Aug 18 2008Roseanne Barr goes on insane offense against Angelina Jolie & Brad Pitt (Is it Crazy Day?)
Roseanne Barr must've decided she wanted to feel relevant this weekend and posted an entry on her blog attacking Jon Voight, Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt. I'll give kudos to Roseanne for calling Glenn Beck a "used tampon" before she dives completely off the deep end in an ultra-liberal rant that makes Rosie O'Donnell look like Rush Limbaugh. I'm, of course, talking politically and not physically because, until last week, I swore they were twins:
[Jon Voight] is a frightened little girl in a pink ballet tutu, who acts like Obama just wandered in from the rain forest with a bone thru his nose and a communist pamphlet in his loincloth. The neocons who own jon voight and make him dance on the chabad telethons are the worst most elitist people on earth. glen beck and jon voight are their bitches... both of them are used tampons who must be flushed down the toilet immediately! jon voight your evil spawn angelina jolie and her vacuous hubby brad pitt make about forty million dollars a year in violent psychopathic movies and give away three of it to starving children trying to look as if they give a crap about humanity as they spit out more dunces that will consume more than their fair share and wreck the earth even more. (just sayin').
Wow. Somebody's going through the change. Did she just attack Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie for providing a home to poor underprivileged children? Yeah, these two are clearly diabolical. I bet next they'll build a hospital for AIDS victims. God, what a pair of assholes. If only some heroic comedian that everyone assumed was dead would lambaste them on her blog. Oh, wait.
RELATED STORIES

Reader Comments
1. mer - August 18, 2008 12:46 PM
Poor Angelina. Her life is rough.
2. msallied - August 18, 2008 12:52 PM
I wonder what that fat cunt has ever done for humanity. Seeing as how she has yet to kill herself, I'd say she's done absolutely nothing.
3. Daniel - August 18, 2008 12:53 PM
I've always liked Roseanne
4. Jim - August 18, 2008 12:53 PM
Once again, Roseanne is ugly-honest and people can't handle it. Just wait for all the comments on how physically unattractive she is, instead of how she was correct about both the right (Voight) and the left (Jolie/Pitt).
5. mimi - August 18, 2008 12:54 PM
ROSIE ROCKS and FISH-GUTZ SUKS!
6. kris - August 18, 2008 12:54 PM
nice dress
7. syn - August 18, 2008 12:54 PM
Who cares what this irrelevent bitch has to say? Agree with them or not, at least Beck and Voight come from a more articulate and well-thought-out position than Barr's "used tampon" platform. Useless hag.
8. Dale S. - August 18, 2008 12:56 PM
She writes like an angry 14 year old girl - Could she even form a cohesive sentence if she tried?
9. rough daddy - August 18, 2008 12:57 PM
how does she find time between meals? and which one of her personalities is this?
10. Rachel - August 18, 2008 12:57 PM
Actually I agree with her on both counts. If you admire either Voight-Beck or Pitt-Jolie, you've got serious mental problems.
11. Jay - August 18, 2008 12:57 PM
Roseanne, one of the angriest and ugliest persons on the face of the planet. She really needs to worry about herself more and stop showing the world what kind of uninformed, low-class idiot she is.
12. Christopher - August 18, 2008 12:58 PM
Wellll...unfortunately she's not far from the mark. She understands what is happening behind the scenes in world events, and has the guts to say it. Annoying? Yes. Is she right? Oh, yeah.
13. i love mer - August 18, 2008 12:58 PM
How come celebrities always come off as unibomber-crazy when they post in their "personal blogs"? There's very little excuse - it's not an interview or a live tv appearance. They have all the time they need to rethink and edit their entry before putting it out there for the world to see.
Roseanne just comes off as angry and a little loony. Consider the same point being made by someone with eloquent writing abilities. She's honest, and that's fantastic, but she needs to be intelligent about it too, or people are just gonna chalk it up to a hollywood catfight.
14. Roger - August 18, 2008 12:59 PM
Voight and Beck are mouthpieces, nothing more. Anybody who listens to them is a moronic follower.
15. buck - August 18, 2008 1:01 PM
That cements it....if crazy ass roseanne barr is supporting Obama then we all know something is wrong with him. Didn't think a celebrity could sway my vote but it has happened...McCain all the way!!!!
16. Smile - August 18, 2008 1:03 PM
Roseanne is my hero!!! At least someone has guts to say it like it is.
17. Glenn Beck fan - August 18, 2008 1:03 PM
8 years of hate, death, crashing economy, and ordinary folks losing their houses - YES PLEASE, GIVE US 8 MORE YEARS! VOTE MCCAIN! IT'S UNAMERICAN TO DO OTHERWISE! MAKE SURE YOU SHOUT OR YOU MIGHT ACCIDENTALLY LISTEN AND LEARN!
18. mimi luvs Amy (so there you have it) - August 18, 2008 1:05 PM
Darling you are the worst whore on this site. Off with yeh!
Brad and Angie of nothing else are certainly doing more to help others than I would imagine any of us here.
Hollywood is garbage and yeah there movies are that but they give back.
Hey "mims", how's your cunt Amy doing today? Has she shaved that sewer slit recently or are the cunt bumps still infected?
19. Shar - August 18, 2008 1:05 PM
Folks, I guarantee Rosie did not write this piece. How do I know this???
She could not put a complete sentence together if her life depended on it.
'"vacuous hubby" - does this sound like something coming out of Rosie!!!!!Absolutely not. Let's move on to something more interesting. She had her
fame, not sure why but its over.
20. Mo - August 18, 2008 1:09 PM
Me: When she can spell, use proper grammar and capitalization? Then perhaps I'll care what she has to say.
Some Crazy Liberal: Does that defeat her message!?!?!
Me: Why... yes, yes it does.
21. Vince Lombardi - August 18, 2008 1:11 PM
How can I take seriously anything from a woman you sings the "Star Mangled Banner" like her:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DrFW2aYHVR8
22. Vince Lombardi - August 18, 2008 1:14 PM
How can I take seriously anything from a woman who sings the "Star Mangled Banner" like her:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DrFW2aYHVR8
23. Mr. Monkey Pants - August 18, 2008 1:15 PM
Wait, hang on. . .Roseann is still alive?? I thought she ate herself to death, a la Pizza the Hutt!
24. Jo Smo - August 18, 2008 1:15 PM
paste this in your browser, rosie. you cow.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pKFKGrmsBDk
25. Conservatives hate American Constitution - August 18, 2008 1:15 PM
I love how the radical right is now dumping on the rest of us. If you run counter to their Neo-Nazi agenda of war and debt then you are now labeled an extremist.
Empty rhetoric same old same old that has caused our nation to literally crumble before our very eyes and asswipes like Beck who is nothing more than a shill do nothing more than defend their impotence and assail those who disagree with stupidity.
We are in deep doo doo here folks.
26. John McCain - August 18, 2008 1:16 PM
"In the 21st century, nations don't invade other nations."
No, seriously, that's what I said! And then I tried to argue that US-Iraq wasn't an invasion. And a little later I said we need to defend Georgia against Russia because Georgia because Georgia is one of the earliest CHRISTIAN nations. No, really, I said all that in just the last week!!! Psychosis or dementia, you tell me! You so crazy - I so crazy! Vote McCain!
27. Roseanne Baar is a fool - August 18, 2008 1:17 PM
16 - tell it like it is??
She is just a fat jealous slob who is grossly immature. She would rather Angelina and Brad not give any money?? Rather them not save children from starvation, poverty and child prostitution?
You are an idiot.
28. Vote McCain - August 18, 2008 1:21 PM
Hard to believe the right wing radicals are so lame and without morals that all they can offer up is this senile asshole that admits he has not clue about economics at a time when our economy has deteriotated (I am kidding debt creates wealth for the debtors idiots).
29. ramalamadingdong - August 18, 2008 1:21 PM
#17. you, sir, are an idiot. if the terrorists had bombed your precious california, you would be the first one ready to fight. fuck the terrorists, fuck the middle east. nuke that shit and turn it into a wal mart. i definitely want 8 more years. hopefully those duoche nozzles will learn their lesson and leave their sorry dune coon asses in the desert.
30. rough daddy - August 18, 2008 1:24 PM
so if you make violent movies you cant give to children? well thats one way to stay relevant rosie great job..
31. Eric - August 18, 2008 1:26 PM
For all his vast crowds and college-campus mania, Obama continues to strike out, completely, with people 65+, and there's no sign that will change before the election. The old people are going to turn out in their usual huge numbers and elect McCain. In terms of politics, young people and minorities are always all talk, no action. For Obama to win, young people and minorities (especially blacks) will have to stop talking bs for 5 minutes and go VOTE, in record numbers. They won't. They never do. By themselves, they could have elected Kerry, but they didn't turn out in any higher proportion than the rest of the population (turnout was high acrros the board). The only way Obama wins is by forfeit (conservatives unable to vote for McCain and refraining from voting).
McCain's an interesting guy and has had quite a life of sacrifice and service to the country. Too bad it's not 8 years ago, because he's obviously showing signs of dementia now. He's going to be a flaky president.
32. Jennifer - August 18, 2008 1:26 PM
@20: From your post, I'll assume that you're somewhat on the "right" side of the political spectrum? And not a "liberal?"
Did you, or people in your respective camp, care about what Bush Jr. had to say? I'm just wondering, because the man often came (and comes off) as being entirely too close to being illiterate. Especially considering that he's the President, and Barr is just a regular person who managed to create a living for herself through being a "straight-shooting," and vaguely amusing, liar? I'm sorry, actress.
