March 20, 2006
Daniel Craig is bad Bond
Following the news that Daniel Craig would be in “casual dress” rather then the customary tux for the majority of the upcoming James Bond film, as well as not driving the Aston Martin, an insider has revealed there will also be a nude scene with his "man dangle" on display. Barbra Broccoli, who runs the Bond franchise (into the ground), wants to show the world that Craig is all man. The insider comments,
“He has no problems with full-frontal nudity and it shows. Prepare for some jaw-dropping love scenes."
Well, well, well. It sounds to me like Daniel Craig is overcompensating for something. He doesn’t get to drive the Bond car, or even wear a tux, so he’s got to strut around with his huge johnson out. Pathetic. Although, seriously, where is this Bond film going? Is it going to feature him driving his kids to soccer practice in a Prius, then coming home to unwind with a virgin Shirley Temple? In this version, he's also going to be using "reflective listening" rather than guns to deal this his enemies, and his mission will be to rescue his balls from Barbra Broccoli's purse.
Previous Entries
» Juliette Lewis is...I have no idea» Nobody likes Teri Hatcher
» Tori Spelling has mom issues
» Natalie Portman gets monkey love
» Chuck Norris reads Chuck Norris facts


Comments
1. Posted by Derek Hail on March 20, 2006 4:21 PM
You left out the fact, he is doing all this without his two front teeth.
2. Posted by xaputa on March 20, 2006 4:25 PM
"Barbra Broccoli"? "Barbra Broccoli"???!!!!
OMFG ROTFLMAOLOLOLllOL!!!!!!!!11!1!11
oh, and Carig sucks
("Barbra Broccoli" is great though)
3. Posted by prideofchucky on March 20, 2006 4:28 PM
Bland, James Bland..
4. Posted by ESQ on March 20, 2006 4:42 PM
Seriously, I guess we will not be seeing no "shaken, but stirred martinis" here. You hit it right this imbecile needs to compensate for his lack of looks, lack of driving abilities and probably lack of acting.
I think porn should be his next option..at least you do not need to know how to drive or really act for that matter.
5. Posted by Lala on March 20, 2006 4:54 PM
Hey, I'm more than okay with it.
6. Posted by sometimesboy on March 20, 2006 4:56 PM
the sad news...the next bond will have to do anal...
7. Posted by naus on March 20, 2006 4:56 PM
They should end this masquerade and just hire Clive Owen for the 007 spot, and get Daniel Craig to be some villain.
8. Posted by el dano on March 20, 2006 4:58 PM
He was great in Layer Cake when he was a laid back coke dealer. I was excited to hear that he was going to be the next bond, until we got news of the "real" Daniel Craig. A guy who can't drive stick and wusses out after getting punched in the face is a terrible choice for Bond. They need to get some PR guys on him quick.
The whole Bond franchise has already been run into the ground, but this is pathetic. What the hell are they trying to accomplish? Making him more attratctive to female viewers is the opposite of what they need to do. He needs to be a man's man.
Sean Connery made James Bond the English equivalent of John Wayne. Daniel Craig is the British equivalent of Macaulay Culkin.
9. Posted by InsomniActress on March 20, 2006 5:05 PM
Intruiging weapon of choice, I'd say.
10. Posted by Kevin on March 20, 2006 5:18 PM
Maybe his "man dangle" is really one of Q's secret weapons and shoots lasers or something.
11. Posted by Jacq on March 20, 2006 5:20 PM
I would be willing to bet that, if there is in fact any full frontal, we'll see it here first. Then, we can save our heard-earned pennies and the pain of watching the entire film.
James Bland? He seems more like Pussy Galore to me.
12. Posted by giant sloth on March 20, 2006 5:21 PM
As I have had pointed out to me, a Shirley Temple is virgin by definition.
13. Posted by cibby on March 20, 2006 5:36 PM
And so begins the transition of James Bond from spy movies to hardcore pornography...
14. Posted by Binky on March 20, 2006 5:54 PM
UUgGGG !
