Sep 18 2008Brad Pitt cuts a check for gay marriage
Brad Pitt has donated $100,000 in an effort to defeat ballot initiatives that would ban gay marriage in California and Massachusetts. Same-sex marriage is already legal in both states, but it's now up to the voters to decide whether to continue the practice. The AP reports:
"Because no one has the right to deny another their life, even though they disagree with it, because everyone has the right to live the life they so desire if it doesn't harm another and because discrimination has no place in America, my vote will be for equality and against Proposition 8," Pitt said Wednesday.
Brad Pitt also expressed surprise that more people in the entertainment industry aren't making donations to keep gay marriage legal. "Especially George Clooney," Pitt said. "Now, that guy should be driving up to city hall with a dump truck full of cash. I'm not implying anything, but 'dedicated bachelor'? That's about as convincing as marrying Katie Holmes."
RELATED STORIES

Reader Comments
1. nique - September 18, 2008 9:03 AM
First?
2. barf - September 18, 2008 9:03 AM
He's a fucking fag himself!!!
3. supersex - September 18, 2008 9:04 AM
WTF
4. Nique - September 18, 2008 9:05 AM
waheyy
5. Slut - September 18, 2008 9:05 AM
I just figured it out.....
there is a 3 way going on with Brad, Tom and George.....
and Matt Damon is just the gimp
6. hollywood_hillbilly - September 18, 2008 9:06 AM
Fish! Did the geekologie writer's mom kick you out of bed early or are you working from home?
7. - September 18, 2008 9:14 AM
f this bloated looking elitist
8. Mike Oxbhig - September 18, 2008 9:16 AM
WOW...Ill bet rough Diddy is stoked to hear this. As well as Matt Damon the "rhodes scholar" (internet translation= al bores greenie cock gobbler)
9. havoc - September 18, 2008 9:16 AM
You know Angelina nails him with a strap-on.....
.
10. PotatoHead - September 18, 2008 9:21 AM
Good for him
[Insert homosexual George Clooney/Brad Pitt joke here...or up Brad Pitt's ass]
11. Spanky - September 18, 2008 9:23 AM
#9 - Well, she is the man of the household!
12. the sysop - September 18, 2008 9:27 AM
you are not your khakis
13. dude_on - September 18, 2008 9:29 AM
Being kind to queers is so trendy. I can't imagine California denying gay people the right to marriage. If it happens then a bunch of people are closet haters. I admire gay people... from a distance, with awkward hugs and discussions of the weather. But as far as marriage goes - have at it and enjoy.
14. Barak Obama - September 18, 2008 9:30 AM
The voters of California did vote and pass Prop 22, banning gay marriage in California. But a bunch of liberal homo judges said they didn't care what the voters wanted, they were going to ignore their vote and say gay marriage is legal. So now Prop 8 will define marriage as between a man and a woman and that it is a California Constitional Amendment. So no liberal judge can change it. Even though George Clooney wants to marry Brad Pitt. They can still pack each others fudge, but not as a married couple.
15. SaraDevil - September 18, 2008 9:52 AM
Why can't gays be just as miserable as the rest of the world. Seriously. If a 54 hour marriage is okay with everyone because it was between a man and a women, then what is wrong with a 54 year marriage between two happy old dykes?
16. fe - September 18, 2008 9:54 AM
I love Brad Pitt and Angelina to death but what are they doing to help people
in Texas ? I believe this is a far better cause than gay marriage. And will they
please help their neighbors first ,they've given so much already to Africa.
17. britney's weave - September 18, 2008 10:12 AM
"Especially George Clooney," Pitt said. "Now, that guy should be driving up to city hall with a dump truck full of cash. I'm not implying anything, but 'dedicated bachelor'? That's about as convincing as marrying Katie Holmes."
he said that? REALLY???
fish???
18. max - September 18, 2008 10:15 AM
his wife was lesbo . that is why!!!
19. Lola - September 18, 2008 10:17 AM
God bless this man. I'm torn between him being pussy whipped by that skank he's with and the good samaritan he is. But he has a good heart. Whether all the things he's doing is just for publicity or he actually really cares about other people, God bless him. At least he's doing something positive with his fame.... All those other worthless, fame whores who call themselves celebrities need to take a good look at this man and be ashamed of themselves.
20. jesus - September 18, 2008 10:20 AM
pitt and cruise should bang each other till someone's ass explodes. then deny they are gay, of course.
21. Turquinha - September 18, 2008 10:21 AM
He is really nice.... I really like he is saying out loud something we all think/know.
George Clooney is gay and Tom Cruise is Freddy Mercury.
22. Uncle Eccoli - September 18, 2008 10:32 AM
It's an admirable message, but Brad Pitt's not married, now is he?
