Feb 23 2007Daniel Radcliffe shows off his wang
Remember those promo shots for Equus and that shot of Daniel Radcliffe's bare ass? If you thought to yourself, "Hey, I really wish I was on the other side of that photo" then you're in luck. I'd never thought I'd ever be saying this, but here's a super NSFW full frontal shot of Harry Potter's penis. And if you're wondering what's up with all the horse erotica lately, it's because I've slowly been turning this site into a home for animal sex perverts. What, you couldn't tell? Then you must be one of them.
Thanks to everybody that sent this in. And when I say 'thanks' I mean it in the loosest least thankful way possible.

Reader Comments
1. jessiewessie - February 23, 2007 1:14 AM
Ahhhhhhh!
2. Catnip - February 23, 2007 1:16 AM
What a hottie.
3. NunoH - February 23, 2007 1:18 AM
Nasty.
4. Aaron - February 23, 2007 1:21 AM
Isn't Photoshop great? :)
(But also capable of so many wrong things.)
5. loveli - February 23, 2007 1:31 AM
Can someone show this to Cisco Adler? Just to let him know what normal balls look like?
6. AmberDextrose - February 23, 2007 1:38 AM
Why did I click on that? I mean, sure the kid's cute, but I really didn't need that "pimento stuffed olive" thing right now. Miss Car Crash Fascination, that's me.
7. mrsreynolds - February 23, 2007 1:41 AM
Oh why did I look?
I really must break my curious streak.
8. Jessa85 - February 23, 2007 1:46 AM
Can anyone say photoshop? Cause I sure can!
9. Spetsnaz - February 23, 2007 1:55 AM
Isn't that kiddie porn?
I'm sad that Harry Potter's magic wang looks normal. I was hoping for something I could point and laugh at!
10. hellcat1983 - February 23, 2007 1:56 AM
Why did I have to click on Mr. T.?! That just goes to show that I need a more interesting job to keep me from looking at horsey pics.
11. machinegundolly - February 23, 2007 2:00 AM
oh dear god. thats scary.
12. ProbablyTooOld - February 23, 2007 2:07 AM
Wow. Am I the only one who is a little freaked out when I look at an uncircumcised penis (on a 17-year old boy caressing a horse).
Poor kid. I bet he's sick of being Harry Potter. He's already one of the richest people in Great Britain, yet more slash, pound per pound, has been written about his wang than any other person in motion picture history. I'm surprised he hasn't cut it off.
13. A Spoonful of Lester - February 23, 2007 2:09 AM
God, you'd think he'd be rich enough to get circumcised by now.
14. FeldBum - February 23, 2007 2:13 AM
I so did not need to see that. But I clicked anyway. Same reason I looked up that Zoo movie you mentioned. I have a problem.
15. RunningWithCarsAndBoysWithScissors - February 23, 2007 2:14 AM
A selection from the Prisoner of Azkaban script:
Harry steps back. Afraid to look. Afraid not to. Wand outstretched... he TRIPS, tumbles over the forgotten trunk. The tip of his wand BLAZES. BANG! TWIN BEAMS of BLINDING LIGHT spear the night.
Kid's movie my ass.
16. saradevil - February 23, 2007 2:19 AM
He's hung like a horse.
17. AmberDextrose - February 23, 2007 2:23 AM
Nimbus 2000 issues aside, where oh where can we go for our gossip kicks now that the Fish has been trolljacked? I quite like celebitchy, but it doesn't have that dry nasty Fish tone.
18. Stink - February 23, 2007 2:36 AM
Instead of Mr. T, I would have used a pic of Hermione eating a ball gag, but that's just me.
19. ImaCracka - February 23, 2007 2:39 AM
ARRRGHHHH!!!!!! I LOOKED!!!!!!
ARRRGGHHHH!!!! TURTLE HEAD TURTLE HEAD!!!!!
Ok ladies... you prefer a turtle or a helmet?
20. HovisGovis - February 23, 2007 2:43 AM
What do size do you think our Harry Potter is... Expecto patronum or ridikulus???
21. leog - February 23, 2007 2:48 AM
#13 - unlike americans, the rest of the world doesn't see the need to cut off something that's SUPPOSED to be there!
I mean really, earlobes aren't that vital but you don't see people cutting them off willy nilly (pun intended).
But that pic is still wrong. I don't need to see his man-wand... I agree with #6 entirely!
22. woodhorse - February 23, 2007 3:07 AM
i don't want to see this movie. i def get the feeling that this movie not only shows way more than the original (with Richard Burton) but that the story line has been quite a bit embellished. again, eeewwwwww.
23. Tephlon - February 23, 2007 3:17 AM
Oh god, it's his Hairy Potter!
#15: From bash.org:
Purely in the interests of science, I have replaced the word "wand" with "wang" in the first Harry Potter Book
I have found, definitive proof
that J.K Rowling is a dirty DIRTY woman, making a fool of us all
"Yes," Harry said, gripping his wang very tightly, and moving into the middle of the deserted classroom. He tried to keep his mind on flying, but something else kept intruding.... Any second now, he might hear his mother again... but he shouldn't think that, or he would hear her again, and he didn't want to... or did he?
Something silver-white, something enormous, erupted from the end of his wang
24. kamihi - February 23, 2007 3:19 AM
Oh my GOD I love Harry Potter, the little boy wizard I mean, this was just not meant to be, I still watch the DVD's sometimes I can never think of little Harry the same way again after seeing this. More than his "man wand" though his perky nips are freaking me out. He's actually quite cute but its just SO wrong, this is HARRY POTTER not a drug crazed rockstar or something. I need to lie down to get this vision from my head.
25. ashla - February 23, 2007 3:30 AM
not gonna lie, it's kinda hot, maybe cause I'm a little drunk..
26. WD-40 - February 23, 2007 3:46 AM
Now, I haven't the courage to look at the NSFW photo, but am I to assume something in that you chose a picture of Mr. T over another person, like, Gary Coleman or Emmanual Lewis?
27. Wow Just Wow - February 23, 2007 3:56 AM
That poor horse!
28. Ososita - February 23, 2007 4:07 AM
"Am I the only one who is a little freaked out when I look at an uncircumcised penis?" (n.12)
...ah.... yes ^^
29. oshkoshb-goshdammgosh - February 23, 2007 4:12 AM
That horse is, like, so laughing at him.
30. CakeGirl - February 23, 2007 4:35 AM
I love British men.
31. Stasmi - February 23, 2007 4:49 AM
He's bigger than Jude Law, so at least he has THAT going for him.
32. churva_ek_ek - February 23, 2007 4:50 AM
ok.. that was clearly photoshopped. I can't even see the horse's feet. and Dan's thigh down doesn't look like it's the same picture of the same quality as the rest of the photo. but anyways...
#23 you do have a point. i'll go look for other pages in the book and replace wand with wang. lol...
33. BlueAthena - February 23, 2007 4:50 AM
You know, that is not nearly as bad as I would have thought, considering that in previous pics his happy trail made it look like he had glued a wolverine to his crotch. I was betting that I would even get to see his Nimbus for all the pubes.
But not bad, not bad at all.
So, how long do you think it took before someone got a still/picture of Hermoine with her mouth open and just photoshoped it on there?
Oh, the masturbation that will occur then . . .
34. Spetsnaz - February 23, 2007 4:52 AM
#34, unfortunately the size of a flaccid penis gives no indication of it's size when erect.
No, I don't even have a penis.
35. horriblecherry - February 23, 2007 4:56 AM
'You people are losers' says the person who just copied and pasted that for the last half and hour. Got to love the irony. They didn't even explain who they thought was a loser so it won't even effect anyone. I bet it was some 14 year old who feels jilted by the fact Harry Potter has a small weird penis.
36. horriblecherry - February 23, 2007 5:00 AM
Yes, welldone.
37. grits2005 - February 23, 2007 5:03 AM
13 IT ONLY COSTS LIEK 50 BUCKS TO HAVE IT DONE LMAO, IM PRETTY SURE WITH WHERE HES FROM THEY DONT DO THAT VERY MUCH. ACTUALLY HERE LATELY IN THE USA MORE AND MORE ARE NOT BECAUSE ITS FOUND NOT TO BE NECESSARY ANYMORE AND A LOT OF INSURANCE COMPANIES WONT EVEN COVER IT NOW A DAYS. I HAVE TO AGREE THOUGH. MY BOYS ARE AND I PERSONALLY THINK IT LOOKS WIERD AND SCARY WHEN ITS NOT LMAO
38. stevob2006 - February 23, 2007 5:29 AM
Firstly, this is just a complete waste of server space and processing.
Secondly, the guy who sits there holding ctrl+v for 20 minutes, doesn't have the right to call other people losers.
Thirdly, who says loser? Where are you from, the 80's?
39. stevob2006 - February 23, 2007 5:30 AM
I would like to make it clear that I thought the 'YOU PEOPLE ARE LOSERS' comments are the things wasting server resources. Not this article.
40. wedge1 - February 23, 2007 5:34 AM
I like them better without the invisibility cloak.
41. MrSemprini - February 23, 2007 5:38 AM
Oh gee whiz thanks a lot. Now I'm having nightmares about Mr T riding a horse. And, Hoff in drag is singing to him. And, I'm standing next to a statue of Dumbledore that has the word "Pringles" etched at the bottom. What I want to know is who is going to help me pay for the extra bottles of Xanax I need now?
Whoops, gotta go, Sirens!
42. didey23 - February 23, 2007 5:40 AM
Yikes...thats not a sight I would ever look forward too!
43. honeydew - February 23, 2007 5:48 AM
We all prefer what we're used to, but I hear that uncircumsized wangs feel more pleasure.
44. churva_ek_ek - February 23, 2007 5:50 AM
omg can someone please ban the "you people are losers" guy???
45. hermione_q - February 23, 2007 5:58 AM
er, looks like you're the loser for wasting so much time with the copy and paste function, genius23.
As for the above picture: Daniel Radcliffe does look disturbingly hot, even with the horse backdrop. Though thanks to Harry Potter, the douches at my local coffeehouse whistle the theme tune to the film every time I order my latte. Some jokes really can wear too thin, especially at 9 every morning. Why couldn't J.K. Rowling have named her bookworm wizardess Sally?
46. honeydew - February 23, 2007 6:03 AM
I agree that British men are hot; men, not boys. I still looked, couldn't help it.
47. TheExpatriot - February 23, 2007 6:18 AM
He surely is in shape.
And, he is not circumcised because circumcision is unnatural.
48. em167 - February 23, 2007 6:22 AM
I think some twelve year old boy discovered copy and paste. What a retard.
49. sassi_chic - February 23, 2007 6:25 AM
#13 I was thinking the same thing
50. jhuck - February 23, 2007 6:30 AM
It's FAKE. Check the link:
http://community.livejournal.com/hp_manips/165524.html
51. bafongu - February 23, 2007 6:56 AM
I could tell there was something amiss with that photo. He has arms that look like they should have olives sticking on them in a martini glass and the legs of a Bavarian weight lifter.
52. woodhorse - February 23, 2007 6:57 AM
#5 You want Cisco's ball sack compared to the horse's? That's bound to make the horse a little aprehensive....
THE CREEP ABOVE is none other than WISEMAN/THELEGENDS#/GENIUS 23 who EVERYONE HATES
Please complain to Fish @ Feedback - he is the only one who can do anything about it. This guy has now been kicked off at least twice.
53. Naid - February 23, 2007 7:02 AM
In Europe men arent circumsized, its considered a form of mutilation, at leats to the people ive spoken with. Im American, but you all shouldnt be to surprised to see this, but then again, nudity in europe isnt a big deal.
54. cincy_josh - February 23, 2007 7:04 AM
All they have to do is limit the comment field so idiots like the guy above don't continue to post such long comments.
55. Naid - February 23, 2007 7:05 AM
Hm... I guess i should proofread my posts before i post them... I cant spell =S
56. JennSTX - February 23, 2007 7:10 AM
I think he looks great. I'm all about full frontal for the guys being as standard as for the ladies. Equal Opportunity and all that.
As for him being uncut - God knew what he was doing.
57. Madonna - February 23, 2007 7:11 AM
I like this phot it's so cool
I wanna see moore !!!!!!
58. tomdeleteseverypageimake - February 23, 2007 7:15 AM
#78--really????cause those long ass obnoxious comments u left didnt make u appear to be retarded scum? let's stick to the issue at hand hmm?
59. tx_angel - February 23, 2007 7:26 AM
Uh, "TheGenius"... so glad you figured out how to cut & paste.
You're an idiot.
60. didey23 - February 23, 2007 7:34 AM
will someone block this idiot please???????????
61. whitegold - February 23, 2007 7:39 AM
Normally I'm not the type to be in a bad mood, but stupid fucking people have really been annoying me today and I'm getting pissed off. So I come to The Superficial to read some humorous celebrity bashing to ease my annoyance, and what to I find but some stupid fag is spamming all the articles with his bullshit "You people are losers" and "You people are retarded scum" posts. What the fuck is your problem buddy? Seriously, get a fucking life and stop being such a loser. You want to post on here that we're losers and retarded scum? You might want to check yourself first. Whose the person wasting all there time spamming a fucking celebrity gossip website? Whose the person harassing complete strangers on an celebrity gossip website? That'd be you, and accordingly, that quilifies you as being the retarded loser and the complete scum. I dunno want your problem is or who took your meds away from you, but seriously, get a life. I'm pissed off enough already today, and a loser like you is really just adding to my frustration!
62. jebus - February 23, 2007 7:42 AM
Hey genius, sorry you clicked on the pretty picture and saw Harry's B.A. and Baracus. Let me guess, that made you feel happy in your pants and you freaked out and maturely started to post these "genius" comments. Bravo, now get to the bus stop cause the short bus is about there.
63. Bugman4045 - February 23, 2007 7:44 AM
The Superfish guy could have warned us that the dude is uncut! Damn, nobody want to look at that!
When do we get to see the full frontal on Hermione? rowrr!
64. tx_angel - February 23, 2007 7:50 AM
Wow, at least you've got an attention span. Too bad you're still a fucking moron.
65. p0nk - February 23, 2007 7:57 AM
houston, we have a problem...
66. RichPort - February 23, 2007 8:04 AM
Looks like a sausage is coming out of it's casing...
Somethings tells me this is someone who was banned recently...
In other news, we are apparently all retarded scum. Mom will be proud.
67. GooniesNeverSayDie - February 23, 2007 8:10 AM
A Harry Potter Haiku:
Uncircumscised wand
Hermione unimpressed
Time to date a horse
68. 86 - February 23, 2007 8:11 AM
Can we PLEASE do something about this cracker ass cracker???????????????????????????????
69. schack - February 23, 2007 8:14 AM
dude- did you just sit there and press ctrl+v that many times?
i don't know about scum, but it's pretty clear who's retarded. why don't you do yourself a favor and stab yourself in the eye that many times? hmmm?