Regardless, I remember people...again, I'm assuming these were the non-crazy, non-liberals...repeatedly defending Bush Jr.'s messages and underlying "principles" even though he didn't sound as professionally polished/trained as he needed to.
Do you have any ideas as to why this type selective grammarian judgment would've happened? Not saying I don't agree with your point that Barr needed to write more coherently, but that's because I'm a snot as far as those things are concerned, anyway.
33. #29 just finished 8th grade! - August 18, 2008 1:32 PM
I hope you are no older than 12 or 13 son. If your really think with our intelligence matrix and the fact that the airline highjackers were well known AND half of them set off alarms in the Airports AND builiding #7 AND Rumsfeld slipping twice about the missile hitting the pentagon AND the lovely way the buildings fell and the advance knowledge of their falling and on and on and on if not you are a moron.
With all the right wing propaganda assaulting the average (dumb) Joe out there and the abysmal lack of critical thinking in this country I am not surprised.
Ummmm maybe if we got out of the middle east and did not have a Israel uber Alles policy they would not hate us so much. Are you aware of the last century of middle eastern history? I would again imagine not.
So...Vote McCain to bring us closer to Marshall Law and a return to the "natural" (I believe this is so) Feudal System!!!
God and Jesus Bless the Elites and Trialateralists and Bilderbergers and Freemasons and Illuminati!!!! Oh and the Neocons (cons all right) and Glenn Beck and Rushie and all those cool guys on the right with tough talk!!!!
34. norton - August 18, 2008 1:33 PM
Wait... who's vacuous? Right, a "comedian" known for her whiny standup routine, foul mouth, plastic surgery and incredibly annoying rendition of the national anthem railing on whomever.
You can go back to your pathetic life now Roseanne you clearly untalented bag of shit.
35. Fox News 4EVA!!!! - August 18, 2008 1:37 PM
Did you see that Iraq is accumulating an $80 billion surplus (due to the spike in oil prices)? Meanwhile, the U.S. has spent $600 billion on Iraq since 2003. See? It's all about ensuring future financial security by generating huge debts and deficits, by whatever means possible. Too bad the Obamoberalerrists are too busy trying to tax and spend to take a moment and understand this basic principle.
36. thatsfckingross - August 18, 2008 1:39 PM
#17 stfu learn a few things before you start spouting off about politics. hating on bush has become a fuckin trend and is starting to piss me off.
ramalamadingdong you are awesome... i think we are safe from sarah today unless... maybe # 17 is sarah
37. Alyssa - August 18, 2008 1:39 PM
HA HA HA
she's right! Too bad it wasn't Michelle Obama saying this, that would have been AWESOME
Jolie is done - MEGAN FOX is Jolie 2.0 - Hotter, younger, adn not bat-shit crazy
38. I fucking love Rosanne - August 18, 2008 1:40 PM
Are you fucking kidding me I fucking love this woman. EVERYTHING she said is true. So what if she's ugly and Angelina and Brad have attractive shells that hide their inner hell fire and demon lava. So many idiots who have grown up around nothing but hideousness confuse outer attractiveness with value. Have you morons not seen a pretty girl before? Big fucking deal there are plenty of hot chicks and attractive men, these pretencious a-holes are beyond overated. Veingy is a fucking hypocritical bitch and her husband is just to stupid to know any better. Voights is a fucking classlessand sheltered looser. ACCEPT IT.
Rosanne I don't care how old and fat you are, I love you.
39. Bob - August 18, 2008 1:43 PM
The Left has run out of arguments, they best they ever had lasted 30 seconds before it brought up the 'war', and continues to fall back on the standard line of I'm angry.
Yes, lack of self care, the missing desire to even use the English language as it should be, and the missing plan to solve the problems really inspire me to your side.
Perhaps I will 'evolve' to your state of mind where reality, education, decency, finance, and fitness no longer matter. Until then I'll be a mindless person that you can label and attack to suit your rants while you live in your Utopian world where everything is someone else's fault.
40. applause - August 18, 2008 1:44 PM
She's fucking right and you all know it. It's just that here on the superficial ugly people are not allowed to have opinions, well except 90% of the commenters.
Now shut your holes and listen to what she is saying.
41. Gus - August 18, 2008 1:44 PM
#36 - "learn a few things"? So, we're not in a recession/depression, huge numbers of people haven't lost their homes due to foreclosure, and we haven't lost a ton of lives and limbs and money in Iraq (to stop al Qaeda? really? you believe that? say...I've got this real estate, great deal, really low price, but you have to buy today, right now, during this phone call...oh, seriously, you're interested? Great! I assume you're voting Republican again, right?).
42. Big Bad Johnny - August 18, 2008 1:49 PM
I listened to what she said, and my opinion of her hasn't changed the least.
She is a dried-up ex-whore (read her biography -- she admits to have turned tricks in her younger days to what must have been really desperate and drunk men), whose 15 minutes of fames was over years ago. She is so desperate for any attention at all that she rants like a freaking idiot.
While I don't agree wih Jon Voigt, I respect his right to say what he wants. It sure sounds a lot saner than what Roseann spews. And Brad and Angie do way more good than most Hollyweird elitisits. Gee, I wonder what % of Roseann's income has gone to charity. Oh wait, she would have to have had an income. But nobody is paying for her idiocy these days. And the last I checked, her spawn is totally useless.
What a talentless skank!!!!!!!!
43. Alyssa - August 18, 2008 1:51 PM
YES, ROSEANNE, YES!!
FREE THE RAGE!
Angelina HOlie And Douchbage Pitt are clinacally retarded....
Dont even get me started on Brad Pitt, trying to re-build houses in New Orleans EXACTLY where they were flooded out before - BELOW SEE LEVEL HAHAHAHHA oh shit dog,
I love america, you're all BROKE AS SHIT and you still quibble over crap like this
44. Alyssa - August 18, 2008 1:52 PM
YES, ROSEANNE, YES!!
FREE THE RAGE!
Angelina HOlie And Douchbage Pitt are clinacally retarded....
Dont even get me started on Brad Pitt, trying to re-build houses in New Orleans EXACTLY where they were flooded out before - BELOW SEE LEVEL HAHAHAHHA oh shit dog,
I love america, you're all BROKE AS SHIT and you still quibble over crap like this
45. We are in trouble deep deep trouble - August 18, 2008 1:53 PM
I actually know 2 right wing wack jobs and they both like Dubya! They believe in the wars, feel we should nuke the middle east, hate minorites, think global warming is a farce, have no respect for the environment,etc.
I have come to the conclusion that this type of person is responsible for all of our probelms on this earth. Problem is there are just too many of them to get rid of. Or is it a problem.????
46. iamright - August 18, 2008 1:58 PM
Liberals are so angry. It makes me laugh.= like this...
ha...ha...ha....ha....ha...HAH
47. jennifer_hammond - August 18, 2008 1:59 PM
I actually agree with what she said.
48. Barak Obama - August 18, 2008 2:00 PM
Fucking white trash Rosie spying on me in my loin cloth.
The only person more liberal than McCain is Obama. Sure go ahead and vote for obama. See where the economy and the price of gas will be in 2-4 years. If we last that long. You might as well just sign every dollar of your paycheck over the the fed's if he wins. That and open the border with mexico.
Can anyone name ONE piece of legislation that obama has put forth as a Senator? Please, just one.....I'll wait.
49. let's learn the lingo - August 18, 2008 2:00 PM
"elitist" = anybody who DIDN'T list Texas History and Woodshop as their two favorite classes in school.
50. Bob - August 18, 2008 2:02 PM
#45. Yes, I have to agree with you. The problem certainly isn't you or the people like you. 100% of the blame lies with those unlike you. Those that don't meet your high moral and ethical standards should surely be killed off. Since you know two of them, why haven't you already taken care of them yourself?
51. A - August 18, 2008 2:03 PM
#41 Do you know why people are loosing their homes? It's because most of them did "no doc" loans to get houses they couldn't afford in the first place. They needed no proof on income, just ok credit and some money down. Then because of the "no doc" they were paying a higher interest rate. And they were doing those loans where the interest would shoot up in a few years. The interest was too high and they lost their homes. They are what started the roughed up economy.
52. 50 is worthless and makes my list GOODBYE - August 18, 2008 2:04 PM
Wow powerful stuff there!! How long did it take you to think that up? Moron.
53. Mark - August 18, 2008 2:04 PM
Obama is unqualified. McCain is highly qualified - to run the country the same was as Bush, but - somehow - worse. A bottle marked "Unknown" vs. a bottle marked "Poison." Great fucking choice. I'm going with Obama, because it'll be his VP who runs the country. Not like Cheney-Bush. Like Johnson-Kennedy, if you get my drift. You know it's gonna happen.
54. Ted from LA - August 18, 2008 2:06 PM
I once saw someone accuse Rosanne of not being feminine enough. She told him to suck her dick.
55. Muffin - August 18, 2008 2:08 PM
Did anybody actually look at this crazy pig's blog? She blogs 5 to 10 times A DAY! The woman has no life! I hope she never finds out about Twitter or she'll be posting every few minutes! Oh, and it's really interesting stuff that everyone totally wants to know about. For example, her recent posting about her infected, pus-filled cuticle. Excuse me while I go vomit.
56. ramamanwithdingdongs - August 18, 2008 2:08 PM
(waddles across room with queen sized bedsheet for cape, trips, shake entire internet)
(composes self, wipes jelly off of chin with sleeve)
you leftie fucktards. Osama Hussein Obama is black. even you lib deutsch banks should be able to see that. we don't need the official white house dinner to have chitlins and apple flavored jolly ranchers. and we'll look stupid serving grape soda when putin comes to tell us he turned georgia into a parking lot and put spinners on all the tanx they got. now if you excuse me, i have to go mispronounce a lot of words to the people in the kitchen when i carry these dirty dishes back........
