ppl ask Kim for her opinion if they think she is so stupid? Find someone who you think is actually worth talking to if you feel that way!
That is such a controversial issue around the USA, not everyone has the same opinion or views! OBVIOUSLY. It's like asking about premarital sex of course your going to have different views. If the word doesnt have a source (bible) to live by (not strictly) but some sort of guideline then you would have one hell of a world. In this case this a woman is getting shit for what she believes in? That's not right.
You shouldnt ask questions like that at a pagent, she stood up for what she believed in and if ppl can't do then that then what has America come to?
Then maybe they shoud have a checklist of what they believe in and what there views are before they allow them to be in a pagent.
67. OMG I HATE THIS BITCH - April 24, 2009 1:14 AM
STOP POSTING ABOUT HER. SHE PAYS A CREW TO FOLLOW HER AROUND AND TAKE PICTURES OF HER TO TRICK PEOPLE INTO THINKING SHE'S SOME SORT OF CELEBRITY.
68. Knee Ya Ha Ha - April 24, 2009 1:52 AM
So. #61
'I CALL LINDA A WHORE IN THE BODY OF THIS MESSAGE'
Cheers.
(Not weelee sure what you subliminal twying to message here - but I guessing it to do with free fall collapse speed through undamaged steel structure)
(That type of thing) Whatever.
# 62-67 - Inside job ?
69. Tom K - April 24, 2009 6:47 AM
Her opinion isn't worth shit! She let's black men piss on her on video for Christ sake. Her dad is spinning in his grave like a fucking tornado!
She’s looking good though and has recovered from the sunburn rather quickly. Must be all that hot sperm to the face she gets from Reggie Bush.
70. Rough Daddy - April 24, 2009 7:18 AM
No melted ice cream here baby, those shock absorbers can bounce a Mack truck to the ceiling...
71. KK GO AWAYKGOAWAY - April 24, 2009 8:36 AM
SHE IS SUCH AN AIRHEAD.
KIM, NO ONE CARES WHAT YOU THINK. YOU ARE NOT A CELEBRITY. YOU ARE AN ATTENTION WHORE WHO ONLY TAKES OFF HER CLOTHES.
AND, WHAT'S UP WITH HER FACE? SHE LOOKS MORE AND MORE PLASTIC EVERY TIME I SEE HER.
72. RichPort's Ghost - April 24, 2009 8:49 AM
She is neither narrow minded nor narrow hipped...
73. Paul - April 24, 2009 8:53 AM
Fortunately, I saw that picture before I read what she said, so I took it with a grain of most-vapid-person-in-history. I really could give a half of a half a shit about her opinion. That's right, a quarter of a shit to her.
74. Michelle Johnson - April 24, 2009 9:07 AM
Ok first off its Adam and Eve , not Adam and Steve!!
75. Michelle Johnson - April 24, 2009 9:07 AM
Ok first off its Adam and Eve , not Adam and Steve!!
76. RichPort's Ghost - April 24, 2009 9:11 AM
If not for gay people, what the hell would the rest of you wear or watch on TV? I make my own clothes out of hemp and stare at my wall alot, so I'd be ok...
77. eggs - April 24, 2009 9:12 AM
@56. That's a reductio ad absurdum fallacy.
78. Disappointed - April 24, 2009 9:20 AM
The title is misleading.
I totally expected girl on girl action.
Disappointed.
79. Christina - April 24, 2009 9:23 AM
People are entitled to their opinions, but we all know they are wrong. God means love.
80. roddy902 - April 24, 2009 9:27 AM
I wouldn't mind seeing Kim K on Miss California!
81. havanicejay - April 24, 2009 9:37 AM
blahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh blahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
82. bored - April 24, 2009 9:50 AM
Don't broad minded people accept all points of view because they ARE broad minded? Fat bitch can take it up the ass and get peed on again, I'm First in line!
83. Mary - April 24, 2009 9:59 AM
Kim isn't know for anything everything is about her. Who wants to look up on a girl like that. Miss California is the girl to look up to, she took a stand in millions of people(thank you Carrie many girls are lokking up to you) Gay marriage is wrong. I'm praying for you Carrie.
84. Mary - April 24, 2009 9:59 AM
Kim isn't know for anything everything is about her. Who wants to look up on a girl like that. Miss California is the girl to look up to, she took a stand in millions of people(thank you Carrie many girls are lokking up to you) Gay marriage is wrong. I'm praying for you Carrie.
85. dirk - April 24, 2009 10:12 AM
Kim said everyone should have the right to get married and gargle urine on their honeymoon.
86. Donkey Dongey Dong - April 24, 2009 10:17 AM
@85
That's funny as balls!
87. Janey - April 24, 2009 10:43 AM
Edna's back!!!!!
88. Daddy-O - April 24, 2009 10:44 AM
"I don't agree with her narrow mindedness..."
How very narrow-minded of you.
89. Ryan - April 24, 2009 10:59 AM
She has such a fat ass. She should be "happy" with the backlash? Regardless of the content of what California said, I commend her on her exercise of free speech without sugar coating it. How dare she disagree anyone liberal!!!
90. Yank and wank they rhyme for a reason - April 24, 2009 11:10 AM
She expresses herself poorly, but at least it not the common ignorant American narrow minded opinion of most of your revolting nation. Thank God I live in a more liberal place (which has less crime, low teen pregnancy, low murder rate, superior education achievement and the rest) How it must feel to be American I can only be thankful it's not something I will ever be forced to experience.
