Oct 11 2008Keira Knightley is serious about getting naked
Apparently, if you want Keira Knightley to take off her clothes and smear herself with apple jelly you have to give her a good reason. (I know, show-biz people—touchy, right?) The Duchess actress took time out from looking hot to reveal her philosophy about nude scenes to Glamour:
GLAMOUR: What about nudity? Are you comfortable doing it in a film?KK: Pretty comfortable. I certainly wouldn’t do it if I wasn’t…. I detest unnecessary nudity and what it says about women in society.
GLAMOUR: What do you think it says?
KK: I think you see a lot of films where, Oh, yes, the woman gets her tits out again and runs around naked for no reason. And you kind of go, Ugh, do we have to?
Keira probably doesn't have to worry about pulling her tits out for no reason, since she's built like a 12-year-old boy and doesn't have any tits. But she's right that she shouldn't strip down unless it's essential to the plot. Hopefully she'll warm up to the project currently in development in my head, Keira Knightley Runs Out of Clean Clothes So She Has to Do Her Laundry Naked and the Washing Machine Overflows So She Gets All Wet and Covered in Soap Suds. She should like it, since it's a period piece, set in a time when she runs out of clean clothes, so she has to do her laundry naked and the washing machine overflows so she gets all wet and covered in soap suds.
RELATED STORIES
Reader Comments
1. Ya? - October 11, 2008 4:05 PM
Something about KEira used to be much prettier
2. Ya? 2 - October 11, 2008 4:15 PM
Oh you're right, Ya. Something has definitely gone awry with this one. Discuss
3. Butt Munch - October 11, 2008 4:27 PM
She's starting to looks like a wax statue
4. Binky - October 11, 2008 4:36 PM
Binky : Hey there used to be a bunch of Duchess ads all over this site - and now a Knightly story....Hummm... ...
Cliff Notes : You're becoming a bit of a conspiracy theorist Bink.
Binky : Oh.
5. meee - October 11, 2008 5:01 PM
can she do ANYTHING besides period pieces? she's always set in the goddamn 1700s or something. get some range. plus her face is weird to me.
6. ACUP - October 11, 2008 5:07 PM
You forgot to mention that she could wash her clothes on her washboard tits.
I think the Superficial Writer has been replaced...just not as insightful as usual. Sigh.
7. CaptainMorgan - October 11, 2008 5:16 PM
If there was a good looking woman in Hollywood who needed a set of boobs, this is the one. Of course, she's all high and mighty about showing boobs - she can't! Jealous: it is the word of the day.
8. Al N - October 11, 2008 5:26 PM
You all are ATE THE FUCK UP! That is a hot muther fuckin woman...and more than a mouth full is a waste!
9. Arroyo - October 11, 2008 6:11 PM
Who cares about her breasts, her ass is very nice.
10. Daniel - October 11, 2008 6:20 PM
I'm so sick of her pouty little face
11. Loo - October 11, 2008 6:48 PM
Jordan Bratman could use some of that jaw.
12. Cornelius - October 11, 2008 7:30 PM
Pouty trout face. Always. Every single photo she's in. Even the trailer to "The Duchess" - check it out, it's a Keira Knightley pouty face fest. Where does she get the idea that it's sexy. Someone should smack her silly and inform her that it isn't. Unless you're a trout. And even then, it's your natural appearance so leave it to them.
13. Rough Daddy - October 11, 2008 8:21 PM
I often wonder, how this stick figure parody manage to have a nice lil ass...
14. Brittany - October 11, 2008 9:08 PM
Hmmm....I'm a little confused about her "unnecessary nudity" comment. She showed her boobs in The Hole, and it certainly wasn't essential to the plot in that flick.
15. Andrea - October 11, 2008 9:13 PM
What does it say about you that you are so desperate to see a 12 year old boy naked?
16. ToTellTheTruth - October 11, 2008 9:36 PM
Who the fuck wants to see a 95 pound bitch NAKED????
17. liz - October 11, 2008 10:48 PM
she's definitely gorgeous. look at her fucking hair. and her perfect lips, skin, eyes...
18. gerard Vandenberg - October 12, 2008 1:26 AM
first: EATING, folks!!
(we want flesh on the bones, NOT?)
19. I watch porn - October 12, 2008 1:56 AM
#17; (s)he had the top lip injected (s)he even admitted it.
20. Narcissist - October 12, 2008 7:48 AM
That sounds like a good movie. Where were you during the writers strike?
21. Uncle Eccoli - October 12, 2008 10:03 AM
This notion of "no nudity unless it's absolutely essential to the plot" is ridiculous. It's a haphazard defence of the actresses' dignity. It hasn't been too long since young boys exclusively played the roles of women on stage - nobody thought it absolutely necessary that there be actual women in the production.