23. Right Fury - September 18, 2008 10:38 AM
Wait a sec. He thinks gays should get married, but he won't marry a women he's knocked up/adopted kids with/lives with?
WTF? He was so traumatized by his breakup with Jen, that he'll never get married again? Whatever.
Wow, another hollywood double standard that defies logic.
24. Bucky - September 18, 2008 10:41 AM
Is this guy meant to play Captain America or what?
25. Crazy Old Bitch - September 18, 2008 10:52 AM
Tom Cruise once shoved a gay couple up his ass.
26. GAbs - September 18, 2008 11:08 AM
Supporting same sex marriage doesn't make you gay. Supporting vegans doesn't make you a cow. Supporting the environment doesn't make you a tree. Idiots.
To #16: That's ridiculous. Texas is already getting massive help. I'm not saying they are good to go, but they're being taken care of. They are helping the needed, and US is not the first one on the list when it comes to that. There are problems all around the world so stop focusing on US only. That's selfish.
"No one has the right to deny another their life, even though they disagree with it" - Amazingly said.
27. Nugaloopagus - September 18, 2008 11:22 AM
"No one has the right to deny another their life, even though they disagree with it" What a hypocrite! I bet that philosophy stops at the unborn! Brad are you "Pro-Life" now?
It must be great to be a fabulously wealthy celeb and talk out your ass all day!
I wish to marry my dog-got a problem with that!
28. Dogless - September 18, 2008 11:31 AM
@27
The dog can't consent, so yes, we have a problem with it. Plus, it probably wouldn't want to fuck your dirty ass, anyway.
Also, try actually reading the Roe Vs Wade decision and you'll see that only people in *born* in the US are protected by the constitution, therefore if it's not born, it has no rights. And I quote "the unborn have never been recognized in the law as persons in the whole sense".
*thumbs nose*
29. les - September 18, 2008 11:34 AM
Yes, because he is an icon to marriage.
Plus, can this man, or his paramour, do anything without publicity?
30. MCcains tumor - September 18, 2008 11:47 AM
So does that mean if i lived in California i could marry Obammy, skip the election, and we could live happy ever after??
31. zuggy - September 18, 2008 12:03 PM
"Because no one has the right to deny another their life, even though they disagree with it".. But it's ok for you to spend money and force your view on me.
FUCK YOU PITT, Go suck Obama's dick, and while your at it, lick my PELOSI!
32. Dave C - September 18, 2008 12:04 PM
It doesn't matter what happens with the proposition. The people in California have no right to decide for themselves. The ninth circuit will overrule anything passed. Prop 187 anyone?
33. amnesia - September 18, 2008 12:04 PM
#28
that's a gross argument if a fetus (let's be honest, baby) is viable. if it feels pain and knows hunger, it's a baby.
and #27 is right, his argument has holes in it pertaining to allowing life. there are lots of adults who would love those babies here in the US
34. amnesia - September 18, 2008 12:19 PM
#31
"lick my pelosi"...hahaha...that's great.
35. JY - September 18, 2008 12:32 PM
Hear, hear 14.
Prop 8 is an unfortunate do-over to prop 22 passed and unconstitutionally revoked by the California courts.
36. edamame - September 18, 2008 12:52 PM
I don't give a shit....B.P. is the man. I'd love to be in a Clooney/Pitt sandwich.
And Hell, I guess if Angie had to be there, as well, that'd be o.k.
That's half of my laminated list, right there!
37. Brad did NOT cut a check for gay marriage . . . - September 18, 2008 12:54 PM
. . . he cut a great big gassy beans and burrito fart for gay marriage. The huge blapping gasser was collected immediately by an awestruck Tom Cruise in a garbage bag, and will be sold at auction at Sotheby's . . . that is if Tom was able to refrain from huffing it . . .
If you click the blue link, you'll get some idea of how it went . . .
38. Frank - September 18, 2008 1:07 PM
What a fucking degenerate.
39. Minerva - September 18, 2008 1:11 PM
#33
Yes, there are plenty of people who would love to have a child and that's why they have adoption centers. Oh wait, that's right... No one likes adopting a child older than 5, too much of a hassle. Everyone wants a freaking baby, never a kid and that's why many of them spend the rest of their life in a terrible system.
Then comes the chance that the child might be abused once it gets adopted, I heard the horror stories from my friend who as soon as she hit 18 left her so called "loving parents" and never saw them again (fun fact: they are super religious and that was one of the key reasons why they were able to adopt her)
I'm not saying that a baby shouldn't get a chance but it's her choice, she's not forcing you to make the same one in her situation and she doesn't want your guilt trip.
And who the hell cares if gay people want to get married or not, let them go ahead and do it. We all have hopes and dreams to form a family so why can't they? Because they are different? Why do people care so much about what they do behind closed doors, they are (fully grown & thinking) human beings just like us and their rights should be the same as ours.