91. Yank and wank they rhyme for a reason - April 24, 2009 11:10 AM
She expresses herself poorly, but at least it not the common ignorant American narrow minded opinion of most of your revolting nation. Thank God I live in a more liberal place (which has less crime, low teen pregnancy, low murder rate, superior education achievement and the rest) How it must feel to be American I can only be thankful it's not something I will ever be forced to experience.
92. Lisa - April 24, 2009 11:20 AM
Actually piss- pot, most people DO agree with her.
93. Objection sustained - April 24, 2009 11:21 AM
@90,91
Considering you're an Englishman you are not doing the English language any favors.
94. RichPort's Ghost - April 24, 2009 11:23 AM
#90/91 - Hey Limey, shouldn't you be preparing for the next potato famine? Don't come to our golden shores looking for a job either... unless of course it's to opening yet another fucking pub so we can make fun of your accent. The reason you have less crime is because your tanking economy makes guns prohibitively expensive. The reason your teen pregnancy rate is so low is... well, I've been to Ireland, and while you're "lovely" people from a congeniality standpoint, no amount of Guinness in the world would ever make me fuck an Irish teen. And you can use your superior education to beg the EU for more money. Now gimme some fucking Lucky Charms you Erin Go Broke beeotch.
95. AJ - April 24, 2009 11:31 AM
OMG Kim already has botox on her face and she's 29! She is going to totally ruin her face by the time she's in her 30s! Gosh Kim has a big fat ass for a short chick!
96. whatever - April 24, 2009 11:37 AM
what a hypocrite ! she's far from "open minded". she said on her blog that she has only dated Christian men and that her dad would be mad if he she dated someone who wasn't Christian (her sister kourtney dated a Jewish guy for over a year). Wow what a hypocrite, first she preached about how she grew up on a really open-minded family and that she will date any guy who is "nice" and then she turns around and says she'll only date Christians lmao what makes kim k a Christian? Oh i guess a sex tape and playboy. She's so fake, she needs to shut up and whoever asked for kim's opinion is a moron to begin with.
97. Where's the loofah, O'Reilly? - April 24, 2009 11:38 AM
Some woman whose sole achievement in life is participating in a beauty pageant thinks she has a big, important idea, and we care why? Good for Kim Kardashian for calling whatshername out for being stuck in the 50s.
Of course, that's no match for the irony of "they're gonna burn in hell!" bible thumpers and anti-gay bigots turning up in droves to lash out ... on a Hollywood gossip site. What happened, did FreeRepublic yank their accounts? Rush Limbaugh won't take their calls?
You're debating societal morals and spewing anti-gay venom on a humor/gossip site? Seriously?
98. OK - April 24, 2009 11:43 AM
HAHA ON HER BLOG THE OTHER DAY SHE PUT UP A POST ABOUT EARTH DAY AND WAS SAYIN HOW WE SHOULDN'T USE THOSE COFFEE CUPS FROM STARBUCKS, ETC, AND HERE SHE IS WITH ONE IN HER HAND, SHE'S SO FAKE. SHE'S FULL OF CONTRADICTIONS. CAN'T SHE EVER SAY "NO COMMENT"??? SHE HAS TO JUMP ON ANYTHING IN THE NEWS, LIKE JESSICA SIMPSON, OCTOMOM, AND NOW MISS CALIFORNIA...JUST SHUT UP KIM, SHUT UP.
99. megan - April 24, 2009 12:14 PM
wow. i hate how people falsely compare gay marriage to marrying dogs/horses/children/yourmother... you cannot compare apples to oranges, it doesn't validate your argument. marrying a horse is not the same thing as marrying a human being. and marrying a person of your sex is not the same thing as marrying your mother (or some other blood relative). if two PEOPLE love each other, and they are of legal age, and not related, why the fuck can't they get married?
100. dirk - April 24, 2009 12:19 PM
For Earthday, kim refused to drink out of the plastic coffee cups, and hopped into her 8,000 lb Escalade. Liberal Frauds.
101. Sid - April 24, 2009 12:21 PM
What the fuck happened to Kim's face? She should have waited to use botox!
102. Kira - April 24, 2009 12:24 PM
So I guess Kim also thinks her previous Barack Obama is also narrow-minded. Oops, I forgot! Obama can believe and support whatever he likes because he's the MESSIAH!
103. Kira - April 24, 2009 12:27 PM
@102. EDIT: "previous" should be "precious." I can't type well.
104. Dirk Diggler - April 24, 2009 12:28 PM
Who gives a fuck what this cow thinks. By her reasoning if a 45 year old man loves a 12 year old boy that is good enough...let em get married. Or if a 63 year old lady loves her cat....let em get married.
I am so sick of this gay rights bs. Sure they have rights...but why do they think they can hijack "marriage". Let them come up with their own thing and call it a something else with legal rights attatched.
105. dirk - April 24, 2009 12:32 PM
Let people have butt sex if they want. Hell, that's how Obama got defecated.
106. Cold Zero - April 24, 2009 12:59 PM
If Kim Kardashian really was "On Miss California", Miss California would likely suffocate from the sheer volume and weight of Kim's giant posterior. Or, at least get caught between the cheeks and disappear forever when KK stood up.