70. schack - February 23, 2007 8:16 AM
p.s. circumscision is really stupid
71. Kyriakon - February 23, 2007 8:16 AM
Genitals aren't very pleasant to look at in general, and circumcision itself, as has been already pointed out, is a social norm that isn't present in all societies.
That said, I find him a handsome young man and eagerly await his impending self-destruction. Sure it's "serious drama," but the fact is his willy is the talk of the town, and he obviously thought such a drastic move was necessary to avoid Harry Potter typecasting. All this at the age of 17! I predict rehab for heroin by the he's 25.
72. schack - February 23, 2007 8:19 AM
FISH- your website, due to its sheer awesomeness, is starting to attract people whose own resentment is driving the so insane that they come here and try to ruin the interface for the rest of us. they dont really underestand the spirit of this website- and they're stuck in the early 19th century- can you PLEASE remove these stupid motherfuckers!?
73. Conky - February 23, 2007 8:20 AM
This is like being goatse'd... you simply cannot "unsee" certain things. :(
P.S. I bet there are hogwarts hidden under that foreskin.
74. schack - February 23, 2007 8:24 AM
i don't think you can really appeal to cultural relativism on this one. the reasons given for circumscision are either religious or medical. the medical reasons are no longer valid, and the religious reasons cannot overrule the agreements which hold our social fabric together. i think circumscision is a violation of basic human rights, and it's just fucking creepy that in the face of a complete lack of medical justification, doctors are still playing with babies' penises using scalpels. i know that tiny humans are fascinating, and if you want, take a look, but for god's sake, just don't cut anything off!
the world has been a madhouse for too long.
75. fluffbottom - February 23, 2007 8:25 AM
I know you are but what am I?
76. jrzmommy♠ - February 23, 2007 8:26 AM
Leog--#21--shut up...okay? yes, it's JUST the Americans that circumcise. the Jews don't. Absolutely not. NOPE! No such thing as a Bris! And the Arabs, no no no, they' don't do it. It's just the Americans. Here you stupid wangknocker....read a little....HIV is halved by male circumcision...Circumcision predates recorded human history...It is also practiced by the majority of South Koreans .and Filipinos...Several studies have shown that uncircumcised men are at greater risk of human papilloma virus (HPV) infection, putting their sexual partners at greater risk of infection...Studies have found that boys with foreskins tend to have higher rates of various infections and inflammations of the penis than those who are circumcised....with regard to penile cancer,the uncircumcised male is uniquely susceptible, virtually all of these cancers are preventable by neo-natal circumcision...uncircumcised males are at greater risk of Pathological phimosis, which is a condition when the foreskin remains so tight that retraction over the glans is painful or impossible...uncircumcised males are also at greater risk of Paraphimosis, which is an acute condition where a tight foreskin is stuck behind the glans and cannot be returned to its original position, curbing the blood flow to the glans.Twelve studies have indicated that neonatal circumcision reduces the occurrence rate of Urinary tract infections in male infants.
Gee, for something that's SUPPOSED to be there, it sure seems to cause an awful lot of problems....dickhead. (ha! that last one was self indulgent!)
77. schack - February 23, 2007 8:30 AM
where did you even get that informatin, dickweed?
maybe you should go back to medical school, instead of reading stuff off of websites written by stupid boys trying to cope with the trauma of having been sexually disfigured in their youth?
78. shoe_addict25 - February 23, 2007 8:33 AM
definitely bigger than Jude Law's.. but still, eew! one freaked out girl here over an uncircumcised penis.=p
is that wang supposed to do any magic? haha.
79. tits_on_snack - February 23, 2007 8:36 AM
I'm digging how they photoshopped the horse's halter off it's face, so now instead of Daniel holding onto the strap, it looks like he's giving the horse an uppercut to the jaw.
PS I am retarded scum, and a loser. o noes.
80. Kyriakon - February 23, 2007 8:39 AM
As she said in post 55:
"I like them better without the invisibility cloak."
Subjective taste, largely determined by familiarity, informs the arguments used. As I said, it is cultural; nations of Europe with higher overall standards of health and longer lifespans than their American counterparts don't perform the procedure, as no need is seen, so it doesn't come down to simple overwhelming health benefits.
Anyway, talk of circumcision is boring... Let's applaud the embarrassment David Radcliffe is becoming!
81. tits_on_snack - February 23, 2007 8:40 AM
Also: Keep uncircumsized penises away from me please thanks. I don't need cervical cancer, yeast infections, or UTI's.
82. p0nk - February 23, 2007 8:45 AM
i'm willing to bet that somebody has some real issues with Mavis Beacon.
83. honeydew - February 23, 2007 8:45 AM
Wiseman is being a dumbass again.
84. schack - February 23, 2007 8:46 AM
GODDAMNIT, fish.
i'm leaving, and i doubt i'm alone. obviously this website is going down the fucking tubes, and if you would actually do your job instead of jerking off all day, you might be able to save it. but clearly you have no problem just letting it all go down the shitter. you lazy fuck.
85. mia - February 23, 2007 8:50 AM
I'm a girl and i'm glad to see a penis, and a normal one. That boy is great and ansome. And 117, maybe those deseases are cause by a lack of hygiene. Don't be shy to pull that little skin and wash under...
And for the cultural thing, yes, many people are circumcised, but why should we do a beauty standard of it?
Circumcised penis become less sensitive. If this skin is there, it is for a reason. I love my man natural and uncircumcised. But I don't say that every circumcised men are ugly. Just that it is useless and cruel.
86. Spetsnaz - February 23, 2007 8:52 AM
Isn't this place supposed to be moderated? Mods, do yer job and delete this shit here!
87. p0nk - February 23, 2007 8:52 AM
either Britney Spears is really pissed at all of us or somebody's mom forgot to log off the computer this morning.
88. crap - February 23, 2007 8:53 AM
"I don't need cervical cancer, yeast infections, or UTI's."
I can't believe the incredibly amount of medical myths they have in the USA.
The genius23, you're one of the greatest thing in internet and I really mean it. Keep it coming boy.
89. Lowlands - February 23, 2007 8:56 AM
I hardly couldn't open the comment section.I guess it must be due the popularity of this site,too much traffic during a short time.What does this little prick want to prove with posing mother-naked?He isn't a kiddie anymore but a fully grown man?Ya right,he just another average teeny just like many other who think he knows all already.With pics like this he's supporting the pedo-gay mafia which are probably also the producers of the show.I don't know who posted this but you shouldn't post photos of naked kiddies in this way.
90. mia - February 23, 2007 8:59 AM
I'm a girl and i'm glad to see a penis, and a normal one. That boy is great and ansome. And 117, maybe those deseases are cause by a lack of hygiene. Don't be shy to pull that little skin and wash under...
And for the cultural thing, yes, many people are circumcised, but why should we do a beauty standard of it?
Circumcised penis become less sensitive. If this skin is there, it is for a reason. I love my man natural and uncircumcised. But I don't say that every circumcised men are ugly. Just that it is useless and cruel.
91. Devil Is Chrome - February 23, 2007 9:02 AM
Harry Potter is hot! Just ignore the uncircumcised member...
For all of you who say that it's "natural" - look, we're not living in the wilderness anymore, alright? It's cleaner and safer (sex-wise) to be circumcised.
And Lowlands...you have obviously never been in Theatre, otherwise you'd understand what Equus is all about. It has nothing to do with kiddie porn - sicko.
92. TJH - February 23, 2007 9:04 AM
Eeew! Does his girlfriend like the smell of smegma when she peels his foreskin back?? Don't girls know the hazards of hooking up with ant-eaters versus helmet-heads???
93. tits_on_snack - February 23, 2007 9:04 AM
88. Posted by crap on February 23, 2007 8:53 AM
"I can't believe the incredibly amount of medical myths they have in the USA."
LOL @ you.
First off, I don't live in the USA thanks.
Secondly, my mom's friend had cervical cancer as a direct result of her husband's uncircumsized dong and the bacteria that thrives in there.
Third, the only guy I ever dated with an uncircumsized wang led to multiple yeast infections.
Now you could go ahead and say "Well that's just a result of poor hygeine," which is true. It is more difficult to keep an uncircumsised penis clean. Which is why I say: keep them away from me.
94. mia - February 23, 2007 9:05 AM
89, i'm sure if this kiddie was a girl you wouldn't think it is pervert at all... I'm 25 years old, and I would be glad to experiment pedo-sex with this boy...
95. Lowlands - February 23, 2007 9:06 AM
#91)Theater or not i'm just not interested in naked kiddies en public,you're the sicko with your 'theater'.
96. sweetsassymoleassy - February 23, 2007 9:06 AM
WOW that was a serious dose of crazy...
How long has Wiseman been around? He only now thinks to use cut n' paste? "Genius" indeed
97. elf - February 23, 2007 9:07 AM
beautiful being:)
98. sweetsassymoleassy - February 23, 2007 9:08 AM
***sighs***
99. sweetsassymoleassy - February 23, 2007 9:10 AM
Aren't there services for the mentally ill across the pond??? Poor fella
100. mia - February 23, 2007 9:11 AM
93
Maybe stop dating dirty and stinky men.
101. mia - February 23, 2007 9:12 AM
93
It is more difficult to keep an uncircumsised penis clean??
Stop dating retarded men too...
102. the chicken - February 23, 2007 9:12 AM
Wiseman AKA whoever - now there's a real dickhead with a too-tight foreskin. No bloodflow to the brain at all.
103. sweetsassymoleassy - February 23, 2007 9:15 AM
#93 You get cervical cancer from a VIRUS (HPV), not bacteria
104. BlueAthena - February 23, 2007 9:17 AM
#93
"Secondly, my mom's friend had cervical cancer as a direct result of her husband's uncircumsized dong and the bacteria that thrives in there."
HPV -- Human papilloma *virus*
105. jrzmommy♠ - February 23, 2007 9:17 AM
77-schack--Trauma? Ask any grown man who was circumcised as an infant and ask them what they remember of it. They NUMB them and they do it surgically. I had my son circumcised as a newborn and I can tell you I'd rather have him have it done when he'll never remember it then have him get all the problems he could develop from not getting it and THEN having to get circumcised when he's older and DOES remember the pain. And I'm in healthcare, fuck job. I don't have to go BACK to school.
106. jrzmommy♠ - February 23, 2007 9:19 AM
Yeah! No trauma in getting penile cancer when your a young man!!!
107. sweetsassymoleassy - February 23, 2007 9:19 AM
#102 - Nice one :)
108. tits_on_snack - February 23, 2007 9:22 AM
LMAO @ 103. Google the words "cervical cancer uncircumcised" and see what you get:
- BBC News | HEALTH | Circumcision 'curbs cervical cancer risk'
- Male Circumcision May Reduce Penile HPV Infection and Cervical Cancer in Partners
- News - Uncircumcised Men Raise Partners' Cervical Cancer Risk
- USATODAY.com - Circumcision lowers risk of cervical cancer
Anyway I'm not fighting about uncut dicks anymore. Go find an uncircumsized man and fuck his cheese-factory silly for all I care :)
109. honeydew - February 23, 2007 9:24 AM
Wiseman got upset with all the penis talk. His was thankfully lost in a botched suicide bombing.
110. DrunkBlogger - February 23, 2007 9:24 AM
Man...what the fuck.
111. the chicken - February 23, 2007 9:26 AM
#109 These young kids, they blow up so soon.
112. jrzmommy♠ - February 23, 2007 9:26 AM
Tits--don't bother.....fanatics are fanatics whether it's religion or dicks.....
113. LinguisticAnthro - February 23, 2007 9:27 AM
#51, skinny arms with big thighs are definitely possible - I know a bunch of guys with them. They're marathoners who do a ton of hill training.
But that pic is definitely photoshopped, as anyone can tell just by looking at it.
114. sweetsassymoleassy - February 23, 2007 9:27 AM
Um REALLY LMAO...
See where it SAYS HPV in your own post?
I never said circumcision wouldn't reduce the risk, I said it wasn't caused by BACTERIA. The risk is reduced b/c there is less skin hence less potential to come into contact with infected tissue. HPV is contracted via skin-to-skin contact, so yes less skin will lower your risk
115. veggi - February 23, 2007 9:28 AM
wow. I shouldn't think this 13 year old is hot. Can't bring myself to click on Mr. T. NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO, don't do it, don't do it, don't do it....
I did it.
That's it. I'm a dirty slut. Great.
116. the chicken - February 23, 2007 9:30 AM
#115 Veggi is really Mary Kay LeTourneau, pass it on...
117. Stink - February 23, 2007 9:32 AM
In the name of everything that holy, please move this story to the second page. I dislocate my fingers scrolling past this nightmare.
118. anothershityear - February 23, 2007 9:32 AM
so a 17 year old boy takes turns being a top and bottom with a horse
wake me up when there's something on this site that DOESN'T happen every-other week in high schools all over the world
119. sweetsassymoleassy - February 23, 2007 9:34 AM
Why Mr. T, do you think? Any theories?
120. Carsten5577 - February 23, 2007 9:35 AM
"God, you'd think he'd be rich enough to get circumcised by now."
Why would he want to mutiliate his penis in a sick and barbarian Semitic ritual? The vast majority of Europeans aren't mutiliated in this horrible fashion. If you're against female circumsicion, as most sane people should be, there's no reason to tolerate the cutting off of a perfectly good body part on a little baby boy and without his consent.
121. veggi - February 23, 2007 9:35 AM
#116 ~ I'm so much hotter though. And I wait until they're 16 because that makes it alright.
122. WienerSchnitzle - February 23, 2007 9:35 AM
Seriously Harry, how do you expect to get laid with with that shy turtle penis?
123. the chicken - February 23, 2007 9:36 AM
#119 "I pity the fool that doesn't click on this!" :)
124. sk8trgurl69 - February 23, 2007 9:36 AM
wash your dingaling and it's all the same...
it's basically just a difference in aesthetic taste...circumcision that is.
I prefer being circumcised...and I am.
125. sk8trgurl69 - February 23, 2007 9:37 AM
no going back, hehe.
126. WienerSchnitzle - February 23, 2007 9:40 AM
Carsten5577 you've officially been granted a title of "Miss Dumb Twat". Congrats!
127. spaz - February 23, 2007 9:44 AM
Photoshop. Srsly. Guys. You seen GoF? You seen his CHICKEN LEGS? You see the thunder thighs on that photo? NO. FREAKING. WAY. That, is in NO WAY a real photo. AT ALL.
I am upset it is even on here. Some 45 year old man is cackling in his recliner right now, squeeing over the fact that this is being passed off as real. Srsly.
128. arden - February 23, 2007 9:44 AM
Wow . . . that's big. On the other hand, not circumsized, yuck.
129. Lowlands - February 23, 2007 9:48 AM
Religion is the number 1 'monster'in this world and a very good number 2 is 'sexuality'.Both 'monsters' are also human needs and many people don't know how to 'handle'these and many other 'monsters'.You've to draw a line otherwise it can go way wrong and for me according to 'sexuality' that's 18 years of age,boy or girl.
