Apr 29 2008Miley Cyrus forced into exile by Disney
![]()
Apparently unable to find a scarlet letter for Miley Cyrus to wear, Disney is forcing the young starlet into hiding after her not-really-that-bad photo shoot with Annie Leibovitz turned into a national debacle. Holy shit, it's her bare back! BURN HER! The New York Post has the details on Disney's brilliant PR move:
"You won't be seeing her for a while," a highranking Disney employee was overheard saying this weekend at a luncheon in LA, according to Page Six. "The company is keeping her away from events and wants her to keep a very low profile for the next four to six months. They're trying to keep her contained."
Of course, as we all learned the past couple of days, Hannah Montana is a billion dollar franchise and Disney is no doubt concerned about losing precious dollars from the Bible Belt. And it doesn't help when Michelle Combs of the Christian Coalition starts making comments to Us Magazine calling for Disney to "reprimand" Miley:
"If she's gonna go out there and represent wholesome values, she needs to be more accountable for her actions," Combs says.
Combs adds that famed photographer Annie Leibovitz has "a reputation for doing racy things ... Miley should have thought this out before she agreed to go in front of Annie."
This makes a whole lot of sense really. If Mel Gibson and The Passion of the Christ proved anything, it's that the Christian market has an ASSLOAD of coin. They also love a good story where a Jew gets blamed for something. In this case: Annie Leibovitz. Not one to miss out on some easy money, I'm thinking of changing the name of the site to something a little more Puritan. I'm leaning towards "Jesus Loves Titties.com." Mmm, wholesomey.

Reader Comments
1. Anexio - April 29, 2008 11:12 AM
I totally want to have anal sex with Michelle Combs.
She hot!
2. sportsdvl - April 29, 2008 11:13 AM
omg FIRST
3. sportsdvl - April 29, 2008 11:14 AM
(that's what Billy Ray said)
4. Zanna - April 29, 2008 11:14 AM
I notice no one is saying anything too much about how she is provacatively laying on her father's crotch in the photoshoot. But I guess it's okay because, you know...they're from THE SOUTH.
5. Zanna - April 29, 2008 11:15 AM
Not ony that....how many of Miley's fans actually read Vanity Fair? Don't they read Tiger Beat or some shit?
6. Media - April 29, 2008 11:16 AM
Some photographers like to make children (4-17) look sexy. It's all about making sure that men enjoy it. It certainly was not for the benefit of children or females.
7. Athens - April 29, 2008 11:17 AM
I feel so bad for Disney kids, fuck up and you spend 6 months in a dark room.
8. Lugh - April 29, 2008 11:17 AM
This is so blown out of proportion. Who the hell cares? Do people let their 15 year olds wear bikinis at the beach? If so, you'll see a lot more skin there than you'd see in the Vanity Fair photoshoot.
9. Nils - April 29, 2008 11:18 AM
She was being prim and proper, actually, because she was lying on her back in her dad's crotch (the father-daughter cig-afterwards position).
10. Zanna - April 29, 2008 11:18 AM
Jon Benet Ramsey was way hotter in her photoshoots.
11. ApacheRose - April 29, 2008 11:20 AM
Re: the father/daughter shots:
Joe Simpson approves.
12. dude_on_a_wire - April 29, 2008 11:22 AM
15 is too young for provocative. Daddy just put the fate of younger MC fans into the hands of their parents. Disney knows the demographics - and a big chunk of guaranteed revenue just got flushed.
13. Andrew - April 29, 2008 11:25 AM
I met Billy Ray once at one of his concerts. He was really nice, down to earth. He let me take a picture of him with Miley and he signed an autograph for me and everything. When I got the pen back, though, it did smell a little bit like vaginal secretions.
14. Uncle Pedo - April 29, 2008 11:26 AM
slurp, slurp, slurp. yummy, yummy.
15. kevin - April 29, 2008 11:26 AM
This is actually a very good news !
6 months without any shots of this little whore, i couldn't ask for more !
Thank u VANITY FAIR THANK U !!!!!!!!!!
16. Gertrude - April 29, 2008 11:27 AM
#8 The photograph shows a 15 year old in a sexy pose looking provacative. Children on the beach wearing bikinis don't walk around making provacative facial exressions. So long as they make men happy, that's all that counts with the media.
17. crazygut - April 29, 2008 11:28 AM
oh yeah thesuperficial needs a "countdown to Mileys collapse" timer... shes Brittney in training!!
18. Anonymous - April 29, 2008 11:28 AM
This girl just isn't very attractive.
19. ph7 - April 29, 2008 11:29 AM
What's the bid deal? 100 years ago, the average 15 year old was married and having children already - just like the Mormons in Texas do today.
20. ToTellTheTruth - April 29, 2008 11:31 AM
Who gives a fuck, she's white trash in the making...