107. RichPort's Ghost - April 24, 2009 1:08 PM
#103 - That's ok. We expect constant errors from your kind.
108. smarg - April 24, 2009 1:11 PM
Homosexuality is a filthy, disease-ridden practice explicitly condemned by God.
109. Kira - April 24, 2009 1:33 PM
@107- That's ok, Spelling Nazi.
You and your imaginary friends can believe whatever you like.
110. Case - April 24, 2009 1:40 PM
Seriously, who gives a shit what she thinks.
111. Jane D. - April 24, 2009 1:42 PM
Actually, it is true that Obama is against gay marriage, though he does support civil unions: http://www.ontheissues.org/Barack_Obama.htm
112. Sara - April 24, 2009 2:26 PM
OMG.. PEOPLE r so idiot... The girl just said what she believes about marriage... she trust in the Bible.. God is so clear about homossexuals... so if she trust in it.. let the girl!!! All u r judging her... She never mentioned she hates homossexual or something like that.. just her point of view... We christian know that God loves EVERYBODY... but it doesn't mean He agrees with some choices we make....
113. RichPort's Ghost - April 24, 2009 2:40 PM
#109 - I've spoken to my imaginary friends, who, interestingly enough, just pissed all over your imaginary friends, and they all agree: you're a douche. And I didn't correct your spelling; YOU did. I just stated that your people are really good at making mistakes. Homeschool much?
114. yo - April 24, 2009 2:57 PM
you know there are some countries out there where a gay man would be stoned to death or have his throat cut while a massive crowd cheers. i think all the fags in this country should be gratful that americans will tolerate their obnoxious fag voices, clothing, and disgusting PDA on the subway with nothing more than a nasty look on their face. oh yea ive seem many a fag on the subway. but anyway they should be happy with that if u ask me. they want too much. you see, because marriage is meant for raising a family and a couple of gay dudes or chicks cant have a true family. they can adopt sure, but thats not what marriage is really about. and the reason there are so many that follow the traditional views is because it is important that we remember where we came from. everything is getting so muddied up with who deserves what. its simple, homos cannot have children together therefore should not be married.
115. Hanz Brix - April 24, 2009 3:12 PM
Parroting everything the MTV crowd says about gay marriage= "one of those rare events where a celebrity says something intelligent about someone else, and not in an insulting manner."
Thanks for that, wags.
116. Wake Up People - April 24, 2009 3:34 PM
#112
Too bad people do not understand a lot of history or else they would understand how inaccuarate The Bible can be.
117. Clive - April 24, 2009 3:38 PM
That guy in blue behind KIm looks just like the Craigslist murderer...
118. Paulina - April 24, 2009 3:51 PM
When will this girl get it through her head that NO ONE wants to hear what she thinks? She should just pose for pictures. If she kept her mouth shut a lot more people would like her.
119. Kira - April 24, 2009 3:58 PM
@113: Sounds like you're the one who has been homeschooled! You have zero reading comprehension. You sound an awful lot like the losers who still live in their mommy's basement. Perhaps that's why you have imaginary friends: no girl in their right mind would ever date you.
The part of your post that I was responding to was how "my kind" makes mistakes. Any idiot with half a brain could realize which part of your post I was responding to except you apparently. Get that stick out of your ass and grow the fuck up. People sometimes have typos, so don't act like your shit don't stink.
Now go back crying to your mommy and being Obama's bitch!
120. InternetToughGuy - April 24, 2009 4:26 PM
You fucking idiots should know home-schoolers do a lot better in college than people that went to the government slave camps before trying to hurl it as an insult. What a bunch of morons that post here. 1 in 10 have common sense.
And to the stupid fucks saying "don't broad minded people accept everything"...no stupid fucks. Broad minded people analyze information objectively that most people won't even consider and are usual liberal in thought, but not always. It doesn't mean you broadly accept everything. Truly embarassing logic used by most of you.
It's ridiculous that Miss California gets attacked for this. Just goes to show all the cry babies out there wanting to force their opinions on everyone. It probably doesn't help that she is in shape and attractive, naturally all the fat people and social rejects are going to be up in arms.
121. jakelymes - April 24, 2009 4:28 PM
Kill em all and let God sort them out.
122. UpChuck - April 24, 2009 4:38 PM
Another candy ass, no talent, born rich, worthless liberal is for queer matrimony.
I don't have a point here. It's just feels good to say it.
123. justifiable - April 24, 2009 4:44 PM
#114 Now, see, in Nazi Germany you'd have been put in the back of a truck with the exhaust vented into it and driven around until you were dead for being so incredibly feebleminded. So you should be grateful that in this country we tolerate your idiocy and don't execute you for your potential to fuck up this country's gene pool when and if you decide to procreate, as you're clearly too stupid to really deserve any rights here.
WANT TOO MUCH? Where the fuck do you think you live, asswipe? Obviously in a nation where you have to be "deserving" by someone's standards (that'd be you doing the deciding, right?) in order to have any rights at all.. So if you think you live in a country where you get to have more rights and freedoms than anyone else because your dick does a natural salute when it sees a woman, I suggest you fucking move to Iraq and end your mental confusion right now, because you're already a naturalized citizen.