(waves cape back around sneering meanly, burps, runs out of door sideways)
57. F - August 18, 2008 2:08 PM
"Do you know why people are loosing their homes?"
Because they're too dumb to know how to spell "losing"?
58. Bob - August 18, 2008 2:09 PM
#51: Unfortunately the truth you speak of and the subsequent blame for people not being educated enough to plan properly is only more ammo for the left to use while they cry about how all the problems in the world are someone else's fault.
These poor people were taken advantage of you know. Certainly purchasing a $800,000 home with only an $80,000 incoming in SoCal is not the fault of these people. I mean who knew that it was going to cost so much to afford. If only we had "FREE" healthcare, retirement, education, energy, etc.. then I could afford the house I never should have purchased.
59. Ted Kennedy's tumor - August 18, 2008 2:10 PM
People loosing their homes is their own fault. They shouldn't have gotten into a mortgage they couldn't afford. That wasn't Bush's fault.
60. bo - August 18, 2008 2:13 PM
Ohhh, #52, What list did I make? I hope it's the 'I can't have a debate with this person, so I'll simply switch to an ad hominem attack' This list is the best list to be on.
Thank you for proving my point.
61. WTF????????????????????????? - August 18, 2008 2:16 PM
Superfish I am so disappointed in you. Come on. These fucking a-holes have at least 7 multi million dollar homes, they live in a 70 million dollar chateau in France, they have 2 airplanes and they own enough shit to fill two malls at least. Yet they blather on about world poverty? Do you know anything about people who actually work to help third world countries? You think the honest ones would ever dream of owning more than one home? Life is about balance and these hypocrites live a life that could support hundreds of people. In this world of poverty and endless charities and causes in need you think that makes sense? What entitlement do they have to their wealth? They didn't earn it, they aren't anymore deserving than anyone else. Like a greedy little child who insists on having more toys than they could ever play with, the immense greed these two exhibit is revoltingly childish. Why do they get picked on, when most celebrities live like they do if not much worse? It;s because these two have the sickening audacity to try to claim to be generous humanitarians. They live a life of intense greed and if you really look at the world greed is at the root of almost every problem. Meaning they are part of the problem, not the solution as they so arrogantly pretend to be. There are many real life versions of what these two pretend to be, but trust someone who actually knows about third world aid, these two are not the real deal.
In this world you don't earn millions, you don't need millions and you don't deserve millions. Firefighters save lives and put their's at risk day in and day out and earn in a year what these two fuckwads are given in a day. There is an endless list of people who work selfless, intensely stressful, vital jobs who make miniscule fraction of what these two make in a year. The people who work to help fight crime like bringing justice to the families of murdered children, the people who save lives, who educate, who help find treatment for disease, who care for the sick and the elderly it goes on and on. Society has it's fucking priorities backwards worshipping celebrities it causes people to value the wrong things and to have a very sad and pathetic view of what an admirable life is and that's why a lot of us come here because we actually believe that this celebrity worship is destructive to society and in between living lives that actually give back we like to vent a little.
Veingy and her man servant care about the plight of Africa where there are child soldiers and genocide's where kids literally watch their whole families get killed and preganant women getting slaughtered and yet then they make movies glorifying violence as something sexy?Yeah that makes sense.
Overpopulation is a huge problem and most people know it has a lot to do with poverty and yet these two have the need to have three kids, when they could adopt three instead They admitted Shiloh wasn't planned, for people who are so fucking in touch with the issues of the world that's a little trashy and irresponsible, no?
Come on superfish, we trash these losers here, don't defend them, that's just sad. So what if Rosanne is ugly, the bitch is right.
BTW It takes far more intelligence to write here for leisure than in does to sit in front of the boob tube and a little rand r is key to a balanced life. That just needed to be said in case there are those of such diminished mental capacity that they can't imagine someone being able to write here and still have an entire life filled with contribution..
62. ramalamadingdong - August 18, 2008 2:25 PM
#41 - i firmly believe that people losingtheir homes is the governments way of weeding out the lowlife scum on this earth. think about it. who causes most of the crime? low income BLACKS. they are getting kicked out of their shit boxes and hopefully moving to some other part of the world no where near me and my family. they fuck up everything. there are several malls in my area that have gone to complete SHIT because the blacks have taken it over. where can you get a shirt that is XXXXL? at the shit hole mall where the blacks shop. not at the nice places, that's for sure. everywhere they move they fuck shit up. this is just a way to get them the FUCK out fo our cities and clean it up. i am so tired of their whining and bitching and moaning, their loud music, their baggy pants, and their gold "teef". keep the taxes higher and keep the rif raf out of my neighborhood.
thanks folks, i'll be here all day.
ps #36, love ya too babe!
63. I hate Alyssa - August 18, 2008 2:32 PM
61 - I hope someone shoots you in the face some day soon, you deserve nothing less. You wrote way too much. Roseanne has millions of dollars as well, what percentage of her earnings has she given to charity? and Veingy doesn't sound like angelina.
If you read what she said, she did not make a point or offer some kind of solution for whatever she is sulikng about. She only compared two people to tampons, and said that she thinks Brad and Angelina are evil for giving millions to charity and having children...
By the way, they only have made three extra children, the other three already existed. Maybe she should pick on the giant families that live in public housing and live off of others.
64. Bob - August 18, 2008 2:35 PM
#61. Greed is what cures our ailments and drives our purpose. Finding the balance needs to be a self imposed discipline.
I wonder how many firefighters you actually know. I myself happen to know at least a dozen, and I'll tell you one thing about them. They wouldn't do it if they didn't get paid. In my county they are paid very well and also come away with a very nice pension. Is this greedy? Is it so they can feed themselves and their families? Why do they do this?
I have a family member that works harder than most people as a post-surgical nurse; however, this person and those firefighters are not angry at the fact that they have the chance to become wealthy via some means. What you are alluding to is limiting people because you are angry that it isn't you.
Now I will agree with you that Brad and Angela are nothing special, and the fact that they have wealth sucks for me. Yet you go to far to say that people don't deserve or have a right to their success. Taking that away makes the human existence something it can't sustain. We are creatures of sin, and the sooner we realize our flaws and accept them, the sooner we flourish as a people. In the meantime people will continue to lie to themselves and pretend to be something they are not. In turn this self-lie turns to anger due to the fact that they know it's still a lie deep down.
65. jen h utchifn - August 18, 2008 2:37 PM
Hmm. Rosie is right. Why are Brad and Angie in such violent movies if they are so peace and love? Good cattch Rosie. And I always likeed Roseanne; funniest woman alive in her time.
66. debisis - August 18, 2008 2:43 PM
62 and 12..right on. You took all those words out of my mouth. What is more sick than what you mentioned is the stupidty of Americans over AJ and BP including the rest of the world.
I love talent and fashion and beauty as anyone else...but my God, my GOOD GOD, these people are none of these...I am so offended as an American that people would settle for these two as if they are talented, huge stars with merit and as if they look hot...I mean, ew.
WORD TO THE WISELESS: These are very dumb and narcissistic people who sort of know how to act in movies, but very poorly written movies at that...
GET THIS PEOPLE, why is it that big name producers and directors who have a lot of merit AND time in the biz, who refuse to put these two in movies or together in a high budget, blockbuster...well, go figure, that is because these are people who know what is in fact high quality and what it takes to be serious minded, genuine folks out there. THINK ABOUT IT. STOP BEING STUPID OVER THESE TWO SOCALLED STARS.
I don't find them attractive AT ALL. I will never understand the naivetee shared by so many people around the world over these two. rock on Rosy!!
67. thatsfckingross - August 18, 2008 2:45 PM
ramalamadingdong for president!
68. debisis - August 18, 2008 2:51 PM
TYPO...I mean to say, 61 and 12..right on. You took all those words out of my mouth. What is more sick than what you mentioned is the stupidty of Americans over AJ and BP including the rest of the world.
I love talent and fashion and beauty as anyone else...but my God, my GOOD GOD, these people are none of these...I am so offended as an American that people would settle for these two as if they are talented, huge stars with merit and as if they look hot...I mean, ew.
WORD TO THE WISELESS: These are very dumb and narcissistic people who sort of know how to act in movies, but very poorly written movies at that...
GET THIS PEOPLE, why is it that big name producers and directors who have a lot of merit AND time in the biz, who refuse to put these two in movies or together in a high budget, blockbuster...well, go figure, that is because these are people who know what is in fact high quality and what it takes to be serious minded, genuine folks out there. THINK ABOUT IT. STOP BEING STUPID OVER THESE TWO SOCALLED STARS.
I don't find them attractive AT ALL. I will never understand the naivetee shared by so many people around the world over these two. rock on Rosy!!
69. Alli - August 18, 2008 2:52 PM
I watched the Glenn Back show she is referring to. It was rather disgusting listening to those two rip on Barack Obama, they had a few good points but for the most part it was dillusional bullshit, Jon Voight was saying all kinds of stupid shit. I do enjoy watching Glenn Beck but the interview with Jon Voight was so staged, almost scripted. Kind of like the one with Rich from Big and Rich. It was neaseating. But what I can't really figure out why JV is such an expert on politics, another actor who thinks he knows it all. At least Brad and Ang DO what they think will help the world, not just talk about it on TV or a blog every god damn day and rant and rave like a bunch of fucking lunatics. Roseanne is a douchebag, no question, she has no right at all to rip on anyone's parenting or work they produced (her show was based sorely on the glorification of dysfunction) actually but that interview disturbed me as well so I can see where she is coming from. Ripping on their children however is uncalled for and inappropriate. They may not give half their income away but 3 million dollars is a lot of fucking money and more than 99.99999999% of the world would GIVE away. They could do more yes, we all could. At least those 3 kids wont starve to death like the other millions of orphans in the world. Hopefully they dont end up making out with each other someday like Ang and her brother used to do. LOL
70. Gerhard - August 18, 2008 2:52 PM
Fat-ugly people are always cranky....