130. sweetsassymoleassy - February 23, 2007 9:51 AM
#123 LOL
I like how the people in that ad below the pic look like they've just seen some horrific natural disaster...appropriate, no?
131. honeydew - February 23, 2007 9:51 AM
Crikey, its a penis in its natural habitat, isn't it beyootiful.
132. sweetsassymoleassy - February 23, 2007 9:52 AM
oh nevermind, the ad switches around, but if you happen to see the career builder one you'll see what I mean
133. Erin - February 23, 2007 9:56 AM
Lol Daniel's wang... I never knew it was going to be uncut XD
134. the chicken - February 23, 2007 9:56 AM
#130 Looks like Harry relieved himself in the coffee cup! Excellent call!
#127 Hey spaz and other photoshop claimers, he's just 17 - he's not done...uh...growing, and adolescent bodies often develop at different rates, it's not an even allover progression. His legs are just more developed than his torso.
135. wtfpwned - February 23, 2007 9:57 AM
Ok everyone, lets be frank. Ladies, your vaginas are dirty, and so is your mouth. Shave, douche, then you can be scared about all the dirty penises that are trying to give you cancer.
136. lickmybutt - February 23, 2007 10:09 AM
lol #135.
i dunno about you dirty whores but i keep my vagina clean and i expect my boyfriend to keep his penis clean, whether its circumcised or not.
Lesson for the day:
Take a fukkin shower, use soap and water!
137. jrzmommy♠ - February 23, 2007 10:15 AM
YEP, don't know what skanks you run with, #135, but my cooch is clean and well groomed.
138. Jay from the Bay - February 23, 2007 10:16 AM
I hope that anteater of his is a grower and not a shower.
139. Defcon - February 23, 2007 10:25 AM
That seems a bit off.
140. Kait - February 23, 2007 10:28 AM
I don't care if it's more natural to have a foreskin, who says nature is always pretty >.< gugh
141. twism - February 23, 2007 10:28 AM
Just posted today...
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17297433/
142. Comment Police - February 23, 2007 10:30 AM
i think wiseman/legend/genius went so crazy cuz he has a very tiny cock and when he saw harry's big one he snapped, realizing that little harry potter already had a bigger dick than he ever would! but don't worry you crazy fool, the pic isn't actually real! so you don't have to feel so crazy.
as for the circumcised discussion, geez people, is it really that difficult just to wash under the foreskin. as an uncircumcised male, i can tell you that i haven't had any issues with it, but i also shower daily and clean it when i shower. maybe some people don't? and it has also been my experience that the ladies absolutely love the uncircumcised cock. it's so much nicer looking and they can jerk it and suck it much better. but that's just the feedback i've received.
and i read somebody also said that being uncircumcised can lead to inflammation, so maybe that explains why mine looks so damn enlarged. but the ladies don't complain.
143. UNWASHEDMASSES - February 23, 2007 10:36 AM
jrzmommy - you stole my thunder, good one. Increased HPV, infections, penile cancer aside, I'd just like to point out that uncirumscised penises are subject to a nasty condition whence we get the derogatory appelation "dickcheese". I went to high school with a guy who was uncut and he hated his parents for it. He told me he had to pull back the hood and clean his prick otherwise he would get a gross accumulation. This was later confirmed by an interview I saw with a pornstar who claimed the one thing she hated, more than even ass-to-mouth, was performing fellatio on an uncircumscized member. Seems those blokes leave a bad taste in one's mouth.
144. twism - February 23, 2007 10:38 AM
anyways.... just practice safe sex.
145. the chicken - February 23, 2007 10:39 AM
#141 The study was conducted in Africa, where HIV is runaway and sanitation, medical conditions, etc. are, unfortunately, much different from North America and in Europe - talk about skewed. I wonder if a similar study taken in NA and Europe would have the same results.
146. OfficeMonkey - February 23, 2007 10:39 AM
Um...dude? The play is called
"Equus". Not "Equis" (sic), the misspelled French word for "exquisite". Yes, Harry Potter's "hairy pee-pee" is pretty scary, but so is the fact that the play was published and performed decades ago...and you still managed to spell that five letter, one word wrong.
147. elizabeththewellread - February 23, 2007 10:45 AM
One girl's opinion:
I LOVE an uncut cock!!!!
Never do it to yourself or your sons--it cuts off 2000 nerve endings which all contribute to (male) sexual pleasure.
148. twism - February 23, 2007 10:48 AM
i actually lived in Africa until I was 16 and i'm now stateside (boston)... you'd be surprised how little the difference is when it comes to "sanitation, medical conditions". Dont believe everything u see in the media. Didnt brangelina choose to give birth there. Sure there are places where sanitation is poor, but i can show u those exact conditions here in the USofA.
149. Scoop - February 23, 2007 10:48 AM
The whole circumsized/uncircumsized debate is ignorance. It's common sense, which shouldn't be left to survey results...look at what they do with coffee, eggs and their "expert study results"...one week it's healthy, next it isn't. Listen to your brain...it's all personal preference and about hygiene. He either keeps it clean or doesn't, regardless if he's circumsized or not. Look at a woman, if she doesn't keep it clean, it starts to really stink. Sleeping with a stinky woman isn't sexy either and can lead to diseases. I've been with two uncircumsized males and from personal experience my opinion is it's all good. Call me freaky, but I think it kind of adds to the foreplay to make the little guy come out from hiding.
150. the chicken - February 23, 2007 10:51 AM
@143 That's so stupid! My husband has no trouble cleaning himself and I'm sure your pornstar source had other problems - to many women not used to uncut it looks wrong, they don't like the feel and are sure they won't like the taste. Your friend also might not have liked being different from the rest of the class.
151. Kate - February 23, 2007 10:53 AM
Just found it funny that as people here are debating circumcision,MSNBC just posted this story.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17297433/
Argue that.
152. the chicken - February 23, 2007 10:58 AM
#151 We already did, about 20 posts back.
153. PigsWalkUpright - February 23, 2007 11:02 AM
STOP THE MADNESS! Who cares about his penis what we should be caring about is the abuse of that poor horse! He's got to be thinking all the humans around him are a bunch of nutjobs.
154. sweetsassymoleassy - February 23, 2007 11:03 AM
#148 Let's face it, the US has, overall, better care/conditions because it has more money & education, whereas a large portion of Africa is in serious trouble with regard to health care. Of course the US has it's shitty areas but you can't say that it is at all equivalent to the conditions in Africa. Where were you, South Africa? Of course conditions are better where the white folk are, that's where the money is. I am sure you can find some decent health care in places in throughout Africa but you'd be a fool to compare it's overall condition to that of the US. And I "pity the fool!" (just to keep with the original post, credit to sexybitch)
155. the chicken - February 23, 2007 11:04 AM
#153 Only if they try to circumsize him.
156. lawboy - February 23, 2007 11:05 AM
Wonder how many times Miss Granger has played with little Harry's wand?
157. mia - February 23, 2007 11:05 AM
146
the french word for exquisite is exquis, not equis...
158. innit - February 23, 2007 11:05 AM
Well, I've been with four uncircumsized guys. The first one was repulsive... I mean seriously repulsive. I was traumatized. There must have been something seriously wrong with him though (and yes, he was a clean person) because the other three were perfectly fine. Maybe that is a condition that randomly strikes some uncut guys :S
159. mia - February 23, 2007 11:09 AM
158
I bet that some circumsized guys a very repulsive too.
160. spaz - February 23, 2007 11:12 AM
Look. Why would the production people even release a photo like this? It completely diminishes the impact of the play. And this is the ONLY one that is supposedly full body. Strange, no?
It's not that he's still growing (he's only 5'5" anyway), it's that it's just not him.
If you want to live under the delusion it's him, then fine. But it's not. This was posted over on LiveJournal at least a month ago. Show me a link to ANY official release from the producers of the show and I'll believe it. Until then, no way Jose.
161. PigsWalkUpright - February 23, 2007 11:13 AM
Agreed 160, Tren on PINKISTHENEWBLOG.COM has said for over a week this is fake.
162. twism - February 23, 2007 11:15 AM
#154... South Africa? Never been there..Lagos, Nigeria (West Africa). more money - yeah but the wealthy sets and government in Nigeria dont exactly declare their monies (we are the largest Oil producing country in Africa...Top 10 in the world). Education - No. Not even close...I started college here at Boston U. at 16 and thats the norm for high schools in nigeria some head off to college even younger.
163. mia - February 23, 2007 11:17 AM
154..
lots of countries in the world are poor because of the usa invasions. Usa puts lots of totalitarism in south america, in middle east, in africa just to control their natural ressources.
164. Hambriq - February 23, 2007 11:25 AM
Agreed with #160. I've been doing Photoshop image alterations for five years, and this bears all the signs of an obvious fake. The photo is black and white when the original is color. The picture is also more blurry than the originals. Also, the line where the original picture ended is has obvious blur lines. Faaaaake.
165. aurealis - February 23, 2007 11:26 AM
First off, I too am disturbed by the genitals of a 17 year old naked boy, who is draped over a horse. Meanwhile, has no one learned anything from Jessie Spano? Well, he might actually be able to act. And Burt Reynolds has nothing to do with this production... So maybe he'll be okay.
166. mika85 - February 23, 2007 11:30 AM
the US has the highest circumcision rate AND one of the highest rates of HIV infection.
over 80% of the world is intact (meaning: "uncircumcised").
there is no medical organization on earth that advocates circumcision.
by the way, the the circ rate in the US is dropping, more and more people are realizing the pain and damage it causes. now more than half of baby boys born now are left intact.
here's where i got all my facts:
http://www.noharmm.org/
there are plenty of good sources of info out there, and i suggest you all get educated. all of the ignorance i've seen in the comments section is really very sad.
167. DannyJames - February 23, 2007 11:32 AM
circumsized penises are cleaner than uncircumsized ones. and some statistics indicated uncircumsized dicks put you at a greater risk for cathcing HIV, because the virus stays in the weird hood area. also, no smegma!
168. beautiful-x-crash - February 23, 2007 11:41 AM
I wish my genitals looked like Mr. T.
=o(
169. mika85 - February 23, 2007 11:42 AM
167:
all you do is pull back the foreskin and wash it. if you're too lazy to clean yourself properly, then that is unfortunate.
170. mika85 - February 23, 2007 11:45 AM
167 and anyone else who thinks circing reduces the risk of catching HIV: if you practice safe sex and wear a CONDOM like a responsible adult, you won't catch HIV. common sense.
171. jrzmommy♠ - February 23, 2007 11:45 AM
http://www.thestar.com/News/article/185009
And aside from a dude named Kevin de Cock being quoted in this article--which is fucking mindblowing and I sware to God I'm not making that up--it's very current (2/22/07).
172. the chicken - February 23, 2007 11:52 AM
#163 Stick to dicks, you know shit about American history or politics.
173. jrzmommy♠ - February 23, 2007 11:54 AM
yeah, mika85--because you know so much about cultural customs and practices in Africa. God, shut the fuck up you. And globally, there are shitloads of other countries ahead of the US in HIV infection--put ALL of Sub-Sahara Africa--every nation--and then a lot of Asian nations, and then maybe the US is after them. And Eastern Europe/former Soviet block nations have one of the fastest growing HIV infection rates.
174. mika85 - February 23, 2007 11:54 AM
http://www.cirp.org/library/disease/HIV/dezzutti/
175. CherryBomb - February 23, 2007 11:58 AM
some studies do show that circumcising men decreases their risk of contracting HIV. BUT...circumcising women will also decrease their risk of infection. but that is considered MUTILATION and BARBARIC. why do we have different standards?
if i were a guy, i'd prefer to keep my foreskin.
176. misanthrope - February 23, 2007 11:59 AM
Ok, so circumcision... It's not only unnecessary, but it is extremely cruel. By extremely, I mean extremely. Any problems that may arise from not being circumsized is rare. Condoms will help a man who is or is not circumsized reduce sexually transmitted diseases. The foreskin was included on the penis for a reason. Men who aren't circumsized have less stimulation, for one.
166 is absolutely correct about circumcision.
177. mika85 - February 23, 2007 11:59 AM
173: lol!!
do you have any sources? i want to know where you get your info.
178. beifiori - February 23, 2007 12:00 PM
CRACK THAT WHIP!
Give the past the slip.
Step on a crack.
Break your momma's back.
When a problem comes along.
You must snip it!
Before the cream sits out too long.
You must snip it!
When something's going wrong.
You must snip it!
now snip it.
into shape.
shape it up.
get straight.
go forward.
move ahead.
try to detect it.
it's not too late.
to snip it.
snip it good.
When a good time turns around.
You must snip it.
You will never live it down.
Unless you snip it.
No one gets their way.
Until they snip it.
I say snip it.
snip it good.
snip it gooooooood.
179. jrzmommy♠ - February 23, 2007 12:00 PM
And Mia, you ignorant fuck, the US is NOT responsible for any of the shit in Africa...except the good stuff. Do you know how many billions of dollars in aid we give to Africa alone each year? When Africa decolonized--and they were EUROPEAN colonies, not Amercian, dipshit--Africa went to hell. Don't believe me, then read it for yourself.
South America? You mean the countries that have their constitutions written in pencil and where socialism from the great Che turned out to be not such a good idea? Where drug cartels rule? Um, yup, the US gives shitloads of aid there, too.
You're obviously just a completely unsavvy person who likes to just make dumb statements about the US. I"m wasting my time...
180. misanthrope - February 23, 2007 12:01 PM
er, men who aren't circumsized have *more* stimulation.
181. beifiori - February 23, 2007 12:01 PM
Daniel must be channelling Caligula's spirit
182. mika85 - February 23, 2007 12:04 PM
175: yes somehow female circumcision is considered a barbaric practice that has been outlawed in the US, yet we still continue to cut our boys?? makes no sense to me.
183. CarnieWilson - February 23, 2007 12:05 PM
Ew it looks like a little smokie wearing turtle neck. What is the signifigance of him being naked in the play again?
184. jrzmommy♠ - February 23, 2007 12:06 PM
And cherrybomb....you're just plain old fucking stupid. Female circumcision is practiced ONLY to make sex less pleasurable for women and in fact female circumcision is downright LETHAL when it comes to infection and complication that lead to astronomical mortality rates. Female circumcision is NOT practiced MEDICALLY ANYWHERE and therfore is preformed ONLY in severly unsterile environments by non-medically trained individuals WITHOUT the benefits of anesthesia, pain management and post-operative infection control.
Personal choice or not, there are undisputable proven health benefits to male circumcision however with women there are absolutely NO benefits and only serious dangers. You are an utter fucking moron.
185. Comment Police - February 23, 2007 12:06 PM
Jrzmommy, i gotta admit, for someone trying to call other people ignorant, you're the one sounding ignorant in the arguments you're making.
186. The Mortician - February 23, 2007 12:06 PM
What does him being naked and with a horse have to do with a movie that isn't porn? I mean honestly, if this wasn't a porn movie, him being naked with a horse wouldn't make any sense. If anything this was either his request or the photographer just has an undercover child pornography with [insert animal here] fetish.
