September 19, 2006
Kylie Minogue has some fancy shoes
I'm not entirely sure what look Kylie Minogue is going for here, but I think my dad owns those same sandals. Only he isn't a pop singer sex-symbol. He's more of a 50-ish year old man who plays golf and walks around the house in his underwear. Which is sort of like a sex-symbol, but only to disgusting perverts who may or may not be blind in both eyes.
More of Kylie and her lovely sandals after the jump.



Previous Entries
» Aaron Carter is engaged» Victoria Beckham slips her nipple
» Lindsay Lohan breaks her arm
» Nicole Richie tries to hide
» Anna Nicole Smith's son gets second autopsy


Comments
1. Posted by Zoey on September 19, 2006 7:04 AM
First!
2. Posted by Wampoon.com on September 19, 2006 7:06 AM
Got dizzy looking at her dress.
http://www.wampoon.com
3. Posted by krisdylee on September 19, 2006 7:11 AM
I have a sneaky suspicion she might end up on GoFugYourself with that lovely get-up.
4. Posted by Tracie on September 19, 2006 7:14 AM
Well, at least they match the dress. I'm thinking they must be super comfortable and she's sick and tired of wearing 4" heels she needs to reach 5'1".
5. Posted by Leyna on September 19, 2006 7:15 AM
aw, celebrities are entitled to wear comfy clothing/shoes too, no? :)
6. Posted by Angry Ferret Jones on September 19, 2006 7:17 AM
Wait, you look at that outfit and it is the SHOES that you find ugly?
7. Posted by Nikk The Templar on September 19, 2006 7:17 AM
I'm with #3. It's just a matter of seconds before the Fug Girls tear her apart.
I love them.
8. Posted by jane's eyre on September 19, 2006 7:27 AM
That dress looks like something you would draw in art class as part of an excercise in patterns.
9. Posted by Onenewshoe on September 19, 2006 7:30 AM
This is all the fuck you have to write about!
10. Posted by reflight on September 19, 2006 7:34 AM
Ladies, is the pairing of a sports bra or T-back shirt with a flowing dress appropriate in this case? Maybe Fug should call her out.
As for the shoes, I must be getting old.
11. Posted by pinky_nip on September 19, 2006 7:36 AM
If I wore clothes like that, I'd have to kick my own ass.
12. Posted by Italian Stallion on September 19, 2006 7:36 AM
Reminds me of a Chinese Checker board........
13. Posted by Italian Stallion on September 19, 2006 7:37 AM
Wow Pinky_nip, It's like when we orgasim at the same time...........
14. Posted by reflight on September 19, 2006 7:39 AM
Nothing from the Lohan/Hilton/Simpson triumverate as yet today, thank heavens. I'd much prefer to discuss the fuck me factor of Kylie's Space 1999 sandals, thank you.
15. Posted by CelebSlam.com on September 19, 2006 7:40 AM
What's with the African Tribal dress? I almost expect her to have one of those lip plates.
http://www.celebslam.com
16. Posted by Lively One on September 19, 2006 7:40 AM
Ummm. They are Balenciaga sandals and they're not THAT bad.
17. Posted by jrzmommy on September 19, 2006 7:43 AM
The phrase "Wrath of God" comes to mind.
18. Posted by Praz on September 19, 2006 7:46 AM
Are we supposed to be making fun of her hair or sandals?
19. Posted by RichPort on September 19, 2006 7:46 AM
This is obviously a Walk of Shame photo. He suitor apparently tore her clothing off, leaving her with just the drapes to cover herself when she left. Of course, that means the men she screws are probably queer. What a shame to hide so a bodacious booty under that eyesore pattern. Bitch.
20. Posted by reflight on September 19, 2006 7:46 AM
The over/under for someone to tell us to leave her alone because she survived the Big C is now 27.
Place your bets.
21. Posted by commissioner on September 19, 2006 7:47 AM
Looks like Ann Heche during her "lesbian experience" days.
22. Posted by TaiTai on September 19, 2006 7:48 AM
Those shoes are de rigeur at all the cancer treatment facilities this year. Dont you guys keep up?
23. Posted by jrzmommy on September 19, 2006 7:51 AM
there's a big truck sneaking up on her.
