Oct 30 2007Kim Kardashian is the reason for the season
I debated whether or not to look at these photos of Kim Kardashian’s Playboy shoot. I was kind of hoping to see them for the first time on Christmas morning. You know, the snow is falling outside. The tree is sparkling and lit up. The whole family is abuzz with holiday cheer. I’ll take a seat near the fireplace and open up to Kim Kardashian’s photos. “Look, Grandma, a nipple! Can you believe it?” As I sip from my mug I’ll call for the children because only their innocent eyes can tell me if Kim Kardashian’s ass truly is a portal to the magical world of Narnia. Sure their parents might call the police and Aunt Sarah’s Nativity scene gets broken in the scuffle. But, darn it, that’s what the holidays are all about. Family. Oh yeah, and also sweet, heavenly asses surrounded by white fur. That too.
The photos below are totally NSFW. Unless your boss is super cool, or perhaps he's, I dunno, Jesus. Then click away.
EDIT: Sorry guys, had to take it down.


Reader Comments
1. D. Richards - October 30, 2007 11:31 AM
Man, fuck Kardashian. Oh, yeah. If first? Go fuck yourselves..
2. yuri - October 30, 2007 11:31 AM
hot
3. steve - October 30, 2007 11:35 AM
Now I will never get rid of my boner
4. marme - October 30, 2007 11:35 AM
yawn...compaired to everything on the internet these days this is nothing.
5. kix - October 30, 2007 11:35 AM
Wow- someone did a good job airbrushing out this Frankenstein's surgery scars
6. BLACK BARBIE - October 30, 2007 11:36 AM
IF YOU LOOK CLOSELY: you can see the photoshoped lines. They shrank her azz, breasts, stomach, face and everything else.
She is a curvy women why would they do that to her?
And P.S, ALL WHITE MEN like anorexic chicks.
7. Brianna - October 30, 2007 11:36 AM
She's disgusting. Someone needs to clean up this trashpile of a human being. Got STDS?
8. Lexoka - October 30, 2007 11:37 AM
It's nothing new... I mean the girl made a sex tape, why would anyone be waiting for these shots?
9. my comment - October 30, 2007 11:38 AM
I'm disappointed in her. It's not like she needed the money or the fame.
Garbage in, garbage out.
10. Steven L Braun - October 30, 2007 11:40 AM
Bring back that little bitch from HiSchoolMusicale....
11. scooby - October 30, 2007 11:40 AM
wow.you can say: "She's gotta sex tape, been there done that," and "Eh, seen better." those are both true. but that doesn't change one simple fact: i like hot naked chicks (even if they are airbrushed).
12. Miss Random - October 30, 2007 11:40 AM
Wow! I remember her (in a previous post on Superfish) recalling this shoot as professional & classy! WAY TO GO KIM! "Carefully" showing off your ham wallet while molesting an innocent pair of beads and a sheet set!... thats genuine class right there!
13. jerryo - October 30, 2007 11:42 AM
Didn't take her long to skank out, did it? Sellout, I mean.
14. my comment - October 30, 2007 11:42 AM
Her lower extremities in photo 4 seriously look like a horse's ass and vag.
15. Duchess of Dork - October 30, 2007 11:43 AM
Hot.
16. Jumpin_J - October 30, 2007 11:46 AM
Thanks for providing this as public service so I don't have to waste my money on a mag that's way past its prime.
17. Ryan - October 30, 2007 11:46 AM
One whole boob and a few side ass shots. What a fucking prude. I bet she wanted the photographer to do all the work, too.
18. ph7 - October 30, 2007 11:48 AM
Photoshopped to the max - they stretched her body to make her look thinner and taller - but the end product looks good - although you can still see t hat hair on her ass in pic #2.
19. FirstTimeLongTime - October 30, 2007 11:49 AM
God bless you, guy who runs Superficial. God bless you.
20. Dick Richards - October 30, 2007 11:49 AM
#6? How the fuck would you know what a "white" man likes? I'm white and I fancy a really nice ass. You're right, though. There is a major difference between nice asses, and an ass that's just huge. Black women? Just because you have a gigantic gravity inducing ass, does not necessarily mean that it's a good ass.
21. hollyj - October 30, 2007 11:50 AM
I concurr with 6. I wanna see the pics the way they were PRIOR to PhotoShop and airbrush.
22. f'd up photoshopping - October 30, 2007 11:52 AM
um, what the hell is her right cheek doing in pic 6? that can't be natural.
23. my comment - October 30, 2007 11:53 AM
They didn't even bother to soften the photoshop lines in her ass in pic #7.
24. K - October 30, 2007 11:53 AM
She (and every other woman in playboy) makes me sick. "Empowering"? If reducing yourself to nothing more than T&A is empowering, then fine. Thanks for doing your part to take away what my mother faught for, Kimmy.
25. Fumus - October 30, 2007 11:53 AM
Superfical rocks!!! YES!
26. Hollywood 360 - October 30, 2007 12:00 PM
Wow, having what she thinks is a classy spread doesnt help with the fact she still is a whore who did porno and made money off of it. I mean, her partner in crime was a white trash whore with a famous last name and tons of money. Wait, she was also a porn star too!
I am just waiting for her ghetto Armenian ass to get fat. Did you see her on Tyra banks or whatever that show was she was on? She tried to wear a conservative shirt that covered all her body parts and only showed a little leg and her hands. She might as well have worn a burka and traditional gowns worn by islamists. Either way, she still a porn star-whore. Covering up doesnt change the fact.
A DUCK IS A DUCK.
27. saggytitsaresick - October 30, 2007 12:01 PM
Disgusting sloppy tits and a man face.