124. RichPort's Ghost - April 24, 2009 4:55 PM
#119 - "mother's basement"... Check... ". "No girl would ever date you"... Check... "Reading comprehension"... Check...
You've nearly mastered the entire Douche Guide to Unsnarky Comments, but to get a perfect 10, you'll have to throw in a few more "threw up in my mouth a little bit," "FIRST!!!," and "body of a 12 year old boy" lines to be a complete stereotype. But fear not, with lack of originality like yours, you are well on your way, cupcake.
125. tons of sarcasm - April 24, 2009 4:57 PM
#120 It figures - those damn home schoolers have a legal defense association, too, to protect their rights. Why can't they just be part of the mainstream and be "normal"? Why do they insist on wanting "alternate" methods of education and then try to push themselves into normal colleges with the rest of us? If they want to learn at home they should just damn well stay at home all the way down the line and not try to have what we have.
126. Kira - April 24, 2009 4:57 PM
@120--Um, if homeschooling works out so well, then why can't my friend's 12- year -old nephew, who is homeschooled, write his own name or solve a simple addition problem? He studies hard, has an average IQ and yet is about as educated as a 6-year-old. Getting a proper education as a homeschooled student requires a lot of time and discipline, which many students and their parents lack.
Why do the homeschooled students in my college classes struggle with writing papers? I'm sure there are homeschooled students out there that are doing fine, but many of them have trouble competing with students who attended private and public schools. Their social skills leave much to be desired. These students aren't dumb at all, but severely uneducated.
127. nemesis - April 24, 2009 5:05 PM
#119 Sorry Kira, you lose. Ponderously explaining how Rich wasn't funny and how you were responding etc etc = compounding your fuckup.
He got off a good shot, you deserved it. Now go be Rush's bitch. With any luck you won't tunnel out from under that bloated pile of oxycontin-laced ranting lard for a month or two.
128. romper room dropout - April 24, 2009 5:13 PM
#126 Depends on how smart the parent/teacher is. If mom couldn't pass a teaching exam or pull more than 500 on a combined score SAT, then the answer to the fanous question "is our children learning" would be "no". How many parents outside the education field can write a coherent essay? Then how to they expect to teach that non-existant skill to their kids? With no other students around to compete, junior or mom often can't see what the standards should be. There are home school teaching programs, but if your parent can't cope with those, better hope Bob Jones University needs another legacy.
129. RichPort's Ghost - April 24, 2009 5:13 PM
Everytime I think Kira hits the bottom of the ditch, someone throws her a shovel... Simple reason your friend's kid can't spel alrite... He's just not that bright. Not that there's anything wrong with that... someone has to be in charge of the drive thru window.
130. yo - April 24, 2009 5:18 PM
#123 now that was a little harsh dont u think? are you a fag? look dude its a simple fact that homos cant have children together. so why the fuck should they ever marry? the point of marriage is to bring children into the world with parents who are biological theirs. so bloodlines can be traced. what would be the purpose of two gay men to get married? even if they adopted its not their child. and that kid would already be confused enough, being an orphan and having two daddies. so i ask you again what is the purpose of gay marriage? just to say they can?
131. yo - April 24, 2009 5:26 PM
#123 oh yea and just because we live in america doesnt mean everyone should be able to do whatever the fuck they want. get a fucking grip. im not saying that only straight ppl should have any rights but as far as marriage is concerned I dont think gays should be able to. because i say again, they cannot have children together. it is a simple truth. all it will do is cheapen what marriage truly is. and i know they cant help being fags bla bla bla. but if thats true then they need to deal with the fact that they are and stop cryin about it.
132. PostmortemG - April 24, 2009 5:37 PM
So Kim only dates 'Christians', eh? As someone else mentioned, Playboy and porn aren't exactly 'Christian'. Another thing - The Bible itself explicitly condemns homosexuality, in the book of Romans. This whore is so fucking worthless and stupid. Once again: *GET TEETH KNOCKED OUT OF YOUR FACE, HOOKER*!!!
That aside, and while homosexuality is the current subject, i recommend the following film [ Add it to the previous list above ]:
Cannibal [ 2005 ]
This is an ultra-gross movie about a homosexual cannibal who fucks, kills, dismembers, cooks and consumes another homosexual, who wanted nothing more than to be eaten. It's a gay match made in Hell. One tender scene features the cannibal cutting off the victim's penis, after which they fry it and eat it together. Gay sex, blood, piss, shit, and excruciating violence upon the male human body - Cannibal has it all! =D
133. Tim - April 24, 2009 5:57 PM
@127 and 129:
If you think Kira is such a loser, then why do you keep arguing with her? Why waste your time? Are you both that easily offended? Geez, no wonder Miss California got attacked for her opinion. We have morons like Rich Port's Bitch and Nemesis who are too damn sensitive about everything!
134. bitingontinfoil - April 24, 2009 6:33 PM
"Kim Kardashian *On* Miss California" LMAO
Those butt cheeks would smother the bitch!!
135. justifiable - April 24, 2009 6:46 PM
#130 A little harsh? No. Am I a fag? No, but thanks for further digging yourself into a bigoted hole. I'm sure it's a strange concept for you, but you don't have to actively benefit in order to object to an injustice.