71. Lonely Australian seeking beauty-disadvantaged women - August 18, 2008 2:55 PM
ROSANNE !!!!!
I LOVE YOU BABY !!!!
72. Passerby - August 18, 2008 2:56 PM
Ludacris just announced he's releasing a sex tape of him and Roseanne. Rumours are that the golden shower and scat action is intense.
73. my comment - August 18, 2008 2:59 PM
She got one thing right. The Evil Spawn beast-childe of Jon Voight!
74. LA - August 18, 2008 3:05 PM
i love roseanne.
75. no Bob NO - August 18, 2008 3:12 PM
Bob you missed the point entirely. No one should be earning millions in this world. Firefighters make around $40,000 a year in America and that's an acceptable salary. When in the fuck did I say they shouldn't get paid. I TALKED ABOUT BALANCE. People do need money to live and care for their families hence BALANCE. 20 MILLION to play a firefighter is not acceptable, it's ludicrous. People do not need 7 fucking homes and in this world that is fucking sick. Like a mentally ill monkey in a jungle who takes 90 percent of the banana's and stores them in his tree when there is a whole jungle of monkeys who need to eat ( I thought I'd try a simple analogy). These tow are INSANE megalomaniacs with revolting greed.
Do you have any clue how much they make? No firefighter can afford a multi million dollar mansion unless he or she has a side business. These two have at least 7 and airplanes and vehicles that cost as much as houses. COME ON, there is NO comparison and that's the point, all the firefighters I know are far greater people than these two could ever pretend to be.
These two aholes need to practice what they preach and actually live a life that is CONSISTENT with the values they pretend to have.
I have always said that living an admirable life is a personal choice it is not something that can be forced upon anyone. These two have the choice to live with some decorum, decency, true generosity and honesty and yet they don't. They can still feed the economy spending lots of money, but how about living in ONE home donating two helicopters to a hospital and turning their 7 mansions into shelters, clinics, homes for terminally ill children etc and taking all the unnecessary shit they have in their homes and donating them, they can still drop 10,000 on a shopping spree but how about keep $500
Worth and donate the rest to a charity.
I know more people that work admirable jobs and have more experience with third world poverty than you can imagine. Of course idiots like these two who skew the view of humanitarianism making the sheltered young and stupid completely apathetic and lazy in their charitable efforts angers me, destructive idiocy will tend to do that. I live a life that is actually completely consistent with the values I do have, but that doesn't prevent me from being frustrated by society. I don't give a shit about how much tendency we have towards greed and idiocy and idiot with a functioning brain can choose to live a decent balanced life, people AR just fucking lazy and it's inexcusable.
The problem when it comes to these two is that these give a very twisted and sick image of what a generous life that's extremely detrimental since so many idiots view them as the gold standard.
76. Bigo - August 18, 2008 3:22 PM
Everybody knows that used tampons CANNOT be flushed down the toilet! Crazy woman!
77. go bob go - August 18, 2008 3:23 PM
honestly you need people in this world with shit tons of money. first brad pit and angie don't even have that much cash compared to other people...movie stars aren't by any means the richest people. think about the jobs people with money create. people to cook, clean, fly them places build them boats planes and houses. you are just jealous. there are about 470 billionaires in the USA. so why don't the people that are bitching about these two shut their holes and go complain to those people. you want to talk about FUCKED UP. the family that owns walmart has a net worth between all the kids of over 90 billion. when it came time to give money for something(can't remember exactly i did read it somewhere) they only gave 500$ THEY MAKE THAT IN A FRACTION OF A SECOND. THEY MAKE MORE MONEY THEN THAT IN THE TIME IT TAKES THEM TO WIPE THEIR OWN ASS. leave these two alone. alright they are rich but not fucking ass holes like alot of other celebs.
78. HankTheDwarf - August 18, 2008 3:30 PM
I agree with everything she said. Fuck the neocons.
79. Big Bad Johnny - August 18, 2008 3:30 PM
Why shouldn't people make millions of $$$'s? It's simple supply and demand. People who make that sort of money supply something (acting, singing, playing a musical instrument, playing a sport, running a giant corporation, etc) that 99.999% of the rest of the population can't.
Angie and Brad star in movies that often bring in $100,000,000 or more (sometimes double or triple that). I personally don't go see them, but lots of people do. If their talents help the movies to make that sort of $$$, why shouldn't they get their fair share of it? The same for Michael Phelps, Madonna (who I really can't stand, but she sells), or MIchael Dell. It's their talents and their willingness to take the risks that got them where they are.
People give the examples of firemen and teachers being "more important". But, ultimately, a much much higher % of the population can do those jobs, so the pay is based on the supply and demand.
But, all that aside, while I can't normally stand Brad and Angie, Rosie is the queen of useless, washed up, classless piglettes. But I guess she is back in the spotlight again, so she gets her wish!!!
80. Bob - August 18, 2008 3:31 PM
I'm only going to respond to one of your comments, because I am not here to judge Angelina and Brad.
The problem here is that you feel that 'No one should be earning millions'. I directly reject your communist/socialist approach to life because it goes against nature. It's been proven time and time again that this doesn't work. Money, privilege, and power, are given out unfairly in all systems of market and government; however, the system we have now is the best of them all. Look up some history on communist Russia. For example; Russian party members had special privileges to shopping, housing, universities, jobs, etc.. This is equal to having wealth, yet with the added layer of social membership/status.
I suggest you work towards removing corruption and increasing ethics in stead of rejecting the concept of money.
Anyway, I'm tired of trying to change the minds of people that have no desire to have even the slightest bit of an open mind with a basis grounded in reality.
81. HankTheDwarf - August 18, 2008 3:31 PM
Also I didn't notice anything "ultra-liberal" in that. It was the fucking TRUTH.
82. SO RIGHT - August 18, 2008 3:34 PM
Hands down, this is what this country is coming to:
Liberals whiners who do nothing but intellectualize and TALK about all that's wrong with the very country they suck off of, and then bully others if they don't agree with their self-absorbed plight.
Conservatives & Independents: People who actually appreciate the freedom and opportunity this country provides while trying to actually DO SOMETHING about the things that are wrong.
End of story.
83. Bob - August 18, 2008 3:41 PM
Because Big Bad Johnny, there is a portion of people that believe life should be something entirely different than what is actually possible. They transcend ideology and arrive at the impossible because they refuse history and must learn the hard way.
It would be sad if it wasn't so scary that this portion of people are being manipulated by those that hold the reigns of big business in order to have them put the handcuffs of oppression on themselves.
It is quite an amazing skill to have people actually put the chains of modern day slavery on themselves and feel good about it.
84. CJ - August 18, 2008 3:41 PM
Hilarious coming from someone whose used up all her time to wreak havoc during her much-too-long of time in the limelight. Talk about the pot calling the kettle black...she pretty much makes it clear she's out to get any one who doesn't think just like her, which considering what a dung heap of toxic trash that is...WHO WANTS TO BE COUNTED IN HER GROUP??? This woman wouldn't know sanity if it slapped her upside her big head. This was her last hurrah....buh-bye and hope you are found within months of literally dieing at what ever land fill you happen to be sitting at when it happens. Oh, and this in NO WAY endorses the awesome couple known as the saviours of the 3rd world...Angie and Brad. What ever.
85. come on - August 18, 2008 3:42 PM
We completely acknowledge that many are wealthier and greedier, but they DO NOT pretend to be humanitarians. THAT'S THE FUCKING PROBLEM WITH THESE TWO. Jealous??? Some of us are wealthy and choose to live modestly and contribute the rest. You can earn insane undeserved amounts of wealth in this fucked up world, but very very few choose to pay themselves a very small reasonable salary and contribute the rest, live in ONE small home and actually consume only our FAIR share. BALANCE that's the word of the day children.
That is what we are suggesting they do, live a modest life, so that they can NOT be GIANT FUCKING HYPOCRITES. They are ass holes and they are the most disappointing of all because they actually seem to be somewhat aware of the poverty and need in the world unlike the greedy little heirs of companies like Walmart and yet they live like greedy little heirs.
It is those with potential that they don't even tap into who disappoint us the most. Billionaires who are not famous do not appear here that doesn't mean we don't criticize them we just don't criticize them here. Again it is the PRETENDING to be a humanitarian that is so destructive. It's like Paris Hilton portending to be a virgin, she is not at all the biggest slut on the planet, but she is a very famous slut and pretending to be anything else is revolting and very detrimental to society because of those who imitate her. If she actually decided to fucking clean up her life FINE, which is the same thing these aholes should do.
How fucking disgusting it is to have "people to cook, clean, fly them places build them boats planes and houses" all those employees to pamper and take care of ONE greedy fucking family. A-FUCKING-GAIN they could turn their homes into shelters, clinics, home for terminally ill children and STILL fucking employ just as many if not MUCH MORE of people, but instead of employing people to pamper their own spoiled asses they would be employing people who actually help others, important causes and by extension society as a whole.
FUCKING THINK OUTSIDE OF THE BOX YOU LAZY APATHETIC IDIOTS. The aholes of Walmart are greedy and so are these two, they all give far too little and more importantly KEEP far to much for themselves.