40. tn hilton - September 18, 2008 1:28 PM
I am so sick of HOLLYWOOD. Yah I read Brad helped out in the south after hurricane. His big lipped wife(uck) helps out the rest of the world -but heres what I see., I see brad having what? 10-11 homes, MIllions in homes which cost millions to run each yearly. I see brad living in a what? 80 million dollor winery in another country. Adopting kids other than american kids. Heres why I am mad. I visited Califonia, I saw the thousands of HOMELESS on the beach, warf, IN DUMPSTERS in the alleys of all you rich movie tars searching for food. FIX YOUR OWN DAM TOWN. FEED YOUR OWN DAM TOWN.ADOPT CHILDREN FROM YOUR OW DAM TOWN. SELL SOME OF YOUR COLLECTINS OF HOMES, CARS JEWELRY AND HELP THE PEOPLE IN TEXAS AND HATTI YOU SICK SELFISH ASSHOLES. THERE IS NO ONE ON THE FACE OF THIS EARTH LET ALONE "STARS" THAT DESERVE MILLIONS TO MAKE A MOVIE. tHE COUNTRY IS CRUNBLING AND ALLL YOU STARS CARE ABOUT IS YOU . I PUKE AND SPIT ON YOU LIVING THE LIFESTYLE YOU LIVE WHILE SO MANY IN THE USA SUFFER. YOU MAKE MORE IN ONE MINUTE THAN THE NORMAL MAN MAKES IN A YR. yOU ARE THE REASON THE WORLD IS SO F'D UP. wHY CAN'T POLICEMAN AND TEACHERS, FIREMEN ETC. BE PAID BETTER? ALL STARS HAVE TO DO IS READ AND MEMORIZE A SCRIPT.OH MY GOD ,THATS SOOOOO HARD. aND GET MILLIONS TO TO IT.AS DO MANY SPORTS FIGURES.WHERE THRE HELL ARE OUR PRIORITYS AS A NATION???? wHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON?
41. T HILTON - September 18, 2008 1:48 PM
P.S. BRAD- WHY DON'T YOU PUT ONE OF YOUR HUNDREDS OF TV'S ON CHANNEL 102-PICK OUT ANY OF THE 8 SCRENES AND SEE WHATS GOING ON IN THE WORLD. DO YOU SEE THE PEOPLE IN HATTI? DO YOU SEE THE PEOPLE IN TEXAS? DO YOU SEE THE THE MULTIBLE HITS THE SOUTH HAS TAKEN IN STORMS AND FLOODS GOING ON AS WE SPEAK? DO YOU SEE PEOPLE FIGHTING EACH OTHER FOR WATER? AS YOU AND YOUR LITTER SIT IN YOUR IVORY TOWERS? YOU MAKE ME PUKE. I GUESS YOU WERE TO BUSY WRITTING YOUR CHECK FOR THE GAYS INSTEAD OF SENDING THAT CHECK TO PEOPLE WHO NEED IT. I SIT HERE WONDERING HOW ME AND MY HUSBAND WILL HAVE A FUTURE, HOW WE WORK AND WORK AND CAN NEVER GET AHEAD. HOW YOU PUT ON YOUR MAKE-UP AND GET MILLIONS TO '"ACT" I REALLY DON'T KNOW HOW YOU SLEEP AT NIGHT.OH YAH -PRETTY F'ING GOOD.
42. amnesia - September 18, 2008 1:56 PM
#39 minerva,
seriously. 'a hassle'? mothers need to form a bond with their BABIES. otherwise, you get a ted bundy or john wayne gacy. i would call that more than a hassle. and to take a child from a foster care system is like playing russian roulette. don't belittle it to a 'hassle'. what a neat little box and bow you just stuck everyone in because they want to have an emotionally happy child.
and while we're at it, spare me with the 'it's her choice' and she 'doesn't need a guilt trip argument. if it cries, feels pain or has hunger, it's a baby and you shouldn't kill it.
i am sorry about your friend tho. her parents are nuts-but not becuz they are 'religious'.
43. Mama Pinkus - September 18, 2008 2:14 PM
AWESOME. All you homophobes can fuck yourselves.
44. yourmom - September 18, 2008 2:43 PM
it's so funny to see people argue on the internet, who gives a shit about anything, we're all gonna waste away someday, love life while you can! peace and love haters
45. yourmom - September 18, 2008 2:44 PM
p.s. Brad is sooooooo effin hot! I'd tap that over and over again
46. minerva - September 18, 2008 3:15 PM
@42
Of course it's like playing Russian Roulette which is why it is a hassle. What in the hell are you talking about putting people in a box, an emotionally happy child comes from an emotionally happy family and even then. You don't know how your child will turn out even if you were the best parent in the universe and my point was that people have this crazy belief that just because you adopt a baby instead of a child things will be happy and dandy.