187. mika85 - February 23, 2007 12:06 PM
all the circumfetishists are coming out of the woodwork. *barf*
188. misanthrope - February 23, 2007 12:10 PM
Circumcision is not medically necessary. It's based in religion and was started to keep boys from masterbating. Please watch Penn & Teller's show Bullshit. They do an episode on circumcision and I highly recommend it.
189. jrzmommy♠ - February 23, 2007 12:11 PM
And why's that oh enlightened one (185)? Please, tell me how supporting your argument with FACT is ignorant.
190. twism - February 23, 2007 12:12 PM
#185... Jrzmommy is stating just the facts. U are the ignorant one.
191. CherryBomb - February 23, 2007 12:13 PM
jrzmommy...you're proving my point. it's not practiced in sterile environments or medical environments. why? because it is unnecessary. it is barbaric. so is male cirumcision. but for some reason, we have decided that it is ok, and created possible benefits for it. it's a damn shame.
do some fucking research. there are plenty of risks associated with male circumcision. and it DOES make sex less pleasurable for men. There is a reason that the American Academy of Pediatrics does NOT recommend routine infant circumcision.
192. jrzmommy♠ - February 23, 2007 12:14 PM
I'm not saying male circumcision IS medically necessary, nitwits, I'm saying it's a very very good idea considering the health benefits and the reduction in serious health problems, especially in populations that are already high-risks for certain problems. Know how you're adamant about your beliefs, I"m adamant about mine. But I at least support my position on medical fact and not emotion.
193. jrzmommy♠ - February 23, 2007 12:17 PM
Cherry, but male circumcision in societies where it IS optional and a CHOICE (outside of religious societies) like in the US, the decision to circumcise is based on informed consent of risks for and against and is done surgically. There is no point in comparing male and female circumcision in the way you're trying to because one has proven medical benefits and one is just a vehicle to harm women.
194. twism - February 23, 2007 12:17 PM
#191 ...what does the World Health Organization know? pffft!
195. CherryBomb - February 23, 2007 12:22 PM
my point, jrzmommy, was that people did have a "medical reason" for doing female circ: the prevention of disease (yes, because sex was painful for them, etc).
and, like i said, there is plenty of research that says the risks of circumcision are not worth the possible benefits. my belief is based on research. and, yes, emotion. because it makes me sad and angry to think that we are routinely mutilating little boys for no real good reason!
what about leaving it up to each individual? when the boy can make the decision for himself, he can decide whether or not he wants to get circumcised. he decides whether the risks are worth it to him. i see no problem with that, or with boys deciding to get circumcised. i have a problem with other people making the decision for him as an infant.
196. InstantAsshat-AddFame - February 23, 2007 12:23 PM
An uncircumcized penis gives more pleasure, period. Both to the man and to the woman.
And why did I just know that's what would be the argument?
If this isn't photoshopped, then Mr. Radcliffe has a delicious, natural, fit male body, with all his proper parts in their proper places. I'd hit it in a NY minute.
197. misanthrope - February 23, 2007 12:25 PM
ok...'Saddam Hussein'.. clearly you are insane.
198. twism - February 23, 2007 12:25 PM
"a medical reason for doing female circ: the prevention of disease (yes, because sex was painful for them, etc)."
give me one link on the web that proves this statement.
199. mika85 - February 23, 2007 12:26 PM
184: you are truly an idiot, and are talking out of your ass.
http://www.fgmnetwork.org/intro/mgmfgm.php
learn something.
200. beifiori - February 23, 2007 12:28 PM
I don't think men have any problem with achieving pleasure if they've been snipped...and how do they know if sex is better with the foreskin if they've never experienced sex with it? there will always be proponents for it and against it, but in the end it comes down to the parents personal choice when the child is a newborn. I personally know of a man who had kidney disease, and before he was allowed to have a transplant, he had to be circumcised, so obviously there is some medical necessity for being circumsized. for all of you moaning about it's not right being circumsized, you just need to get over the fact that you aren't right. the most indignant people are the ones who usually are wrong.
201. jrzmommy♠ - February 23, 2007 12:28 PM
That is not WHY girls are mutilated in Africa is because sex is painful for them. Girls are circumcised in Africa BEFORE THEY ARE SEXUALLY ACTIVE! God, take off the fucking dunce cap!
Do you have children? Because I do. I have a son. And when you become a parent your job is to make decisions in the best interest of your child. And being good parents, my husband and I talked about it and decided to circumcise our son based on informed decision making. Believe me, I have never heard a man, boy, dude, whatever wander around crying about not having his fucking foreskin. NEVER. NOT ONCE in 40 years.
202. misanthrope - February 23, 2007 12:29 PM
It is based on medical fact that circumcision is not necessary. It was introduced as a religious practice and continues for social reasons. Those are emotional reasons.
203. CherryBomb - February 23, 2007 12:32 PM
you just haven't been talking to the right men. because there ARE men who are very unhappy about not having their foreskin. that's why there is such a thing as "foreskin reconstruction."
so...if it's so good for infants to be circumcised, why has the american academy of pediatrics come out against routine circumcision? are you saying that they are not making an informed decision?
204. misanthrope - February 23, 2007 12:33 PM
I have a three year old son. If men aren't upset over not having a foreskin it's because they don't know the benefits of having one. They don't know that it is a cruel and unnecessary. They don't know that they are missing a part of them for religious and social reasons.
205. danielle - February 23, 2007 12:34 PM
Really Old.
206. wedge1 - February 23, 2007 12:37 PM
The first touch was Danielle'ss tongue tip just below my clit.
I reached down and pulled my lips open for Danielle, anxious
to feel her mouth. Gentle and teasing, Danielle licked and
sucked here and there, never staying in one spot too
long. I lay back and enjoyed it, feeling it build
slowly, one of the kind that lasted a long time. Danielle
reached for my breasts and started rolling the nipples
between her thumb and finger, sucking hard on the upper
half of my puss. As Danielle flicked the underside of my
clit with her tongue it began growing urgently, the
pressure starting outward. I held her head with my
fingers and crossed my ankles behind her back, pulling
her closer.
207. babyforrest - February 23, 2007 12:39 PM
jrzmommy has finally gone insane. Seriously, wtf did that come from?
208. blondewithnobrain - February 23, 2007 12:41 PM
ummmmm, i'm a chick, and there is NOTHING i like more than a good stiff one in me every now and then...but i just CAN'T get into the uncircumcised look. i think people just have there preference...there's no right or wrong for the man OR the woman...i prefer helmets over turtleheads thankyouverymuch.
209. jrzmommy♠ - February 23, 2007 12:41 PM
Mika--ASSHOLE--There is no medically necessary reason to support female circumcision. There IS, however, LOTS of medical evidence to support male circumcision. I'm not talking out of my ass, BITCH!
210. velveethra - February 23, 2007 12:43 PM
LOL at the old snipping controversy. My son was born perfect and beautiful and so he shall remain. My boyfriend's parents were not of the same mind, and I think he is also perfect and amazing.
And technically, I believe Mr. Radcliffe's willy constitutes kiddie porn. Photographic depiction of the anal or genital region of someone under the age of 18. Don't ask how I know this. Just don't.
211. jrzmommy♠ - February 23, 2007 12:44 PM
207--it's called TypeKey trolls. Anyone can sign in and use another name to post whatever they want under any name they want. you must not be familiar with it.
212. babyforrest - February 23, 2007 12:46 PM
Nope I guess I'm not. The trolls have outsmarted us. Damn.
213. jrzmommy♠ - February 23, 2007 12:47 PM
The "right" men? I can guarantee if, first, if I brought it up they would look at me like I was insane. Normal men, normal people, don't walk around obsessed with foreskins. Second, I doubt they fucking care. Seriously, what head cases have YOU been talking to that wander around, OH, boo hooo, my foreskin is gone.....I feel incomplete, wah wah wah.
214. twism - February 23, 2007 12:47 PM
i swear... i think some people just started using the internet yesterday.
215. wedge1 - February 23, 2007 12:49 PM
Ok the truth - by the time women have some experience, say about mid-20s, it's not a big deal one way or the other for many of them (a majority? don't think so; but definitely not the case that lots of women prefer uncut over cut [gays do]). But from high school through college years (first experiences), in the U.S., a clear majority of girls prefer not to deal with the anteater. That's the reality, and no amount of parental "my boy was born perfect" fuzziness can change it.
216. Spindoc - February 23, 2007 12:50 PM
#163 mia....
You are an idiot. Yeah, thats right, the U.S. is completely responsible for all that poverty. What a nice way to excuse the complete stupidity of the govts. in those countries. The national boundries in the Middle-East were cut by Britain mostly, Latin America has done a fine job of messing itself up. America had no colonies in Africa, but Europe divided the continent up at it's whim and the place has been a mess ever since.
However guess what. nobody should blame Britain for the Middle East, or Europe for Africa's problems, because frankly after decades, it isn't anybody elses fault anymore. Just like a 45 year old can still blame his parents because they are an unemployed asshole, but nobody cares and it's their job to take care of themselves.
So Mia, is it America's fault that you are stupid? No, I think that is your fault.
217. misanthrope - February 23, 2007 12:52 PM
I don't know any men doing that either.
I'm just saying the risks for non-circumcision are rare and the same goes for any other part of your body.
If it were common practice to remove your eyelids for religious and social reasons.. not medical.. isn't that the same thing? You'd be missing a vital part of your body. True, you *could* get something caught under your eyelid and get an infection, because you didn't clean it or seek medical attention.
218. jrzmommy♠ - February 23, 2007 12:53 PM
If the American Academy of Pediatrics felt that strongly about it they would have banned it altogether and wouldn't have left it up to informed parental consent.
219. Carsten5577 - February 23, 2007 12:55 PM
If you ever had doubts that jews are sick fucks, read this little story:
Fear rabbi gave tots herpes
Probe death of baby after circumcision
City health officials are investigating whether a baby boy died after contracting herpes from the rabbi who circumcised him, the Daily News has learned.
The probe was launched after city officials realized that three infants in the city who tested positive for herpes last year all were circumcised by Rabbi Yitzchok Fischer. The Rockland County-based Fischer is a prominent mohel - someone who performs religious circumcisions.
Under Jewish law, a mohel is supposed to draw blood from the circumcision wound to remove impurities. While many mohels do it by hand, Fischer uses a practice little known outside ultra-Orthodox communities called metzizah bi peh, in which the mohel uses his mouth.
http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/277069p-237314c.html
220. jrzmommy♠ - February 23, 2007 12:55 PM
Removing your eyelids does not offer any medical benefits; MALE circumcision offers medical benefits. don't be stupid.
221. dk - February 23, 2007 12:56 PM
uh, how old is he? is he even allowed to do this by law?
222. jrzmommy♠ - February 23, 2007 12:58 PM
220--that's not relevant to the surgical male circumcison debate.
223. misanthrope - February 23, 2007 12:58 PM
Ok jrzmommy... I don't know you, but I like your humor and such. We'll have to just agree to disagree. I'm not trying to start any crap, I'm just giving my two cents.
224. carpemundus - February 23, 2007 12:59 PM
i have NO interest in seeing that shit
www.carpemundus.com - harry potter and horse por free since 2006
225. Comment Police - February 23, 2007 1:01 PM
@190, where did that come from? what's with the random ass kissing, and what about my comment makes me idiot? you're foolish.
@189, gladly. know, first, you made an ignorant assumption in assuming that i called you ignorant based on your "supporting an argument with fact". did i ever say that was the reason for your ignorance? or was that perhaps an ignorant assumption on your part? but that's beside the point. i said you were sounding ignorant on several fronts. first, you try to make your point by saying that anyone that disagrees with you is a fucking moron or other pathetic uses of profanity in an attempt to adding a bullying emphasis to your point. needing to argue your point in such a manner does in fact make you more ignorant. second, your statistics are slightly questionable. we can agree that sub-saharan africa is by far the worst in terms of aids/hiv infection, but to try and compare the state of affairs in an area like sub-saharan africa to the US, or any other nation for that matter, is not a fair comparison. now as for the many many other nations across this world, the US can arguably be shown to be the "leader" in aids/hiv infection. in terms of the proportion of adults living with aids, the US is arguably the worst in the world other than sub-saharan africa (well, okay, technically the caribbean may have a higher %, but then, they also have a much much smaller population that this % is being drawn from). so while your statistics aren't necessarily entirely off base, for you to spout them out with such authority and venom further makes you sound ignorant.
Did i make that clear for you?
226. twism - February 23, 2007 1:03 PM
#217... Nobody is saying if u are not cut ur dick is going to fall off... there are proven medical benefits to being cut (but what do the Doctors/MDs who have reached the holy grail of their profession @ the World Health Organization know?)... and its not a matter of something getting stuck under the afformention ed body part its because the cells in the foreskin of the penis are especially vulnerable to viruses.
227. jrzmommy♠ - February 23, 2007 1:03 PM
Hey, I'm cool with that 223--it's all about personal choices and doing what you belive is in the best interest of your child.
228. misanthrope - February 23, 2007 1:03 PM
The medical industry won't ban the procedure because it's considered a choice at this point. It became a social norm, is part of religious practices and if the procedure were to be done, it should be done by a doctor. Same could be said about abortion... and no I'm not comparing the two... I'm saying they are both based on choice.
229. Carsten5577 - February 23, 2007 1:04 PM
jrzmommy bitch, if female circumcision offered so-called medical benefits, would you be for it? By the way, it's total bullshit that the medical benefits of circumcision outweigh harmful effects: http://www.cirp.org/pages/general/hammond1/
Bottom line is this: you don't amputate somebody's perfectly healthy body part without that somebody's consent, cunt. Are you too godamned thick to understand that?
230. jrzmommy♠ - February 23, 2007 1:05 PM
225--Pathetic use of profanity, like, fuck you you fucking asswipe fuckup? This all started by some jackoff saying that JUST the US routinely circumcises. READ a little, fucknut.
Gratuitious profanity count--6
Telling an asshole to fuck himself..priceless.
231. twism - February 23, 2007 1:07 PM
#225... No ass kissing here.. ur statments are misleading at best
232. BobMarleysDead - February 23, 2007 1:08 PM
I think his body looks pretty decent and his penis is a nice size. It probably gets quite thick when he's erect. Not bad at all.
233. misanthrope - February 23, 2007 1:10 PM
Thanks jrz.
twism... It was meant as a comparison, not as fact. The vagina is also especially vulnerable to viruses. The risks to an uncircumsized penis is the same as any other human body part. The chance of being seriously ill from any of those 'risks' are rare.
234. jrzmommy♠ - February 23, 2007 1:14 PM
229--That's a moot point, Carsten. And I'd watch who you're calling cunt....that's QUEEN Cunt to you and don't you ever fucking forget it my big-gummed, slack-jawed five-toed cousin fucker!
235. twism - February 23, 2007 1:17 PM
misanthrope...
If "The risks to an uncircumsized penis is the same as any other human body part", why the reduction (by up to 60%) the infection rate of circumcisefd individuals? A foreskinless penis is still considered a human body part.
