Oct 25 2008P. Diddy + Family Photos = A bucket of inappropriate

P. Diddy poses with his two sons in the latest issue of L'Uomo Vogue. I guess they're going for the pimp Chippendale's look. Cute, right? Just one small problem: THEY'RE HIS DAUGHTERS.
I'm seriously at a loss for words here - with the obvious exceptions of "Fuck," "What," and "The."

Reader Comments
1. Eggy - October 25, 2008 6:03 PM
FIRST! And creepy
2. Hugh Macpherson - October 25, 2008 6:06 PM
fix your rss - doesn't show images anymore
3. Pedro Maciev - October 25, 2008 6:09 PM
Yaeh, fix your RSS please.
4. kati - October 25, 2008 6:11 PM
umm i dont think this is that bad! he just has bad taste in everything so he must find it cute. but this is not creepy or inappropriate imo
5. Maham - October 25, 2008 6:14 PM
Superficial writer, you just proved how Americans in general have such an immature mentality regarding issues as such.
They're babies. I'm assuming you were born wearing a full outfit? Who fucking cares how they're dressed.
6. gotmilk? - October 25, 2008 6:16 PM
too bad those kids are fucking ugly.
7. Rob Raymond - October 25, 2008 6:25 PM
If the broken images on the RSS are to force people to visit the site so you can get ad $$$, fine. But I'd rather have embedded ads in the feed.
8. Crystal - October 25, 2008 6:28 PM
They're actually adorable...it would be different if they were older but they're just babies. I'm sure they won't appreciate it when they are older but as babies, it's cute! Ever heard of Anne Geddes?
9. Mugato - October 25, 2008 6:34 PM
Nice tits.
10. Vake - October 25, 2008 6:35 PM
Can't view photos in Google Reader anymore.
11. Lily - October 25, 2008 6:42 PM
cute babies. just a little weird, don't know why.
Maybe I am jut use to cute baby pictures where they are surrounded by bubbles or dressed like pumpkins,
12. Kahlee - October 25, 2008 6:44 PM
Those children are overweight. He should seriously consider switching them to a vegan diet, which science proves is very more healthy.
13. Boo - October 25, 2008 6:55 PM
@ 12
I hope you never have children, because they'll die of malnutrition. ALL BABIES ARE FAT.
14. Nately - October 25, 2008 7:00 PM
Those are his little GIRLS btw...
15. CaptainMorgan - October 25, 2008 7:02 PM
I don't care about the kids. I think the "damn I'm SO friggin' cool" look on PeeDiddly's face is hilarious. I can't stand this guy anyways, so this just cements my opinion of him. LOSER.
16. Stiles - October 25, 2008 7:02 PM
Those are some ugly babies. His two sons look like old women. Looks like the real babydaddy was a bulldog.
17. CaptainMorgan - October 25, 2008 7:02 PM
I don't care about the kids. I think the "damn I'm SO friggin' cool" look on PeeDiddly's face is hilarious. I can't stand this guy anyways, so this just cements my opinion of him. LOSER.
18. canshy - October 25, 2008 7:03 PM
Woulda been cute if they were boys...
19. Stiles - October 25, 2008 7:03 PM
Speaking of which, I hope Kahlee above doesn't even have a dog. She's probably one of those wackadoos who'd only feed her dog vegan food.
20. Joe - October 25, 2008 7:04 PM
I echo the problem with images in RSS feeds. I agree with Rob; if you're doing it to force me to the site please just put ads into the RSS feed.
21. YAWN - October 25, 2008 7:05 PM
lol... How many counts until the spineless, ill-endowed insecure inbreds start spewing their racist bile in the safety of their mothers' basements?
22. Not living in Chicago anymore - October 25, 2008 7:08 PM
You mean like the one where he looks like he just got done preping them for what to tell the police after he finishes his drive-by?
23. sieh - October 25, 2008 7:09 PM
p diddy is a child molestor.