24. Posted by RichPort on September 19, 2006 7:57 AM
#20 - Just because I had testicular cancer wouldn't excuse my wearing shitty underwear. I agree; I say the bleeding hearts start coming out any time now.
25. Posted by reflight on September 19, 2006 8:05 AM
I'm actually shocked nobody has appeared as yet. She's about as deified as Irwin down under.
As for me, the flapper hair is a riot. If it's hers, she needs a stylest or a hat. If it's chemo hair - well, honey, you *can* by good hair.
26. Posted by reflight on September 19, 2006 8:06 AM
Or buy, as you might prefer.
27. Posted by reflight on September 19, 2006 8:08 AM
by buy stylest stylist
Fucking sunspots from those shoes.
28. Posted by biatcho on September 19, 2006 8:20 AM
Kylie - we can't feel sorry for you because you had cancer when you insist on running around like SuperDyke. Clean it up & get your shit together.
29. Posted by Troller on September 19, 2006 8:38 AM
Is that Sharon Stone?
30. Posted by jrzmommy on September 19, 2006 8:47 AM
is there a Locomotion joke here somewhere?
31. Posted by UNWASHEDMASSES on September 19, 2006 8:49 AM
Kylie Minogue. Sounds like Australian slang for a dirty sexual act, probably involving mouth-to-ass. "Crikey, when she was done blowin' me pisspump, I wheeled her 'round and gave her a Kylie Minogue. Filthy bird."
32. Posted by Shannon on September 19, 2006 8:58 AM
Erm... why does nobody else see what I see? Obviously she's wearing these oh-so fashionable shoes because they are magic shoes. See picture #2? Yup, she's floating.
Everything makes sense now doesn't it? Eat my shorts, hoverboard. Kylie's got hoversandals.
33. Posted by Amy3000 on September 19, 2006 9:00 AM
Is it just me or does it look like she was run over by a truck in that dress?, it looks like tire tracks running the length of it. Unless of course it was the fashion police intentionaly aiming for her, that would make a little more sense...
34. Posted by S.P.F.R.S. on September 19, 2006 9:14 AM
Is it just me or does that scarf wrapped around her neck in #4 look a bit out of place with an (ugly) summer dress? Covering up something Kylie?
35. Posted by RichPort on September 19, 2006 9:21 AM
#31 HAAA!!!!
36. Posted by edb87 on September 19, 2006 9:29 AM
#31 - Priceless.
For someone who usually looks halfway decent, I feel betrayed on this one. I think I'm gonna go bathe in tomato paste.
http://www.edquartersaudio.com,
37. Posted by pinky_nip on September 19, 2006 9:50 AM
@13, Stallion, except when we orgasm together, you're usually shouting "you dirty whore".
Thus, why I want to be your wife. The little niceties.
38. Posted by andrewthezeppo on September 19, 2006 10:36 AM
Did she have breast cancer or brain cancer? That's a horrible outfit.
39. Posted by PaisleyMoon on September 19, 2006 10:39 AM
Congrats Superfish..you are no longer a man. A fact we've been aware of for awhile now.
40. Posted by RichPort on September 19, 2006 10:57 AM
#38 - She has fashion cancer.
41. Posted by jrzmommy on September 19, 2006 11:14 AM
40--oh boy, what a moral dilemma.....to laugh or not to laugh? hmm....I choose.......BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
42. Posted by RichPort on September 19, 2006 11:21 AM
Jrz, where the hell are the morality police today? I am forced to get more vulgar in hopes that they'll pop their tightly bound sphincters out.
43. Posted by jrzmommy on September 19, 2006 11:24 AM
Rich: maybe one is busy wackin' it to old Sophia Loren movies? I dunno *shrugs shoulders*.
44. Posted by NYC on September 19, 2006 11:32 AM
The shoes that Kylie is wearing are really beautiful Balenciaga silver leather sandals from the Summer 2006 collection.
I get a strong feeling that the people on this site critisizing her clothes both can't afford designer clothing nor have good taste.
45. Posted by RichPort on September 19, 2006 11:47 AM
Uuuh, NYC is it? Wear that outfit on the streets of Manhattan and people will start throwing you change. But be careful, they may expect you to sing out of key or dance like a monkey chained to a music box. Cancer Chic is sooooo not eye catching. Which may be the point. I'd walk right past that boombastic booty without even being able to have a stare. Now you tell me what's so great about that??? Oh, and people that can quote pieces of fashion collections spend way too much time on celebrity web sites and... what's that? Oh...