And while you're at it, YOU CAN'T TELL A PERSON WHAT TO DO, they will do it the legal way or back door ally way... But of course you wouldn't care, it goes against your belief so you don't care about the health of the woman, her options, what happened and why she's doing this. I'm not saying that child shouldn't be cared for, I'm not saying that life shouldn't be given a chance but it's none of your business what someone else does and you cannot blame them for it. When it's your choice, when it matters TO YOU then fuck, do whatever you seem fits best.
And yes, I feel sorry about my friend too. She's highly messed up in many ways but she still goes on with her life. Like I said, you never know how someone will turn out.
And just for the record, I just mentioned the whole super religious thing as a point, that just because you "Praise God" in public doesn't mean you're a rotten person on the inside. I'm religious and proud of it, I would never deny my faith and yet still I know that the choice of a man is their own.
47. minerva - September 18, 2008 3:24 PM
On a lighter note... why is Brad Pitt dressed like a pimp with a bleached outfit?
48. Lenore - September 18, 2008 3:34 PM
AMNESIA is there a particular reason why you have that name or is it because someone slapped the fuck out of you so hard you got it. If your going to ramble on then please do all of us the favor and make sense. I totally agree with minerva.
49. jesus - September 18, 2008 3:41 PM
what a sick country we have. men can suck each others turdy cocks but we prosecute bigamist????
50. Chester - September 18, 2008 3:57 PM
No surprise that Brad Pitt is a closet case limp wristed faggot.
51. lori - September 18, 2008 4:34 PM
Is that the Great Gatsby?
52. meh - September 18, 2008 4:35 PM
50 - say what you want. he wont hear you. you are not good enough to lick his boots.
53. Dogless - September 18, 2008 5:07 PM
I still don't understand why people are threatened by homosexuality.
54. amnesia - September 18, 2008 5:40 PM
#48 lenore
i couldn't care less you disagree with me or dislike my name. At least half the US agrees with me and quite a bit of the world as well.
I think researching the actual 'back-alley statistics' would surprise you and Minerva both.
And yes, I completely stand by the fact that most parents want to raise an infant so they can properly bond with it. That's a fact, toots and if that sounds like rambling, I will reply next time using only mono-syllable words for my feisty opponent.
55. John - September 18, 2008 7:26 PM
I love how #31 Zuggy thinks a view is being forced upon him/her... as if oppressive views aren't being forced upon gays to begin with... as if gay marriage is going to affect Zuggy's life.
Good to know there's so many haters alive and well in the Superficial message boards. Hopefully at some point they will go back to finish Jr. High and learn about, hmm...
-SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE - (the religious definition of marriage should have no bearing on the legal status)
-SEPARATE BUT EQUAL = NOT EQUAL (civil unions are kinda like having to move to the back of the bus)
-maybe some common decency. Gays are people, just with naturally different desires. Homosexuality exists all over the animal kingdom, just Youtube it if you don't believe it. Quit living in fear and hatred, just live and let live.
56. John - September 18, 2008 7:26 PM
I love how #31 Zuggy thinks a view is being forced upon him/her... as if oppressive views aren't being forced upon gays to begin with... as if gay marriage is going to affect Zuggy's life.
Good to know there's so many haters alive and well in the Superficial message boards. Hopefully at some point they will go back to finish Jr. High and learn about, hmm...
-SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE - (the religious definition of marriage should have no bearing on the legal status)
-SEPARATE BUT EQUAL = NOT EQUAL (civil unions are kinda like having to move to the back of the bus)
-maybe some common decency. Gays are people, just with naturally different desires. Homosexuality exists all over the animal kingdom, just Youtube it if you don't believe it. Quit living in fear and hatred, just live and let live.
57. TJ - September 18, 2008 7:28 PM
Homosexuality is a filthy, disease-ridden practice explicitly condemned by God.
Questions?
58. John - September 18, 2008 8:10 PM
Hey buddy, God doesn't exist. Other humans born before you wrote the bible in his imaginary name. Now those ancient social laws tell you what to do and how to think. So wise up and use your brain that makebelieve-God gave you or just go to imaginary-Hell.
59. Matt - September 18, 2008 8:15 PM
God = Santa Claus for adults. You believe in God just as much as children believe flying reindeer land on their roof on Dec. 24th. Taking moral advice from a fairy tale makes you gullible, forcing those values on other people makes you a dick.
Questions?
60. gfk - September 18, 2008 8:42 PM
57,
There has never, ever, been any proof that any gawd exists or ever existed. Gawds only exist in the imaginations of the fools who believe in them; there have been thousands of gawds worshipped yet none have ever been proven to exist.