24. Groucho - October 25, 2008 7:13 PM
#18, exactly. While the superfish is clearly overreacting here (this is NOT inappropriate), I just don't understand the picture. Why are they wearing bowties?
25. spineless, ill-endowed insecure inbred - October 25, 2008 7:15 PM
Actually #21, I live in my father's basement. BTW, it's "FROM the safety of their mothers' basement." keep trying tho, it's always cool to see a negro trying to reason
26. Nate is great - October 25, 2008 7:15 PM
He's gonna fuck those two bitches after the photoshoot.
27. Kahlee - October 25, 2008 7:18 PM
Oh jesus I have a troll! For the first time ever I have a troll!
28. spock - October 25, 2008 7:20 PM
He'll probably rape them when they get a little older. He sucks. outloud.
29. jenni - October 25, 2008 7:22 PM
ARE YOU F-ING KIDDING ME?!?!
30. g-unit says: - October 25, 2008 7:24 PM
nice & tight
31. hi - October 25, 2008 7:29 PM
TNB at its finest!
32. Jesi - October 25, 2008 7:30 PM
SOOOOO disgusting
33. Not living in Chicago anymore - October 25, 2008 7:33 PM
Also @21 if you recall, most negros in the United States are decended from a relatively small group of folks that were brought here more or less unwillingly. Which means that they also win the INBRED PRIZE for teh United States as well! Woot!
34. Not living in Chicago anymore - October 25, 2008 7:35 PM
Wow, what an epiphany that is. Now everything is clear. They all act the same way because they are all related. I also now get the prolific use of 'brother' and 'sista' in their dialogue. Amazing. Thanks #21!
35. bob - October 25, 2008 7:38 PM
Those children are overweight. He should seriously consider switching them to a vegan diet, which science proves is very more healthy. Many friends on ===mysportsdate.com=== think so too/
36. Yanks wank - October 25, 2008 7:56 PM
they are not cute babies really (hate to say that) but its not tasteless just sort of the faces only a mother (or father) could love.
37. Yanks wank - October 25, 2008 7:57 PM
they are not cute babies really (hate to say that) but its not tasteless just sort of the faces only a mother (or father) could love.
38. Yanks wank - October 25, 2008 7:57 PM
they are not cute babies really (hate to say that) but its not tasteless just sort of the faces only a mother (or father) could love.
39. Yanks wank - October 25, 2008 7:57 PM
they are not cute babies really (hate to say that) but its not tasteless just sort of the faces only a mother (or father) could love.
40. Yanks wank - October 25, 2008 7:57 PM
they are not cute babies really (hate to say that) but its not tasteless just sort of the faces only a mother (or father) could love.
41. Yanks wank - October 25, 2008 7:57 PM
they are not cute babies really (hate to say that) but its not tasteless just sort of the faces only a mother (or father) could love.
42. Yanks wank - October 25, 2008 7:59 PM
So true I said it 5 times
43. jesus - October 25, 2008 8:07 PM
somebody should beat those kids with a baseball bat before they grow up and become drug addicted whores like the rest of their kind.
44. kill blackie - October 25, 2008 8:38 PM
Look, the one on the right is already giving the camera attitude. Ugly nappy headed hoes!
45. emma - October 25, 2008 8:42 PM
I think that perhaps they should have worn cute little bowties in their hair, or a bit of "bling" as a necklace or something rather than the bowties they have which are much more suited to little baby boys. Just looks odd, (not in a weird gross way though)
#26 and #28..... seriously.... WTF?!?!
46. answer dis - October 25, 2008 8:48 PM
Why is it that blacks can say 'black pride' freely but when whites say 'white pride' it's considered racist?
47. whatever - October 25, 2008 9:09 PM
FIX YOUR DAMN RSS FEED!
48. Vichus Smith - October 25, 2008 9:31 PM
?????????
Why are you guys commenting on how the kids look? The whole fucking picture is in bad taste, stupid looking, and awful! I don't care how the dumb kids look like! P Diddy needs a hit artist on his dumb label, because he looks like he's bored, looking for something to do.