If the purpose of marriage is to produce children so they can inherit, I assume you'll now be enforcing an adoption program for all infertile couples? WIll they be forced to take two, or will just one do? I assume you'll also be confiscating all birth control from those married couples who ARE fertile but stubbornly refusing to have kids - shame on them! And I assume anyone who has a child outside of marriage will be forced to wed the father so that child will fall within the marriage framework. If bloodlines "need" to be traced I assume there wil be no more children given up for adoption or foster care, they'll have to stay with their biological parents. If their mothers abandon them, we can just have the babies killed as we don't know what sort of genetic heritage they have.
It never occured to you that not all gay couples adopt, did it? Many have biological children through a surrogate or antificial insemination - gee, just like hetero couples who go outside their union when one or both of them is infertile. Cheaters! I assume their inherited goods will NOT be left to such an un-genetically linked kid.
You need to learn the difference between "doing what you want" and "a right" before you embarass youself any further. On the other hand, if you're the type who likes to haul his pants up to his armpits and sit on the porch rocker and complain bitterly how everyone does what they want all the time nowadays, don't even bother.
You might 'want' to hold up a liquor store, but you have no 'right' to do that. I might 'want' to keep you from voting because based on what you write here I think you'll make the stupidest choice possible, but I can't, because that's YOUR 'right'. It's my 'right' to enter into a legal contract like marriage, but I can't prevent anyone else from having that 'right' because of how they look, how they worship, how they think, how smart they are, or how they fuck, no matter how I might 'want' to. I also can't dictate that they think of marriage just as I do, or have one just like mine, even though that's what I 'want' to do. Get the difference?
That's what it comes down to. Now, if you disapprove of someone having the same rights as you because you don't like how they look, think or act, you have three choices. You can either agitate to remove those amendments from the Constitution so you'll be happy and secure and superior among those second-class citizens who don't have what you have, or move someplace where equal rights aren't guaranteed, or stick around and bitch about fags. You have a right to all three, you can do what you want.
136. nguoithutu - April 24, 2009 6:53 PM
Man, she even sucks at shutting up...
"I don't agree with her narrow mindedness". She didn't ask you to agree with her, dumb ass. Miss CA clearly stated that it was her belief. Since when did we lose our freedom of speech and freedom of religion?
I agree with #104, "I am so sick of this gay rights bs. Sure they have rights...but why do they think they can hijack "marriage". Let them come up with their own thing and call it a something else with legal rights attatched."
And this is my opinion. If you don't like it, too bad.
137. russian roulette - April 24, 2009 6:54 PM
#132 Hey genius, what does the Bible say about people who continue to defile their minds and eyes watching the "unclean" movies you've seen? And the paedophile in Glass Cage is just that, a child molester, not a homosexual. So you just bore false witness.
Would you like to be stoned tonight for these sins after sundown or can we just get you at dawn tomorrow?
138. Nikki - April 24, 2009 7:15 PM
@137
I lol'd IRL *high five*
What's this crap about "cheapening marriage"? Is marriage like a Coach bag -- now that everyone has one, they're worthless? What? I thought marriage was a legal contract to which everyone has a right? And isn't the quality of the relationship with your spouse was determined by you and he/she, not the gay couple down the street? Like, what, every time a gay couple marries, 10 "opposite" couples get divorced in a fit of rage? Are you gonna beat your wife upon seeing two guys kiss?
I don't get it.
139. yo - April 24, 2009 7:18 PM
#135 no you are completely not getting it. I was simply stating what the purpose of marriage is and what it was meant for. . yea i see what you are saying. but if marriage has nothing to do with children then why should anyone get married at all? you say there are hetero couples who use birth control. yes. gay couples who do not adopt. true. but the hetero couple still have the opportunity to have a child together whereas a gay couple does not. even if one of them has a child from a surrogate it is still not a child belonging to them as a couple. and i think it is very important for bloodlines to be traced because otherwise people wouldnt know where the fuck anybody came from. and no i dont think all that shit u said about being forced to marry the father and having the babies killed and whatever, thats ludacris. but i think youre opinion is well thought out and i can respect that. no need to be childish and immature with name calling am i right? im really not a biggot. matter of fact im sure there are plenty of decent gays out there but i just think marriage is for families..not for two people to say look at us we're gay and married..im asking you once more, why should two gay people be married? what purpose will it serve?
140. smell the reality - April 24, 2009 7:28 PM
#136 Since when is she not allowed to disagree with Miss CA's statement? KK has a right to call it narrow-minded and Miss CA has the right to say it and call Kim a fatass too if she wants, so what's your damn problem? (other than you don't agree with KK I mean) WTF, if you voice an opinion based on your religion, no one should say shit because it's your faith? If Tom Cruise and Bijou Phillips don't get a pass with their scientology crap, why the hell should she?
I don't think Miss CA should have been put on the spot, I think it was a stupid obvious setup but I also think she was too dumb to field it and get out of her own way so no wonder she lost, she looked like an airhead. Beauty pageants are about politics just like anything else, that's why everyone gives that same world peace answer and if you haven't got that down you won't get anywhere.
141. jdisse - April 24, 2009 8:49 PM
Kim Kardashian must be shelling out some serious money to the Superficial. You would think that shes Elvis out of hiding the way this site promotes her EVERY DAY. Kim Kardashian on the superficial=product placement.