The bible is a book of fairy tales fabricated by ancient men who had no science; they were guessing that they were like the 3rd generation on the planet. Of course the sciences and Darwin shattered the glass houses of religions. Your glass house was shattered by Darwin 150 years before you were told what to believe.
Get a clue, fool.
61. gman - September 18, 2008 9:23 PM
FAG
62. minerva - September 18, 2008 9:29 PM
@ 54
It's cute to see how you react, the last punch trying to make someone feel less than you... Really doesn't though, in fact it makes me feel like somehow you felt threatened and that's why you have to use that as your comeback.
It's ok you can talk to me just like any person, no need to spell things out for me. You know you can't change my mind and I can't change yours (not like I was planning to anyway) I wonder what that was again, oh yes, choice.
Go ahead and think what you want. I'm out of work so I really don't give a damn anymore haha... But remember though, don't treat a person as your inferior just because they don't agree with you, it just makes you look like a bigger moron in the end...
63. UpChuck - September 18, 2008 9:31 PM
If the bible is false, how do you explain the prophecies that come true thous ands of years later?
64. amnesia - September 18, 2008 9:40 PM
#62- minerva
relax. i was responding to lenore. go back and read her post and then apply your advice accordingly.
thanks, hon
65. Megan - September 18, 2008 10:06 PM
@ Minerva and #56-John and several other people:
It's great to see that there are some open minded, intelligent people in the world, and I absolutely agree with you. I just want to hug you all and have a giant intelligent conversation.
66. amnesia - September 18, 2008 10:33 PM
#65 megan
supporting a woman's right to make careful choices about her body should be celebrated.
using abortion as birth control is disgusting. i'd like to hug you too and tell you it's okay to suck the head off a baby. but it isn't and it shouldn't be a random choice for a 3rd trimester baby (life of mother, possible severe deformity excluded).
tell yourself you're the bigger person and you're open minded. if you think it's okay for a woman to choose an abortion on a healthy 36-week old baby, you're a joke. enjoy your 'intelligent' conversation.
67. Elizabeth Humphries - September 19, 2008 12:24 AM
Brad is only helping contribute to the moral decay that this country is already experiencing...disappointing that he gave financial support for something like this.
68. JB - September 19, 2008 1:49 AM
Didn't Angelina Jolie say she wouldn't get married again until everyone had the right to marry? Wow he's really putting some work in to tie her down.
69. Canadian - September 19, 2008 2:25 AM
#40 + 41
I am praying your UPPER CASE post was a joke, if so, great (don't read below), if not read on:
RE: Brad Pitt; At least he does something. He does not have to do a thing to help anyone. He could just sit on his yacht and let gerbils munch his hoop. As for you, if you fill out an employment application form with your spelling and grammar, I can see where some of your problems have started. Have some personal accountability and stop focusing on shit you can't change and focus on things you can. Like pressing the caps lock button.
As for #57 - TJ; God does not exist, you douchebag.....get a clue.....
70. kaos - September 19, 2008 2:37 AM
Am I the only one fairly amused about how people bitch and whine about celebrities, their lifestyle, their supposedly doublestandards, their looks, their sexuality, their hair, their looks, their toenail-clippings, how they might masturbate etc...
Yet..
They still check out this blog and probably "iwatchstuff.com" too...?
..and they always seems to be coming back for more...
71. Roop - September 19, 2008 4:09 AM
"Because no one has the right to deny another their life, even though they disagree with it, because everyone has the right to live the life they so desire if it doesn't harm another and because discrimination has no place in America, my vote will be for equality and against Proposition 8," Pitt said Wednesday.
That said by a muthafucker who is pro-abortion. Can you believe these Hollywood hypocrites?
72. MJ - September 19, 2008 5:59 AM
Waw these old fashion remarks are even funnier than what the superfish writes. Welcome back in the prehistory!
73. The_Freedom_Whistler - September 19, 2008 8:38 AM
This fraud eurasian bastard doesn't even live in America and has no intention of ever returning to America. Brangelina isn't married. Americans genetically wouldn't know gay from happy. Most of the posers on this page have another agenda, just like Brangelina had in America. Pitt, Clooney and Damon are losers who've probably done a threesome. Don't count that out. Eurasia hates gays AND Africans, let alone Americans. Americans don't care what eurasians hate because Americans can beat them up in their own caves. Marriage is a piece of holy government crap. Love RULES!!!!!!!!
VOTE McCAIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
74. Lenore - September 19, 2008 9:33 AM
Dear, Amnesia...... its mainly pointless to write you this because by tommorow you wont remember this.... but wait maybe it is a good idea so you can re-read it here in your absent minded head. Incase you didnt know this is a place where people can express there ideas, thoughts beliefs and whatever.... so much like minerva said ..... well it doesnt matter. Basically FUCK OFF. if YOU care to have a smart remark much like you do to many ppl just follow me into another post spot where i can royally let u lick my ass...... oh by the way you have something on your upperlip. I didnt feel the need to use toilet paper because i knew you would come......... *toodles
Minerva you were so right!