21. mo' like Ger-PRUDE, i tell ya! - April 29, 2008 11:32 AM
"Children on the beach wearing bikinis don't walk around making provacative facial exressions"
15 year old girls in bikinis don't make provocative facial expressions? Is your beach in black and white, by any chance?
22. ApacheRose - April 29, 2008 11:32 AM
It's not that you can see her exposed back. It's the just-been-fucked hair and expression that's inappropriate. I find the pics of her and her dad way more creepy, though. Gross.
23. Dr. Otto VanDerWahl - April 29, 2008 11:33 AM
As I have often warned on these message boards, keep away from your fathers' crotch.
24. ApacheRose - April 29, 2008 11:34 AM
Annie Lesbowitz should have to answer for this shit, too. Not only are the pics creepy, but they don't even make her look GOOD. (In my opinion, of course)
25. Opie - April 29, 2008 11:36 AM
When I was in high school, there NEVER were girls who looked like that. And if there had been, I would have told my paw and Aint Bee all about it.
26. Erica - April 29, 2008 11:36 AM
i really dont see what the big deal is. you cant see anything private.
27. The Fat Baldwin - April 29, 2008 11:37 AM
Every one on this board who rips into a 15 year old girl who entertains on a childrens program, is fucking pathetic.
Is your life so empty, so miserable, that the success of a young girl spawns so much hate?
looooosers.
My kid watches her show, and of all the crap aimed at young girls, her show is the least painful to sit through, and for that, I praise her.
28. PETE - April 29, 2008 11:37 AM
# 19 at least at those times 15 year old girls got married to guys their own age and were definately not in a not-so-clear relationship with their dads !
29. BONNER - April 29, 2008 11:38 AM
for fucks sake, what is America coming to ? Now we sell magazine using sexually provocative pictures of our children?? All those law hats out there can those responsible for this shoot be charged and prosecuted with child exploitation. This is no art. These pictures are inviting, whorish, in your face “fuck me pops”. Great God where the heck are you? Why do we, as a society allow this type of debauchery unpunished?
I fuck anything under the sun but children cause to me children are sacred and Miley is a child and Hill Billy Pedocreep needs to answer some questions.
30. ApacheRose - April 29, 2008 11:39 AM
@28
They married guys their own age? REALLY?
31. Sid - April 29, 2008 11:41 AM
She's not pre-pubescent, so it's not child porn. She's going to reach the age of consent in 35 states later this year. The sick parts are the pictures with her dad, and Disney continuing to promote the conservative white man's ideal of a young, untouched, innocent SLUT.
32. Wendy - April 29, 2008 11:46 AM
She's putting her sexy-tramp image out now, before anything has happened with sex tapes, pregnancy, or drugs and alcohol (which, as we've seen many times before, will happen by the time she's 20). Good for her. Everything is accelerated in these kid-star childhoods, why lie about it? Didn't we just learn that Jamie Spears was fucking (maybe) her boyfriend or (more likely) the producer of her show? At least Miley keeps it all in the family - even her name is derived from a sweet family nickname, "Smiley" (or, in her dad's version, "vertical Smiley"). I think it's great!
33. whocares - April 29, 2008 11:50 AM
If you look at the pictures from behind the camera they don't look as dark and suspect as the photoshopped end-result...
Miley didn't mean any harm... Fuck Disney.
34. Agent - April 29, 2008 11:52 AM
Wow what a bunch of bleeding hearts! Obama '08!!!
...but, look, she's kinda ugly. The last time she'll ever be "hot" is as jailbait. This is a well thought out career move, and she'll get a boost from it in terms of movie roles she doesn't deserve in the least. She'll have 4-5 years playing this new character in movies before audiences start to pan her (in addition to critics), but that's a nice little extra to her "music" career.
35. CV - April 29, 2008 11:52 AM
The problem with the photos is that under the law this is seen as child pornography, now do I see a problem with them, not really, but if her PR person and her father allowed this to happen they are dumb as shit.
36. iamawhore - April 29, 2008 11:54 AM
What a surprise, a 15 year old shows her back and the religious wave in America comes crashing in. They are so scared that their daughters might become whores that they have to control all of the media and other people's lives. Her dad had no problem with it, she had no problem with it. It's her back. Its not illegal its not disturbing its nothing.
p.s. guess what your daughters are whores.
37. Ramon M. - April 29, 2008 11:55 AM
Omg...i swear, if all the news media zoomed out a little, and showed her wearing pants...this thing would fizzle so quickly...but no...we have to focus on the fact that "she looks like she just had sex." everyone is a perv.
38. Jimbo - April 29, 2008 11:55 AM
Her dad looks like the type of guy who makes her lick his butthole before she starts sucking.
39. Kevin - April 29, 2008 11:57 AM
Well I think the most accountable person is the DAD ! I mean can u believe this he sees his 15 year old daughter with that come-and -fuck-me look on her face and he doesn't say a thing ! DUDE YOU HAVE A SERIOUS PROBLEM THEN ..............