28. RENEE Z.... - October 30, 2007 12:01 PM
Her parents must be so proud. I mean really, with all the money daddys got, did she really have to do this? Usually its just desperate white trash poor chicks that do this. Pathetic. Oh yeh, and lets play the guessing game...whats real and what isn't on her? She's probably 75% plastic. And with photoshopping you never know what you're really seeing anymore anyways; its aggravating. Damn photoshop!
29. Crotch Kicker - October 30, 2007 12:02 PM
Yeah right, I'm sure this wookie really looks like this naked. Who ever had shaving detail must have needed a really big drink when they were through.
30. hetta - October 30, 2007 12:06 PM
where is her lady hair?
31. Ally - October 30, 2007 12:11 PM
Ehh. Looks tranny-ish. And can you say AIRBRUSHING?
32. furrykiss 321 - October 30, 2007 12:11 PM
Shit. This skanky whore's nasty ass has NOTHING on Nicole Kidman's PERFECT BOTTOM!
33. Huge Ass hater - October 30, 2007 12:13 PM
I just don't get the whole, " I love a huge ass" thing. Time will not help it, that thing is only going to get bigger and bigger!!!
34. schack - October 30, 2007 12:14 PM
eh... silicone. that breast looks as springy as a rock.
35. Stinkypoo - October 30, 2007 12:15 PM
Where is her giner? Photo number seven pretty clearly reveals that shit's been spackled up or something.
36. Kiwi - October 30, 2007 12:18 PM
Remind me why we care about her again? Did she ever really do anything that gave us reason to care about a reality show about her?
37. A - October 30, 2007 12:28 PM
finally the sexiest women in the world takes it all off and shows why she's the baddest bitch out today. The complete package
38. BigBoneDaddy - October 30, 2007 12:28 PM
Loose-meat sandwich.
I'd still poke her pooper, though.
39. Doomhammer - October 30, 2007 12:40 PM
All I see when I see her is a white-trash whore sucking off a filthy black crackhead rapper. Disgusting!
40. Leticia - October 30, 2007 12:41 PM
I am in aw that her mother as her agent would allow this.
Yes, they may need all the money that they get a hold of, but to pose nude for a few bucks, is so sad.
I feel bad for her and her family!
41. gross - October 30, 2007 12:41 PM
woof.
what a fucking dog.
42. Rick James - October 30, 2007 12:42 PM
Guys with no money and no taste will think this urinal is sexy. So, all black guys, and some pathetic wiggas.
43. ch474 - October 30, 2007 12:44 PM
Hmm. Good looking woman. Better looking if she hadn't spent quite so long with the razor. Being Armenian I expected that she'd need a little trim here and there. I didn't quite expect THAT though (shudder). Could do with a little less Photoshop too.
44. antoine - October 30, 2007 12:45 PM
Kim KarDAMN-she's-hot
45. * MISS UNIVERSE - October 30, 2007 12:47 PM
Could it be - she is replacing Pam Anderson as the sex symbol.
One of the rare dark brunettes to get this status
Pam seems to have dropped out of the news since turning 40
46. your psychiatrist - October 30, 2007 12:47 PM
she's pretty, but, i am sick and tired of all these celebrities getting air-brushed and half of these people are too stupid to believe it! listen, the woman never let anyone see her mushy, cellulite ass when she was on the beach, she always kept it covered up. and if you look at the 3rd picture on the top row, you can kind of see her cellulite lines. 90% of woman have cellulite, especially women with large butts...so... not only that, but she has very sloppy, sloopy tits for someone so young and that doesn't have children...not to mention the fact that her nipples are stretched...she actually looks like someone who has had children to me. there...have i picked her apart enough? it just ticks me off, cuz i know that if most (and i say most, not all) of us were to go and have hours of primp time with these top people and all this air-brushing and top photographers...well, we could look that good, too...
47. tulip - October 30, 2007 12:48 PM
where is her lady hair?
******
Temme about it!
48. freakwad - October 30, 2007 12:49 PM
wow, she's hot.
49. misha - October 30, 2007 12:50 PM
she doesn't have a vagina. looks like a mannequin!
50. im impressed - October 30, 2007 12:52 PM
easily one of the best looking women
almost non-human
it's like she is just made for sex.
51. nipolian - October 30, 2007 12:55 PM
In pic 2 you can see the razor burn from where they shaved all the hair off her ass prior to the photo shoot.
52. havoc - October 30, 2007 12:56 PM
She may be photo-shopped but I still bang the living hell outta her all night long. Whether its the face you fuck or the fuck you face. Its all good.
53. Jesse - October 30, 2007 12:57 PM
#50 - you're 100% correct (but only your second line).
54. MindRiot - October 30, 2007 1:01 PM
Sand dollars.
I knew it.
55. tanya - October 30, 2007 1:01 PM
Do women not have vaginal lips anymore? When did this happen?
56. Pooper Pounder - October 30, 2007 1:01 PM
Something seems seriously wrong with her ass on pic #6
57. Jesus Christ - October 30, 2007 1:05 PM
Doesn't look nearly as good as she does dressed, what went wrong?
58. Flavio - October 30, 2007 1:05 PM
now she needs to pose naked with her sisters. mmmm.
59. mkell - October 30, 2007 1:08 PM
@56: Looks like it's been painted with dazzle patterns. You know, like they used to do on battleships to break up the outline and confuse u-boats.
I dunno, this whole thing is a little disappointing. I mean, this was the best they could do?
60. Lisa - October 30, 2007 1:11 PM
Sorry, but I still dont understand Ass implants....... Why?
61. Eva - October 30, 2007 1:11 PM
OH I'm disappointed. I was looking forward to this, but she looks better with her clothes on and without airbrush.