236. beifiori - February 23, 2007 1:23 PM
for the dimwit who said we should slice of our earlobes because they don't serve any purpose, they help in capturing sound.
for those who say that the glans is more sensitive with the foreskin intact, how do you know? that's not really something someone can measure. how does one intact say 'oh my penis is more sensitive because I have my foreskin'? they don't have any thing to measure it by, and on the same token, how does a circumsized man say his is less sensitive because he's not intact? he has nothing to compare it to. the fact is, if God really thought the foreskin were all that important, he wouldn't have ordered abraham to start circumsizing the males. yes it was a show of faith, but you have to consider too the benefits of doing so given the environment in which they lived. it just plain ol' kept em cleaner, and that fact still stands today no matter where someone lives. for all you haughty people saying the europeans don't tend to practice that today and the americans have odd medical advice, europeans aren't exactly known for taking baths everyday, nor are they known for cleaning clothing before wearing it 3 or 4 times a week, they are known for smelling pretty rank though. so, when you are practicing better hygiene, please come back with your argument.
237. Comment Police - February 23, 2007 1:23 PM
@230, i hope that was a troll, cuz that comment was really sad. anyways, just further supports the ignorance, i mean, that's really the best you could come up with, real brilliant haha. look, everyone is entitled to there own opinion and i don't so much take opposition to your opinion, but rather your pompous and self righteous attitude in delivering your opinion, like you think your so great and smart and stuff. stop being such a pretentious jerk in the way you talk to people and maybe you won't get picked on so much in the real world?
@231, your comments are random at best. i merely said that someone was sounding ignorant, and you made the random comment that i was ignorant? that was a baseless comment. but whatever, no big deal.
238. the chicken - February 23, 2007 1:25 PM
It enrages me that people refer to FGM as "female circumcision". When male circumcision comes to mean lopping off the head of the penis and half the shaft, and sewing it shut so urination is almost impossible, THEN the term can be used.
Not until then. In no way does it convey the horrific mutilation that is this practice.
239. Tiffin - February 23, 2007 1:26 PM
If you circumcision zealots take a minute to look into it, most of the medical "benefits" of circumcision are negligible. It became widely popular in the United States because of a puritan fear of masturbation, and social conditioning perpetuates it.
Wikipedia's got a good page on this. See in particular the current opinions of the American Academy of Family Physicians and the American Academy of Pediatrics.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision#United_States
240. jrzmommy♠ - February 23, 2007 1:31 PM
NO fuck wit, it was me....just to show you how much I truly care that you think I have a potty mouth.
241. jrzmommy♠ - February 23, 2007 1:32 PM
And I am great and smart..."and stuff."
242. jrzmommy♠ - February 23, 2007 1:33 PM
239-yeah, thanks for the update...the AAP stuff has been addressed. Anything else you have to add?
243. misanthrope - February 23, 2007 1:34 PM
@235... I'm not going to argue with you. Show me your source of information. I can throw out numbers and expect you to take that as fact too. I'm not questioning your intelligence, don't try to question mine. What I know to be true is different than what you know to be true. I never said a circumsized penis isn't a human body part.
The facts are, in countries where there is little if any education about sexually transmitted diseases, much less sanitary conditions... circ should be used until they learn about condoms. I acknowledge that there is some benefit for cutting sexually transmitted diseases, but no more than using a condom. That is a fact. Why put your baby through the pain and shock of a procedure that will give him no more benefit than a condom? Leave your boy natural, teach him how to take care of himself.
@236... You are basing your opinion on circumsision using your religious beliefs.
244. Truthseeker013 - February 23, 2007 1:37 PM
After applying fifteen straight flash-bulbs to my eyes, I still have that image ingrained on my optic nerves forever. Damn you, sir.
245. beifiori - February 23, 2007 1:38 PM
243, no i am not, just because I pointed it out doesn't mean I am basing it on religious belief. personally I think it should be done for cleanliness, and yes, it does look better. I just don't buy into the 'it's more sensitive if not cut' argument. you can't compare it, either a man is cut or he's not, and there is no way for one to say they are more sensitive either way.
246. Comment Police - February 23, 2007 1:41 PM
@240 aww, that's kind of sad, especially since you can't seem to come up with anything better and in the first place could only offer a rebuttal for a small portion of my original comments, the rest of it you could come up with absolutely no response for.
thank god it's friday. enjoy the weekend everyone.
247. Tiffin - February 23, 2007 1:41 PM
#242 Jrzymommy! You're talking to me again.
If it's been addressed, why are you still perpetuating the myths?
248. twism - February 23, 2007 1:42 PM
misanthrope
its always been a known fact... and just today a study was posted about how it reduces the risk more than previously thought...
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17297433/
just stating the facts.
249. mia - February 23, 2007 1:43 PM
216
No, i'm not an idiot. You're country is the cause of MANY problems, not EVERY problems, that is what I said. And I know that african country were not colonies of the US. I said that USA put a lot of totalitarism in many poor countries just to take their natural ressources. But you seem to patriotic to understand.
And Jrzmommy
You seem to be a very insecure personne. You are always making super long comments with lots of insults. In fact, you seem unable to talk to somebody without insulting him. And what is that shit about you having a son? Are we suppose to care about it? You think that makes you less than an idiot? You think you are better and you know better than me because you have a son? (obvisously, you will say that you khow better than me because i'm an idiot, or a bitch or every great ideas that comme from that thing up your ass) I bet that you are just a slacker who stays home and eat cheetos while her kid lies in is own shit (yes, even if he is 3 years old, he must be a retarded)But like you said, i'm wasting my time.
250. misanthrope - February 23, 2007 1:44 PM
@245... This 'cleanliness' bullshit is retarded. As far as the comparison between the sensitivity... there's this thing called 'science'.
251. wedge1 - February 23, 2007 1:46 PM
The U.S. medical community has discouraged circumcision for a long time now, but the rates really haven't dropped that much. It's still the case that a majority of newborn boys get circumsized. All the debate about health and illness and pleasure and whatnot has had very little impact. American women prefer circumsized penises, and as moms they usually have at least 51% of the decision power, so their boys get snipped. Now stop your silly arguing, and ask yourselves this: if that horse goes "Zoo" on poor little bareassed Daniel Radcliffe, who will play Harry Potter in the next movie? (I think Rachel Dratch should)
252. twism - February 23, 2007 1:49 PM
#237 "Wheres Wlado?"...
Read your post #142
253. noac - February 23, 2007 1:49 PM
..236.. you bellend.
Adults get circumsized too.
It's funny cause I hear alot of prejudice people over here in europe saying people from the USA are idiots who cant tell tazmania from tanzania..
[/Sarcasm Example] Now you go and learn to read and write, come back with an argument afterwards. [\Sarcasm]
254. wedge1 - February 23, 2007 1:50 PM
#249 - mia:
My hands move over your pubic hairs now glistering with
the oil, as I lean lower my ass rises and you get a
good view of my pussy, you start to kiss and lick at
it, and I think it is about time that in did the same,
I lower my head towards your pussy and proceed to play
with your clit with my tongue, my fingers slowly
playing with your pussy and entering you two at a time,
I start to taste your juices as you get wet, they taste
so nice and sweet.
255. commissioner - February 23, 2007 1:50 PM
Malpractice insurance companies in many states prohibit most doctors from performing circumcisions, unless they are board certified urologists. There is a steep premium increase for adding "circumcisions" to your policy. It is considered an "elective procedure". In fact, Medicaid plans stopped covering the procedure years ago in many states, because it was not considered "medically necessary".
Many parents prefer circumcision because it is nearly impossible to teach a young boy to properly clean the foreskin, given the fact young boys seem to have an aversion to soap and water.
256. twism - February 23, 2007 1:53 PM
“Circumcision is the most potent intervention in HIV prevention that has been described.”
257. jrzmommy♠ - February 23, 2007 1:54 PM
Waldo--When someone begins to use my use of profanity in the middle of their debate, I sense that they're running out of intellectual steam and they then become like a cat toy to me.
Mia--You, my dear, just aren't worth a response. but I will make fun of you just for kicks.
258. twism - February 23, 2007 1:57 PM
not saying if u are cut ..its ur license to fuck raw..but there are medical benefits according to the Director of the World Health Organization’s AIDS department.
259. mia - February 23, 2007 1:57 PM
254
I hope you're retarded kid will be able to read in 20 years and will look at your prose. That prove my other hypothesis that you are not a mom at all, you are a teenage pervert. But, that sound like my last fuck (without that lesbian shit)
260. mia - February 23, 2007 1:58 PM
''your''
261. jrzmommy♠ - February 23, 2007 1:59 PM
once again Mia the Brainiac--Trolls. And trust me, sunshine...your kid will be pumping MY kid's gas one day.
262. misanthrope - February 23, 2007 1:59 PM
@248... Known fact by whom? The same people that endorse it for social and religious reasons?
"Friday says that conclusive data shows there is no question circumcision reduces men’s chances of catching HIV by up to 60 percent.
The question now is how to put that fact to work to combat AIDS across Africa."
To combat AIDS!!!!! Just like a condom!!! This is a study about the men in Africa! It is an entirely different story. An entirely different mindset and an entirely different situation. They are trying to rid the continent of an epidemic! Circ has the same reduction of HIV as a condom. Africans are not privy to the education nor the piles of condoms that we have. They are also uneducated about the 'stigma' of AIDS. They are talking about a epidemic of HIV-AIDS on a continent with little or no sanitation; protection from many diseases. They are not talking about the US!
263. the chicken - February 23, 2007 2:00 PM
#249 Yeah, you are, and yeah, you did say the US put totalitarianism in Africa to take it's resources. You come up with these lameass statements that you can't back up and then you try to justify that you didn't say them. Read a book and quit trying to drag politics that you know nothing about into a discussion just because you got a hard-on for the US.
264. misanthrope - February 23, 2007 2:02 PM
@256... It was a study for the epidemic of AIDS in Africa. You know, where getting a condom is nearly unheard of?
265. wedge1 - February 23, 2007 2:06 PM
I was naked, my skin shimmering like quicksilver. I felt
arms wrap around me from behind. Commish giggled sweetly as
her small bare breasts pressed into my back. Her hand
went to my nipple while her other slipping down my
belly, her fingers playing with my short curls before
pressing between my legs. I yelped with joy knowing it
was she.
Commish kissed my neck while she rubbed my pussy, working
her fingers to open my lips before sliding inside me.
Commish moaned in my ear when she discovered the creamy
wetness engulfing her finger. I pushed my bottom back
into her feeling her curly bush on my ass. She was so
wet.
I reached back and pulled her ass cheeks apart, working
my fingers between them, exploring the moist valley in
search of her tender rosebud. Then I realized lips were
kissing my fingers; Mia was kneeling behind Commish,
licking her ass.
266. the chicken - February 23, 2007 2:08 PM
259
jrzmommy, my hands move over your shaved pussy, as I bend lower to give you homage with my tongue, my ass rises. You get a good view of my pussy, you start to kiss and lick at it, and then proceed to give me an enormous kick in my ignorant stupid gas-pumping ass. I still cannot stop myself, as I start to taste your juices as you get wet, they taste so nice and sweet.
267. jrzmommy♠ - February 23, 2007 2:09 PM
First of all, Troll, Commish is shaved smooth as a slab of granite!
268. misanthrope - February 23, 2007 2:10 PM
There's an epidemic of unquestionable urgency on the continent of Africa. Using that situation to justify circumcision in the US is ridiculous.
269. commissioner - February 23, 2007 2:10 PM
#265
I was wondering when you were going to toss me in the lesbian orgy. I consider it wishful thinking on your part, troll.
270. p-britty - February 23, 2007 2:11 PM
oh yea - come to momma - eh.. uhhh... hmmm - awkward silence....
271. commissioner - February 23, 2007 2:12 PM
Thanks, JRZ. I am. The flooring definitely does not match the drapes.
272. Comment Police - February 23, 2007 2:12 PM
ROTFLMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!! All the stupid trolling aside JRZMommy is taking it prtty hard here and her true colors are showing. Making yourself sound kinda pathetic babe. But who am I to jump in I'm jsut along for the ride and enjoying the entertainment of it all hahaha.
273. twism - February 23, 2007 2:12 PM
misanthrope
WHO is an organization based on the upmost medical accreditation.. no religion/social beliefs involved.
The arguement here is the medical benefits of circumcisition. If you are not circumcised it doesnt mean you are indisposed to a number of ailments but circumsition does cut the risk of infection. And no matter if u are African, American, Asian, Black, White, or Blue... HIV knows none of that boundary. The study couldnt be conducted here (in the US) cause we are more educated about it and could not get a significant polling. But if it could the results would not change.
274. mia - February 23, 2007 2:12 PM
263
Ok, I shouldn't say africa, it was a mistake. The fact is, usa put totalitarism in many country making it look like a hero. Usa is able to destroy all infrastructures of a country who tries to be democratic by puting a despote just to make it stable and be able to suck up all the ressources. I mean, you can't deny this. And if usa don't put the totalitarism, usa deal with it and encourage it. But when this governement make a mistake, usa send bombs over civilians like on Afghanistan or Iraq.
275. mia - February 23, 2007 2:15 PM
266
suddenly, i gain incredeble skills in english and dirty talk. Nice try. You don't make enough typos to sound like me...
276. the chicken - February 23, 2007 2:17 PM
#274 You shouldn't say a lot of things. Your generalizations are really to stupid to attack, and have no place here. Go on a political site and rant there and quit trying to hijack things.
277. twism - February 23, 2007 2:18 PM
#268... Nobody is saying every1 should be cut ... all im saying is that it reduces the risk. its a fact. Its not a relgious thing or some urban myth.
278. mia - February 23, 2007 2:18 PM
But go ahead, that's funny.
Just one last thing, Daniel radcliff is handsome and is penis too.
279. jrzmommy♠ - February 23, 2007 2:18 PM
the mistake Afghanistan made, Mia, you ignorant fuck, was that the harbored the terrorists that murdered 3,000 innocent people on 9/11 and don't you fucking forget that.
You're an uninformed lightweight when it comes to global events.
280. mia - February 23, 2007 2:20 PM
277
I'm sorry if i sound like i am making generalizations. The fact is I speak french and i'm not bilingual, so everything i say look strange. But I thought you could understand despite my lack of vocabulary.
281. BritneysFUCKhat - February 23, 2007 2:20 PM
Cut the penis, who wants a cheesy cock for christ sakes?
282. wedge1 - February 23, 2007 2:22 PM
Mia realized now what had been missing. Mom was still
wearing her towel. As hot as she looked that way, it
didn't seem fair. Mom had looked and felt her up, and she
had not really gotten a good look at mom before she
disappeared under the thirsty towel. Yes, it was apparent
to Mia that her mother was well endowed, but Mia
couldn't really 'see' that like Mom was seeing her. "Ummm
...Can I see yours, mother?" She asked sheepishly. "Can I
see what your breasts look like?"