75. Right Fury - September 19, 2008 11:41 AM
What's funny is most gays are anti-religion yet marriage is a religious institution. Why does it matter to them if we call it a civil union, so the can get their benefits or whatever? If it was truly about equal rights, than why can't we call it "a certificate of royal ass slamming and carpet munchery"? They could even have their own ceremonies with flannel shirts/tutu's.
It's because they want special rights, not equal rights. So a compromise (civil union) is offered, yet is refused.
Face it, they aren't the same. They're "special" Why do they want to be treated the same?
76. gerard Vandenberg - September 19, 2008 12:36 PM
pay attention: MISTER FAGGOT HIMSELF IS SPEAKING!!
Are you a fucking priest or something?
OR AN APOSTEL OR EVEN "JESUS"?
Get a life, you IDIOT!!
77. James - September 19, 2008 1:11 PM
I can't believe the majority of the comments posted on here. It's very saddening to hear that so many people in this country are so biggoted, conservative, and closed-minded to say such mean things about Brad Pitt and gay people in general. So what if someone is gay or bisexual? It doesn't really matter. People should be celebrating gay and lesbian people and the fact that they are interested in pursuing marriage. It's difficult in this world for gay and lesbian people as it is. Having the benefits (and some of the problems) of marriage would make it a little easier for gays and lesbians - at least economically and socially. I don't understand how or why so many people in this country believe that the Bible is against homosexuality. That is TOTALLY FALSE. In fact, the Bible doesn't say anything about homosexuality in the modern sense of the idea as being morally wrong. It says that men who lie with another man as with a woman is wrong. That could mean a lot of things. Most gay men who lie with another man are not doing it as though they were with a woman. They are doing it as men lie with a man. But beyond this whole Bible issue, even if the Bible was against homosexuality does not mean that gay and lesbian people should be discriminated against and not allowed the same benefits of marriage as heterosexuals. Freedom of religion, freedom of assembly, freedom of speech, liberty and justice for all, not just the heterosexual Christians. So please go read more and educate yourselves about what is most important in this country and world - equality.
78. Evan - September 19, 2008 1:36 PM
I don't see the point in criticizing people for taking up one cause over another. Gay marriage over Hurricane relief. Adoption over Aids research. Whatever it is.
Who gives a shit WHAT they decide to support, as long as they support SOMETHING!!!
79. viewer - September 19, 2008 2:24 PM
YES ! He should, since he has owned half of it.
80. asdf - September 19, 2008 5:08 PM
Whatever the fuck he's wearing, he's makes it look gay. Like him.
81. jesus - September 19, 2008 5:14 PM
i am proud to see so many people still hate fags. there is still hope for this country!
82. THE RICHEST - September 19, 2008 6:38 PM
I am a Ph.D. qualified attorney (New York Law School, New York University; 1996) and I can happily tell you that there is no legal right to be a homosexual (The Human Rights Act (1958)). Laughing at me? So long as you are a flawless Ph.D. attorney too. Check old prospectuses for New York University and you will see something called The Criminal Offenses Act (1958) referred to and this is one of a set of Acts that include The Human Rights Act (1958). In The Criminal Offenses Act (1958) it is made clear that ALL crime comes from homosexuality in the brain.
Any claimed legalization of homosexuality is legally a FALSE legalization. Therefore, any claim that gay marriage is legal is also FALSE.
This makes me think of the "Takes one to know one" phrase for Brad Pitt. As a 100% heterosexual I can tell you Brad Pitt's behavior here is not what a 100% heterosexual would do, this behavior of his stems solely from homosexuality in his mind - is he a bisexual?
George W. Bush is a homosexual. Laugh. Go on, laugh. Have one of the best laughs in your life. Laugh at George W. Bush (errm, his REAL name is Dennis Norris) because he honestly is a homosexual. In August 2008 Barack Obama was telling people that George W. Bush is a homosexual, so there you go here is some proof for you. I know things about George W. Bush, like having some involvement in those two 1995 nuclear bombings in the U.S.A., and all the other nuclear bombings around the World. It was a 100% homosexual that led these nuclear bombings and he did so from his 100% hatred of everyone and everything - natural love turned into unnatural hatred all because of homosexuality in his brain.
Brad Pitt reckons himself to be a 'hard man' and a 'big tough guy' so maybe he should prove he is these things, instead of just reckoning he is them, and stand AGAINST same-sex marriages.
I do not hate homosexuals - but I completely disagree with them. Hatred is a mental problem suffered by those that enjoy homosexuality. People that are 100% heterosexuals hate no one, they hate nothing and they can only completely disagree with homosexuals not hate them.