62. Snarky McComments - October 30, 2007 1:12 PM
I'd cancel my Playboy subscription if I had one.....
63. veggi - October 30, 2007 1:12 PM
I don't want to click. I wonder what Britney's doing right now.
64. Tea Bagger - October 30, 2007 1:14 PM
I can't WAIT to get this issue... and read about Jimmy Kimmel and Sarah Silverstein: A Love Story!
Oh, and masturbate furiously to thoughts of me playing Butt Darts with Kim's giant brown bullseye.
65. beesknees - October 30, 2007 1:15 PM
Sure she's pretty. But it's pretty pathetic that people call her "the complete package"..how laughable. Would you want your mom or your sister displayed like this? This is a girl who gets peed on during sex for all the world to see. If that's your definition of the complete package than you don't live in reality. Especially since we all know how airbrushed these pictures are. You must be so lonely waiting for something that doesn't exist.
66. veggi - October 30, 2007 1:15 PM
Nevermind. I know what Brits doing. She's reading this and is frantically looking for a brush that paints air.
67. beesknees - October 30, 2007 1:16 PM
#50 just made for sex LOL!! That pretty much sums it up.
68. Zee Brat - October 30, 2007 1:18 PM
Wow. It might just be that I watch way too much America's Top Model. But those are awful awful photos.
69. NewOrleansNegroSwimleague - October 30, 2007 1:19 PM
# 39.... I think you got it right.....She's a mud shark
70. Macaque - October 30, 2007 1:19 PM
Doesn't even look like her.
And Black Barbie, you don't know shit about white boys.
71. Jimbo - October 30, 2007 1:21 PM
Geez - you could airbrush my ass and it'd look BETTER than hers!
*snaps*
*tosses head*
72. Anon - October 30, 2007 1:22 PM
Anybody got any higher quality scans of these?
73. One-hand Specialist - October 30, 2007 1:23 PM
Wait, this issue features a story on Norman Mailer? (yup, I "read" Playboy). Nice to see that Hef is keeping up with the times.
74. James - October 30, 2007 1:24 PM
booooooring pics
75. Jimbo - October 30, 2007 1:26 PM
@71 thanks for covering for me troll. You must be a female. That is a nice ass and a nice rack.
76. leelee - October 30, 2007 1:26 PM
In the second to last photo it looks like someone seriously Photoshop-ed her vagina, and it looks incredibly weird...
Didn't she say the playboy shoots we're going to be more about showing her breasts than anything else? I feel like there's less nipples than anything else.
77. 63474 - October 30, 2007 1:27 PM
Very hot chick, really great bod, but both her boobs and ass are soooo fake and look like that thanks to a plastic surgeon.
She's so fake though, and I don't mean her body, I mean herself. I hate when she says her ass is natural when she knows it's sooo fake and plastic surgeried LOL, what a liar and a fake. Nothing wrong with plastic surgery hon, you know if it wasn't thanks to it you wouldn't have the body you have, not even close, so stop lying and being such a fake.
It's like her sex tape... she is the one who made it "leak" and made sure it was sold to porn companies, and then pretended she had nothing to do with that and that she didn't want it to be released to the public, and sued the porn company who sold it. Funny how not even a month after it was released she dropped her lawsuit against that porn company after they gave her $$$. It was all planned.
She's such a fake. And if there's a second part of her sex tape, it's the same bullshit, she makes it all "leak" herself.
Fake ass, fake boobs, fake person.
78. PunkA - October 30, 2007 1:28 PM
Where is Jay-Z? I thought he was peeing on her in this?? Wrong spread? Huh. I didn't realize she appeared naked anywhere without getting peed on by Jay-Z. Like her personal rule to live by.
79. chaim ben pesach - October 30, 2007 1:31 PM
"Once you've gone black we don't want you back"
80. No Talent Famous People Pose for Playboy - October 30, 2007 1:34 PM
Usually when a celebrity lacks talent; they pose for Playboy or release a sex video tape.
81. Jimbo - October 30, 2007 1:35 PM
Am I first?
I am such a fucking moron i cant tell
82. nipolian - October 30, 2007 1:35 PM
#76 Of course it looks wierd - they erased it......flapping lips, herpe scars and all.
83. Fumus - October 30, 2007 1:37 PM
Kim for president.
84. Andrew C - October 30, 2007 1:38 PM
Man I would bury my head in that ass. If I suffocate, oh well... I die happy.
85. Allie - October 30, 2007 1:41 PM
What is with the shaved snatches??? She looks like she has the pu$$y of a 7 year-old girl. Yuck.
Otherwise, she actually looks pretty hot- but taking into the consideration her plastic body and the major post-editing, I think Playboy could make ANY chick look hot.
86. veggi - October 30, 2007 1:43 PM
I think these pictures are making people crazy - is that TT trolling Jimbo at #71???
87. das - October 30, 2007 1:43 PM
I know she is photoshopped here, but in real life that is the ideal woman figure. All the fat girls beware.
88. Andrew C - October 30, 2007 1:44 PM
@85... uhh... Allie, hate to break your bubble sweety, but if you ever want to have a guy go down on you it's best not to look like sasquatch down there. Nobody wants to choke up furballs.
89. nipolian - October 30, 2007 1:47 PM
Mmmmmmm.........furballs.
90. MoonChild - October 30, 2007 1:48 PM
Nice to see that they photoshopped out her stretched out, over-sized nipples ....She also appears to have a waxed ass...yuck....She's looked better in clothes....This is kinda lame.
91. veggi - October 30, 2007 1:49 PM
86- shaadap!