At least it's not his dumb video blog.
49. dew - October 25, 2008 9:49 PM
Those girls aren't really fat; it's probably 'baby fat', and they'll have plenty of time to lose it if their parent/s don't let them eat too much junk food, and let them sit in front of the TV/Vid games/pc.
And they'd be a lot cuter if they were dressed like girls, and had a cute girlie hair style.
FIX YOUR STUPID RSS!
50. Britboysarehot - October 25, 2008 10:18 PM
I'll never understand this douchebag. With all of his undeserved millions, he could afford clothes for his kids.
51. ummm...yeah - October 25, 2008 10:22 PM
I cannot BELIEVE some of the shit you people are writing on this page!
Most of you need to get some HELP and fast.
Although the children are not cute by any means, and the picture is in ...incredibly bad taste, nevertheless they ARE BABIES!
GROW the fuck up or SHUT THE FUCK UP!!!!
52. Googolygoo - October 25, 2008 10:42 PM
Kahlee, you are a pasty, weak, flaky-skinned, malnourishef freak. Go eat a burger before I club a seal in your honour.
53. Jazzy - October 25, 2008 11:31 PM
I'm shocked at the overwhelming amount of IGNORANCE and just pure stupidity displayed in comments. Hell, it is the internet, which brings even the most half brained individuals to the forefront and gives them a voice.
54. voracious - October 25, 2008 11:33 PM
Damn he is sooooo hot.
55. Jizzy - October 26, 2008 12:02 AM
I think what Diddy wanted is a boy. So what he's doing is dressing them up in boys clothes and rapes their asses in private.
56. truth - October 26, 2008 12:07 AM
I find the pics rather creepy, seeing a bowtie reminiscent of the play boy bunnies on two naked babies was disturbing, if he had left the bowtie off they are just cute babies, with the tie there is that vague pedophile feel, it looks like the centerfold of the child molesters calendar 2009 edition
57. Harold Maudulin - October 26, 2008 12:29 AM
Serious question for kahlee the resident scientologist-vegetenarian----
scientifically speaking is it possible that those two kids have fat stomachs because they are filled with their fathers love batter???
58. kendra w - October 26, 2008 12:43 AM
OKKKKK. They're wearing nothing but bowties around a grown man that refers to women as bitches and whores? Indeed disturbing.
59. SueMe - October 26, 2008 12:48 AM
These have got to be the cutest set of baby twins I've ever seen in my life, and they take after their beautiful mother Kim. BTW many people have taken pics of their babies naked, and most of them have been white babies with their booties all in the air. Im no pedophile, but I've witnessed it happen. People on here including the writer are jokes JOKES!!!! I tell ya.
60. hahahahahaha silly poop dildo - October 26, 2008 12:56 AM
Wow I guess he had to one up Jlow. " Look Jlow I have twins too and they have bow ties and are sitting on a dead animal " See your twins could've looked like mine or mines as he would say. Bofe of em.
61. Mr. Sleepyhead - October 26, 2008 1:16 AM
In the 2012 game of Trivial Persuit, his kids and himself won't even be on the radar. Just another kalostomy bag using his children for self promotion.
P Diddy = douche bag in Slovakia.
62. Sim - October 26, 2008 2:33 AM
They are actually his DAUGHTERS. Poor kids being paraded like that for his amusement. Wonder what their mum thinks? If my husband tried to do that to my daughters I'd kick him in the nuts.
63. Sim - October 26, 2008 2:33 AM
They are actually his DAUGHTERS. Poor kids being paraded like that for his amusement. Wonder what their mum thinks? If my husband tried to do that to our daughters I'd kick him in the nuts.
64. Sim - October 26, 2008 2:33 AM
They are actually his DAUGHTERS. Poor kids being paraded like that for his amusement. Wonder what their mum thinks? If my husband tried to do that to our daughters I'd kick him in the nuts.