The best thing for homosexuals can not be done for them and for the human race and that is to kill them. The most realistic thing that can be done for homosexuals is to fade them out, just like a failed business.
Like The Criminal Offenses Act (1958) the TRUE Bible is very rare and like The Criminal Offenses Act (1958) I have copies of it. In the TRUE Bible the first (and most important) Commandment truly translates to Thou Shalt Not Be A Homosexual. So, yes the (TRUE) Bible is primarily and 100% AGAINST homosexuality.
Have you heard the revolting crap in the music charts recently? E.g. Rihanna, Akon, Kanye West, Kelly Rowland, Beyonce Knowles, Timbaland, Justin Timberlake? They are all connected to the lead nuclear bomber (a 100% homosexual (and, by the way, he is English) and they all know he is), they are all pro-homosexuality for themselves and others, their revolting crap comes from their own inner homosexuality and they do it primarily for capital gain. Would you listen to any of these on a Naim Audio system? Nope.
"Homosexuals are not human."
'Bye for now.
83. James - September 19, 2008 7:28 PM
According to a scholarly website called religioustolerance.com:
The institution of marriage has been in a state of flux for centuries. In the U.S., it has continually been redefined:
It was only after the civil war that African-Americans were allowed to marry in all areas of the U.S.
Prior to and during 1967, at least sixteen states prohibited mixed race couples from marrying. Inter-racial marriage became legal throughout the U.S. after a U.S. Supreme Court decision in that year.
But, until recently, same-sex couples could not marry anywhere in the world.
This final restriction was lifted during 2001-APR, when The Netherlands expanded its definition of marriage to include both opposite-sex and same sex couples. Belgium followed suit during 2003-JAN. Next came Ontario, a province in Canada in 2003-JUN. By 2004-NOV, same-sex marriage had become available in most Canadian provinces. When federal law C-38 was signed into law on 2005-JUL-20, SSM theoretically became available across all of Canada. However Prince Edward Island ignored the civil rights of same-sex couples, and refused to issue marriage licenses to them for almost a month. The capitulated when threatened by a lawsuit. Spain passed a law allowing same-sex couples to marry on 2005-JUN-29. South Africa's law came into effect on 2006-NOV-30.
Many political jurisdictions have special legislation that allows gay and lesbian couples to register their committed relationship as a civil union or domestic partnership and gain some benefits. These areas include most of the Scandinavian nations, the UK, Switzerland, and a number of states in the U.S.: The enabling legislation varies greatly among the jurisdictions. Many couples receive only some of the advantages that opposite-gender couples automatically acquire when they marry. In the case of the U.S., couples typically receive a few hundred state benefits but not the over one thousand federal benefits.
This web site ( http://www.religioustolerance.org/hom_marr.htm ) uses the term "same-sex marriage" (abbreviation: SSM) in place of the more commonly used "homosexual marriage" because it is more precise and inclusive. Some individuals with a bisexual orientation form loving committed same-sex relationships and want to marry. The term "SSM" covers them as well as homosexuals.
Many people believe that same-sex marriage -- or its equivalent under another name -- will become available to all loving, committed adult couples throughout North America and western Europe sometime in the next few decades -- whether they be same-sex or opposite-sex spouses.
Others -- typically religious and social conservatives -- feel that same-sex marriage is a major threat to the institution of marriage itself. They often describe themselves as "supporters of traditional marriage" which actually means that they want to prevent same-sex couples and their children to be forever denied the approximately 1,400 benefits and rights of marriage.
Bible passages describing same-sex marriage:
There are none! You can scan from the beginning of Genesis to the end of Revelation, and not see even a single same-sex marriage mentioned.
The Bible does contain:
Three stories of loving, same-sex relationships in the Bible involving David, Ruth and Daniel. But there is no indication that any of the three involved sexual activity.
A dozen or so oft-quoted passages about homosexual behavior in the Bible. Because conservative and liberal Christians interpreted the Bible very differently, they reach totally different conclusions about their meaning:
Many conservative Christians interpret these passages as stating unambiguously that all homosexual behavior is forbidden, is an abomination, and is hated by God. It does not matter whether it is in the form of casual sex with a stranger, or sex within a committed, monogamous relationship. It is all sinful. Some consider it an "ordinary" sin -- in the same league as all other incorrect behavior, like lying, cheating or stealing. Others consider it such a serious sin that it will prevent gays and lesbians from attaining Heaven after death, even if they had previously been saved.
Many liberal Christians largely ignore English translations of the Bible which are often heavily biased against homosexuality. They prefer to refer to the original Hebrew and Greek. They frequently interpret these passages as condemning:
Homosexual rape (Genesis 19; Judges 19:14).
Homosexual ritual sex in Pagan temples -- a religious taboo (Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13).
Homosexual prostitution (Deuteronomy 23:17; 1 Kings 14:24, 15:12, 22:46; 2 Kings 23:7).