Where's BRITNEY!
92. mixedmartialartvideos.com - October 30, 2007 1:49 PM
i thought it was all going to be implied nudity but they sneaked in some better shots
93. Andrew A - October 30, 2007 1:50 PM
Allie, never mind what my retarded brother (#88) said. Only guys with homosexual tendencies think a natural pussy is nasty. They need it completely shaved so that they can pretend a nice pink cock is sticking out for them to suck.
94. matt - October 30, 2007 1:51 PM
How come no one mentioned anything about those stretch marks on the mag cover? Imagine what her non-photoshopped butt looks like.
95. Lysol - October 30, 2007 1:54 PM
I wouldn't waste my piss on that
96. Zoostation - October 30, 2007 1:57 PM
A Zoostation exclusive on these pics.
97. Erin - October 30, 2007 1:59 PM
Yay for #24. I've always ridiculed that term -- "empowering." Jenna Jameson used that as her defense behind doing porn...that it was "empowering." If she was so empowered and strong, she certainly wouldn't be in the condition that she's in today! Same goes for Pam Anderson. Girl looks a mess, and obviously isn't very fulfilled in her life since it always seems that she's looking for something other than what she has.
But to my point: I love how these kinds of women rely on "empowering" to try and blind themselves from the insufferable shame that they've wrought on their family and any self-respecting woman around. "Empowering" really is a facade for "male-relient self-esteem"; anything but empowered. These women are a dime a dozen -- you find them primping for hours on end so that guys will notice them in a bar, waxing and lasering any surviving follicles of hair on their netherregions so that guys will report them as "satisfactory" in bed, starving themselves to bones, tanning themselves to leather, and kicking their legs up on a pole in a club while wearing a short skirt and no underwear in the hopes that some guy -- no matter the grade -- will look. I find more and more, however, that some men regret what society has done to its women, and would much rather have a classy, beautiful woman on their arm that they can be proud of.
It seems that women hold other women down more these days than anyone else.
98. veggi - October 30, 2007 1:59 PM
95 ahahahahahaha!! goodun!
99. danielle - October 30, 2007 2:00 PM
Im a bisexual girl and i think the photos look good, yes they are probably 95% airbrushed and imperfections erased but thats a playboy magazine. the woman has to look good!! I would rock kim anyday. Nice pussy! X
100. JJ - October 30, 2007 2:01 PM
Hmmm, is it just me or does she look like a 60 yr old mom who's had a shitload of facial surgery?
Something doesn't look quite right.
101. Texas Tranny - October 30, 2007 2:02 PM
Texas Tranny NEVER trolls, NEVER EVER.
*snaps finger*
*tosses head back*
*swishes out of the room*
102. Art - October 30, 2007 2:03 PM
Wow, I'm so proud women across the world have died for equal rights and for what? Guys to whack off to images on a computer. Cheers Kim, here's to you and your giant arse
103. Mike - October 30, 2007 2:03 PM
The artist they hired to paint these pictures is really good. They almost look like photographs!
104. Maxx - October 30, 2007 2:06 PM
#97, your last sentence says it all and I couldn't agree more. It's enough to make me mad!
105. Christina - October 30, 2007 2:08 PM
Man she's gross. How can anyone like her? She's talentless with a low IQ.
Why is she famous? Oh yeah because she has big boobs and a huge ass.
106. A - October 30, 2007 2:08 PM
If i were a lesbian........
107. poo - October 30, 2007 2:09 PM
Omg look at the terrible photoshop job on her ass in the 6th photo...
108. Anonymous - October 30, 2007 2:12 PM
what's wrong with you people?
first off, I smell LOTS of nasty jealousy here.
second, she's really hot, and has a great bod, fake, but great nevertheless.
It's great that a chick who is actually -HOT- is praised and considered really hot, I was so sick of hearing chicks who are average and are curveless and assless sticks being praised and people claiming they were hot, when they are NOT (like Jessica Alba... average super overrated lady). At least, unlike Alba, Kim Kardashian is truly hot and she's got such a great body, the praise is fair.
I love Kim and I love her brunnette/dark Spanish/latin like look. I think hot spanish/latin like brunnettes like this one beat every blonde on Earth anyday when it comes to hotness.
Second, you people have a problem with sex and nudity. You post comments claiming she's so horrible for posing naked or having a sex tape or performing sexual acts. People, it's tits, ass, you all have that, it's the most natural thing in the world and there's nothing to be ashamed of. If the girl is proud and wants to show it off, leave the girl alone, she's not doing anything bad at all, you people are sick for saying otherwise, what's so wrong about a naked body? And sex, it's the same. It's the most natural thing in the world. Everyone has sex or wishes they could. If she has a sex tape and she likes performing certain sexual acts, what's wrong with that? don't look if you don't like it, don't do it yourself if you don't like it, but respect others who feel different because she's not doing anything wrong at all and she's not hurting anybody.
So get your facts right you ignorant jealous prudes. There's nothing wrong with sex and nudity, it's a natural thing. There's something wrong with killing people, with hurting people... that is gross and nasty, that's trash, that's low. But with sex and nudity? nothing wrong.
109. sva1994 - October 30, 2007 2:12 PM
Jesus CHRIST they did a shitty job airbrushing her ass in pic #7. Don't they even have anyone checking these things? It's bad as when they airbrushed Tori Spelling's gigantic chin when she the 20 questions feature years ago, and ended up giving it a sharp point.