65. Pedo Diddy - October 26, 2008 2:52 AM
LMFAO @ #26
that is TOTALLY what he's thinking, judging by the look on his face. (check the ho on the left feelin up the one on the right-- looks like it's gonna be a threesome!)
66. Tracey - October 26, 2008 3:26 AM
I don't see anything wrong with them being nude, they are BABIES! I think the photo is eh, below average. I would not pay money for that.
67. Tracey - October 26, 2008 3:26 AM
I don't see anything wrong with them being nude, they are BABIES! I think the photo is eh, below average. I would not pay money for that.
68. Tracey - October 26, 2008 3:26 AM
I don't see anything wrong with them being nude, they are BABIES! I think the photo is eh, below average. I would not pay money for that.
69. 1moreidiotintheworld - October 26, 2008 3:52 AM
Isn't it time for that dumbshit to change his stupid name again????
70. Puff Douchy - October 26, 2008 4:52 AM
^^^ hahahaaa
#69, see #65
(or just change it to DJ Gummy Mouthbreather?) DUDE IS FUGLY !!!
71. swallowmycum - October 26, 2008 6:08 AM
Those two things are ug-leeeee
72. Xanadu - October 26, 2008 7:39 AM
Do they already have pierced ears?
Only pikeys and gypos pierce their kids ears when they are babies.
73. Air Mail - October 26, 2008 7:47 AM
"But Daddy, why do I have to tell the police the gun is mine?"
74. Borat - October 26, 2008 8:47 AM
Somebody call the zoo. Apparently 3 monkeys just escaped.
75. Molimol - October 26, 2008 9:01 AM
Nothing worse then a black man with too much money
76. Me - October 26, 2008 10:47 AM
The pic would be a whole lot better without Puffy, I mean....Puff Daddy, err....P. Diddy. Whatever name this douche bag is going by now is anyone's guess. Just shows how full of himself he is.
77. WTF - October 26, 2008 11:26 AM
Ok guys...These comments are fucking idiotic and so vulgar. You're insulting a bunch of 2 year olds as if it was their idea to pose nude with fucking inbred Diddy. And you're spewing racist comments with makes you all seem stupid. If there is someone you are going to insult in this picture should the idiot Diddy who invited sick peados to look at them and the photographer for being a fucking idiot and the magazine for beings inbreds - Just like most of these guys.
78. Sheila - October 26, 2008 11:40 AM
ahhh can you say CHILD PORNOGRAPHY!! WTF... where is the mother of these children????????
79. Sheila - October 26, 2008 11:43 AM
seriously, how is this NOT child pornography?? what the fuck kind of father would pose his daughters naked in photos for the whole friggin world to see. Way to protect your daughters' innocense you ignorant FUCK.
80. Kristen - October 26, 2008 11:59 AM
I think the things that are weird is that it's a family picture but...well, why isn't he cuddling them? It seems too much like a photoshoot-- that's exactly what it is but come on, they're his babies! It's also strange that he put bowties on them. If he's going for a classy, decadent look, why not put long strings of pearls on them instead? Also, they all look so pissed off? I don't think it's possible that P. Diddy could look anything like an arrogant asshole in a picture, but at least make the babies laugh! The lighting shouldn't be so serious.
I agree with the fish that it's inappropriate but in a different kind of way-- not because they are topless baby girls. I feel like...when does P. Diddy end and Sean Combs begin and why does he have to drag his daughters into the P. Diddiness? If he's going to share a portion of his personal life, he should include himself in it, too.
81. Chris - October 26, 2008 12:37 PM
This guy is a complete moron
82. SueMe - October 26, 2008 12:48 PM
STFU Chris, because most of the posters on here are lower than morons. If brown faces show up on Superficial then people get pissed all of a sudden. This isn't the race card Im playing, but you all are a bunch a haters. Lay off the hater-aid.
83. swallowmycum - October 26, 2008 1:25 PM
Piss Daddy is more annoying than a puss-filled pimple on the ass. His kids are ugly and look retarded.