40. Newport Beach CA - April 29, 2008 11:57 AM
#21
Sure the misguided children/teens try to imitate provactive things they see on TV but educated children with positive home environments have other things on their minds like having fun and being a kid.
41. Barrack O. - April 29, 2008 11:57 AM
Too bad they didn't pose her with a black guy instead of her dad. Then both the South and the North would be pissed off.
42. meany - April 29, 2008 11:58 AM
16, i guess if you find her sexy & provocative, that's your issue to work through. frankly, i find her to be squirrely and the opposite of sexy. so those photos are no biggie in my book.
43. monty - April 29, 2008 11:59 AM
And another point,
if a girl is legally allowed to have sex at 16, what's wrong with showing a bit of back at 15?
44. Pervy - April 29, 2008 11:59 AM
oh yeah baby, miley in her pops crotch with her legs wide open. fantastic!!!!
45. Health Class - April 29, 2008 12:02 PM
"Sure the misguided children/teens try to imitate provactive things they see on TV but educated children with positive home environments have other things on their minds like having fun and being a kid."
Sounds like folks need a refresher. Children go through puberty, their bodies change, and they develop increased interest in romantic and sexual activities. As far as we know, this is a natural biological process and not a result of imitation of TV shows; for example, we're pretty sure it happened before TV.
46. gotmilk? - April 29, 2008 12:03 PM
29, the only one exploiting Miley is Disney and her parents so if anyone should be locked up, it's them.
47. pinky_nip - April 29, 2008 12:04 PM
You can't fucking buy this type of publicity.
But you can buy this type of pubescency... just go down to 47th and ask for Big Papa.
48. RTH - April 29, 2008 12:06 PM
Ok, so... if you're going to be a child star, work for Nickelodeon, not Disney.
Do something stupid, like get knocked up, you continue working for Nickelodeon. Show your bare back, you get exiled by Disney.
49. veggi - April 29, 2008 12:08 PM
Miley shows back, but Donald Duck NEVER wore pants.......
50. monty - April 29, 2008 12:16 PM
Yeah, speaking of Disney characters showing skin....
Check out the Little Mermaid vs. Miley:
http://robfrost.blogspot.com/2008/04/help-disney-im-confused.html
51. Andrea - April 29, 2008 12:17 PM
I don't like these pictures and I think her dad is creepy and it goes without saying that Disney is an evil empire. But, if you're a parent of a 15 1/2 year old girl, you're under no delusion that she's a "child" in the sense of being a little kid. She's not ready for it, but she wants to be treated like an adult, especially (or exclusively) in terms of having lots of freedom and independence (and spending time with boys). It's a huge daily fight to try to continue to protect her, despite herself. That's what we're dealing with here, an adolescent girl trying out an adult's look and behavior (happens all the time and is normal). The freaks are her dad, Disney, Vanity Fair, the guys who will jerk off to this, and the people who talk as if a 10 year old has been photographed naked and the perpetrators should be arrested. And of course, there's the fact that in just a couple of years, when pictures like this are posted here, her looks will be microscopically and heartlessly ripped to shreds.
52. Norma - April 29, 2008 12:17 PM
@@45
I have a good relationship with my kids. My 11 year old daughter tells me that one of her friends talk about sex all the time at school because of the TV shows she watches on TV in her room and this bothers her because she would rather talk about kid stuff. Her parents are divorced and her mom is too busy with the boyfriend. The breakdown of the family and bad parenting encourages bad behavior for children.
53. Kiko The Republican Cabana Boy - April 29, 2008 12:18 PM
#29, your name is a typo; there should only be one 'n'.
Geez, where to start with you, asides from the self-righteous sanctimony you display? The irony you display when bemoaning "inviting, whorish" photo shoots yet patting yourself on your Domino's 'n' Hot Pockets- gorged ass about how you can "fuck anything under the sun"? That says a LOT about you and not much of it very good. Fact of the matter is that sex will sell anything because it is a very real biologically motivating factor embedded in human consciousness, the little remnant of reptilian brain matter inherent in all humans that says procreate. That's just the way we evolved, Boner. Some humans have achieved a level of consciousness and self-control where things like a naked back does not send them into convulsions of moral uncertainty. God didn't put it there, and since you were wondering where God was, he/she/it gave up on the US when we put Reagan into office. Law Hats? Oh please! They're just as ethically corrupt as the rest of the Men's Room Republicans that put great ideas to "protect us" like Homeland Security into play, and just as morally corrupt as the religious leaders calling for Miley's Disney-approved chastity belt. You want to ask questions, then ask why are people more offended by a little back skin as opposed to MC practically nuzzling the Achey Breaky penis? Is it a Southern thing? 15-year-olds will have sex; ask the Spears family or ask one of the girls from the Mormon compound in Texas. The post-shagging shot of Miley is probably something Billy Ray will have to contend with pretty soon when he catches some boy coming out of Miley's room at two in the morning, but that is THEIR problem, and not the country's. The point is, America, there are bigger problems at stake as opposed to the hand-wringing, the wailing, the bemoaning of some religious groups set of moral standards, than about a girl and her dad and the stupid decision THEY made.