110. Jeff L - October 30, 2007 2:20 PM
GOD I HOPE THIS IS STILL UP WHEN I GET HOME FROM WORK
111. kristina - October 30, 2007 2:20 PM
she is fucking gross
112. AZLez - October 30, 2007 2:22 PM
ok. I know she is disgusting, but seriously... tits ass and vagina, and I don't even have to pay?
merry christmas, happy channukah/hannukah, and merry kwanza
113. kristina - October 30, 2007 2:23 PM
photo six, look at her ass, you can bluntly see the poor airbrushing skills. I don't blame them though, it's too hard to airbrush
114. Erin - October 30, 2007 2:25 PM
#108 -- I agree with you to some extent. Yes, it's just T&A, and I think she's a great looking girl in my opinion, too. But it's unfortunate that she should pride herself on "just T&A."
Let's get this straight: It's not the content that angers me. It's the social ramifications. Society as a whole is being conditioned to view the female as nothing more than a sexual object. Being a female myself, this bothers me. If you're a female as well, this should bother you too. It's the fact that I am probably paid less because I'm a woman. It's the fact that every time a woman interviews here, the guys have to gossip about the number 1 priority: what did she look like? You'll never ever hear anyone speak like that about a male interviewee. It's not just Kim Kardashian but a great majority of women who promote this societal tendancy. Sure, some people who speak out about this kind of thing are prudes and maybe jealous even. But I think there is a respectable and sincere basis for my argument, and I hope you can recognize that.
#107 - Thanks! I almost didn't even post since usually anything half-serious on these forums gets completely bashed...Makes me mad too.
115. A - October 30, 2007 2:29 PM
#45, Why can't you be a dark haired brunette and achieve sex symbol status
116. Erin - October 30, 2007 2:29 PM
#108 -- I agree with you to some extent. Yes, it's just T&A, and I think she's a great looking girl in my opinion, too. But it's unfortunate that she should pride herself on "just T&A."
Let's get this straight: It's not the content that angers me. It's the social ramifications. Society as a whole is being conditioned to view the female as nothing more than a sexual object. Being a female myself, this bothers me. If you're a female as well, this should bother you too. It's the fact that I am probably paid less because I'm a woman. It's the fact that every time a woman interviews here, the guys have to gossip about the number 1 priority: what did she look like? You'll never ever hear anyone speak like that about a male interviewee. It's not just Kim Kardashian but a great majority of women who promote this societal tendancy. Sure, some people who speak out about this kind of thing are prudes and maybe jealous even. But I think there is a respectable and sincere basis for my argument, and I hope you can recognize that.
#107 - Thanks! I almost didn't even post since usually anything half-serious on these forums gets completely bashed...Makes me mad too.
117. alibi - October 30, 2007 2:29 PM
94- right o!
108- "first off, I smell LOTS of nasty jealousy here". No hon, that is the smell of reality. If you smell something foul, it's your finger from having it so far up your ass, you can't tell the difference between hot and plastic nonsense.
118. Danielle - October 30, 2007 2:31 PM
I'd like to see the original photos.
119. 21st century digital boy - October 30, 2007 2:40 PM
Ugh. The obligatory feminist backlash that always ensues...
Look, nobody forces women to take off their clothes and pose for Playboy. They know the game. They know what they're getting into, and what they want to get out of it. Fame, fortune, loads of cash, all that. Girls make bank just to be naked. Must be nice.
Maybe some of these girls do have esteem issues, but so do a lot of guys who try to compensate by becoming rich and powerful and dating women like this. Kim's an adult, and she made her decision good or bad. Whatever.
Can't a women decide for herself about these things? Of the many things that are so annoying about feminist crusaders is how they think they must always butt in and pronounce their judgement every time a woman doesn't share their aversion to showing off the female body. Like each and every woman can't think for themselves and make their own decision instead of adopting someone elses ideology and cause. And yeah, I think that while a lot of classic feminism was good, a lot of it is just a modern incarnation of our Puritan heritage that refuses to die.
Men find women's bodies desirable. That's a fact. Men are not women, and they will never become sexless Vulcans who only value women for their minds, anymore than women will stop dumping less successful guys when they find their Prince Charming/Alpha male with the bigger, better bank account.
120. fat cow - October 30, 2007 2:45 PM
WHAT A DIRTY SLUT!!!
121. saralicious - October 30, 2007 2:46 PM
whats up with her vagina? it looks like the top of a dawn soap detegent...lol
122. Radar - October 30, 2007 2:50 PM
I hate friggin' Playboy celebrity spreads. They fucked up Debbie Gibson as well. Where's the friggin beaver? Where's the full on total frontal nudity. Showing a glimpse of pubes and a 4/5ths covered nipple isn't "baring it all".
Piss poor, Playboy.
And yes, she's still a lard ass!
123. Riotboy - October 30, 2007 2:52 PM
Hit It Meter:
_____________________+
1...2...3...4...5...6...7...8...9...10
_____________________+
/so friggin' HOT!!!
124. Eric Ginsberg - October 30, 2007 2:57 PM
LAME. She's a beautiful woman and they've made her look 1987 sub-par. Who was in charge of the set and props? Her grandmother? And her hair and make-up are pathetic. She does a better job doing them herself. All in all, what a freaking let-down. And, you know what? I blame Hugh Hefner. That's right, I said it. If you'd take a little less time pretending to be a befuddled old man surrounded by ditsy cosmetic surgery nightmares, and more time worried about what's going in your magazine, this could have been awesome. DAMNIT!
125. MT - October 30, 2007 3:04 PM
NOT bad!!
126. CoM - October 30, 2007 3:11 PM
Crap, they're gone. Anyone got a link...?