84. YEAHYEAH - October 26, 2008 1:45 PM
IT'S NOT THAT THE BABIES ARE NAKED, NUDE, WHATEVER.. ITS THE FACT THAT THE BOWTIE DO REMIND YOU OF A PLAYBOY BUNNY, IM SURE P.DIDDY DIDN'T JUST PUT THOSE BLACK BOWTIES ON TO MAKE IT LOOK CUTE, MAYBE HE WANTED THEM TO LOOK MORE ''MATURE''. ANYWAY, DISGUSTING AND DISTASTEFUL.
I AGREE WITH:
''if he had left the bowtie off they are just cute babies, with the tie there is that vague pedophile feel, it looks like the centerfold of the child molesters calendar 2009 edition ''
85. DISTURBING - October 26, 2008 1:48 PM
The only thing I find very disturbing about this photograph is that P.Diddy actually UNDRESSED his children for the photoshoot, why did he feel that it was neccessary? He could have at least left the diapers on!!!!
Maybe P.Diddy aint the bad guy, but did he think of protecting his children from pedophiles looking and spreading these photos? He should have at least thought of that, and not just the publicity. I think its disgusting to exploit children in this way, but the only reason he is getting away with it is because he is rich.
86. whatever - October 26, 2008 2:17 PM
#82 if you haven't noticed, everyone is equally hated here. If you don't like to see the hate, then stay off the site.
87. fix_the_RSS_feed - October 26, 2008 2:24 PM
FIX THE RSS FEED!!!!
88. SueMe - October 26, 2008 3:04 PM
I think not # 86 and in your wildest dreams will I stay off this site biotch. Why don't you go and crawl under a rock and die somewhere. btw fuck off.
89. TheTenia - October 26, 2008 3:05 PM
Okay, for the final time can anyone after seeing this claim blacks are equal to other races? Seriously. If they are, why does NO ONE want to live around them? They created a whole style of living, the suburb, just to avoid this. Well, here it is all you "open minded" types: The fruit of civil rights....
90. Ohmeomy - October 26, 2008 4:20 PM
To summarize:
P Diddy is butt ugly; so are his offspring.
He is desperate for attention, even the negative kind.
He is using his poor little homely babies to get noticed. What will they think about being used this way when they are older, or will they be so immersed in the so called hip hop "culture" that they won't care.
People using their children like this reminds me of that vile show, Jon and Kate Plus Eight. Greed knows no bounds.
http://gosselinswithoutpity.blogspot.com/
91. Angela - October 26, 2008 5:21 PM
My first thought was "ew." Something about it is just wrong and creepy to echo many other comments.
92. hannah - October 26, 2008 7:27 PM
its just extreme bad taste. The black fur, the lighting, Diddy's clothing, the bowties - need I say more... The photo-shoot doesn't have anything playful & childlike in it at all - which makes it appear ADULT and inappropriate. The babies look like they have been supplanted in P. Diddy's weird world, which is not child-friendly at all, and is exploitative... I wouldn't be surprised if 5 minutes later they weren't all watching strippers and drinking Canadian club.
93. silyly - October 26, 2008 9:22 PM
seriously speaking, it is so unfair. so many rich ppl are trying their best to have fun, some of them find ppl for sex, some of them make friends at all kinds of sites, such as sportinglove.c om . and some of them bet. but seldom they thought about these poor children.........guys, be kind, and help them. please
94. niggahater - October 26, 2008 10:33 PM
fuckkkk n!gg@s. ughhh i hate them
95. BkMsTee - October 27, 2008 1:31 AM
A desperate act for attention. I hope it's not for money. To exploit the lil angels as bunnies has got to be an act of a Sicko. Kim and Diddy you all need a Refresher Course in Parenting Skillings. You have Very comely lil angels here. How dare you scar them for Life. Get it together or send them over here to me. I'll be mommy, daddy and the nanny. I'm ashamed of the two of you. Kim did Lil Chance a favor by not wanting her around her children. I would not my daughter around her either. Get it together Kim and Diddy. Not a good example for the African American Family.