54. FRIST!!! - April 29, 2008 12:19 PM
Could be worse. She could be pregnant (Zoey Spears) They didn’t even CANCEL her show! What the crap are these Disney execs thinking about? Don’t they know I haven’t had my coffee yet? And, once again no breakfast??
55. Math Class - April 29, 2008 12:19 PM
#51: 15 is different from 11.
56. UNCLE NED - April 29, 2008 12:20 PM
This girl is underage, posing sexy near her father's crotch - which means she's PERFECT for today's young girls to look up to, so that when they become teenagers, the industry can use Smiley to sell makeup and acne-creme and shampoo and clothes and perfume etc etc. If you have kids, then you get the problem with all this, and if you don't...
57. FRIST!!! - April 29, 2008 12:20 PM
Oh! It's ok, I have cottage cheese in my purse..
58. Marg - April 29, 2008 12:21 PM
My 15 year old daughter focuses on hobbies, books, and body surfing. She has friends that focus on boys and sex. My daughter knows there is plenty of time for boys but some kids are encouraged to grow up faster because of bad parenting and bad influences that their parent did not prepare them for.
59. Sam - April 29, 2008 12:22 PM
"there's the fact that in just a couple of years, when pictures like this are posted here, her looks will be microscopically and heartlessly ripped to shreds."
52 said it. Considering the tone of this place, spare us the loving parental concern. It sounds funny when spoken from the gutter.
60. BONNER - April 29, 2008 12:23 PM
@ 46
gotmilk? PLENTY. want some? im gonna look for my favorite ass on the planet. yeah, kim's ass.
61. Alice - April 29, 2008 12:25 PM
#58 - sounds like your daughter's anxiety disorder is developing nicely.
62. BONNER - April 29, 2008 12:31 PM
@53
THANKS FOR THE SERMON. NOW GO FUCK YOURSELF.
regarding my name it's bonner w/ double n and it's my first family name.
63. miggs - April 29, 2008 12:32 PM
The Billy Ray pics are really sick. But otherwise - wah wah waaaah! Jesus, enough with the whining. There's always a "Miley" or a "Lindsay" or a "Britney" around for poorly-parented girls to imitate slavishly because they've developed no identity of their own. If your kid can't say "I really like her but some of the stuff she does is kinda stupid!" then you've FAILED as a parent. Stop blaming others. Or, get really really good at it, because you'll have lots of stuff to be angry about and you'll need a lot of skill in misplacing blame.
64. tight lipped smiler - April 29, 2008 12:34 PM
She can't have it both ways. Either she's the squeaky clean corny role model for the kiddies or she joins the skank of the day club, Billy Bob's choice.
65. Angus - April 29, 2008 12:36 PM
I love the conservatives. They rail against the corrupting influence of our sinful carnal culture, and then their major leaders are revealed as having engaged in illegal financial practices and sordid sexual affairs (often homosexual, for whatever reason). Forget Disney - you folks are the real cartoons.
66. Proud Mom - April 29, 2008 12:39 PM
>>
Very True!
My daughter is not into bubble gum music so she is not fan of Miley.
67. Grunion - April 29, 2008 12:41 PM
Exile eh? St. Helena here she comes...
68. Proud Mom - April 29, 2008 12:41 PM
# 63
Part of my comment was omitted probably because of my symbols I used as quotes so here I go again.
"There's always a "Miley" or a "Lindsay" or a "Britney" around for poorly-parented girls to imitate slavishly because they've developed no identity of their own. If your kid can't say "I really like her but some of the stuff she does is kinda stupid!" then you've FAILED as a parent."
Very True!
My daughter is not into bubble gum music so she is not fan of Miley.
69. Kiko The Republican Cabana Boy - April 29, 2008 12:42 PM
#62
If you liked that sermon, you should've heard the one Mister James Dobson gave Kiko after his backrub. I can't recall it word by word, but I do remember Mister Dobson calling Kiko a "tan tease" then crying when Kiko wouldn't accept his flowers.
70. Captain-Insano - April 29, 2008 12:42 PM
Its times like these I'm glad I'm Canadian, rather than live under the Nazi-esque censorship of the US of A. Also, the bacon is good, and canadian beer rocks.
71. Ms Techincal - April 29, 2008 12:49 PM
70
And it is tough being a successful intellegent aggressive female in the US as well. Just look at Hillary Clinton and all the crap she had to endure even when Bill was a governor.