127. CoM - October 30, 2007 3:15 PM
Nevermind, found a link (NSFW):
http://forums.hollyscoop.com/Topic1640-2-1.aspx
128. lentista - October 30, 2007 3:17 PM
whos cares about playboy,she should've did these pose's for hustler,so i can puke on my cock and get off......teehehe
129. shakeit - October 30, 2007 3:28 PM
there's nothing to be jealous about. any woman can look good in hollywood. anyone can look good in playboy. natural beauty is lost.
i mean didnt she just get through saying that she felt bad for doing a video?
130. Ted from LA - October 30, 2007 3:29 PM
I've been around the block a couple of times, but this is the first time I've ever seen an ass with a step in the middle of it.
131. Photo #6 - October 30, 2007 3:30 PM
I believe the main problem in Photo 6 is that it is part of the mag spread and didn't align properly during the scan. HOWEVER, the pshop on the roundness of the ass is TERRIBLE. Terrible makeup, scenery, accessories, photography, pshop, and publishing. Someone else said it best, she does better herself. She's a nice speciman, but that facts are the facts, she's fake and sold out AGAIN. And stop standing up for her actions because they are WRONG.
132. whatGfunk - October 30, 2007 3:37 PM
Are those stretch marks on her side?
133. Quinn - October 30, 2007 3:50 PM
what a shame they did such crappy airbrushing.
She's HOT, but they made her waist half the size it is in any other pic.
In the pics of her birthday she has belly action.
134. another feminist - October 30, 2007 3:59 PM
Erin, I do not understand feminists like you at all. You are SOOOO judgemental . You say that a lot of women hold other women down and I hope you realize you're one of them. Why can't some women show off their bodies in Playboy and STILL get respect, and why would that affect womens' careers in general? If you think it's because men don't respect women when they see pics like Kim's, well then BLAME THE MEN. That's where we need to start, instead of bashing Kim for posing nude. Men should be able to watch women show off their bodies and still respect them, and so should you.
135. Eileen - October 30, 2007 4:00 PM
# 127 thanks for the link
136. Skip Smith - October 30, 2007 4:04 PM
@114
>>"It's the fact that I am probably paid less because I'm a woman."
No, you're paid less because you're stupid.
137. FeministSchmeninist - October 30, 2007 4:05 PM
DON'T blame KIM for posing in Playboy, blame the MEN?!?!?!?!??!?!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
138. Kim - October 30, 2007 4:11 PM
I'll just wait til my issue comes in the mail to see her gigantic booty. I really don't think she looks that bad. She is a no talent bimbo who does NOT deserve an entire 1/2 hour devoted to her on TV, but she looks good.
139. Patrick - October 30, 2007 4:21 PM
These pics ARE "really classy!" I mean, nobody's peeing on her, right?
140. M - October 30, 2007 4:22 PM
It was great while it lasted, thanks...
141. Mr. Pickles - October 30, 2007 4:42 PM
WEAK. keep them up. make them sue you.
142. cowcat - October 30, 2007 4:52 PM
#119, the women who perpetuate sexual objectification as a source of empowerment, rather than education and intelligence, are the same women who would choose their husbands/boyfriends based on their bank account. So, you're preaching to the choir on that one. True feminists aren't hypocrites, and there's nothing wrong with wanting a little equality.
143. Emmyem - October 30, 2007 5:13 PM
What's funny are the remarks from the guys (or gals!) who write "I'd do her", or something really filthy they'd do to her. LIKE SHE WOULD LET PEOPLE who write about her here, "do" her.
She's all FAMOUSY now! She's PURE CLASS! NOT! Ray WHO? The women in Playboy have been airbrushed since airbrushing was invented.
Does anyone remember when JOAN COLLINS posed nude for Playboy? I think they had to redo her entire body, and face. My older brother had the mag, and he said "flat ass, booze legs, gut". I remember laughing so hard.
Then my Mom yelled at me, because I was a young girl and was not supposed to hear "that kind of talk".
Ahhhh, how times have changed. Now, sadly, I don't think twice when I see Brit's lady parts, or, as I like to call them, the gates to Hell.
A very smelly Hell, just fire, and torture, no food.
Oh, I got off topic.
Kim K is a skank. And she will be a HUGE fat ass when she gets older, COMPLETE with a mustache and chin hair....coming out of a mole. DINNER TIME!
144. Ript1&0 - October 30, 2007 5:27 PM
Yawn... well, they're gone by the time I get here. It's ok, I saw them Friday anyway already.
I'm gonna vote for shaved in the Shaved v. Not Shaved debate.
145. lastangelman - October 30, 2007 6:15 PM
Got a look see elsewhere on the net, small inconvenience, after studying the pictures scrupulously with my buddy, the ever trusty one eyed trouser python, 'tis amazing what you can do with Photoshop, Blender, a rendering farm of 500 Xserves and 270 MacPros and skilled technicians using the most advanced protective eyewear this side of the galaxy. This technology could be used to make Barbara Bush (both of 'em) bonerific.
I've seen Kimmy K in the flesh two days ago - a Harry Hines ninth level skank-ho with Haitian Death VD, your penis withers and crawls inside your body cavity to die within fifty yards of her mere presence, so wear protection, for the sake of the human race, wear protection.
146. Erin - October 30, 2007 6:25 PM
@#119: You sound intelligent so I do respect your opinion. I too agree that it may be some kind of convoluded puritanism that still lingers as a part of feminism today, but I hope that any part of my posts didn't lead you to believe that I have an aversion to the naked female body. It's just the manner in which it is too often represented. It doesn't uplift a woman or cause her to be admired/appreciated but instead just provokes a desire to conquer, objectify and subjugate her. Until I can view a comments forum following revealing pictures of a woman that don't include vulgar comments, I find it hard to believe that I'm wrong. Until men can handle nude images of women without taking it as a medium of their own dominance, women should be ashamed to partake and therefore encourage this kind of behavior. It's self-defeating and only exists because women allow it to exist.