142. justifiable - April 24, 2009 9:04 PM
#139 What "purpose" would it serve for two people who know they're infertile to be married - except that they love each other, make each other happy, and would build a life together taking care of each other? That's the most compelling reason I know of to be married, and what right do you have to stand in the way of that? If reproduction and inheritance were all that was required of the institution, arranged marriages to perpetuate inherited wealth would still be made today, and barren women and their dowries returned to their fathers' houses in disgrace.
And you're wrong - a child made by a surrogate for a gay couple is just as much their child as one made for a hetero couple, or do you somehow think gay people don't love or feel as deeply for a child or each other as a hetero people do? The gay or straight parent who didn't contribute genetic material to that child still has to legally adopt it. If neither contributed any DNA, then both parents, whether gay or straight, would have to legally adopt it.
You keep harping on bloodlines being traced, like this is somehow vital for a family's existence. That's an argument against single parents and a very big one against adoption, but not one against gay marriage. What about the orphans from Russia, Romania, Guatamala and China being adopted by US families - who know nothing about them or their bloodlines? Legitimizing gay marriage provides a traceability you're seeking because of the change in one's legal status.
But what about straight black people - are they now not allowed to marry because they can't trace their bloodlines because their great-grandparents were sold and traded and kidnapped to this country as slaves? That argument for having to know your genetics was used by bigots, along with the popular "racial pollution", to prevent laws against interracial marriage being overturned back in the 1950's - so you might want to rethink how, or why, you're so insistant on using it. It's nice that you put such store on knowing your heritage - I do, too - but quite frankly, it's irrelevant here.
You might term the argument I gave you "ludicris' (btw, that's the rapper, it's 'ludicrous') - but it was the logical extension of your argument. If it's ludicrous, get a better argument. Nowhere in any marriage contract will you find that producing children is necessary to legitimize it. Children are often the result of two people coming together in marriage, but that's not the sole reason it exists, especially today when there's far less stigma to having a kid on your own outside of marriage. And you can adopt without being married - or straight.
"Marriage is for families" you say....Two people who love each other ARE a family, no matter what their gender or whether they have children. It's the love that binds them that makes it so, not biology, not reproduction, not a church or synangogue, not your opinion or mine. You can have a "family" where mom and dad are married in church, with kids and the whole deal, and it can be destructive and abusive and unloving and produce damaged children. What purpose does a "family" like that serve? Just because it looks like how you think a 'family' should look doesn't mean it is one. And many 'families' that don't look exactly like your classic definition - truly are.
143. Tcat - April 24, 2009 10:05 PM
So I guess that makes President Obama narrow minded too....since Miss California stated the same thing Obama did. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=criiu2h3ZAk
144. Tcat - April 24, 2009 10:10 PM
My other comment didn't post...so I will post again.
Does Ms. Kardashian think that Obama is narrow minded too. He stated the same thing she did.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=criiu2h3ZAk
145. yo - April 24, 2009 11:22 PM
#42 holy fucking shit im gonna be honest i did not read all of that but i did skim through it. alright you win. very good points. buuut i still gotta say i dont completely agree with gay marriage but ill meet u half way and say what u said is very true. i do actually think people should be happy.. u beat me on this one. peace man.
146. yo - April 24, 2009 11:26 PM
oh i meant for #142 not 42. and the ludacris thing was funny. i didnt even realize i did that. i actually can spell ludicrous. hahaha.
147. justifiable - April 24, 2009 11:47 PM
#145 Peace, too. Holy fucking shit is right, because I know it's a fucking treaty no kidding. But I took everything you said seriously, so thanks for reading some of it. Change is weird and frightening and uncomfortable, and accepting people who do things differently than you isn't easy - sometimes it's impossible. You may never personally approve, and nothing says you have to, either. But denying someone a right that you have because you don't approve of them or like them isn't only wrong, it's dangerous - what if you aren't on that "approved of" list some day? The law that would protect you then is the one that you got rid of long ago - when it benefitted you to do so.
148. justifiable - April 24, 2009 11:54 PM
#146 Ha, I didn't even notice you left off the '1'. Just wait, someone's gonna start posting on how Ludicris wants to kill babies or bag single mothers and then all the nutbag bigots will jump on it and drag in Obama and Chris Brown. And it'll be all your fault because of that typo. Troublemaker.
149. Kitty says - April 25, 2009 12:42 AM
#138 LOL yeah its like marriage inflation. The more marriages there are the less yours is worth.
And respect to Kim for not being a bigot.
150. dude - April 25, 2009 12:55 AM
Miss Cushion on Miss Cali..? yeah i'd watch :D
151. russian roulette - April 25, 2009 1:08 AM
#138/149 That was freakin' awesome you two - Coach bags is right! Wait and see! Annulments will be the new marriage. Papal annulments will be the equivalent of the black AmEx card. And Rene Zellwegger already has one, god dammit!
152. russian roulette - April 25, 2009 1:12 AM
#138/149 That was freakin' awesome you two - Coach bags is right! Wait and see! Annulments will be the new marriage. Papal annulments will be the equivalent of the black AmEx card. And Rene Zellwegger already has one, god dammit!
153. LOL - April 25, 2009 2:08 AM
All of you are hilarious and pathetic. To the rabid, snarling, indignant children on both sides of this "discussion", thank you for making me feel better about myself.
154. salawhite - April 25, 2009 3:17 AM
Recently I found a hot club -- SeekingTall . c o m -- just for sexy tall gals and guys to find their cupid. Come on, tall singles. Don't miss your love.