72. Jade - April 29, 2008 12:58 PM
I'm by no means a prude.. but when I saw the pic of Miley with the satin sheet and her hair all mussed like post-sex hair with the reddish lipstick, my first impression was "this pic looks like child porn". She was made to look young with the minimalist makeup, yet she is wearing a bed sheet. I kinda think it was very bad judgment on the photographer definintely, but also on her daddy who was right there for it. Also, the pic with her and her dad, if you didn't know they were related you'd think the pic was to promote a little mild eroticism. I never took a pic like that with my dad..
73. Bakery G. Muffed - April 29, 2008 12:59 PM
i dont see that there is much of a big deal, but in todays world, you can barely do anything without getting scoffed at by some group, left or right. she asked for it, showing her undeveloped little un hot back; whatd she expect? also, theres no need to disrespect the J man into this Mr Superficial. if so, slam them all, Mosestripsondick.org, Allahmuffdiving.edu, Buddharidesfatties.gov. am i right or wrong?
74. Donald Duck - April 29, 2008 1:14 PM
These photos don't bother me in the least. However, I do feel sorry for Miley. Her celebrity is non-sustainable. Let's face it: she is not hot at all. It's hard to imagine she will ever have an adult audience, except for those who want to read about her tabloid flameout.
75. Columbo - April 29, 2008 1:17 PM
Her parents were on set the whole time. It was their responsibility to prevent the sexualization of their daughter in these photos. Blaming Vanity Fair, Leibovitz or even Disney is a red herring. Parents need to be parents and why anyone would want their kid to be a child celebrity is beyond me.
76. DB - April 29, 2008 1:34 PM
I'd fuck her in the ass, then she'd have to lick it clean. That dirty little whore.
77. mamadough - April 29, 2008 1:57 PM
if she really want to send the midwest into a spiral, she should have taken a picture of her masturbating with a crucifix....just saying.
78. boo - April 29, 2008 2:01 PM
Bet if they had photographed her holding smoking guns, covered in blood and bodies laying around her, no one would have said a word. And the pictures still would have been considered "artsy".
79. denial - April 29, 2008 2:04 PM
#58 your daughter is either a liar, ugly, or a lesbian. Most likely is the first one and I know I know you and your daughter talk about everything she never hides anything from you. Wake up and smell the sex. She has a period, she masturbates, she talks about sex and boys, just not to you.
p.s. her hobby is boys.
80. Informer - April 29, 2008 2:17 PM
Miley or Hannah or whatever her name is will get at least one day off from her bad behavior. BYU's 65,000 capacity stadium is sold out for a 4th of July concert with Miley as the featured performer. Confirmation was in Salt Lake newspapers that she will still perform. No way I'm going, but she get's a "Get out of jail free" for one day at least.
81. Karisha - April 29, 2008 2:20 PM
I feel for her. That picture was not at all bad, not as bad as these conservative christians claim it. What the fuck is the big deal anyway. She wasnt naked, she had a blanket and jeans on. Come on! Disney is blowing it way out of proportion...
# 27 you are so right. She is a 15 year old girl who entertains kids. Now all of a sudden is a slut and Britney Spears in training? I dont think so. Miley is a sweet girl. Everyone ragging on her is just jealous of her success.
82. Marg - April 29, 2008 2:23 PM
@79
It is amusing that you believe an attractive and intellegent teenager with good self esteem has to be a liar, ugly, or lesbian if they would rather talk about other things besides sex all the time. I have no doubt that sex crosses the minds of all teenagers, but some have other goals and interests besides just sex. I suspect that you were not into anything as teenager growing up except for sex and this is why you did not go to college and are currently doing clerical work.
83. Jade - April 29, 2008 2:29 PM
@81 Karisha -- Stereotype much?
I am neither christian nor conservative, and that pic looked like child pornography.
It is cute how you say "she is wearing jeans". Yeah, the behind the scenes photos show that. But this wasn't meant to be a photo documentary, therefore the pic was to suggest she was naked wearing a sheet.
Why do people want to make whores of young girls? Is that the 'in thing' now? If so, might as well lower the age of consent to about 12, since so many people think there is nothing wrong with a girl being sexual at that age.
84. Yes Always blame the Jews - April 29, 2008 2:45 PM
If the photographer was Jewish than...I don't know I still think that regardless of what the little skank does with her free time and I would not expect anything intellectual or artistic as she does not stike me as having a mind, there still is not justification in Leiboshitz taking a sexually provacative photo of a 15 year old girl.
Let me give you assholes my take. Let's say my 15 year old daughter (who IS a total whore by way) sucks and fucks behind me back constantly. I am not going to ALLOW her to do so KNOWINGLY. I am going to (hypocritically I might add) try to teach her morals in life.
So yeah , in my way of thinking, the Leiboshitz slut took advantage of the little girl. Would she buy her beer and cigarettes as well?
As for Mel Gibson (I don't understand why we always pick on him he is awesome...oh yeah he spoke the truth...wait the whole world is wrong or is it not chosen?) and the Christian "market" and all their coin, compare their money with the Jewish Rothschilds and then get back with me.