@#142: Amen. I started getting awfully flustered and thought of posting yet another response, but I realized that it was just more trouble than it was worth. You put together the bottom line very concisely though, and you echoed my thoughts exactly: I'm not a feminist, but there's nothing wrong with wanting a little equality. Keyword: Equality. It has nothing to do with valuing one sex over the other or turning men into "sexless vulcans who only value women for their mind." I don't expect men to ONLY value a woman for her mind, and I like a man with a healthy sex drive just like most women. But I do expect men not to ONLY value a woman as a living tubesock. Thanks for posting.
147. Uppity Cunt - October 30, 2007 6:33 PM
I HATE PLAYBOI BECUZ IT LIKE DEGRAIDS WOMIN. IT SHOWS NASTIE BODIE PARTS LIKE BOOBYS AND SNACH.
WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!
HOO WANTS TO SEE NATERAL BODYS IN ALL THEYR GLORIE? BOOBYS AND SNACH ARE RONG RONG RONG, REEL WOMIN DONT HAVE BOOBYS OR SNACHES.
148. kix - October 30, 2007 6:47 PM
Wow-- some of the most intelligent posts I've ever read on here (#97, #104, #117, #142). Like 142 implied, these people tend to stick together- mindless women who rely on their sex to get by and the cavemen who are controlled by their hormones. The way these kind of people hookup makes it easy to weed out the idiots from the rest of productive society. Unfortunately these people can still reproduce.
149. kaytee - October 30, 2007 7:11 PM
Why is it that beautiful women must act so damned stupid? Is there some sort of law that says "if you have a beautiful face and body, you MUST act like a brainless bimbo who is always willing to trade sex for attention and stuff, and peddle videos of yourself getting fucked on the Internet. Bonus points is someone pees on you."?
KK is nothing - useless. A breathing blow up sex doll. She is pretty. Would be prettier still if all her body parts are home grown. (Maybe they are) And would be absolutely beautiful if she had (or used her) brains to go along with the body.
Too bad.
The problem with Playboy and it's ilk is that they photoshop to bits beautiful women. They have always cleaned up reality in the past but with the digital age, hell, even Joan Rivers is a potential contender for a layout!
It would be kind of interesting to have disclaimers at the bottom of the photo - you know, list all the body bits photoshopped and surgically altered. Wouldn't take away the viewing pleasure, but would introduce some reality to the women displayed.
And yeah - what is it with the labia in Playboy? No woman has pubic hair OR labia? Hard to keep up with the trends. It would be cheaper to just go with totally cartoon women - save on paying the models AND on all the money they seem to be paying for photoshop artistes!
150. John Gallucci - October 30, 2007 7:18 PM
Posted on my site. www.goochonline.com
151. Jrod - October 30, 2007 7:22 PM
108- She is Armenian, not Spanish.
152. blah - October 30, 2007 8:59 PM
Playboy is to sexy women what Kraft macaroni & cheese is to food.
153. Jathro - October 30, 2007 9:37 PM
"blah" wins this comment thread.
154. Jrodd - October 30, 2007 11:26 PM
108 said LOOKS LIKE.
155. Cuppity Unt - October 30, 2007 11:36 PM
It's WRONG because a beautiful woman's body is to be saved for their soulmate, not the whole world, to see.
156. KayteeDid - October 30, 2007 11:39 PM
There actually is a word for over-photoshopped images. Can't recall it offhand but it's starting to get used in the professional publishing world. I believe it should be REQUIRED with all the faking that goes on in ALL publications, from people, to lawn and garden, to indoor decorating, etc., etc. Fake, fake, FAKE!
157. dmagickal - October 30, 2007 11:47 PM
shes pretty she has a good body shes still an idiot. boys like idiots. remember that :) makes it easier on their kind. she looks white!
158. peachesdainty - October 31, 2007 1:39 AM
# 20. i love your comment haha black women and their digusting asses that like freaking stick out and look like two cannons. IT LOOKS DEFORMED! damn i hate all those fucken black ppl that come on here and say stupid shit about white ppl when that wasnt even being talked about. idiots. by the way.
all of your asses are disgusting, dont be fooled by videos. the rest of the world is laughing at your deformaties or genetically retarded asses.
159. bruce jenner - October 31, 2007 1:45 AM
...not that impressive
http://evilbeetgossip.film.com/2007/10/27/who-wants-to-see-kim-kardashians-vagina-the-playboy-photo-spread/
160. 21st century digital boy - October 31, 2007 2:00 AM
Dear Erin (# 146)
This whole thread is probably over and done and adding anything more irrelevant, but... You sound pretty smart yourself, but also a tad bit idealistic and perhaps a bit naive about the realities of the male mind (no offense intended).
Again, I'd say to you that men are not like women. Men aren't on the whole going to develop this innocent, uplifting, platonic, disinterested admiration for the natural beauty of a naked woman the way another straight woman might, or the way you might admire a sunset. Call it erotic desire, call it lust, call it whatever you want, but that's what men are going to feel. Men are also not going to overcome their instincts and need for competition and dominance over each other and over women. If you don't like that, blame the fact that despite our clothes and our veneer of civilization, homo sapiens are still basically animals.
But, concerning dominance, what makes you think that a woman's sexuality isn't one of her most potent weapons in her struggle to dominate the male of the species? Who's really in control and which sex really dominates? It's never been clear cut.