155. fase - April 25, 2009 7:42 AM
PICTURE ONE!!!!!!SHE GOT MAN HANDS!!!!!!!!!!!!
156. Martin - April 25, 2009 11:23 AM
How judgemental can an out of shape short fat no talent porn star celebrity be? After all she lies about her cosmetic surgery; breast implants, nose job, lipo on her hips and lower bac. She lies about improving her stout body with butt girdles, body shapers, and airbrushing her photos.
157. Martin - April 25, 2009 11:25 AM
Also look at Kim's botox face! She looks like a freak now!
158. Laura - April 25, 2009 1:23 PM
She wears WWAAAYYYYY too much make-up. She looks like she puts it on with Homer's make-up gun! POW! Seriously who wants to be with a chick that has to literally paint her face on before she goes out? Not Hot.
159. Jamie's Uterus - April 25, 2009 4:54 PM
Is this piss whore still claiming to be a size 2? Look at the last picture, no way that ass is getting into size 2 anything. Maybe 20, but not 2.
160. Scott - April 26, 2009 2:31 AM
the temptation of uniforms- Whether you are a single people in uniform seeking love, or a civilian interested in dating singles in uniform you will find personals in uniform.chat .-www.uniformmate.com-
161. PostmortemG - April 26, 2009 4:27 AM
"Hey genius, what does the Bible say about people who continue to defile their minds and eyes watching the "unclean" movies you've seen?"
Apparently i missed the part condemning extreme cinema.
"And the paedophile in Glass Cage is just that, a child molester, not a homosexual. So you just bore false witness."
The Nazi only chooses to have sex with male children, so i would say that qualifies him as bisexual, considering he has a wife and kid. The Nazi's male nurse Angel is the straight-up gay element, who has been warped by the abuse he suffered as a child; Angel's role in the film is 'reversing' the abuse he suffered at the hands of the Nazi, therefore becoming the abuser and making the Nazi the abused. Or do you think one adult male molesting/raping another adult male should be labeled something other than homosexuality?
"Would you like to be stoned tonight for these sins after sundown or can we just get you at dawn tomorrow?"
So by saying "we", you're either a Jew or a Christian then? You're more than willing to cast the first stone, but i wouldn't say you're without sin, you confused, YHVH/Je$u$ loving cocksucker. =D
162. huh? - April 26, 2009 9:14 AM
"Narrow mindedness"...now in addition to being a useless, no-talent, brain dead, fat ass whore, she's a hypocrite too! Actually, her mind can't be narrow...there's nothing there!
163. salawhite - April 26, 2009 10:43 AM
She is so tall and sexy.I know a place you can date with such girls.
*** Seekingtall.C OM *** which I have joined. I think it is interesting and you will like it.
164. RichPort's Ghost - April 27, 2009 10:25 AM
#133 - I am NOT too sensitive you fucking twat!
165. Kevin - April 27, 2009 12:51 PM
@161
"The distinction between a victim's gender and a perpetrator's sexual orientation is important because many child molesters don't really have an adult sexual orientation. They have never developed the capacity for mature sexual relationships with other adults, either men or women. Instead, their sexual attractions focus on children – boys, girls, or children of both sexes."
You can read the rest of it here
http://psychology.ucdavis.edu/rainbow/HTML/facts_molestation.html
Why don't you read it and expand your little mind?
Also, I can name more movies of heterosexual relationships gone wrong than homosexual relationship gone wrong.
166. PostmortemG - April 27, 2009 10:40 PM
Thanks for the information, but i can't say it applies to In A Glass Cage, which you'd already know if you'd actually seen the film. The Nazi was never abused as a child - he initially preyed on boys and murdered them because it was his job, in a concentration camp; after he flees Germany with his family, he continues to 'work overtime' because rape, torture and murder are things he has grown to *LOVE*. Whether or not Angel conforms to your suggested psychological stereotypes is another matter.
"Also, I can name more movies of heterosexual relationships gone wrong than homosexual relationship gone wrong."
So what's your point? It's clear you've never seen the films I've mentioned; your "I can name more movies of blah blah blah" statement makes that obvious. I'm not looking for bullshit commercial/pedestrian movies about "heterosexual relationships gone wrong" that anyone can rent from Blockbuster - I'm looking for underground films that can literally make one sick, regardless of their characters' sexual orientations. Now who's limited?
167. mika - April 28, 2009 7:44 PM
Am kind of disappointed in Kim just a little bit they asked the girl a question an she answered honestly. If you don't want an honest answer then don't ask the flicken question plain and simple. At least she didn't go up there lien like some would. People have different feelings towards stuff an if that's how she feels then .....Ok get on with life you people make a big deal out of nothing and it getting old. Shoots is this what the world is coming to, a place where if you say how you feel your called foul names. An Perez Hilton needs to get a life he will never be a woman an he's mad boohoo:(.
168. mika - April 28, 2009 7:54 PM
And secondly if God wanted it this way ...he would have made ADAM AN STEVE not ADAM AN EVE get it right read your bible ...this isn't rite we all know it an we are accepting it like its nothing .....woman an woman cannot produce ...HELLOOOOOOO PEOPLE THERE IS A FREAKIN REASON ...HATE ME IF YOU WANT I DON'T CARE AT ALL...I AM NOT HERE TO PLEASE YOU PEOPLE AN BE CAUTIOUS ABOUT YOUR FEELINGS I'M BEING REAL. LIKE THEY KEEP SAYING PEOPLE HAVE RIGHTS AN THEY CAN CHOOSE BUT KEEP IN MIND JUDGMENT IS NEARING AN WE WILL ALL PAY FOR SINS WE COMMIT .