46. Posted by jane's eyre on September 19, 2006 11:49 AM
Labels mean nothing to me. If it's fug, it's fug.
47. Posted by commissioner on September 19, 2006 11:50 AM
@44
Ever hear that saying, "just because you can doesn't mean you should"? Applies here. I don't give a rat's ass how much those ugly fucking shoes cost, I would never, ever consider velcro-ing them on my beautiful feet. "Hoversandals" be damned!
That dress could have cost more than my car, but it doesn't mean it ain't an eyesore.
48. Posted by commissioner on September 19, 2006 11:53 AM
I don't care who you are, if I spot your dumbass wearing something that ridiculous, I'm pointing and laughing my ass off. A big, loud, horsey laugh.
49. Posted by jane's eyre on September 19, 2006 11:54 AM
Those sandals look like those fugly teva velcro sandals spray-painted silver. Balenciaga is laughing his ass all the way to the bank. Stupid mindless label-worshipping lemmings.
50. Posted by commissioner on September 19, 2006 11:56 AM
It's cancer chic. Much like heroine chic, but the drugs aren't as good.
51. Posted by Doodlebug on September 19, 2006 12:24 PM
Um...am I the only one who wants to give her a bit of a break? The woman just survived BREAST CANCER..she can damn well wear whatever shoes she wants to!
52. Posted by pinky_nip on September 19, 2006 12:27 PM
And the predicted douchebag checks in at #51!!
53. Posted by EazyE on September 19, 2006 12:29 PM
She reminds me of some crazy old woman who wanders around all day going into diners and ordering just a cup of hot water, then pulls out some crumpled tea bag from the bottam of her purse, muttering loudly to whoever's seated next to her.
54. Posted by biatcho on September 19, 2006 12:48 PM
NYC - you are the epitome of a wannabe. Just because there's a name like Balenciaga attached to a hideous pair of sandals one could easily find in a dump like Payless and because famous folks wear them does not make it appealing or proper to wear in public for all to see. Remember the dead swan Bjork wore to the Oscar's years back? remember that?? I am sure it cost a TON of money but it was still grotesquely offensive to everyone but her.
So me a favor you lemming, go pretend to be Marilyn Monroe and OD on sleeping pills please. Because she did that apparently its cool!
55. Posted by 86 on September 19, 2006 1:03 PM
Kylie Minogue can do no wrong.
56. Posted by jane's eyre on September 19, 2006 2:08 PM
Hey hey hey!! Star Jones has shoes at Payless--that means that whatever has her name on it is gorgeous--because she's a celebrity!
57. Posted by RichPort on September 19, 2006 2:12 PM
#51 - Thank you for allowing #52 to give me a hearty laugh. As a reward, I shall now slap you with my johnson.
What (slap) the fuck (slap) were you (slap) thinking??? (slap slap slap slap slap)
58. Posted by reflight on September 19, 2006 4:32 PM
Wow - just checked in to see who won the pool, but I'm pretty sure nobody had 51.
Thanks, RichPort, for giving Doodle the door prize.
59. Posted by stonefoxhippie on September 19, 2006 10:57 PM
Having cancer is no excuse for poor taste - My MOM had cancer and remains stylish as ever, "chemo brain" or not.
60. Posted by knowhere on September 20, 2006 5:22 AM
her clothes are clearly from the future. her haircut sucks. unless it's a wig. in which case her wig sucks. PS. the future sucks
61. Posted by miss_fantomas on September 20, 2006 7:42 AM
Her 'haircut' would be her hair growing out after having chemotherapy.
I think she's gorgeous and at least as unfortunate as her outfit is at least it's not the same hideous trendwhoring shit everyone else is wearing.
62. Posted by cv on September 20, 2006 9:31 AM
Is it really worth posting Kylie Minogue photos unless there are some nice shots of her bum?
63. Posted by Michele on September 23, 2006 4:37 PM
Is she still alive?
Good to Know...really good to know. Now i have to make my ears ready to crappy disco song, AGAIN! no way!!!
64. Posted by Michele on September 23, 2006 4:39 PM
Is she still alive??
No WAY!!!