86. small penis - August 18, 2008 3:46 PM
Fuck you and your "somebody's going through a change" comment. I'm tired of your vicious attacks against older women. Seems like you are the one with the fucking problem. Roseanne is right on, as usual, with her comments. And you, sir, once again, don't have a clue of what you're talking about.
87. small penis - August 18, 2008 3:51 PM
Make that "the change".
88. SO RETARDED - August 18, 2008 3:52 PM
"Conservatives & Independents: People who actually appreciate the freedom and opportunity this country provides while trying to actually DO SOMETHING about the things that are wrong."
Like what? Invade another sovereign country under pretenses known to be false at the time? And later say "In the 21st century, nations don't invade other nations"? During 6 of the 8 years of the Cheney presidency, there were conservative Republican majorities in the Senate and House, as well as in the state governorships, and across the state and federal judgeships. And all the conservative Republicans could do was whine about how "the liberals" were blocking them from doing anything productive.
Everybody knows the Republican party has become lost and corrupt in all ways (Larry Craig, Ted Stevens). If you're not out fucking boys (or trying to), you're stealing money. Party's over.
89. Bob - August 18, 2008 3:59 PM
88, why are you trying to draw a parallel between conservatives and independents with Republicans? I saw no claims of party membership in the poster's comment that you used to attack.
I am conservative, yet I am no Republican. I could name drop like you have from both parties with examples of corruption, lies, etc.. We could also talk about the last 2 years with the democratic party and all they haven't done.
You are being manipulated and you believe that it's the other side that is doing it when in fact they are both doing it. Problem being that the corruption that is more like you is easier to sympathize with.
Might I suggest a torch and pitchfork against them all?
90. hello - August 18, 2008 4:01 PM
Bob you are so insanely twisted in your logic. Only idiots who cannot think for themselves spew idiocy about socialism and communism. PEOPLE ARE TALKING ABOUT A PERSONAL CHOICE to not be so fucking greedy. It's a personal choice to live a generous life and the world will not fucking implode nor will the economy if the greedy stop spending so much ON THEMSLEVES and instead spend their wealth which morally they can admit is not entitled on the endless list of causes in need in this world.
Since you clearly do NOT work for causes in need you obviously have no comprehension of the fact that MONEY is needed to pay for hospital equipment, for vaccines, for safe housing, for security, for health etc... The MONEY needed for all those things and more in this world is being spent on fucking INSANE bullshit like many MULTI million dollar homes and planes etc... By grown adults who should be intelligent enough to not live like greedy little children and actually truly give back instead of giving crumbs to the peasants and then going home to a life of royalty.
The comment that no one should make millions is about entitlement NO ONE has suggested any kind of government enforced socialist regime. Its ridiculous to jusmp to that lazy and TIRED argument. We are talking about grown adults who profess to be humanitarains yet live a life that is incredibly greedy, materialistic and wasteful. We are suggesting that they grow the fuck up and actually practice what they preach and that doing so would be tremendously beneficial for society in terms of the immense aid their wasted wealth would provide and the honest and impressive example they would provide for the idiots who need an example to follow.
Again balance being the word of the day no one is suggesting they live in a cardboard box on the street, enjoying life and comfort is essential for sanity and health and is something all people deserve, yet so many do not have it and one of the reasons is that aholes like these two live a life of obcene luxury that could give comfort to hundreds instead of pampering ONE ridiculously spoiled family.
91. Deport Intellectually Ineffective Republicans - August 18, 2008 4:07 PM
Hey right wing wack jobs can I ask a question? What kind of condition do you think our country is in? Are you aware that we are now in (let me spell it for you idiots) M A S S I V E debt so badly that we are essentially finished as a nation. Yeah we are in deficit spending and have been the whole time these criminals have been in office.
Invading other nations to STEAL their natural resources.
Offending other nations that do not agree with us like GERMANY and FRANCE and CANADA etc.
ahh ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha your old worthless criminal McCain says he knows notihng about economics. GREAT!!!!!!!!!!!!! I did not make that one up he said it himself!!!!!!
You people should get the fuck out of our country.
Oh yeah. Dubya calls the constitution a goddamn piece of paper!!!!!!!!!!
You really are a rancid lot aren't you?
92. meee - August 18, 2008 4:10 PM
hahaha goddamn i love roseanne. & i do really wish angelina would stop having fucking kids. goddamn. procreation is not a fucking hobby, people!
93. Bob - August 18, 2008 4:17 PM
Your ability to make a case is stellar. You make assumptions about me on the internet, you constantly use profanity, you attempt to isolate your socioeconomic viewpoints from terns that you feel are negative (not matter how accurate) and you clearly think that your morality is something that should be pushed on others.
If you are trying to 'bridge the gap' and allows others to view your side of it, you fail.
BTW, what exactly is it that 'they are preaching'? Because I haven't seen a single moral code come from them like I have from the countless angry voices here an elsewhere.
94. SO RIGHT - August 18, 2008 4:21 PM
Don't like the condition of the country, ha? Funny -- no one can make a move without Congress, and CONGRESS is filled with liberal Democrats! What have THEY done to change anything? Nancy Pelosi and her empty promises --- whatevs.... Blame yourselves for voting that clown in.
95. Bob - August 18, 2008 4:22 PM
91: It's not just the right leaning lawmakers that have created the debt. How are we going to pay for the left's idea when they create free health-care, education, pre-school, additional stimulus (tax-rebate) checks? Where is all that money going to come from?
Tell me where, without attacking me.
96. DAN KEEPS THE CAPS ON - August 18, 2008 4:27 PM
92- SHE HAS ONLY HAD THREE ( THE OTHER THREE ALREADY EXISTED AND WOULD HAVE STARVED OR BEEN CHILD PROSTITUTES IF NOT FOR HER) AND SHE CAN SUPPORT THEM, UNLIKE THE REST OF THIS GHETTO COUNTRY THAT LIVES BEYOND THEIR MEANS.
SHE GIVES NEARLY A 3RD OF HER INCOME TO CHARITY, WHAT IN THE HELL ARE YOU UGLY NOBODY FAT ASSES DOING, WHAT IS ROSEANNE DOING...
SHE DIDN'T MAKE ANY POINTS, SHE IS RIGHT ABOUT NOTHING, SHE JUST DID SOME NAME CALLING AND WHINED A LITTLE...
WHO IN THE HELL ARE ANY OF YOU TO JUDGE ANGELINA?? TELL ME ABOUT HOW MUCH MORE YOU HAVE PERSONALLY DONE FOR GOOD CAUSES, CHARITY, AND THE LESS FORTUNATE.... AND YOU THINK SHE DOESN'T DO ENOUGH, WHY DON'T YOU COMPLAIN ABOUT EVERY OTHER CELEBRITY , INSTEAD OF COMPLAINING ABOUT HER? IS IT BECAUSE SHE MAKES YOU FEEL FAT, FLAT CHESTED, BIG NOSED, UGLY, TALENTLESS, USELESS, POOR, PETTY, BORING, SELFISH, BECAUSE SHE IS THE OPPOSITE OF ALL OF THESE THINGS?
ROSEANNE BARR IS NO BETTER THAN PEREZ HILTON, SHE WOULD NEVER SAY THESE THINGS TO ANGELINA'S FACE.
ALL ROSEANNE HAS SAID IS THAT ANYONE WHO DOESN'T AGREE WITH HER IS AN EVIL TAMPON
BY THE WAY SHE HATED OBAMA A COUPLE MONTHS AGO...
SHE SHOULD OFF HERSELF ALREADY, A LONG WITH THE REST OF YOU ILLITERATE FOOLS WHO ADMIRE HER.
97. 150 Foot Tall Meeghan - August 18, 2008 4:29 PM
I never understood a thing rosie has ever said... it always seemed like rabid, frothing at the mouth, batshit insane ranting. here, however, is rosanne barr saying something that actually makes sense. granted, she said it in "rosannespeak" so that she'd look like she was trying to be funny if somebody misunderstood her... but, still, she makes a clear point: both sides of the fence are bozos.
98. bootlips - August 18, 2008 4:30 PM
Successful celebrities always feel obligated to give to the criminal negroes. I think they do it to look like Saints and also do it because they feel it will protect them from all the black crime.
99. Banquo - August 18, 2008 4:36 PM
"make about forty million dollars a year in violent psychopathic movies and give away three of it to starving children"
THOSE BASTARDS!! They should give all that money to starving kids and THEY should be poor, just like Rosie does,..oh wait no I guess not.
Also Rosie has that same hollywood disease that Michael Jackson has, but instread of getting the plastic surgery (that she could actually benefit from) she just says whatever pops into her undereducated brain.
100. Banquo - August 18, 2008 4:36 PM
"make about forty million dollars a year in violent psychopathic movies and give away three of it to starving children"
THOSE BASTARDS!! They should give all that money to starving kids and THEY should be poor, just like Rosie does,..oh wait no I guess not.
Also Rosie has that same hollywood disease that Michael Jackson has, but instead of getting the plastic surgery (that she could actually benefit from) she just says whatever pops into her undereducated brain.
101. columbo - August 18, 2008 4:38 PM
i hate brangelina. roseanne rocks.
102. levi - August 18, 2008 4:38 PM
this is the funniest thing I've seen in several days!! yes!! people who read the superficial discussing politics! lol! man, this rules!! it's a website devoted to lame celebs in bikinis! some washed up 90s sitcom star writes something on her blog about *both* sides of the campaign, and all you people are suddenly informed Americans!! go! go! go!
jesus, we are all fucking doomed.