Now, don't get me wrong, I enjoy cinematic nudity as much as the next man, but let's not entertain any illusions about it. If these actresses want to be taken seriously they should cure cancer. The only difference between a Keira Knightley sex scene and a seedy red light peep show is one of budget.
22. veronica - October 12, 2008 10:18 AM
her nose is always a little weird i wonder if its really her natural nose.
23. Slut - October 12, 2008 1:25 PM
She looks frail and very sun deprived
24. Verity - October 12, 2008 4:44 PM
Her eyebrows are scary.
25. Fernando Narcos - October 12, 2008 6:40 PM
Sammiches.She needs to eat lots and lots of sammiches.talking about getting naked now is a threat.
26. JT - October 12, 2008 10:04 PM
as you can tell by the number of comments this is how many people are intrested in seeing Keira Knightly naked
27. Googolygoo - October 12, 2008 10:31 PM
Unless she puts some flesh on those bones, I can go into any first year medical class and stroke off to the sample skeleton for a more satisfying orgasm.
She is not nearly as attractive or impressive an actress as she perceives herself to be. An English accent does not ability make.
28. sally - October 12, 2008 11:02 PM
Meetingblack.com----- ? It is really a funny and interesting place to date attractive girls or hot guys. Many hottie videos and photos at this site, you can enjoy latest interesting videos or talk about hot topic with other friends. I've met many thoughtful singles who were trying to find true love.
29. random - October 13, 2008 2:05 AM
So why did she show her breasts in The Hole and Domino?
Both shitty movies with nudity that was pretty pointless.
She's probably done it in other things, too, but those are all I've seen of hers aside from Pirates.
30. seelee - October 13, 2008 9:52 AM
Keira Knightley= Horse Face
31. seelee - October 13, 2008 9:52 AM
Keira Knightley= Horse Face
32. scooby - October 13, 2008 10:20 AM
she looks like michael jackson. what the fuck.
33. TJ - October 13, 2008 10:28 AM
Much uglier than in the movies. SERIOUS jaws.
Oh, and the spammer sally with the "meetingblack.com" site: Say girl, you actually want folks to meet the most HIV-infected ethnicity in America??
34. sarah - October 13, 2008 10:42 AM
Just saw the Dutchess - she seriously has one dimension (both physically and in her career) ...
Cheeks sucked in, eyes glaring ahead - and the audience is left to fill in the parts she's supposed to be acting out. No range whatsoever.
And um, sweetie, I hate to burst your "I'm a serious Actress" Bubble, but do you remember doing a little movie called THE HOLE? where you flashed your ta-tas at a teenage boy? Yeah, well, defining serious roles for "Women in Society" must have a different meaning over there in Blighty.
35. sarah - October 13, 2008 10:54 AM
Thank you #29 - I had forgotten about Domino...
Nudity must always be important to the plot, eh Keira?
So, she likes to strip, whatev - just admit it and stop playing pious because you think you're becoming a serious actress. Her roles haven't changed too much - the clothes have just gotten fancier.
"Keira, 23, recently revealed that she has no qualms about appearing in the buff, insisting nudity has even become a habit of hers.
She said, "I always bare my breasts. It's not like it's only in this film!"
Her mother has been quoted that she doesn't mind if her daughter is nude on screen.
Her father told her to basically 'milk it for all it's worth' while she has a body people want to see.
36. Parker - October 13, 2008 10:55 AM
I agree, who cares about boobs. She doesn't need them. She's cute and she's got a nice ass. And I loved her in those pirate movies! How adorable. I would fuck her ass any day!
37. 1 MILF Hunter - October 13, 2008 11:30 AM
I've had mosquito bites bigger than her tits.
38. wtafuc - October 13, 2008 1:43 PM
Um, she's done nudity in a bunch of movies. Not a one had a plot that wouldn't move forward otherwise. Google it fuckers
39. Dannii - October 13, 2008 7:28 PM
she looks very different now than her "pirate" days. her face looked fuller in the first pirate movie. now every time i look at her i think "skeletor."
40. Dannii - October 13, 2008 7:28 PM
she looks very different now than her "pirate" days. her face looked fuller in the first pirate movie. now every time i look at her i think "skeletor."
41. kdollarsign - October 13, 2008 10:32 PM
She's built like a 12 year old boy? what does that mean? what does that mean? OH -- it means she has no breasts!!! what a stupid bitch, not having big enough breasts, what a useless, sexless whore.
42. jessicamarie - October 14, 2008 6:34 PM
Wait, how hypocritical is this? I mean, I like Keira Knightley as an actress, but she did a pretty pointless topless scene in the hole, where she flased some guy so she could get screwed...I swear, once you make a few period films, you become so pretentious as an actor/actress!