Mia's mom looked her daughter in the eye. She was hoping it
would come to this. She was so hot and tingly, that she
probably would have shown her daughter everything, even
without being asked. This way definitely made it better.
Mia watched intently as mom put her fingers in the
knot, and s-l-o-w-l-y peeled the garment back like a
banana...
283. jrzmommy♠ - February 23, 2007 2:23 PM
...and your lack of sense.
284. the chicken - February 23, 2007 2:25 PM
#280 I understand you don't know what you're talking about and then you fall back on the oh poor me, my ESL excuse. No matter what the language, you're ignorant.
285. mia - February 23, 2007 2:25 PM
Well, if americans act when afghan destroy the giants buddhas in afghanistan, when they install the charia, if american mind is own business, it wouldn't be attack by ''terrorists'' if they were terrorists...
286. the chicken - February 23, 2007 2:26 PM
#282 And a motherfucker to boot.
287. mia - February 23, 2007 2:27 PM
no sorry, i'm not ignorant. You are masturbating on your flag and that makes me sick. GoodBye. Salut gang de caves.
288. 1971 - February 23, 2007 2:28 PM
americans are so ignorant and ALL are terrorists.
big fuck you to america you will soon be wiped out
289. the chicken - February 23, 2007 2:29 PM
#285 Can you really be that incredibly stupid? I expect this argument from one of my fifth graders if he hit the crackpipe. Stick to porn.
290. BritneysFUCKhat - February 23, 2007 2:29 PM
According to mia's ramblings, the French are big fans of random capitalization.
291. misanthrope - February 23, 2007 2:29 PM
@273... It cuts the risk of infection the same way a condom does!!! Period! That study for the AIDS epidemic in Africa says the same thing. No shit there's no social/race boundary. Did I ever say that? If you can't teach your son that the use of a condom will reduce the risk of infectious diseases and to rely on circumcision to keep him 'less affected'... that's your business. The study is saying that circumcising males in Africa reduces men’s chances of catching HIV by up to 60 percent. That is not saying that circumcision in general will reduce HIV! The use of condoms reduces the rate of HIV. I did not say they shouldn't use circ in Africa! This is a situation where education about HIV and the use of condoms will take years, centuries in fact. To cut the rate of infection... they are looking at every possible way to reduce it. You are arguing an entirely different subject.
292. the chicken - February 23, 2007 2:31 PM
#290 Let's ask Algeria and Indochina.
293. BritneysFUCKhat - February 23, 2007 2:32 PM
The only thing circumcision cuts the risk of, is cock cheese.
294. Tiffin - February 23, 2007 2:32 PM
In countries with poor access to basic hygiene facilities, some studies have shown that circumcision can reduce the risk of HIV infection during unprotected sex by 50%. For the uncircumcised, washing after unprotected sex is also an effective method of reducing the risk of HIV infection.
Condoms reduce the risk of HIV infection by greater than 99%. They are also an effective method of preventing pregnancy. If Jrzmommy had adopted this strategy instead, maybe she wouldn't be lumbered with that fucktard kid of hers.
295. za-rodinu - February 23, 2007 2:37 PM
To cut or to uncut, honestly it makes no difference to me. And I'm American.
@294 Insult a grown woman all you like, whatever. But you should probably leave a child out of it. Because insulting children is a really cunty thing to do.
296. the chicken - February 23, 2007 2:37 PM
#287 And just what the FUCK makes you think you can come and piss on mine? It makes you sick? You dragged the subject in as a really lame aside, asswipe - and if you don't like someone arguing with you, either make a statement you can back up or STFU.
297. twism - February 23, 2007 2:39 PM
@#291
u stated ..."known fact by whom? The same people that endorse it for social and religious reasons?" referring to the WHO i suppose.
and u are adjusting the facts... the underlying conclusion here is "Male circumsition cuts HIV risk"... not "Circumsition cuts HIV risk in African males"... i did not state anywhere u said "they shouldn't use circ in Africa". The medical benefits applies to ALL males.
298. twism - February 23, 2007 2:42 PM
"Male circumsition cuts HIV risk"... This fact has been known for years... it didnt just come up yesterday. And today it holds more weight than it did yesterday.
299. beifiori - February 23, 2007 2:42 PM
misanthrope it's only retarded to a stunted mind. I have a medical background, do you?
253, as much as you hate to hear it, I am not dense. bellend my sweet ass. if that's the best you can come up with, then I'm doing pretty darn good! and fyi, i do know my geography. when all else fails, insults someone's intelligence, right? Lord knows, if someone doesn't agree with you 100% they must be retarded idiots **rolling eyes** come back to me when your argument is strong and we can actually have an intelligent conversation beyond 'you're so dumb'.
300. Tiffin - February 23, 2007 2:42 PM
# 295 Normally I'd agree. But Jrzmommy went there first, e.g. see #261. In my opinion, the gloves are off.
301. wedge1 - February 23, 2007 2:44 PM
All I know is the uncircumsized men ran a little faster and screamed a little louder when the planes hit the towers. But they still died. Like rats. It was funny to watch.
302. beifiori - February 23, 2007 2:44 PM
ewwwwwww 293, i just threw up a little in my mouth with that vision in my head (and smell in my nose)!
303. za-rodinu - February 23, 2007 2:44 PM
@300 Duly noted!
304. misanthrope - February 23, 2007 2:46 PM
@297.... twism! Do you live in a country where you can't get a condom? It reduces the risk the same way a condom will! Can't teach your son how to use a condom? Do you live in a country where there are million of people dying because they do not have the necessary education to keep themselves alive? That is a medical pandemic.... my newborn does not live in a situation like that. There is a difference.
305. twism - February 23, 2007 2:50 PM
#304... misanthrope! i'm not argueing about condoms. i know the condoms reduce the risk of infection 99.99% or whatever the label says. im merely stating that circumsition has medical benefits and its not based on religous beleifs as YOU stated.
306. twism - February 23, 2007 2:52 PM
the^ that*
307. twism - February 23, 2007 2:53 PM
"In an “extraordinary development” in the fight against AIDS, a medical journal article published Friday says that conclusive data shows there is no question circumcision reduces men’s chances of catching HIV by up to 60 percent.
"
308. twzzlrgirl - February 23, 2007 2:57 PM
I really like this site a lot, but there has got to be a better way to post than this -- with trolls able to take your screen name. It's ridiculous. I've scrolled through some old superfish posts and cannot believe what i've supposedly "said" in the last week or so....
Come on...make the site secure. Otherwise it's just a trolling ground for every asshole who has nothing better to do with their time.
309. blondewithnobrain - February 23, 2007 2:57 PM
Being an American woman, i can pretty confidently say that most of us prefer a penis to be circumcised. we just aren't "forward thinking" like Europeans...hey, we aren't even using the metric system! hahahaha!
310. beifiori - February 23, 2007 2:59 PM
309, yeah, we're renegades LOL
311. twzzlrgirl - February 23, 2007 3:00 PM
Ah, but #309, I know the size of my boyfriend's penis in metric and inches! That's worth converting ;)
312. misanthrope - February 23, 2007 3:04 PM
@305... Circumcision in the US is generally based on social and/or religious beliefs. Condoms reduce the transmission of infectious diseases. You are not going to tell someone who is circumcized not to use a condom because they have less of a risk. Circ is an unnecessary procedure. The medical risks aren't any different than a circumcized penis. If you consider that you are going to wear a condom whether you have been circumcized or not. AIDS a medical risk to either situation, foreskin or not. We're not living in a situation like that of Africa. I already said it should be done in a situation like that.
313. RichPort - February 23, 2007 3:06 PM
You know it's the real RichPort because I'm FUNNY!!!
314. misanthrope - February 23, 2007 3:11 PM
beifiori... Didn't mean to imply that *you* are retarded. The idea that cutting the foreskin off for cleanliness is. IMHO.
315. beifiori - February 23, 2007 3:14 PM
alright, I'll accept that as your point of view, but having seen what I've seen in life, I still maintain I think it's cleaner to be circumsized. can we agree to just have different POVs, then? :)
316. misanthrope - February 23, 2007 3:17 PM
Yes, beifiori... I agree to disagree. I think that's all that any of us can do when discussing this topic. :)
317. misanthrope - February 23, 2007 3:45 PM
Re:312.. Just to add... Getting circumcized doesn't mean you're *not* going to get AIDS. Not getting circumcized doesn't mean you *are* going to get AIDS.
318. woodhorse - February 23, 2007 4:20 PM
IN REFERENCE TO REMARKS #52: I said "the guy above" meaning the jerk who typed "you are losers" a million times and now Fish has wiped him off (again) so it looks like I'm insulting the person above my post whom I have nothing against. So, uhm, sorry.
319. woodhorse - February 23, 2007 4:26 PM
EXCELLENT AND TRUE #76 - ALL TRUE. the only objection I have is that not enough anesthesia is employed when doing circumcisions as normally practised on babies. I RAISED PURE HELL with the pediatrician for my son when he was a baby AND FORCED THEM TO DO IT WHILE HE WAS PUT TO SLEEP IN AN OPERATING ROOM. That is the only way - It took 15 minutes and yes insurance pays for it, you just have to be adamnant about how your baby boys are treated!!
320. the chicken - February 23, 2007 4:26 PM
#318 Woodhorse, that asshole has been all over this site for the past few days - all the numbers are screwed on all threads. The 'fish needs to keep the number there and insert "deleted post" to avoid gang wars.
321. Lowlands - February 23, 2007 4:29 PM
Here on this thread,you're all a bunch of dumb bimbos.First at all if in Africa,that means most at the time in Ethiopia and Somalia,a girl get circumcized.That means her whole clit is getting removed,not parts of her labia.That's a whole big different with a guy getting circumcized.Also if a guy is circumcized that's not only more hygienic but that means also he can have longer sex with for instance dumb,fat househags like you girls.Because his tip of his penis is not covered anymore it will get less sensitive in a way.That means he can have longer sex before he shoot his load on faces like dumb bitches like you girls.Get the right information before you start to talk.
322. woodhorse - February 23, 2007 4:40 PM
Waris Diri is a beautiful model from Sudan who wrote a book called "Desert Flower" about her CIRCUMCISION AT 5 YEARS OLD WITH A RUSTY RAZOR BLADE. It is done solely to make the females more valuable in trade because if they can't enjoy sex, they aren't going to "stray". It is the Number One Priority of the World Health Organization to stop female circumcision. Hell, it isn't even circumcision, it is mutilation and castration and should be done to every father that causes that to happen to his female children. READ AND LEARN BEFORE YOU OPEN YOUR STUPID MOUTHS.
323. misanthrope - February 23, 2007 4:41 PM
@321... Yep, I'm a fat, dumb, bimbo, househag bitch. But you, on the other hand, are a gloriously intelligent, slim, loyal, man about town, gentleman.
324. crazycowlady - February 23, 2007 4:41 PM
He's uncirmcumsized...who'd a thunk it?
325. Lowlands - February 23, 2007 4:45 PM
Thanks woodhorse for your support.Female circumcision is mostly common in islamic African countries.
326. Lowlands - February 23, 2007 4:46 PM
#323)Why don't you start to suck a circumsized dick.with a bit luck you'll get your load in 2 hours time.
327. misanthrope - February 23, 2007 4:49 PM
@326... No thanks. By the way, women prefer sex that lasts longer than 2 minutes. Just sayin.
328. yousuck - February 23, 2007 4:52 PM
jrzmommy you keep saying research research research. You talk like what you say is fact. Where exactly are you getting your information? Where are you doing your alleged research? People have asked you repeatedly and you skirt the issue with insults. So, where is this information coming from??? I'm not really on either side, but everyone is posting websites to support their argument except for you.
329. EJ - February 23, 2007 5:13 PM
Looks like jrzmommy has been holding down the fort guite well, but can I just say this to all the fucking idiots:
FEMALE "circumcision" and MALE circumcision are NOT the same thing.
Just because something has the same name doesn't make them identical, or even analogous. A woman who has been "circumcised" finds sex extremely painful for the rest of her life. Not so for men. Now, you can argue until the cows come home about whether cut/uncut gets the most pleasure, but the point is that when you straddle a cut guy, he doesn't scream in pain and beg you to stop. Please stop comparing the two - you're looking like a real asshole to say that female circumcision has anything in common with male circumcision.
Now, with that out of the way...
I hate to be the resident board whore, but I've tasted and fucked cut men and uncut men and I'm never going near an uncut again. Ever. I hate the taste, I hate the look, I hate the smell. Yes, they can clean it out, but (and this is just me!) but I like to have "spontaneous" sex that doesn't involve a lengthy shower beforehand. I love giving oral as a form of foreplay and there are few things nastier and dirtier than an uncut penis at the end of the day.
Now, that's just me. Maybe your man/men had a slower "funkiness" rate; maybe you don't mind scheduled sex with showers and schedules. But I, for one, prefer the cleanliness, the attractiveness, and the overfeel of a smooth cut dick. And my partner NEVER has trouble orgasming, so I reckon he's getting a hell of a lot of pleasure from the act, regardless of his lack of foreskin.
330. EJ - February 23, 2007 5:18 PM
Oh, and yousuck (328), a lot of the research was posted earlier in links. It's not her fault if you can't be bothered to read before jumping in. When I was scrolling through, I saw no less than 7 articles linking circumcision with lower risks of HIV infection, 3 on circumcision and yeast infections, and 4 on circumcision and HPV.
Also, Google works very nicely.
Please don't denegrate jrz for not doing your work for you.
331. InstantAsshat-AddFame - February 23, 2007 5:21 PM
Hey, remember when this blog was actually funny, and the comments were funnier? Now it's degenerated into the old Yahoo message boards, full of irate people calling each other fucker and trying to be more right than the last guy.
Booooooring.
That's what happens when the Ferret leaves, I guess.
332. the chicken - February 23, 2007 5:24 PM
#328 jrzmommy's gone until Monday but I know she works in healthcare. She moves too fast to cite every NEJM article but she's very accurate about medicine. There's debate about this in the MD community, the reasons that most everybody mentioned above are valid in some way or other. I just know if I still had a hoodie I wouldn't be getting it cut off, and also I don't plan to get one sewn on now.
333. EJ - February 23, 2007 5:24 PM
331, and what's up with the "fake-name-trolls-who-post-crappy-porn-in-our-name"? I swear, if the Fish doesn't start IP banning some people soon, I may have to go elsewhere. And I really don't want to, since I'm basically lazy.
334. the chicken - February 23, 2007 5:29 PM
#333 You mean that porn wasn't real? Bummer.
335. supafreak - February 23, 2007 5:35 PM
It looks like a mini JDAM missle with a penetration detonator tip.
If I clicked, does it mean I am gay?
336. diamondprynzez - February 23, 2007 5:37 PM
Guys that are complaining about the uncircumsized peepeee:
Hahahahahahahahhhahahahaha your parents cut off potentially 8 inches of HIGHLY sensitive skin.
Sucks for you!