103. columbo - August 18, 2008 4:39 PM
look at that haughty look on mangie's face. she's so impressed with herself. makes me wanna vom
104. vera - August 18, 2008 4:40 PM
Wow. So, by Rosanne's account, the Jolie-Pitts make 40 million a year and give 3 mil away to children's charities? I think both of those numbers are probably pretty low, but by Roseanne's count, Brangelina are hypocrites because they donate nearly ten per cent of their income to charity???
Please, Brad and Angelina could KEEP all their money and still register as a children's charity themselves, with all the children they have.
But no, I'm sure Roseanne is right. I mean, afterall, that IS why the United Nations picked Roseanne as their international good will ambassador, right? Oh yeah...
105. goodbye - August 18, 2008 4:47 PM
96. Try reading the comments here for answers to all your stupid questions.
Bob you talk in circles and yet you have nothing intelligent to say. It's not about being judged it's that a person as narrow minded as you clearly does not do a lot for society because you have no understanding of reality. Again this is a place where people vent. Profanity? Big fucking hell who are you the catholic church? Come on. You are providing nothing but lazy excuses instead of understanding that in life you have a choice to be innovative and creative in how you give back to society, you have a choice to not be a lemming to not be lazy and selfish and to create your own life of giving back without trying to justify your own selfish greed and apathy. There is no excuse in this world for o 7 mansions, 2 planes and malls worth of obsessions.
Again try thinking outside the goddamned box and then try living outside the god damned box.
And Preach? Clearly you have not seen the press conferences, the speeches as goodwill ambassador of the UN and the constant use of the word humanitarian, the interviews where miss Jolie has bragged about what she gives ( omitting how much she keeps and how ridiculously she lives) and actually telling interviewers that after her experiences in Africa she no longer values material things, except that she lives in a 70 million dollar chateau has at least 7 other homes with her partner two airplanes and fucking boatloads of SHIT.
I'm done keep lying to yourself, keep making excuses, you can live a truly generous life that takes intelligence and innovation, you can pretend to live one while being extremely greedy or you can be selfish wasteful bastard who doesn't give a fuck, it's up to you.
Good luck.
106. Dan - August 18, 2008 4:54 PM
And she has already went in and changed her blog posts...she does this all the time. ALL THE TIME! What they report about is no longer on her website blog like they have it written above...isn't that a shame? I think she gets drunk and then she blogs...then she goes in or someone else and cleans up her mess. Trust me, I know her and this shit gets old.
107. Bob - August 18, 2008 5:01 PM
So how do you feel about Bono? And how do you give back exactly?
And no, I don't see her preaching. I can't say I try to follow what a celebrity says. I fully admit that if she does make those claims, then she/they are full of shit, lying hypocrites.
And on a personal note, you can suck my @#$3 since you continue to assume that I've done nothing. I suppose Habitat for Humanity, Donating Blood, and donating my time and money to raise capital for soccer equipment (goals, shoes, uniforms, balls, field equipment) for Iraqi children is nothing.
108. 105- leaving because has no argument - August 18, 2008 5:05 PM
i hope you don't see movies or watch tv, listen to music, etc. because i guarantee you will be supporting much greedier individuals than the jolie pitts. look at roseanne's greedy self indulgent ass, with her many many MANY plastic surgery procedures and still looking like an ugly fat slob.
All she manages to do is call people names for not agreeing with her on how to spend tax dollars, and you think she is so great.
it is easy to call people greedy when you are dirt poor and you yourself have nothing to give. ...
the jolie pitts give back more percentage wise than you do, not only with their helpful tax money, but the millions upon millions they give to charity, again, what does roseanne do? what are you doing? what are other celebrities doing that have more than them?? there were higher earners in 08.
but ya know what, they don't HAVE to do ANYTHING.
the only question I see in 96 is who are you to judge her? What kinds of volunteer work do you do? What percentage of your income do you donate?
And how much does your life suck, because you must hate nearly everyone, because lets face it... not that many people give back as much as these two do...
109. Sportsdvl - August 18, 2008 5:06 PM
I just want everyone to visit my website www.afflsports.com so I can make millions off my ESPN banner I have at the top of my webpage!
Thanks guys! You're great!
110. fox news drooling right-wingnut superficial commenter - August 18, 2008 5:18 PM
America...
America...
America, FUCK YEAH!
Coming again, to save the mother fucking day yeah,
America, FUCK YEAH!
Freedom is the only way yeah,
Terrorist your game is through cause now you have to answer too,
America, FUCK YEAH!
So lick my butt, and suck on my balls,
America, FUCK YEAH!
What you going to do when we come for you now,
it’s the dream that we all share; it’s the hope for tomorrow
FUCK YEAH!
McDonalds, FUCK YEAH!
Wal-Mart, FUCK YEAH!
The Gap, FUCK YEAH!
Baseball, FUCK YEAH!
NFL, FUCK, YEAH!
Rock and roll, FUCK YEAH!
The Internet, FUCK YEAH!
Slavery, FUCK YEAH!
FUCK YEAH!
Starbucks, FUCK YEAH!
Disney world, FUCK YEAH!
Porno, FUCK YEAH!
Valium, FUCK YEAH!
Reeboks, FUCK YEAH!
Fake Tits, FUCK YEAH!
Sushi, FUCK YEAH!
Taco Bell, FUCK YEAH!
Rodeos, FUCK YEAH!
Bed bath and beyond (Fuck yeah, Fuck yeah)
Liberty, FUCK YEAH!
White Slips, FUCK YEAH!
The Alamo, FUCK YEAH!
Band-aids, FUCK YEAH!
Las Vegas, FUCK YEAH!
Christmas, FUCK YEAH!
Immigrants, FUCK YEAH!
Popeye, FUCK YEAH!
Democrats, FUCK YEAH!
Republicans (republicans)
(fuck yeah, fuck yeah)
Sportsmanship
Books
111. To Bob - August 18, 2008 5:34 PM
Hey brother no attack (this time heh heh). I don't know how the Hell we are gonna pay for shit when we are in massive debt. Your point is valid. We are beyond bankrupt.
Alternate energy is an emergency measure and we will create many new jobs with that.
We NEED to go back to small farming THAT will create new jobs.
I say TAX the fuck out of the rich!!!!! Tax these capitalist greedy thieves out of existence. NOONE deserves to smile and act in mindless movies and make millions while we go out and work for like 1/100th and less for a whole year and some fucks are worth billions.
How is it good for the state of the word economy for there to be 10,000 worth 41 tillion and estimated to be worth 60 trillion by 2012???????????
THERE'S where the MONEY is at!!!! IN the hands of the elite!!!!
The SUPERRICH have OUR money!!!!!!
I guess fair play is not an option realistically because we will all be slaves soon. Don't think so? OK.
112. SO RIGHT - August 18, 2008 5:48 PM
The super-rich pay their fair share of taxes. They pretty much take care of the entire country. So let them get rich, dumbarse! Yeah -- smart idea -- let's punish people for working their butts off while we reward those who just want mediocre lives or do nothing. That's the American way. SOCIALISM! Ugh -- gross liberals!
113. haha - August 18, 2008 6:22 PM
The democrats are on vacation while the republicans are actually trying to get something DONE about the gas prices.
Did you forget that the democrats are in charge of Congress right now??
114. titsonsnack - August 18, 2008 6:36 PM
Who flushes their tampons down the toilet?
115. FUCKING RETARDED WEBSITES - August 18, 2008 6:52 PM
The super-rich pay their fair share of taxes.
-----------
What fucking dream world do you in live in? I bet I pay more taxes than the super-rich. Since all celberities are narcisscistic garbage, its kinda fun to watch the ya'all try to sort through it for no real reason though.
116. Loli - August 18, 2008 7:08 PM
Shes not criticizing tem for giving money, shes saying they are hypocrites. and they use charity as a cover up for the other bull shit they do- to generate good publicity. And she has a point.
117. THE REAL BARELY STEARN - August 18, 2008 7:19 PM
Roseanne Barr: WHO FUCKING CARES what this one thinks, does, feels. I'm numb - I feel nothing. I feel like my dick after seeing pictures of Selma Blair in a bikini. Absolutely nuthin'. My tool has flat-lined...sorry.
Oh wait! I have a snappy rejoiner for Ms Barr...uhh...nope...lost it....Don't care...never have, never will....
118. Jude - August 18, 2008 7:24 PM
The more you talk about "Republican" and "Democrat" the more you play into their hands. You should be a Christian -- or better yet a medieval Catholic -- who stands up against this entire rotten one-world system they're developing. Even at the cost of your life.
Because I can tell you, as much as you don't want to hear it -- you have no future. I'm sure that after a quick look around you will admit this to be true. Read the Book of Daniel where it talks about the end times and says of the devil "Through comfort he will deceive many." That is precisely how you're being deceived. You think you have "human rights." THEY DON'T EXIST. You think you have the right to a good job and long life and health insurance. Huh? Did Jesus have a long life and good job and health insurance? While you were concerning yourself about your body, the devil has gotten your soul. He has made you think heaven and hell don't exist. That you don't have responsibility to God. That you are just a creature of the earth. You think that if you all hold hands and deny Jesus together that somehow you can't possibly be punished. WRONG. Billions of people can go down together.
It is a typical ploy of the communists -- and by that I mean both Democrats and Republicans, who are both Jew-controlled just like this entire country -- to talk about their love for the "people" when in truth they only see them as money-generating drones like in The Matrix. So what Rosanne ( who is Jewish ) is doing is nothing new. She is trying to pretend Democrats and Repulicans are on opposite sides. But then she goes and brings up how Jon Voight went on a Chabad telethon -- which is true. This is the usual tactic, they are like serial killers who want to be caught, just so the world will know how clever they are. However there is more to this demonic attack than just the Jews. YOU the "good people" are all a part of it, since you went along with it without raising a peep.