Heterosexual men and women going against their basic nature and engaging in homosexual Pagan orgies (Romans 1:26).
Men who sexually molest boys -- and the boys that they abuse (1 Corinthians 6:9; 1 Timothy 1:9).
Bestiality: Men engaging in sex with males of another species -- angels in this case (Jude 7).
But on the topic of sexual activity within a loving, committed, monogamous homosexual relationship, many religious liberals view the Bible as being completely silent.
One of the very few beliefs on which conservative and liberal Christians agree is that there are no definitive statements in the Bible which deal directly with same-sex marriages (aka domestic partnerships, civil unions, holy unions, etc.)
The books in the Christian Scriptures were all written before 100 CE (according to most conservative Christians) or 150 CE (according to most liberal Christians). The concept of homosexuality as a sexual orientation that could lead to a committed, long term relationship was not developed until the late 19th century. Thus, one can not expect to find biblical references to same-sex marriage. There are no references to planes, trains or automobiles, either.
There are two sources that we can use to infer Christian perspectives on same-sex marriage:
Bible passages which deal with principles of love, sex, and marriage. Conservative and liberal approaches are described below. They come to opposite conclusions.
Direct assessment of the will of God through prayer. Unfortunately, according to a pilot study of some visitors to this web site, this path does not seem to be available.
Celibacy: The Bible generally promotes celibacy, for the minority of humans who can experience a complete, fulfilled life without sex.
Sexually active singles: The Hebrew Scriptures contains very severe penalties, including burning alive and stoning and for sexually active single women. Some passages in the Hebrew and Christian Scriptures condemn sexual behavior by both single men and single women.
Committed relationships are strongly supported throughout the Bible, from the Song of Solomon to Paul's epistles. Although not specifically mentioned in the Bible, same-sex permanent relationships would seem to be as beneficial and holy for a gay couple as they are to a heterosexual couple. It benefits society as well, in terms of lessened promiscuity and greater social stability. As of mid-2001, only gays and lesbians who are residents of the Netherlands can actually marry. Americans and Canadians can only register a civil union in Vermont, U.S. or as a domestic partnership in Nova Scotia, Canada. This situation is bound to change in the future.
A religious liberal might thus conclude that gays and lesbians are called by God to either remain celibate or to enter into committed, loving, supported relationships -- exactly the same lifestyles as God expects of heterosexuals.
84. amnesia - September 19, 2008 10:24 PM
#74 lenore
i remember you're ignorant from yesterday. i also remember your charming way with words. you are truly an eloquent speaker who can charm the birds from trees. god bless you, lenore!
85. lenore :) - September 22, 2008 9:21 AM
Amnesia darling came back for more i see... was a bit tastey?
86. Good Friend - September 22, 2008 12:50 PM
It’s great that Brad and Angelina have contributed a lot of money to charities. They are generous and have good heart! Brad is open to liberalism and support gay’s right. But one thing HE MAY NOT KNOW is Gay and Homosexual are sinful according to the Bible (1 Corinthian 6:9 Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor sodomites, nor thieves, … will inherit the kingdom of God ). If someone denies the truth that homosexual behavior is sin, but instead approves of it or rejoices in it, what that person bring to the homosexual person will not be love – no matter how affirming, kind or tolerant.
There is no such thing as homosexual marriage in the eyes of God. The Bible defines homosexual behavior as “dishonorable” and “shameless” and “contrary to nature” (Romans 1:26-27). God destroyed two cities: Sodom and Gomorrah according to the Old Testament because of their sinful act in homosexuals. Brad is generous for his charity but he is against the will of God.
For the people who are homosexuals, we respect and LOVE them just like anyone else as God love us all. However, we need to pray for them so THEY CAN CHANGE their sinful lifestyle (as stated in the Bible) if they come to God (in the Name of Jesus Christ) and ask for help and repented, unless they are so prideful and want to do things according to own-self’s lust.
We DO NOT WANT OUR KIDS TO BE RAISED UP IN SCHOOL that encourage HOMOSEXUAL as a normal thing to do. People can smoke if they wanted to, but there’s warning sign on the outside cover that smoke can cause cancer and hazard to health. We need to PROTECT FAMILY MARRIAGE between A MAN & A WOMAN, and SUPPORT PROPOSITION 8.
You may read story of a Liberal Democrat at below link:
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-blankenhorn19-2008sep19,0,2093869.story
87. GAbs - September 22, 2008 1:16 PM
Why is same sex marriage so hard to accept? It's not like you are forced to go to the wedding.
I wonder how some of you would react if your children turned out gay... or if someone you loved deeply "came out of the closet"
88. Mistik - September 23, 2008 5:56 PM
hahaha!
That’s kind of cool of him to say so (if that’s even true..).