337. misanthrope - February 23, 2007 6:03 PM
RE: #327... I misread your insult, Lowlands... but, never mind.
@329... I wouldn't dispute that at all. That said, a quick bathroom break before getting head (male or female) is only fair. I know what you're saying about the spontaneous thing, but if you think it's headed that way... even a quick freshing up is in order.
It's a sensitive subject that has strong opinions both ways. In theory and when you're not making the decision for someone else, circ is easily disputed on the side of doing it, but when you have to make that choice for your newborn, there's an awful lot to consider. It becomes very real and parents these days do a lot of research (hopefully) before they decide what to do.
If another parent and I have the discussion, generally it's left to what you have chosen for your child. Parents who are for it have their reasons and parents who aren't have theirs. I can only hope the choice came from as much information as possible. It's a huge decision. I can take the heated discussion more from parents (though it is more painful for us) than I can for those who just want to be right. I'm not for it. I have my reasons for which I know to be valid. Others are for it and for reasons they know to be valid. It's a choice.
Who knew Harry Potter would get us talking about such things? Sorry to piss anyone off. Sincerely. I'm glad twism and I could debate it without calling each other names.
BTW, I think it's universally agreed, at least on this thread, that female 'circumcision' is mutilation.
338. September_bebe - February 23, 2007 6:14 PM
HovisGovis #22 that was frickin hilarious! I think it was Expecto ridikulus if you ask me! but, i like em better circumcised
339. September_bebe - February 23, 2007 6:16 PM
oops, number 20 i mean, 22, you're boring
340. TheExpatriot - February 23, 2007 6:28 PM
I am really scared now by you "circumcision is good" wingnuts. How many women have I killed so far by not being circumcised?
341. kkh - February 23, 2007 6:48 PM
I have a hard time believing they would release a promotional shot with full frontal nudity. I think this is a fake.
342. honeydew - February 23, 2007 6:57 PM
@329 Here here girl!! And, what's wrong with being the resident board whore I ask?
343. EJ - February 23, 2007 7:01 PM
misanthrope (337), I'm cool with you since you seem to be open to discussion (rather than foaming at the mouth like so many posters here) so I want to say upfront that I respect your decision and I can definitely agree to disagree.
That said, I really really REALLY hate "before sex bathroom breaks". Maybe it's just me, but it just totally kills my mood. It's not just that the really fabulous spontaneous places don't always have accessible bathrooms nearby, it's also that the mere act of going off to the pisser strips the spontenaity out of the event. (It's also one of the main reasons I deal with the Pill in all her glory rather than rely on a diaphram.)
And, yeah, okay, you can technically have sex without a bit of oral first. But sex without oral is like toast without butter. Sure it'll get you through your day, but damned if you don't want that fucking butter for the taste and the way it helps the toast slide down properly.
P.P.S. I find it really funny all the people who claim it's irrelevant that circumcision cuts the risk of HIV by something like 60% because you "could always wear a condom". Am I the only one that's forgotten once or twice to slip the jacket on? (Mea culpa.) Sure, it was STUPID and DUMB and SUICIDAL, but it happens. In that case, wouldn't you rather be 60% protected rather than 0%? I sure would be anyway....
344. EJ - February 23, 2007 7:03 PM
alaskanchicsickle (342):
Heh. Thanks. I'm blushing. :p
345. JennSTX - February 23, 2007 7:13 PM
I'm sorry but I guess that I am just want to believe that most men are not mindless apes that are so stupid and instinct driven that they are incapable of cleanliness, morals or having the intellect to understand protection and discrimination in sex partners.
From many of the responses supposedly from men, I guess I'm wrong and that the only way to stop these moronic beasts is to cut off a part of their genitals when they are helpless infants. This way they can be dirtier and sleep with more diseased whores before catching something deadly before they die.
Too bad it is the primary piece that interacts with the female genitalia giving her an orgasm. Oh well, no one on here seems to care about that either.
My bad.
346. RooneyPunch - February 23, 2007 7:46 PM
"Too bad it is the primary piece that interacts with the female genitalia giving her an orgasm."
Nuh-uh! At least, not with my junk. I've been with both cut and uncut, and some were good and some were better... but I didn't see (you know what I mean) it had anything to do with any foreskin. Some of the cut were great. Some of the uncut were too. Some of the uncut weren't so great, ditto the cut. Some had smaller packages that were DY-NO-MITE, and some of the bigguns thought that size was ALL they needed to break it down. I'm just saying. But I have never had anyone else's vagina, so maybe I'm an anomaly.
I have never had a penis attached to me that was with or without a foreskin, either, so I have no idea if not having one would detract from sex or that having one would make it better. But... if it's true that not having one takes away from sex, then.... hey, that SUX.
I sort of agree with EJ, though- a circumcised pecker IS more asthetically pleasing to ME, but I can deal with one that's not cut. In fact I did... I married a guy who wasn't circumcised. I just wouldn't give him any head unless he had showered recently, but I didn't except HIM to go down on ME unless I had also had one. So.... spontaneity didn't really suffer since we were both kind of into practicing good personal hygiene. Also, he could REALLY put it down.
(We're divorced now because you can't just DO IT all the time... eventually, you gotta talk to him, but if that talking thing hadn't come up we would still be married because DAMN. That was some good shit, even if it DID look like a worm in a turtleneck.)
347. RooneyPunch - February 23, 2007 7:51 PM
Oh, and about Harry Potter... I'd hit that. Even though that makes me a filthy, lecherous old whore. Can chicks be leches? If so, I totally am one. Because they'd be scraping his pasty British ass off the ceiling for weeks.
Yep.
348. dharma - February 23, 2007 8:27 PM
i always thought the harry potter kid was cute in the same way i think my nephew is cute ,FOR that reason i didnt have to see his dick its wrong his not even 18 yet, and there are perverts lookin at his dong ..anyways for those of u who asked cut vs. uncut i had both,first with someone who is uncut and the sex was so great ,the forskin doesnt allow for the loss of lubrication form the vag. and it glides there is less force needed ...so here i am thinkin omg sex is freakin great why do so many women complain about it how they dont enjoy it ,then i slept with a guy with a cut dick even tho its more visually apealing sex sucked !
349. hobieluv83 - February 23, 2007 8:37 PM
uncut? Awesome. Circumcision is so overrated. P.S. This has restored my faith in male genetalia. Cisco Adler who?
350. Roedhunt - February 23, 2007 8:43 PM
THIS PHOTO IS A FRAUD!!!
I know that for a fact because it was done by an artist who's link is at Live Journal. I should know, I saw the original posting of this picture by him. If you lighten the photo, look at the foot on the bent knee. The foot is completely wiped away. I confronted him about this being a manip - "I must say, it is a very good manip, but you messed up on his foot." And he said to me:
Quote:
"Thank you for your comment. :DD. Yeah, I know. But there is something I was more concerned with ;)."
End of discussion.
351. Roedhunt - February 23, 2007 8:49 PM
By the way.. To the mods on this site:
Please PLEASE tell everyone this! I don't want everyone to think it's real. It's not! It has to stop! I'm begging you. Contact me if you need to have it verified, because I have proof!
352. yousuck - February 23, 2007 8:52 PM
#330, before you respond to peoples post you should pay attention.Go back and read my post again. Very. Slowly. (If you can manage it)I said "EVERYONE IS POSTING WEBSITES TO SUPPORT THEIR ARGUMENTS EXCEPT FOR YOU."
#332, anyone can say they work in healthcare. I could say I'm a neurosurgeon, doesnt mean I really am one.
353. yousuck - February 23, 2007 8:55 PM
@332,I shouldnt really say I dont believe she's in healthcare, I can believe she's a janitor at the hospital.
354. InstantAsshat-AddFame - February 23, 2007 9:28 PM
Roedhunt, I do think you're right. I didn't sit and STARE at the picture, so missed the weird little blur at the hip line at first, till someone else expressed suspicion it was a fake. Plus, I don't think Dan's legs are that muscular. That's some other guy from the hips on down. And what would his foot rest on, anyway? Did they put a box under the horse? lol So no...I don't think it's Dan's. I'm a big Dan fan, but nah...this ain't his. Though I'm sure all his parts are just fine. ;-)
I remember seeing an argument similar to this on another website once. Circumcision is a topic like religion--everyone has an opinion, and you can argue forever and never reach a consensus.
355. Katty_LD - February 23, 2007 10:15 PM
As someone who has seen this play, well this is NOT a real pictures of Daniel's goodies, I was sitting in the stalls and from there you can see everything, he IS cut, and he has big really big balls, his wand size is about normal size, no super long but NOT small, he has a nice size and it suit him perfectly.
This is a freaking fake picture.
356. the chicken - February 23, 2007 11:07 PM
#352/3 Hey, yousuck - you suck. There's no requirement to provide footnotes or anything else on this site, and you're not the Research Sheriff here. You want verification so much, look it up, don't expect people to spoonfeed you with an attitude like yours. You got a disagreement with any of arguments stated above, let's hear a real rebuttal. Put up or shut up.
357. sumnersgal - February 23, 2007 11:35 PM
I'd do him - with or without the extra meat...if he were 18 of course ;)
358. greeneyedcat - February 23, 2007 11:39 PM
It's false to say that most women like the way circumcised penises look better.
Also, I had never heard about this non-spontaneous cleaning before sex... maybe that just depends on the penis? Maybe a shower a day is fine for most.
359. Laura - February 24, 2007 2:57 AM
This needs to be removed. Read the comments and replies at this site:
http://thesuperficial.com/2007/02/daniel_radcliffe_shows_off_his.html
It's a manip and the creator tells actually owns up to it being a manip.
360. woodhorse - February 24, 2007 5:43 AM
I second #356. My ex was uncut, it was Ok for his life, OK when we were married. My son had to have circumcision FOR MEDICAL REASONS and I made sure it wasn't painful to him. Male circumcision is removal of the foreskin. The loosely termed female circumcision is removal of most of the labia, removal of the clitoris and surrounding tissue, the stats in Africa is that 25% of those female children die from infection and the ones that live through the mutilation and pain suffer severe health problems - like being unable to urinate more than a drop at a time, consistent genital pain,severe pain during intercourse (after their fathers trade to a 60 year old man when are 9 years old for some goats), sterility, and frequent UTI's. Anyone who wants to do that to a female child needs to be flayed alive.
361. Kyriakon - February 24, 2007 5:51 AM
"Female circumcision" is nowhere near as culturally homogeneous as some organizations would have you believe. Certainly some forms are inexcusably destructive, entailing complete removal of the glans clitoris and infibulation, but pharaonic circumcision as practiced in rural Egypt often consists of the excision of only the clitoral prepuce and the procedure as done in Mogadishu, Somalia, is often little more than a pin prick to the clitoris, a symbolic drawing of blood to provide purity.
362. noac - February 24, 2007 6:11 AM
@299, I Thought the SARCASM BRACKETS where enough to get it across to you that your argument was prejudice.
Considering you where the one to non sarcastically [insult] my hygiene first you're not in the position to complain.
I suppose I could help you out and make it as simple as possible.
1. You used a prejudice statement about europeans
2. To make you realise this I sarcastically said such a statement about usapians myself.
3.Irony was the tool I used to make you see what you where doing.
Please try your darndest to not misconstrue what I said this time.
363. EJ - February 24, 2007 9:27 AM
352, is there a REASON why you seem to need jrzmommy to post links to research when those links have already been posted? Or do you just want her to look like an idiot by reposting links?
Yeesh, what a troll.
364. elys - February 24, 2007 10:16 AM
This IS fake
http://community.livejournal.com/hp_manips/165524.html
365. HollyJ - February 24, 2007 2:35 PM
81. Posted by tits_on_snack "Also: Keep uncircumsized penises away from me please thanks. I don't need cervical cancer, yeast infections, or UTI's" Absolutely
I spontaneously projectile vomit when I see an uncut dong. It's a matter of personal preference. Me PERSONALLY? -I think it's disgusting-looking. 'No skin off (no pun intended) my nose if some of you love it, though...
I suspect that all the dudes in here that're getting defensive of turtlehead are uncircumsized. =/
366. kathleen170 - February 24, 2007 3:13 PM
Oh... my... god!
367. vaselineintensive - February 24, 2007 3:28 PM
nastiness
368. no1justminda - February 24, 2007 5:04 PM
Now when I watch the next Harry Potter movie, all I'm gonna think about is the fact that I've seen his penis!
369. yousuck - February 24, 2007 5:38 PM
#356, first of all, I never said there was a requirement dumbass, I said she speaks like what she says is FACT and keeps mentioning research, and I have yet to see her reference ANYTHING, 2nd, who the fuck was talking to you anyway?
#363 Are you jrsmommy's mommy?
I dont think I was rude in my first post, at least I wasnt trying to be. I was just wondering if she's a scientis or something. There must be some reason she thinks her word is gospel.(And some reason you all think so too!)
370. Nikky Raney - February 24, 2007 5:49 PM
i think i am going to throw up
371. EJ - February 24, 2007 6:55 PM
Yousuck, I'm going to speak very very slowly because you are so phenomenally stupid.
Jrzmommy is referencing the SAME research that the rest of us are referencing. The research that has been posted already MULTIPLE TIMES in the form of links to reputable newspapers and periodicals.
You came in and huffed and puffed and DEMANDED that she post proof as to what she was claiming. You also stated that she had skirted the issue, insinuating that she was just making things up. This is ridiculous - the stuff has already BEEN posted. She is not posting MORE stuff because (a) it would be superfluous, and (b) there isn't much more to post. What more do you want - a fucking petri dish and some lab printouts?
As for the rest, jrzmommy is NOT claiming to be a scientist - she is stating medical facts. The same facts that are available to everyone else. Via the links I mentioned earlier. We take her word as "gospel" because we are also aware of those facts. Inasmuch as we are aware that the sky is blue.
If you wanted evidence, proof, or research, you'd Google it. Instead you're just trying to smear jrz by attempting to make her look like she's talking fom her ass. I've got no problem with that (she can take care of herself without my help), but you're doing it so fucking amateurishly that I'm hating you on principle. If you're going to troll, then be SMART about it.
Happy now?
(God, what a fucking tard.)
372. Where's Waldo? - February 24, 2007 9:11 PM
I have reread several of my previous posts, and I realize that I am an arrogant, pompous
jerk. I apologise. Also, my male organ is really MUCH smaller than I implied. Sorry for the lies. I'll go back under my rock now.
373. sumnersgal - February 24, 2007 9:13 PM
#347 - amen to that
1971 - a big fuck you right back!!
374. Tpoison - February 24, 2007 11:20 PM
listen a lot of boys are circumcised, its necessary for them cos its in their religion and now you know why you have to be circumcised. take a look at #76 that'll be more than enough i guess. and God! this guy should really do it soon!
375. cole007 - February 25, 2007 5:25 AM
in the voice of the comic book guy from the simpsons:
"worse penis ever."