Bottom line - I have no illusions that men or women are going to change to fit some new kind of ethical standard of behavior approved by the tenets of feminist theory anytime within our lifetimes or beyond. I also don't buy that all women are sisters. Kardashian represents Kardashian, not you, just like Federline represents Federline and not me. Her grasping, slutty hijinks aren't going to bring you down anymore than the stupidity of Federline or Tom Cruise is going to bring me down.
If you really want to be empowered, uplifted, and undominated, take your future into your own hands and refuse to be so. I believe in indivdual not the collective. You have more opportunity and power as a woman to shape your own destiny today than ever before.
161. Ron - October 31, 2007 9:10 AM
What happened Why were the pix removed?????????? Kim is outstandingly HOT!!!!
162. emerald - October 31, 2007 11:41 AM
Did anyone notice in last nights episode when Bruce was driving with the two younger girls fighting in the back seat , and he was talking to the mother on the cell phone that neither of the children where wearing seat belts? He was wearing his though! You would think email would have noticed that.
163. blizzy - October 31, 2007 1:00 PM
#158 needs to get hooked on phonics quick.
164. Erin - October 31, 2007 1:15 PM
@#160: Thanks for your post. I understand fully everything that you say and appreciate your ability to respond to my posts with reason. It's a rarity in these forums.
Like you, I believe in the individual. If I didn't, I wouldn't steadfastly hold to my convictions despite living in a sea of hypocrisy and ignorance. I wouldn't even be able to put together a (perhaps somewhat) cohesive argument because I would've fofeited my education long ago for an aspiring "trophy wife" status. I would've sold my soul to the collective a long time ago, and it would've been obvious.
Still, I sometimes wish that I didn't have the intelligence to recognize how seriously disappointing it is to be a part of a collective that rampantly does its best to defy its more "redeemable" (subjective, I know) constituents. It's like being mistreated by foreigners because your president is George Bush. As an individual, I hate being represented by this collective. My posts here are just an extremely feeble attempt to break the fruitless stream of comments about this girl's photoshopped privates, and spark a conversation on an important point sparked by #24. Anyways, maybe it is ideological to wish for people to wake the fuck up -- not just about women effacing their own integrity, but on things that span from healthcare to consumerism to environmentalism and religion, etc. But honestly, if people just believed in themselves a little more, this world would be such a better place.
Thanks for your feedback. Happy Wednesday (or Halloween).
165. Erin - October 31, 2007 1:18 PM
Last post I swear:
@#148: "The way these kind of people hookup makes it easy to weed out the idiots from the rest of productive society. Unfortunately these people can still reproduce."
My thoughts exactly. You ever see that movie, "Idiocracy"? Not a superb film, but the first 20 minutes scares the shit out of me.
166. DW - October 31, 2007 1:54 PM
Is anyone going to pee their name in all the white stuff surrounding her massive bubble buttocks??
167. 21st century digital boy - October 31, 2007 3:25 PM
Erin @164: It's been a fun conversation. I wish I could be less cynical sometimes, but eh... what are you going to do? The world is full of fools, and always has been. Unfortunately, at this point, I don't know what to do except find some solace in laughter as I watch Rome burn.
Don't give in to apathy like me. Stay strong, intelligent, and (relatively) idealistic. But, whatever you believe in, I do think that your best bet is not to wait around until all men or women decide to change to fit some impossible standard or construct of behavior. Academic theory holds little sway outside of certain small circles. You've got to lead the way through your own life and actions.
Intelligent dialogue on a Hollywood gossip site, and in reference to Kim Kardashian, no less? Who would have imagined that were even possible?
Ciao and Happy Halloween!
168. JumBo - November 2, 2007 6:35 PM
This is pure garbage...she's covering up her boobs on almost all the pictures. What's up with that?!
169. elle - November 3, 2007 2:41 PM
I am not hating but this girl is head to toe fake to begin with and to add photo shop etc., you might as well have built her from scratch. She wears extensions to make her hair fuller, she has false eyelashes and pounds of makeup- I've seen a pic of her without all the above and she still is attractive however add on fake boobs which there's a pic floating around where you can see the scar and of course the ass implants. That's a lot of work for a 27 year old and in these pics she looks like she's hitting 40. That pic where she is bent over it is clear as day they did some work on her butt because its cropped and the line in her ass is crooked. Girls like her do all this work to themselves and they want a return on their investment. So that's why she is basically prostituting herself. I wonder if her exhusband has any pics of her post-op. Anyway, as someone who has no reason to be jealous I think she is pretty all things considering but its really a shame that she has to put herself out there like that, I mean really! She did a sex tape with RJ! Yuck- that sh!t looked nasty as hell, he is gross. I mean someone that "Hott" couldn't find a better partner? WTF Who really wants to see tape 2 of that nasty sh!t and did he pee on her or was that the other way around? What is wrong with this girl? I'll tell you NO SELF ESTEEM!
170. JT - November 3, 2007 11:32 PM
YUCK, EWW, GROSS> FAT
171. selina - November 17, 2007 4:22 AM
pretty girl with good figure, someone saw she is on a dating site called sugarcupid.com. why she goes there?
172. Yong - November 19, 2007 3:03 AM
I LOVE her big eyes. So perfect!
173. honesty - February 19, 2008 6:59 AM
how can this woman walk around not horribly embarrased to be herself? she was made famous by being FUCKED by a some thug in a fucking video? what is the world coming to when thats your claim to fame?
what a fucking white trash nasty piece of shit bitch. we need more women who pursue intellegent things.
174. erkek bileklik - October 20, 2009 6:19 AM
Is anyone going to pee their name in all the white stuff surrounding her massive bubble buttocks
175. xmas presents - November 16, 2009 4:25 AM
Hey kim is looking so hot and sexy in this pic. I don;t care what people think about her . I like her very much.