96. Cornelius - October 27, 2008 5:51 AM
Well, at least Puffy wasn't wearing aviators and chewing a toothpick, like usually.
97. GG1000 - October 27, 2008 9:26 AM
It's not because the girls are naked; children this age naked generally don't seem sexual. That visceral "eeeewwww" feeling comes from the setup of the shot, which looks like bad '70s porn, his pose and facial expression, which is like a parody of a Playgirl magazine shot, the fact that he's chosen to arrange his legs so that we've got a straight view to his crotch, the bowties on the girls, which subliminally hint at Playboy bunnies, and then the fact that the children are naked in this setting full of sexual references. It's gross. And look at their faces. Even young as they are, they know something's not quite right.
98. Big Al - October 27, 2008 9:40 AM
P Dumby looks like a typical thug with his 2 offspring. Who would, in their right mind, pose with their kids lokking like that? And his daughters at that?? Those bows look so stupid arounf their necks and they really, really do not look cute at all. He is a punk-as-jerk of a father.
99. Right Fury - October 27, 2008 10:04 AM
Angela just creamed her slacks.
100. Vamp - October 27, 2008 11:32 AM
Though this picture is pretty stupid the comments here surprise me and I can't believe whomever put up this story doesn't delete them. I mean if you're going to have a comment section then you need to moderate it or have someone do it for you. There are just so many racist remarks here and I'm surprised about that. You ppl make me ashamed to be white and I'll apoligize now to anyone you offend. You need a better name for this site like White Sheet Gossip because that's where I feel I am!
When I first found this site I thought it was awesome because it had such interesting stories but so many trolls lurk here to try to spread ignorance and hate.
Plus saying babies should be vegetarians is also wrong. Do some research because when those babies die of being on a low protein diet it will be your ass. Opinions are like a-holes everyone has one but use your brain because forcing a strange diet down a baby is not a good thing. I'm thinking most Dr's would disagree with your thinking. If babies were meant to be vegetarian orange juice would come out of their mom's breasts.
101. mamamiasweetpeaches - October 27, 2008 12:34 PM
Wow. They're not even CUTE.
102. Right Fury - October 27, 2008 12:47 PM
@100
Wow, I've never seen a case of white guilt like that before.
Shouldn't you be early voting for Obama...for the 5th time?
103. Blah - October 27, 2008 1:05 PM
RSS images broken - please fix, or tell us why!
104. toonces - October 27, 2008 2:21 PM
this is a perfect example of the black culture. pimp and thug.
105. Becky - October 27, 2008 3:23 PM
racist bastards go Obama......
106. Honky - October 27, 2008 3:32 PM
People that originated from the ghetto or trailer trash do ghetto/trailer trash things like these pictures.
107. Traci Bingham - October 27, 2008 3:36 PM
I don't care what any of you crackers say - those little niglets are cute
and my fake titties are HOT!
108. Traci Bingham - October 27, 2008 3:36 PM
I don't care what any of you crackers say - those little niglets are cute
and my fake titties are HOT!
109. el ces - October 27, 2008 3:43 PM
Naked babies are fine.
Its been an art theme forever.
And he has two beautiful daughters.
Good for him.
That said, bowties are bad news. Ever since Peewee Herman.
110. deox - October 27, 2008 5:43 PM
Wait. It's not okay BECAUSE they are girls? ??? Why would it be okay if they were boys? Because girls have breasts? And breasts are....wrong?
Or is it that we sexualize breasts, forgetting that they are a body part that men and women have?
This always makes me wonder why nakedness is wrong.
It's not like he's doing anything inappropriate with them. I guess I think the naked body is natural and the fact that we freak out over any and all naked bodies is weird.
Aren't we teaching shame of the body when we say naked is bad regardless of gender?
That said, I'm not sure it's appropriate to chose public semi-nude photos FOR your children, but either way, nakedness is not wrong across the board.