I think this franchise is headed in the wrong direction fast and DOA. How about 'plot' or 'character development' or 'relevance to today's society'?
{I actually saw Cubby one year, ages ago, in Cannes. He seemed ok, somewhat sane, and he said 'Hey Binky - How goes it ?' - which really surprised me as the internet hadn't been invented yet. well...I thought that's what he said}
It's been done. If I want porn... I'll... like - WAKE UP !!!
15. Posted by Jayne on March 20, 2006 5:57 PM
hottttt <3
16. Posted by Spindoc on March 20, 2006 6:03 PM
Nice to know that Mark Whalbergs fake Schlong from boogie nights is still getting acting work.
17. Posted by Feed_Me_Chocolate on March 20, 2006 6:04 PM
#3, how 'bout:
Schlong. James Schlong.
Really, does anyone want to see his thingamajigger? What's with Hollywood trying to get full male frontal nudity into non-porn films? I love my husband's member, but let's face it, GUYS PENISES ARE REALLY FUNNY TO LOOK AT.
18. Posted by Mugato on March 20, 2006 6:28 PM
Is everyone ignoring the fact that there's no way they would make an R rated Bond movie, therefore everyone involved is just talking out of their ass?
19. Posted by MrPloppy on March 20, 2006 6:50 PM
Mugato is right. There is no way we are going to see Bonds dick in a family film. They haven’t even shown tits yet.
Besides I think all the shit coming from the set is misinformation. So when we do see the next mediocre film it isn’t as bad as we’d feared.
20. Posted by toby on March 20, 2006 7:12 PM
Nice to see where men get their class these days.
21. Posted by ILovePapaSmurf on March 20, 2006 7:15 PM
Well, I at least know NOW that my 10 bucks will not be going to waste...
22. Posted by newbondsux on March 20, 2006 7:18 PM
Actually #19, breasts made an appearance in "The Living Daylights" when the last disgrace to the Bond name used a topless woman as a human shield to surprise a bad guy. That doesn't change the fact that they're not gonna show you Bond's winkie, and doesn't change the fact that this Bond "Reboot" is a boot in the ass to real Bond fans.
23. Posted by dwhmnsa on March 20, 2006 7:34 PM
I'm no Bond expert, but we need to remember that the movie they're apparently making is Casino Royale, which was the first James Bond book ever written. In this book Bond isn't sure he wants to keep being a spy, and is adjusting to a life of espionage. I'm not saying that this means it will automatically be good or anything, but that could be one reason why he isn't all snazzed up, driving the car, and spouting the catch-phrases, because it's early in his career. Also, in terms of Craig's "man dangle", the novel Casino Royale had Bond get captured and undergo graphic genital torture at the hands of a villain called "Le Chiffre". Maybe this sounds lame to you guys, but I think its an interesting idea to go back to the roots. I'll be honest, I haven't enjoyed the last few gadget-crazy Bond flicks I've seen anyways. Remember, Ian Fleming, the creator of Bond, wrote Casino Royale. He wrote the cock dangle scene, he wrote the unsure-of-himself Bond. Maybe it'll be cool.
24. Posted by dwhmnsa on March 20, 2006 7:36 PM
and Clive Owen is way too caveman to be Bond anyways.
25. Posted by newbondsux on March 20, 2006 7:44 PM
Clive Owen??? I love that "when I fall in love" duet he did with Celine Dion, but I don't think he can cut it as a Bond...
26. Posted by krisdylee on March 20, 2006 7:49 PM
I know there's a "cobblers" joke somehow, but damn my wine infused brain, I just can't think of any right now..... Happy Birthday to Me
27. Posted by Binky on March 20, 2006 7:59 PM
I don't know what the 'f' 'cobblers' is but - pass the wine #26
28. Posted by bunnyhugger on March 20, 2006 7:59 PM
dwhmnsa, you make an excellent point. i never read the books, don't remember all the movies (although i remember being dragged to the drive-in w/ my folks). however,
WHO THE HELL IS THIS GUY??
somebody give me a frame of reference!
and even tho the last few bond films sucked, i thought pierce brosnan at least had the class to carry it off.
sorry, sean connery is the man. more so now than ever (pant-pant)
almost forgot. without the car and the tux, bond becomes magnum on valium.