119. Gramma Nazi - August 18, 2008 7:51 PM
How come 'celebs' always have such poor grammar? Angelina should spare some of that forty million and give bloggers English lessons. Now that's giving back to humanity.
120. Kimberly - August 18, 2008 8:15 PM
Wow, she makes a point.
121. Buddy "Tough" Love - August 18, 2008 8:20 PM
I'm actually pretty proud that we can have these discussions..and that there are opposing viewpoints.. <3 you all, even you fucking conservatives.
122. Buddy "Tough" Love - August 18, 2008 8:23 PM
Although I DO NOT CONDONE CHRISTIANITY. Fuck all you goddamned nutjobs spewing shit about the books of some fake piece of trash.
#118, I hope your fucking family dies in a fire, and you have to watch them burn.
123. debisis - August 18, 2008 8:31 PM
61 and Bob, Just my point of view, I don't think we need to worry so much about people becoming insanely rich, it's a free entreprise, capitalistic society..and I think there's more good that comes out of it than having a bunch of Caps around.
But I agree with 61 that there are some severely over paid people in our society and perhaps industries and businesses should take a better look at who gets what and how much...or a better tax system ...not putting caps on..but you get my idea.
The biggest point I think 61 is trying to convey is simply how people buy into the hype over people from the media/entertainment industry and thier [well] presented and choreograph humanitarian efforts compared to how they actually live thier lives...as if they are hypocrites.
You know we spend a lot of time putting down people with respect to their image, or those in politics or some kind of controversey...but we should instead focus [and complain about when necessary] on issues like this...
this kind of hypocrisey in itself perpetuates poverty and disconcern towards those in need-- who may have a lot more to offer if they had basic needs.
Lord knows we need better talent in the media and entertainment industry thanks to AJ and BP standards. i mean, ew.
124. debisis - August 18, 2008 8:35 PM
...sorry typo...
if they had their basic needs MET
125. sorry bob - August 18, 2008 9:13 PM
#108. Wow you must really live a sheltered life if you think these two give back. Try getting out a little and learning about all the hard working people who give back tirelessly without any need for praise or the need to brag about it.
I happen to actually practice what I preach having travelled all over Africa working to help poverty (without forcing any religion, since I am not religious and I do not believe in that approach) I also work with a research lab to help find treatment for complex immunological illnesses and I work with extensively with children's charities. I happen to be technically very wealthy, but I pay myself a very small salary in order to give back as much as possible. Projects that I have worked on have generated wealth that I know I do not deserve, that I know no one deserves. I live in one very small home and have one vehicle I do not buy anything designer, I do not go to the movies or buy dvd's or cd's made by overpaid idiots and I like programs on the discovery channel. I could own mansions and several cars, but I would rather contribute the money wasted on such ridiculous luxury to the causes I believe in. I truly wish more people did the same and I think if Hollywood did, because they are so influential and famous that the contagious affects of it would be incredibly beneficial.
I LOVE the idiots on here who think the rich work their butts off. Could you please try to get out a little and meet the hospital workers who care for the sick and dying who have to see sick and dying children day in and day out, paramedics who save lives and have to watch people die like a young child hit by a drunk driver, the good teachers out there who are paid crumbs to help children learn, the scientist who find cures and treatment for deadly and debilitating diseases, the aid workers, the fire fighters, the social workers who help abused children, the police, the investigators who work to find missing children who have to deal with grizzly murders beyond your wildest nightmares, the people who keep us safe, the doctors who run their own clinics and work crazy hours taking on patient after patient in a tapped out medical system, the people who own companies and barely pay themselves so that they can pay their employees good salaries that they can raise a family on, the people who work with disabled children, all the people who work dangerous, vital, insanely stressful jobs and still give back to the community and while they could take and take and take some more they instead choose to give and give and give. I have known so many amazing every day unsung heroes lie the above mentioned and single parents who have taken in abused children and put themselves last to put those children first. People who owned a camp for disabled children and lived in a tiny home putting everything they could into that camp so they would never have to turn a child away. there are so many admirable people in this world and instead we admire celbrities, no wonder the world is so messed up.
The point in life is to give and not to take so much for yourself, because the real way that we give is by taking LESS (yet so few people realize that because is much easier to give, but to take less that is a real challenge). Even basic Christmas cartoons for little kids try to teach that simple concept. The goal in life is not to collect the biggest pile of stuff and put your name on it. Enjoy life, of course, that is necessary for sanity, peace of mind and health, but we all know when we are being greedy and million dollar homes and airplanes is greedy and insane and so are many lifestyles far less materialistic then the extreme ones celebrities live, they are not the worst but since they are in the public eye they are dangerously influential.Hollywood sells greed.
In this world you ARE NOT entitled ridiculous luxury, you may fool yourself into thinking you are, but if you look around you will see that you aren't. Being a mature reasonable adult means being generous in what you give to society and modest and reasonable in what you keep for yourself. Anything else is being a greedy little child who sits around with more toys than they can count ignorant to the fact that so many other kids in the world have nothing.
BOB your last comment was deserved. I'm glad you give back so much. I judged you in anger and admittedly I was sure you probably gave back quite a lot otherwise why would you be so strong in your convictions. I think our view points are actually not that far off. Obviously my ranting here does not reflect the mellow tone I take in life and in the causes I support, but I get my frustrations out here like a mental punching bag and honestly I find it relaxing and necessary because the world is very frustrating. It's better than sitting in front of the TV barely using my brain, which is something I don't enjoy doing. Anyway best of luck and I'm sorry for misjudging you.
126. bitch - August 18, 2008 9:24 PM
Superfish, you suck. Roseanne has a very good point. You shoulld be mock Brangelina, not Roseanne.
127. RichPort ( Is Gay ) - August 18, 2008 9:25 PM
An American political primer.
Democrats. Misguided liberals, militant feminists and complete pussies, ironically often womanizers, who consistently negotiate defeat from the jaws of victory, while raising taxes and wasting revenue on massive ineffective entitlement programs exclusively for the benefit of their traditional constituents, the poor, the illiterate, the Negroes ( forgive the redundancy ), at the willing expense of the liberals, squandering every opportunity to act in a fiscally or ethically responsible manner.
Republicans. Blustering hawks, closeted Nazis and and religious zealots, ironically often homosexuals, each clamoring to act tougher and more pious in direct proportion to their proximity to a camera and or a microphone, who lower the taxes of their traditional constituents, the corporate elite, the oil industry, the defense industry, the pharmaceuticals, while borrowing unimaginable and unsustainable sums, often from the very countries that they publicly denounce, squandering every opportunity to act in a fiscally or ethically responsible manner.
That said, ... Obama '08, bitches!
128. Leila - August 18, 2008 9:28 PM
Rossanne uses cheap words in order to appear "real" to the masses. So she said "tampon" and most people wouldn't during their average conversation, somehow those same people end up hearing "I'm just very honest!".
I don't agree that all the rich are so because they could do something nobody else did, some become rich due to their lack of morals or limits, in any case Brangelina obviously don't consider money as important as those who are jealous of them, so much that they are giving a few poor kids something more valuable which is their TIME and a chance to have parents.
You want to criticize Brangelina and say they are hypocrites?, how many people have YOU helped today?, Oh so you are the next Mother Theresa, why should it then matter what exactly they're giving?, or is it so you can feel better about your miserable lives?, "Yeah, they're good looking, they adopted some kids, they share some of what they have BUT, ".
I mostly agree with Bob anyway. Oh and the USA economy is going to get worse whether Obama or McCain wins, I actually feel bad for whomever ends up becoming president, he'll be the ultimate villain.
129. nice bitch - August 18, 2008 9:29 PM
I like you 125, you're so intelligent....
130. nice - August 18, 2008 9:33 PM
Well said #123. Imagine all the children who die of poverty in Africa every day, we are loosing all that potential of course more importantly they are loosing their right to a life, freedoms and education, love and the experience of a life in this crazy world. We are loosing such great talents, children who could grow up to find cures for various types of cancer and do amazing things if only they were given what so many of us take for granted. If this world was a business it would be the most poorly run corrupt, dysfunctional and horribly unsuccessful business imaginable. Even brilliant immigrants who were professionals in this country with medical expertise that could save lives or legal minds that could really fight for justice are forced to work menial jobs that deprive them and us from benefiting from their talents and education. If all the world were the children of god 9 I am not a religious person but for arguments sake) anyone would agree that brad and Angie are extremely spoiled selfish children.
The reason there is so much concern with these two is because at this point they are the gold standard in many people eyes of what a generous charitable life is and that is so truly detrimental because if people aim to give back and live in that kind of a selfish hypocrisy then the world is doomed. We need real admirable examples of humanitarianism and frankly I just wish these two would get it together and walk the walk they so boldly talk. Not that I agree with idolization but if it has to exist why can't we get a better example then these two or why can't they have the decency to grow up. The only solution I see is society wising up to the bamboozling of Hollywood.
Think of how many movies are made where the actor plays an ordinary working class hero while the bad guy is the rich greedy one, doesn't that seem a little intensely manipulative? They have the obscene lives of wealth and luxury because of the money ordinary people contribute to go see their movies (and heck hard working people have the right to see a movie once in awhile) but it's all such a big twisted mess of lies and hype and society plays blindly right into. The Olsen twins are goddamned billionaires in a world where kids die of starvation, I mean fuck something gotta give.
All I want is for society to wise up to the bullshit and quit buying into it.
131. lawrence - August 18, 2008 9:43 PM
She is nice Momma~~But I am a little uncomfortable to view some photos of Brad on Richromances .com where celebrities and wealthy guys are talking about it. What is he looking for over there?