169. Kevin - April 28, 2009 8:10 PM
@166
Hahaha, you're funny. I like how you are telling me that I'm limited because I haven't seen the movies you've seen or have the same taste in films as you do. That's true, I haven't seen those movies, but it's cute how you have seen a few movies about male-male pedophilia/rape and think you have a clear picture of homosexual relationships in general. There was obviously something mentally wrong with those people, so I don't understand why you are using them as an argument as to why homosexuality in general is wrong.
"I'm looking for underground films that can literally make one sick, regardless of their characters' sexual orientations."
That was my point, that there are extreme stories/movies (based on a true story) that do happen with male-female orientations. But to watch a few about people with ABSOLUTELY DISGUSTING male-male sexual tastes and using it as an argument as to why homosexual relationships are wrong in general just boggles me. Care to elaborate more? I don't see what kind of point you are trying to make.
Do you have any other arguments as to why homosexuality is wrong? Or are you judging a whole group of people on the actions on a select few people that THAT ARE OBVIOUSLY MENTALLY ILL. By the way, men rape/molest little girls and men rape women too, but that doesn't mean heterosexuality is wrong.
170. PostmortemG - April 28, 2009 10:36 PM
I don't think i ever stated I'm trying to 'prove' homosexuality is wrong; what i mentioned earlier, about homosexuality being condemned in The Bible, is a simple fact. It's just something i happened to know because religion/spirituality are huge interests of mine, so i shared that information, regarding K.K.'s goofy statements advocating Christianity *AND* homosexuality. Sure, you can take both stances, but doing so goes against the fundamentals of Judeo-Christianity, wherein homosexuals = sodomites. Another huge interest of mine is extreme cinema, especially European exploitation films from the '70s, wherein just about *ANYTHING* was possible. =D
"Care to elaborate more? I don't see what kind of point you are trying to make."
I'm just sharing my 2¢ on a message board; I'm not condemning or advocating homosexuality, I'm just giving out a bit of info regarding my own interests. =P Yes, there are plenty of extreme films that deal with heterosexuality gone waaaaay wrong, I Spit On Your Grave being the best one i can immediately think of; i only mentioned homo-centric films because the theme of this thread is homosexuality. What can i say? I dig anything that expresses the most extreme aspects of the human condition. Thank you for the current discussion.
'Salud' from South America!!! =D
171. PostmortemG - April 28, 2009 10:49 PM
I don't think i ever stated I'm trying to 'prove' homosexuality is wrong; what i mentioned earlier, about homosexuality being condemned in The Bible, is a simple fact. It's just something i happened to know because religion/spirituality are huge interests of mine, so i shared that information, regarding K.K.'s goofy statements advocating Christianity *AND* homosexuality. Sure, you can take both stances, but doing so goes against the fundamentals of Judeo-Christianity, wherein homosexuals = sodomites. Another huge interest of mine is extreme cinema, especially European exploitation films from the '70s, wherein just about *ANYTHING* was possible. =D
"Care to elaborate more? I don't see what kind of point you are trying to make."
I'm just sharing my 2¢ on a message board; I'm not condemning or advocating homosexuality, I'm just giving out a bit of info regarding my own interests. =P Yes, there are plenty of extreme films that deal with heterosexuality gone waaaaay wrong, I Spit On Your Grave being the best one i can immediately think of; i only mentioned homo-centric films because the theme of this thread is homosexuality. What can i say? I dig anything that expresses the most extreme aspects of the human condition. Thank you for the current discussion.
'Salud' from South America!!! =D
172. PostmortemG - April 28, 2009 10:52 PM
I hate when that happens.
173. PostmortemG - April 28, 2009 10:57 PM
I hate when that happens.
174. Kevin - April 29, 2009 1:28 AM
@170
I don't have a problem with what the Bible says. The problem I have with it is that there is supposed to be a separation of church and state. Therefore, I don't believe the Bible should have any merit in determining federal and state laws. Not everyone in the US is a christian, so why should everybody adhere to the bible's view on what marriage is supposed to be.
I honestly don't even care about marriage. I care about the government treating heterosexual and homosexual unions equally under the law, like how it should be. Whether it is called marriage or civil unions doesn't make a difference to me. Everyone should get marriage or everyone should get civil unions. It is an equality issue when heterosexuals are given marriage and homosexuals are shafted with fucking "domestic partnerships" (which doesn't even afford the same amount of rights,) Christians can keep their religious views but they shouldn't have a right to use them in politics.
"about homosexuality being condemned in The Bible, is a simple fact."
There is controversy regarding whether or not those verses were translated incorrectly or edited to someones' liking. There was a post in one of the miss california topics that elaborates on this. But I'm not a christian so I don't really care about it anyways.
That's my 2 cents... I'm not forcing anyone to see the way I do, but that is my view on it all.
175. Zachary - May 26, 2009 5:41 AM
I'm glad ignorant people express their opinions, because then the enlightened have a chance to sway it.