111. malicious - October 27, 2008 7:03 PM
#56, #92 & #97 AGREED. He is pimping his daughters out already, sick bastard. Yeah and thanks for the crutch shot diddy, didn't need that.
112. Nic - October 28, 2008 12:11 AM
You can't see their genitals, so it's not sexual. God I miss innocence.
113. love these babies! - October 28, 2008 12:29 AM
Gorgeous man!
The baby girls are beyond precious. It's a beautiful family, I honestly don't have a problem with it.
114. darkmorcel - October 28, 2008 1:32 AM
really.... so what ? the only problem I see here is the pimp fur and the ugly aunt ring he's wearing...
115. Chantall - October 28, 2008 2:14 AM
Wow... I cannot believe the amount of ignorant and racist comments that have been posted regarding these two innocent children... It is things like this that reflect how far the USA still needs to come on issues such as acceptance.
In regards to the picture, Diddy just has no clue when it comes to taste or style and the photo is as trashy and self centred as the man himself.
My God, this whole situation has raised my opinion of Canadians even higher...
116. Helen - October 29, 2008 4:52 AM
NICE!My friends recommended me a very popular and interesting place "AgelessOnly.COM". If you've ever been there you will know what I mean....
117. Miss Tuva - October 29, 2008 12:45 PM
Hi! I cannot see anything sexual in this picture. How do we know that the girls are naked? Nothing is shown of their private parts and the girls are still small, not even 2 years, so I think I have seen many other shots that are problematic. Actually this pic is rather innocent. On the other hand, they would have been prettier with clothes on. P Diddy could afford some cool clothes for the babies and wth is the bow tie doing there?
118. Miss Tuva - October 29, 2008 12:46 PM
Hi! I cannot see anything sexual in this picture. How do we know that the girls are naked? Nothing is shown of their private parts and the girls are still small, not even 2 years, so I think I have seen many other shots that are problematic. Actually this pic is rather innocent. On the other hand, they would have been prettier with clothes on. P Diddy could afford some cool clothes for the babies and wth is the bow tie doing there? And it is nasty to write insulting words about the looks of the babies. It is not the issue here and it is sad to read...
119. Annette - October 31, 2008 4:53 AM
Please call the magazine and protest this issue:
L'UOMO Vogue
6520 Telegraph Rd
Bloomfield , MI 48301 USA
t: 248.855.7788
f: 248.855.9495
120. jammie - November 4, 2008 2:13 AM
they are very ugly, diddy ur gloss. for real whats this@@@@@@@@@@, they need plastic surgery
121. juley - November 21, 2008 2:40 PM
why you all cares about what diddy do, he is rich and his physical life is ok
i think he has the right to do what he want to do
fu$*&* u all
leave him alone
122. reno music - December 5, 2008 8:40 PM
I personally feel that you are right about him being rich and doing what ever you want but i think as a parent you have to protect you children especially when you are famous, but what he has done posing with his children knaked id disgracful, especially when you have sexual wierdos surfiong the net, i have no respect. conentrate on your children not fame.
123. reno music - December 5, 2008 8:41 PM
I personally feel that you are right about him being rich and doing what ever you want but i think as a parent you have to protect you children especially when you are famous, but what he has done posing with his children knaked id disgracful, especially when you have sexual wierdos surfiong the net, i have no respect. conentrate on your children not fame.
124. I'll Be Damn.... - December 28, 2008 2:54 PM
Beautiful Babies!
125. I'll Be Damn.... - December 28, 2008 2:54 PM
Beautiful Babies!
126. Americans... - March 1, 2009 2:52 PM
77, 78, and 79, you are all morons. If you see this photo as sexually explicit, you need a mental examination. And too, 112 and 118, even if they're genitals were showing, this would still be an innocent photo.
127. JESSICA COMBS - March 28, 2009 6:00 PM
what ever i think all his kids are cute so get over it there not ur so
128. JESSICA COMBS - March 28, 2009 6:00 PM
what ever i think all his kids are cute so get over it there not ur so