132. ps - August 18, 2008 9:49 PM
Oh and I think Bono sucks balls. He, Oprah and Gore (who lives in a giant estate the size of several mansions which guzzled more than $30,000 a year in energy bills while he was off flying in private jets promoting the movie that preached about a lifestyle he was too lazy and selfish to follow) are the biggest douche hypocrites along with these two, they all squawk the loudest about giving and yet they all the live hypocritical gluttonous lives.
On the Gore note, having been involved in one of the first European companies that studied and talked about global warming I can tell you that any intelligent environmentalist will tell you that the wealthy create the most pollution because they consume the most even when they live so called Eco friendly lives it's called a footprint and these douches have GIGANTIC footprints which could support hundreds of families. Only Oprah has and ass that is bigger than her footprint but that's still no excuse. I'm one of the few women that doesn't buy her megalomaniac bullshit, but I'm not a fat bitchy housewife whose husband prays for a way out everyday on his way to work so I guess I'm not her demographic.
133. lawrence - August 18, 2008 9:54 PM
By the way it's not like I'm trying to shamelessly plug Richromances.com or anything. Really, the last thing I would ever want you to do is to visit Richromances.com, or any site that sounds like, looks like or smells like Richromances.com. So don't interpret my previous message in any way as a suggestion that you visit Richromances.com, though I am sure that it is a perfectly gay, I mean, good site and all. Has anyone been to Richromances.com yet? Just askin'.
134. douche - August 18, 2008 10:01 PM
U <3 <===========3
135. Paula - August 18, 2008 10:12 PM
OMG, is she serious?? Since when is it wrong to give to and help needy children?? Who cares about what kind of movies they make, they're actors. Would Rosanne prefer that Angelina and Brad just keep all the money and help no one?? Stupid. Violent psychopathic films?? What did rosanne ever do other than a show full of sloppy ignorant hillbillies??
136. bassline - August 18, 2008 10:26 PM
Damn straight Roseanne has a point. What the fuck kind of people worship celebrities who got rich as fuck because of OUR money? Then they take OUR money, pamper themselves rotten, give some to charity (still way less percentage-wise than many commoners!) and pat themselves on their freshly massaged backs for it all? Worse thing is, Americans (and Brits!) are so fucking obsessed with celebs that they look beyond reality and choose to see exactly what these celebtards expect the sheeple to see - AMAZING (Hollywood's favorite word), PHILANTHROPIC, SUPERHUMAN, WORLD-CHANGING, etc,, etc. Roseanne just sees the truth and it spils many sheeple's rosy-tinted view of such people as Brangelina. Fact is, Brangelina do not give as much back as they should. The fact that I give 10% of my typical American slave income to African students doesn't make me philathropic, now does it? Yet rich as fuck people get the label for donating less than that. Oh, so they change the world , eh? You know what would change the world? For them to set an example that says it's ok to be freakin middle class and that doing what you love isn't about 100 million dollar mansions and private jets, it's about fulfilling your heart and soul, and you don't need those things to do that. Frankly I think it's Brad that is the fucking materialistic S.O.B., but Angie goes along with it all because she'll do anything to keep her aging fool around, and the two of them, it's almost as if they keep having/adopting kids to assuage theoir guilt for being SUCH MATERIALISTIC A-HOLES!!!! Oh yeah, and they had twins "naturally": just like the 30 other Hollywood couples recently that ahd twins. Riiigggghhhttt, it's "in the water"! Blind fool sheeple. They had twins because they wanted to kill two bird with one stone. They needed to spawn more of their genetically superior (or so they think) spawn but Angie didn't want two more pregnancies, so they did what all selfish Hollywood a-holes do and TOOK CLOMID or did IVF, then lied about it and said twins run in the family, lmfao. Roseanne was right. these two are a joke and the fact that they have a massive fan club is just testament to the declining collective IQ if the U.S.
137. ANOTHER PERSON WHO GETS IT - August 18, 2008 11:04 PM
#136. You made my day, thank you.
138. here ya go - August 18, 2008 11:29 PM
Only losers would really care about what a loser has to say
139. Sarah - August 18, 2008 11:30 PM
I've always hated how everyone viewed Angelina like she was some sort of saint. If she really cared about the world, she would not live in a mansion and she would not spend so much money. She does not give a huge percent of her income. It's easy to give a few million when you make so much more. My family donates more than hers does.
140. uranus - August 18, 2008 11:50 PM
Even I donate more than Angelina. In fact, I'd like to make another donation right now, a special deposit to her tight little twat. Hell, I might even donate another massive load of life to her tight little bung hole. Yeah, I'm that philanthropic, and better than you.
141. bootlips - August 19, 2008 12:02 AM
If Angelina wasn't a celebrity she'd just be a crack whore giving BJ's for 25 bucks. It makes celebrities feel superior when they donate money. They do it more for their ego than anything else. This way they can fly around in their private jets and chastise us for driving to work in a car with an air conditioner.
142. bob - August 19, 2008 12:02 AM
I came back and am glad to find that we found some common ground to work on. Thanks for the positive comments and constructive thoughts that we got to on this site made for 'superficial' pleasure. How Ironic eh?
In closing, I'm a conservative (non-republican), with many questions about spirituality and a strong belief in personal responsibility. I strongly respect the ability to have your word be backed up by your actions. I believe that the way to get us all to what I think we are all saying is via incentives, and not rules. As any parent can tell you, there is something in the human psyche that makes us all less productive if we are forced to do a thing. The unfortunate thing is that forcing someone seems to be the short term solution that ends up creating long term problems. In this age of immediate gratification, google, and immediate alleviation I feel that it's only getting worse.
143. Geoff - August 19, 2008 12:38 AM
After reading all the BS postings from people in this website, I have learned just one thing. Live your life the way you want to live it without worrying what people might think about you. If you do good, there's always someone who thinks you're the devil, if you do wrong, there's always someone who will think you're great.
I'm pretty sure Brangelina and Roseanne live that way. The difference is Roseanne has a lot to lose when she makes those idiotic rants without having her facts straight to support them. Brangelina on the other hand might have people who don't like them, but their contributions are far still more relevant when compared what Roseanne has done. I don't see Roseanne building home for the Katrina victims. That physical activity might help the fat alcoholic bitch look a little better.
All you people, get out there and get a life and stop posting on this stupid sites comments about people who really don't give a shit about what anyone here have to say about them. Angelina and Brad will not change because of these opinions, and Roseanne will not stop getting drunk and posting nonsense in her blog either. I should get my cherry popped by my boyfriend so will stop typing crap in here and back to my real life. I'm horny...
144. serwer - August 19, 2008 2:54 AM
She is right. With the money those 2 spend on jet setting the world and adopting foreign babies, do youknow how many private hospitals could be opened in those countries? HOw many schools. How many microloan banks. how many small buisneses for illeterate women. how many things could be done with the millions they spend on 6 babies?
145. Whitebear - August 19, 2008 3:04 AM
What's most annoying about the grand us of a is that theyre hypocrites and keep saying theyre bringin peace when that whole fucking , yes fucking, country was built on fighting wars with others, that's how america handles their economic crises, sell some guns, they're the ones helping dictators to rule and then "fighting" them, for fucks sakes people if you could actually read and open a history book in your miserable lifes maybe you'd be able to realise that, terrorists, what terrorists? the ones you helped create, and now the rest of the world has to pay for it, and yes you're not the only fucking country on this planet. I know this has nothing to do with that post, but that's just the rambling of an old drugged up woman, doesn't even worth mentioning, and yet i did..
146. jenny - August 19, 2008 3:43 AM
omg man this retard is stupid, at least jolie and pitt actually donate their money to the poor, i don't see roaseanne barr doing that or other celebs. so she's just being a stupid fat cunt hypocrite! jolie and pitt are just like other people, doin their job and recieving money for it like any other human being does. they make alot of money becuz their actors ofcourse and they give their money away to the people who needs it the most!
147. jennys - August 19, 2008 3:48 AM
and also! why do people keep saying oh yer they have money but how come they don't help the rest of the world or open hospitals! well for all those people why don't you do that? why put the pressure of saving the world to jolie and pitt for? they done enough! and the people who actually is responisble for poverty and war! is the government! george bush! so leave pitt and jolie alone atleast there doing something to help around here! i dont see any of you guys doing that! stop being hypocrites
148. Alyssa - August 19, 2008 4:19 AM
INTERNET ARGUMENTS!!! LOL!!11!!ONE!!!!
149. Alyssa - August 19, 2008 4:20 AM
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
INTERNET ARGUMENTS!!! LOL!!11!!ONE!!!!
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
150. America is For Sale - August 19, 2008 6:19 AM
How do you guys feel about our crumbling transportation and electrical infrastructures and the fact that we are selling the place off and sending jobs to slave countries and manufacture little here and export war and don't care about our own poor?
Why I would imagine the philosophical plague on the right could care less and vacant intellectually as they are. You will all see when gas is $8 a gallon in the next few years and when food prices than double and when the creditors become more harsh and yes the government will back their draconian policies because the SUPERRICH own this place (EARTH)!
151. gerard Vandenberg - August 19, 2008 7:13 AM
jolie and bread are both DAMN DIRTY and SMELLY SHIT-PIT'S!!!!
152. grow up - August 19, 2008 8:20 AM
To all the idiots you have NO IDEA how much some of us contribute because you don't know us. "I don't see any of you contributing" FUCKING RETARD read the goddamned posts some of us do nothing but give back (see #125) and the reason you can't "see us" is because you can't see people from a comment board through the computer screen. Fucking ridiculous. We are talking about LIFE