376. Me - February 25, 2007 7:53 AM
#93 Cervical Cancer is caused by certain strains of HPV, which one can get from someone who is or is not circumcised.
http://www.healthywomen.org/healthtopics/humanpapillomavirus/q/L2/44/L1/3/
377. EJ - February 25, 2007 7:56 AM
Me (376), that's already been discussed to death over this thread. YES, you can get HPV or HIV from either cut or uncut guys. However, cut guys are less likely to be carriers because it's harder to infect a cut guy.
Next time, read THEN post.
378. jrzmommy♠ - February 25, 2007 10:48 AM
Research compliments of WHO and Pan Am Health Org
and, NO I didn't go "there" first with your kid will pump my kids gas one day.....FYI
259. Posted by mia on February 23, 2007 1:57 PM
254
I hope you're retarded kid will be able to read in 20 years and will look at your prose. That prove my other hypothesis that you are not a mom at all, you are a teenage pervert. But, that sound like my last fuck (without that lesbian shit)
379. SuperChic - February 25, 2007 11:06 AM
I gotta comment about this ummm, picture... is that what we want to dignify it, with the word "picture?"
Gosh, is he not making enough money off of Harry Potter publicity or something? AND what lack of good judgement pills was he on that week... c'mon now.
I don't want to see his wang chen no matter if it is uncircumcised or not... btw, I can count his ribs... is this some sick idea of anorexia male art or something? I'm just not getting it...
380. Thomas the Wrapper - February 25, 2007 2:21 PM
actually it is a good idea to be circumsized for hygienic reasons. My understanding is otherwise it's a permanent germ wand. You could see how putting that in someone might be gross. No pimento olives.
381. SuperChic - February 25, 2007 2:34 PM
What about the horse? Anyone care this poor horse was subjected to Daniel's anorexic erotic fantasy of being naked with a horsey?? The horse isn't having any fun obviously. Don't know 'bout you, but I think the only one who is actually enjoying the pic is Daniel. Hmmm...
382. Lowlands - February 25, 2007 2:56 PM
How about the horse AND mr T?He seems to be a little irrited...
383. Lowlands - February 25, 2007 3:03 PM
#382)It's irriTAted.*Shakes Head*
384. Lowlands - February 25, 2007 3:25 PM
<383)Actually you'd mean;*Shakes Head in the way only mr T can do*.
385. ffordegroupie - February 25, 2007 6:56 PM
leog, I hate to shatter your foam-mouthed preconceptions about Americans, but nobody here thinks that anything should be cut off. For that, you'll have to head to Africa and Asia (which has a startling number of castrations, including self-inflicted ones).
If you're referring to circumcision, I have two words to say to you: anti-Semite. If you have a problem with medically sound procedures (which, I might add, are optional), then don't insist that everyone should be just like you because Europeans don't.
That is called DISCRIMINATING AGAINST ANOTHER CULTURE. But then, it's okay for a European of unusually snotty demeanor to do that, huh?
Anyway, I know why he's doing this: they have only a couple more Harry Potter movies after this, and what does he have then? A reputation as a kiddie actor. This way, he gets to show that he can make the transition to adult actor, and not become a has-been at twenty.
And the parents who are whining about how he's a bad role model should shut up. There are far worse role mdoels (Dakota Fanning, anyone?), and it's not like he signed a contract to never do a movie or play that they disapproved of. He's an ACTOR, dammit.
JennSTX, it's hilarious to see someone actually froth at the mouth, as they spit out a bunch of erroneous information they probably got from their "special friend" dad.
386. snapesworst - February 25, 2007 6:57 PM
It's fake. They just pasted his pubic hair over and over and edited in a new dick. The testicles look all wrong, and the play is about seeing his ass, not his dick in the open. And why would this photo be in black and white, instead of color like all the other ones? Exactly...
387. pana1718 - February 25, 2007 8:06 PM
this is fake, people! fake! the real picture of this ends at dan's waist. photoshoped! dream on biatches! pobre de daniel tienen a varios pendejos aqui creyendo que la foto es real! pobre de daniel...
388. Lowlands - February 25, 2007 9:19 PM
Girls,do you finally see now this photo is fake?First i thought also they photoshopped a coconut with donkeyhair attached in front of his genitals.But then i finally saw it was mr T...
389. NamelessHussy - February 26, 2007 1:46 AM
This is possibly the wrongest fucking thing ever. Wrongest is totally a word. I love harry potter but I did not need to see his man parts. Ever. Thank you. I don't care if it's fake or not.
As for all the shit about circumcision, this is why I had to run away from america for a little while. The willful ignorance is astounding. If you think something LOOKS more attractive, fine, I personally don't like fat people, but I hardly suggest mutilating chubby newborns so they will look sexy and thin. That's anna nicole's schtick. Christ I hate people.
390. NamelessHussy - February 26, 2007 1:51 AM
385-religion as a sacred cow is so 1990. Get over it. Just because some retard thinks God Said does not excuse the fact that they are being retarded. The end.
Circumcision is retarded. It's done for asthetic or religious reasons, everything else is only an afterthought for justification purposes. Any health benefits gained can also be gained through safe sex and proper hygeine...basically not being a stupid, dirty pirate hooker.
And I hope your name is not a reference to jasper fforde. You're annoying and I don't want you reading the books I like. Stay away from shakespeare as well please. Kthx.
391. cayana - February 26, 2007 8:07 AM
Woot! Wang pics!
And for all the guys who looked close enough to see that he's uncircumcized, you are automatically gay now. It's a rule.
392. queenbuzz - February 26, 2007 9:34 AM
When I dreamed of a man "riding" a horse...that wasn't exactly what I had in mind.
393. vegasglitr999 - February 26, 2007 8:37 PM
Ya know...I actually thought he might be hot but now...I understand why I will never date British guys...The Deftones were right....that's disgusting!!!!!!!!!!!
394. vegasglitr999 - February 26, 2007 8:40 PM
Ya know...I actually thought he might be hot but now...I understand why I will never date British guys...The Deftones were right....that's disgusting!!!!!!!!!!!
395. yousuck - February 27, 2007 1:27 PM
#371 Oh, now that you've "spoken" very very slowly I think I get it now...Mee stoopid. Yoo purfict.
Keep telling yourself that.
396. mooky - February 28, 2007 10:00 AM
Jrzmommy - your sweeping cultural generalisations and heroic reeling off of 'medical facts' are inspirational.
Just browsing through some of your earlier posts and love your anger at the 'billions' we plough into Africa.
Is that before of after the 'billions' we plunder from them via embargoes, US farmer subsidies and crippling sanctions?
I imagine you sitting there revelling in the smell of your own farts as you furiously tap out tawdry insults to us lesser mortals.
ps Spindoc re: #216 - It's not strictly true that America has never had an African colony. There's a country called 'Liberia' (over on the west coast) that might beg to differ. In fact it's still crawling with CIA today. They're about as covert as a Harry Potter's foreskin, which, I might add, there is nothing wrong with.
397. hobieluv83 - March 2, 2007 6:13 PM
honestly, I've been with a few uncircumcized men ad a few cut and when they are fully errect I can't really tell the difference
398. matt - March 12, 2007 8:23 PM
That photo is a fake. We went to see Dan Radcliffe in 'Equus' and we were in row C, near the front row, on two separate occasions. His nude scene lasted about 5 mins, and his private area looks nothing at all like the photo! His balls are larger & his dick is smaller than in the fake photo. His pubic hair is neater, too. Also, his glans was totally uncovered. So, he either keeps his foreskin fully pulled back all the time, pulls it back for the show, has a short foreskin, or he's circumcised. All of us agreed he looks fully circumcised! So, any ladies here who are worried/grossed that he may not be circumcised, I'm pretty sure you can relax! :)
399. HollywoodSnark - March 23, 2007 10:56 PM
god, so bad....please no more wang pics....ever!
400. SoapScumBuildup - May 26, 2007 11:49 PM
Thank God I got a picture of Dan totally neked before it was covered up with Mr. T.
Whether that's his real pecker or not, if he wasn't embarassed to show it and it was okay with his parents and this place was nuts enough to print it, let's see the full monty.
Also, I think in England- 17 is legal.
401. Wow - July 11, 2007 10:41 PM
Woah. Woah. I would sure as hell like to see that picture... Without the that picture over his balls. He is such a hottie. Too bad he is having sex with unicorns and not me. ;D
402. Ryan Thompson - July 12, 2007 3:18 AM
That version of the photo with Mr. T's face of his crotch, there's an uncensored version out there on the net. Its really difficult to find, though.
Didn't David Beckham recently post naked? Oh yeah, that's right, he did.
http://www.net.hr/2007/04/18/0423007.17.jpg
403. Ryan Thompson - July 12, 2007 3:20 AM
Also, any ladies who might be "gross out" that he might be uncircumsized, just so you know, most of the world is uncircumsized. Get over yourself.
404. Roy - July 13, 2007 3:03 AM
woah....Why can't I see it? I can only see Mr. T and when I click on it, there's a black square
405. Rose - July 14, 2007 12:43 PM
he was disgusting in equus
406. alex - July 14, 2007 11:01 PM
why cant i see the pix
407. Kalle - July 15, 2007 10:16 PM
I'm assuming the reason why the his penis is "covered up" is because he's 17 years old in this picture, and makes it childpornography... And you wanted to see it? EWW!
408. John - July 18, 2007 8:35 PM
Your nude PICS of Daniel Radcliffe are a fake here is the proof....
http://photos.imageevent.com/johnw/carlo/websize/herm20.jpg
The pic was reversed cropped and was turned Black White,
But, Not bad photo shop
409. n/a - September 8, 2007 3:11 PM
Okay, Its like blacked over. . . but I super don't want to see it cause he is SOO ugly!
410. Geena Rudland - September 13, 2007 1:40 PM
Uh, harry is HOT and i love the jealous guys saying that his penis
was photoshopped. Give me break.
Man, for 17 he is the PERFECT MALE SPECIMEN.
GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
I want me a piece of that.
"Thank heaven, for little boys, for little boys grow bigger everyday"
signed
an older woman
411. superdude - November 22, 2007 5:20 PM
I hope Emma Watson becomes a "serious" actor too.
412. ED - March 15, 2008 1:52 PM
Circurcision is for ignorants and losers. Any woman who freaks out by seeing a uncircumcised penis is a complete ignorant who wouldn't be happy if her male partner wanted her to go throught female circumcision.
413. Ellie - April 18, 2008 5:14 PM
You idiot, that's a fake >_< Dan never did full naked shots. The only real proper naked one is the one from behind showing just his ass lol.
414. P!@YBOY - June 13, 2008 10:59 PM
He Is SO Focken SEXY BUT WHY CANT IT SHOW HIS DICK I WILL SOUC I WANT HIM TO FOCK ME RIGHT UP I WILL MARY HIM HEYS SEXY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
415. P!@YBOY - June 13, 2008 10:59 PM
He Is SO Focken SEXY BUT WHY CANT IT SHOW HIS DICK I WILL SOUC I WANT HIM TO FOCK ME RIGHT UP I WILL MARRY HIM HEYS SEXY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
416. mr black - July 6, 2008 1:59 AM
this is the pcture
417. sllong35 - July 6, 2008 4:33 PM
Hey, you poeple the dan-man is an natural born human just like everyone else so what is the big deal about the Equus Play yes I do know that some others have promblems with the nudity and sexually incounters which was un- call for but you know how actors are when they get famouse and rich they go wild and crazy this is big news to take in but know that the dan-man is an very great actor but this how and why now just about everyone has seen his privates in the public eyes which is an bad idea the most concern that I have mostly was the age which was very shocking I also hope that thses pictures from the new Equus Play wil not come out like these because very shameful I heard that the new york will protect the dan-man prviacy which is very good idea the london area should have done the same but the pictures were leaked out on the internet and around on others cell phones but why all young guys have the same parts so the dan-man should not been any differently he lives just like everyone else does in life he is just lucker than we are I also wanten to know something else where were the dan-man parents at when this was happening say I respect them they have done an lot for their only son but this acting has gone too far they also say that the dan-man has an size issue but what does that have to with the acting because that was what he was only doing his job and why would the dan-man would say I like to express myself out of the Harry Potter movies guess what this is no way to get out in the public eyes I just dont understand what is really going on with the dan-man this also no way to catch an lady friend either which he is crazy and wild about the young girls for what the dan-man done inside this Equus Play should have been done behind close doors nudity is not bad its how you show it off and how to handle the sexually intercouners with an change actress whic I belive that the dan-man had done an great acting job so how come did the dan-man only was on stage nude for about 10mints long so how did so much get done in an short time who is the girl that is standing nude infront of the dan-man with the black underwear on cant guess is it the young Joasnna or Laura drives me crazy trying to figure the young girl name I just that I need to see the play for myself you see but do not have any clue to because you know that some how it gotton taped just like the pictures did poeple done wrong when they expose the picture in the way thry did because they made it seem nasty and dirted mine that is not right because the dan-man should have been explored around I that you see it was his body and mine so let it be very odd news no I did not approve but guess what its none of our bussiness beside he is just an actor getting paid for he is asked to do what about the December Boys movie that the dan-man played in I heard that he was very bad because it also had some nudity and sexually incounter so what else is new about the dan-man you see I heard that dan-man got hooked on smokeing daily about one pack a day which came out of his own mouth just wondering if when the dan-man does the part about the gay boy that died will then he turn gay or what just asking since he has done before again its none of our bussiness its the dan-man life have to wait an see about the furture of the beloved dan-man I hope for the best in his acting just need to cool down some not to go so fast when an good thing is gone then never can get it back on track beside maybe the dan-man will turn out better and differently than the other actors at his age beside he is very wise and has an good head on his shoulder beside the dan-man is just living his own life style can not change an person action or ways beside the dan-man will come around soon or latter until then be careful of what you all see and read over the internet can be dangerouse in some ways you know how computers can become when you think that its safe when it really isnt so much has happen in the pasted years watch the moves I have respect for the dan-man so should everyone else if you still think that the dan-man is wild and little crazy actor then you are still cool if not then stay away from the stuff about the dan-man which mostly is lies and scames which could hurt his true fans if you are really one be apart of the real dan-man not for what is said or put on the internet which can make you very mad dan-man is an very real cool guy wish that I could get the chance to meet him wish is very impossible for me all else you can do is to wait and have to dreams well about enough on the subject too depression to think about just leave it alone the dan-man is an young man and knows how to act so let it be hes cool.
418. djohnson - April 30, 2009 2:30 AM
I believe this is borderline child pornography. Okay, so I understand he wants to show the world he's a man now, but seriously ... does it have to be nudity? There are many other great ways to show maturity. What about going to a 3rd world country to raise funds to end poverty or run a campaign for the environment. Hell, if Jolie can do it in style why not the D man? This emo-wanna-be-androgynous-CK-ad promo just ain't cutting it. I say bad PR on the agents part. I'm sure there was a lot of money involved to accept this gig. Too bad he decided to sell his soul to the media.
419. bluetooth kopfhörer - November 3, 2009 5:07 AM
Shame Shame he just tryies to be over shotty boy and totally shameless stuff its really awful one.