Christians built this country (I am not one by the way). So if they have earned "coin" that is fair. Yes? No?
Fuck your contrived fiat money also. And your economic "wizardry" and sleight of hand. Thieves in sheeps clothing. Begone.
Not that I feel or think strongly about this.
Bring it...
85. denialtake2 - April 29, 2008 3:15 PM
lol good one 82. actually i am in my 3rd year of medical school, but you know all right.\
ps. 50% of teenagers have lost their virginity by the age 16. Quit being in denial and accept reality.
86. shut the fuck up - April 29, 2008 3:26 PM
#85, maybe her daughter does not belong in the 50% you have mentioned.
You should quit posting your asinine, prejudice-ridden shit here.
87. Prof - April 29, 2008 3:27 PM
@36 you are my hero!
If this photo is unsettling then you better not look at highschools, jr high, the beaches, malls, and your daughter's (and her friends) closet. More people are outraged over this than that Vanessa girl from the High School Musical showing her little muffin to the world!
88. Sandra - April 29, 2008 3:28 PM
##85
This is because of bad parenting that children have sex by age 16. 50 percent of marriages end in divorce and this does not help with raising children properly, so I'm not surprised that 50 percent of teenagers are having sex by age 16. Believe it or not but there are actually teens out there that would rather wait until later to have sex; thanks to good parenting. My oldest daughter waited until she was 19 to have sex because she saw how out of control the teens got after having sex and getting dumped from guys in high school. My daughters motto in high school was I'd rather get dumped for not giving sex than to be dumped after giving sex.
89. Clem - April 29, 2008 3:32 PM
Not even close to being good looking.
90. booya - April 29, 2008 3:36 PM
The 50% marriage analogy is lame. The high rate is b/c women are independent, have job security, and money so they can leave when they want to. In the 1950's people were not happier, women still got beat by there husbands ,they just didn't have jobs or money so they couldn't leave their marriage.
I am glad divorce is at 50%. People who are unhappy should not stay together because of money problems or social stigma.....
okay this is so off the subject of this forum. END
#88 so your saying your daughter is ugly or religious but i think those go hand in hand.
91. CindyM - April 29, 2008 3:43 PM
I'm not usually one to feel pity for celebs but I do feel sorry for Miley. Annie Leibovitz should have known better than to be "sexing up" pictures of a 15 year old--what a sicko. If a man had been doing that they'd be behind bars.
On the other hand Disney needs to get off their high horse and quit acting like Miley just did porn. Disney's been making shit loads of money off the backs of kids for years--maybe they're jealous that Annie and Vanity Fair got there first?
92. Ensign - April 29, 2008 3:45 PM
Miley is 15 and posing for sexy pics with her FATHER. How can anyone see anything right with that scenario? Me posing with my daughter in a sexy fashion would be the most disgusting thing I could imagine. People need a reality check.
93. Ingenious Conceptions for Free - April 29, 2008 3:46 PM
Just fire the old lady and the little slut. And replace Disney and Nickolodean with something moral for the kids.
94. MM - April 29, 2008 3:51 PM
@90
Typical chauvinistic male response; if a female has boundaries then she must be religious or ugly.
95. mikenc - April 29, 2008 4:04 PM
#94 is ugly or religious
96. El Bobulo - April 29, 2008 4:14 PM
Is America going backwards in time and getting *more* puritanical?
I don't see really anything "provocative" or "sexy" about the photos. Just some photos of a young lady. Since when is a bare back "provocative"? what's next, should she wear the "polygamist compound dress"?
What else is in there - she's in jeans and a dress. That is "sexy"?What else is she supposed to wear?
Good grief.
97. el ces - April 29, 2008 4:47 PM
Like Vanity Fair gives a shit about Disney.
VF probably angled it like this, Smiley Miley isn't going to be cute forever, so she needs to get a jump on shopping that sex appeal, even if its just a little skin from behind, harmless, so she doesn't end up like whats her name......fuck.....from Melrose Place?
(looking it up, cheating I know, shut up)
....uh, Neve Campbell!
Remember how she wouldn't take it off until she was like 37?
Ppl don't want it now, in your 40's. It's a slap in the face now. Everyone remembers how you USED to look.
They're resentful. They wanted that young piece of meat.
Not 40 yr old leftovers.
....yeah, maybe I'm a little bitter.
...fucking Neve Campbell (grumble grumble)
98. twzzlrgirl - April 29, 2008 5:23 PM
I think the pics with billy ray are way more disgusting than the back shot; who in god's name poses that way with their father??
you have to wonder what they were thinking. or, ok...i'll tell you. they were thinking, "hey, look at how much attention this will get us!!!" And, as far as I can tell, it's worked!
99. Sapphire - April 29, 2008 5:25 PM
The Britneys and Lindseys of the world are starting young. Although maybe I am behind the times, maybe 15 is pretty old these days to get inducted into the hall of whoredom. And to pose like that with your FATHER and your 52" hips keep getting in the way is just eye-ball-bleeding for us to look at. When I was 15 I didn't have hips that were ready to pop out quadruplets.
100. Sapphire - April 29, 2008 5:29 PM
oh and I've seen babies in bikinis at the beach. They look REAL provocative. Good point. I never realized babies could change their facial expressions completely just in the bathing suits they wore until one winked at me the other day and pinched my ass as I was walking by! The nerve!
101. America is Finished... - April 29, 2008 5:39 PM
If this is what we are coming to...
102. oJAEflo - April 29, 2008 6:37 PM
"Miley Cyrus," I heard, is Appalachian for "corporate property."
That's Disney-owned, yo.
103. Tina - April 29, 2008 6:54 PM
miley is ugly, horsey voice this is what she wanted now she can fuck off..
104. Squishy - April 29, 2008 7:25 PM
First off THANK YOU VANITY FAIR for releasing us all from the onslaught of news revolving around another prepubescent celebri-teen, if only for a few months!!! Unfortunately, I don't really think there is anyone left out there for you to soil with another graceful and tastefully done Leibovitz photo.
Secondly, as if a 15 year old is going to be held responsible for a photo shoot her representatives knew about and her father partook in?! If anyone should take the fall for a supposedly tawdry shoot it should be her parental figure...yes, the one posing with her! As if a 15 year old, underage for all you doh's out there, is going to be responsible for a photo shoot Disney was probably well aware of ahead of schedule, but merely were taken aback by a bare backed pic. Get over it already! There is nothing sexual or dirty about the picture unless that is how you already tend to read into things!
105. arrg - April 29, 2008 7:40 PM
ugg ugg ugg she isnt hot and she is 15
wtf cant u brainwashed morons figure out when some publicity agent is feeding u a line?
106. Queefer Bukakke - April 29, 2008 9:59 PM
Christians don't know a fucking thing. Miley should go out every night and get drunk and laid. This is her time to have fun, not be a goody-goody slave to Disney.
107. lambman - April 29, 2008 10:24 PM
why is this a bigger deal than those candid pics where she was like showing her bra in the mirror with a friend?
108. Lack of Adult Morality - April 29, 2008 11:32 PM
To you perverts out there with your inevitable crack children: as to the little slut's behavior - I have not respect for her whatsoever. Her father is a dullard. And the photographer is a perverse opportunist.
The picture of a 15 year old girl simulating nudity is plain filth. I am sure some of you disagree. Well the law is with me here so you characters are obviously crooks.
Provacative photos of this girl are further evidence that we are falling fast and faster and I guess we have a long way to fall yet.
109. Real-Women-Are-Fat (oops, I mean have curves) - April 30, 2008 2:06 AM
Who the fuck is Miley Cyrus, and who the fuck cares?
110. Joe - April 30, 2008 3:50 AM
# 49 God u are stupid ! Donald DUCK as you say is a DUCK U MORON and it's a cartoon caracter !!!!
111. GTBurns - April 30, 2008 6:05 AM
Let me explain what is going on here. This entire fiasco is DISNEY's fault, Miley was probably told by the Mouse to say those things about the VF shoot because some Disney EXEC fraked up big.
If you followed Disney you know that Leibowitz has been doing the Year of a Million Dreams shoots, where several stars have been photographed as famous disney characters. Recently there was a photo released of Juilanne Moore as Ariel. It is very tasteful and nothing like the VF Miley pics.
Someone at Disney saw Annie Million Years stuff and then contracted her to do a shoot for VF, and told her to do whatever. Now with the million years shoots, Annie was on a script and told EXACTLY what to do.
Here she went free reign and the Disney people are freaking out as Miley and Hannah Montana are their major draw card.
Some EXEC at Disney is going to be getting the AXE.
112. Fiorella R. - April 30, 2008 10:05 AM
I think you are very bad with her, this photo dont have anything wrong. She is young and she has the right to made mistakes. You sucks, this morality thing you are talking about is full of shit because her photo is normal she is showing her back so please stop saying " she is a slut because she is a kid, she is not lindsay lohan ni britney spears!!!"
113. Elliot_Spitz_On_Her - April 30, 2008 10:34 AM
A billion dollars? You'd think she'd be able to afford a brush for her dad.
114. LunchAdmin - April 30, 2008 10:54 AM
Uh oh - time to start stocking-up on hijabs!
115. Greenie - April 30, 2008 3:43 PM
This is why I hate people.
116. Jennie - April 30, 2008 4:58 PM
Some people have commented on it, but I really think is disturbing is the weird sexual tension she and her dad seem to have going on in those photos. It's weird. Not unlike Hulk saying that his daughter looks hot in her video shoots, or Joe Simpson always staring at Jessica's boobs.
CREEEEEPY.
117. amee - May 2, 2008 4:34 AM
so disney is giving this girl hard time while they let that other girl from high school musical off scot free? am i missing somthing? that other girl posed naked and did sexy shots! it was a million times worse than mileys. i just dont get disney.
118. whatever - May 2, 2008 11:21 AM
When I first heard about this I looked up the photos and I honestly thought the photo everyone was upset about was the one with her lying back on some dude's crotch.
Then I realized it was the back photo and thought "why?"
Then I realized the dude in the crotch lean was her dad.
Then I puked.
119. herbiefrog - May 5, 2008 9:10 PM
we have to ask...
who is miley cirus : )
.,..and we assume that
...she is younger than emma watson
hey babe, how are you... things gon k? e sod
120. Zoe - May 21, 2008 6:55 PM
What r u talking about Hannah Montan And Miley Cyrus is the best she is perfect i love her singing so leanve her alone how would u like if someone said that to u u WOULD NOT like it so just leave her alone!!!!!!!!!!! :(
121. Tired Cheska - June 9, 2008 10:38 PM
I have commented at least a million blogs about Miley Cyrus and Hayden Panettiere and other Disney stars. My only question is: is there other blogs about Miley Cyrus other than this stupid Vanity Fair topic??? I know there are other blogs other than VF in the next three pages of Google, but I'm getting tired of this!!! It's just some magazine featuring a half-naked Disney star photographed by a famed camera-holder and just some commenters arguing about it's appropriate or not, blaming a said-plastic cartoon channel and calling Miley Cyrus a "retard". I know what retard means: a crazy kid confined in a mental hospital. And you people, American teenagers, I'm guessing aged 13-19, know nothing about grammar. My book is right. American children ARE stupid, especially Californian kids. The only smart state is Vermont. I once thought Vermont is a Canadian province. Oh, wait, I'm sorry, you don't know what I'm talking about because all you care about are filing your nails, talking on your phone and skateboarding. Some are fans of Miley, some are not, some are angry at her, and some hate her. We all have opinions right? I, myself are a FORMER fan of Miley, after finding out that she had pictures on the internet. BAD pictures, just to be sure. My point is let's just stop bickering, fighting and arguing! Let's just put the whole thing to rest, it was all in the past, there's nothing you can do, and you're free to tear your issue of Vanity Fair or your WHOLE collection of VFs to shreds. There's no reason to turn a blog site into a chat room with all our bickering or cursing Miley.
122. Tired Cheska - June 9, 2008 10:47 PM
#117, you have a point. Vanessa Hudgens was NOT put up to it. She did that on her own. Yes, I don't get Disney either. One time, they said they'll premiere the episode of the Suite Life of Zack and Cody where they audition for a school play named High School Musical in a musical marathon or something where people get to watch episodes of Disney shows with plays, songs or musicals in them, but instead, me and my sister watched another episode of Zack and Cody. I was disappointed. I'm disappointed in a lot of people: my uncle because he didn't got the job, Vanessa Hudgens, Miley Cyrus and Disney...
123. Cheska - June 11, 2008 2:58 AM
This comment is just an advertisement saying: "If you don't like Miley Cyrus, you should switch to Selena Gomez." (Sponsored by Selena Gomez Fan Club)
124. gowgouis - August 31, 2008 2:31 PM
miley!!!!!!! I am so sad that you changed like that! i really loved you but now I don't
125. Hannah - September 28, 2008 4:44 PM
MIley turned into a hoe ass bitch
126. Hannah - September 28, 2008 4:44 PM
MIley turned into a hoe ass bitch
127. dickspitz - January 21, 2009 2:33 AM
Miley's a fugly eyed skank. Selena though,good god,i'd luv to lick her shithole & fuck it til' she became addicted to my cock up her ass! Selena, I luv you,your gorgeous!
128. dickspitz - February 1, 2009 11:39 AM
Selena has gorgeous tits with a beauty mark on the inside of the right boob, a perfect pair of juicy, cocksucking lips and a tight, browneyed bunghole all waiting for a good, hard fucking! What's Miley got? Well at least her "pa" is horny for her (and her money).
129. Lhincy G - February 3, 2009 8:46 PM
Weeehhh Love miley...
130. nicole - August 22, 2009 10:48 AM
you know you going to not be lovely to me or to the people.
131. miley cyrus clothing line - October 24, 2009 12:07 PM
I think Disney is stupid to do this. Luckily this all behind now.
132. promotional letter openers - November 3, 2009 3:53 AM
What a pretty woman.
133. power electric wheelchairs - November 3, 2009 4:17 AM
Not a wise move by disney.
134. lord2035 - November 3, 2009 11:37 AM
Show more baby!
http://www.ecoproductsnews.com/2009/09/ecoproducts-iphone-solar-charger.html
135. iPhone Gamer - November 3, 2009 11:40 AM
Chio Bus man...