29. Posted by Binky on March 20, 2006 8:00 PM
And Happy birthday!
30. Posted by krisdylee on March 20, 2006 8:08 PM
Thanks, Binky. I am enjoying a really nice reisling my hubby bought for me.... cheers to you, and cobblers is some crazy british term that means bollocks, or so I've been told. (And this is what his daddy said when this guy was accused of being wimpy!!) I dunno. It's all fun to read though. Woohoo!!!! Damn, this is good wine.
31. Posted by MeganHarris on March 20, 2006 8:11 PM
Today was a YELLOW day at TheSuperficial.com
On the index page we have:
Natalie Portman wearing a tacky yellow thing.
Juliette Lewis wearing a yellow banana suit.
Daniel Craig in front of a yellow backround.
Nicole Richie with a cute yellow Tweedy bird in backround.
On purpose?
32. Posted by bunnyhugger on March 20, 2006 8:18 PM
#30 krisdylee
happy birthday! my daughter was yesterday. enjoy your wine, i toast you with the Captian!! : )
33. Posted by LoneWolf on March 20, 2006 8:41 PM
#30, that was me. I was hoping that someone would ask what bollocks are, but they never did .
Maybe they can come up with a new name for the movie based on the full-frontal scene:
Dr. No (I Did *Not* See That)
Thunderballs
The Man With the Golden Schvantz
Never Say Nudity Again
Golden One-Eye
You Only See It Once
This Worm Is Not Enough
From Craig With Nausea
Oh, and Happy B-day.
34. Posted by krisdylee on March 20, 2006 8:59 PM
How about octowussy?
35. Posted by Binky on March 20, 2006 9:36 PM
#33 lol
(and here I am stuck with home brew. e-mail some Young's and London Pride.)
36. Posted by SpiderMomma on March 20, 2006 9:43 PM
He would be better off doing gay porn. There we go, a Brokeback version of James Bond. Yeah...that's the ticket. Does this seem pathetic to anyone else? I admit I am not a fan of Bond, but sheesh! At least get an actor that actually has some balls!
37. Posted by SpiderMomma on March 20, 2006 9:44 PM
He would be better off doing gay porn. There we go, a Brokeback version of James Bond. Yeah...that's the ticket. Does this seem pathetic to anyone else? I admit I am not a fan of Bond, but sheesh! At least get an actor that actually has some balls!
38. Posted by Pez_D_Spencer on March 20, 2006 10:40 PM
2 - You'll love her dad: Albert "Cubby" Broccoli.
39. Posted by popsi_zen on March 20, 2006 11:52 PM
You know all this controversy is probably going to make this the highest grossing Bond film in years, and you know what that means, they will just keep remaking them all with this guy as Bond - they could use #33's list of reworked titles.
40. Posted by Lord Absu on March 21, 2006 12:18 AM
A view to a kill, indeed... ginormously emblazoned on the silver screen in all its unholy glory... yuck. >.<
41. Posted by hafaball on March 21, 2006 3:28 AM
If there was any glimmer of hope for me to see this movie...it all died by the mention of his weewee. If Bond dies now, I will be sad, though I'm sure Sean Connery will be quite mad. For Craig and co. has ruined this film, and Bond forever in no time still. Quoth the Raven, nevermore bitch
42. Posted by bafongu on March 21, 2006 7:41 AM
If, as it looks, they plan on featuring his tool, is the movie going to get a "X" rating? And if all the hype is now about featuring his tool, instead of the maximum coolness of the character, do I really want to be in an audience of men envisioning an evening of bone smoking with ol Danny boy? Lights go down in the theater and all the boys start puffin? Geeeeezzzz......
43. Posted by prideofchucky on March 21, 2006 11:06 AM
1. #17-(feed me chocolate): That's brilliant! (How did I miss that one?)BUT---
FYI if u plan to say "Penises are funny to look at" while looking at ur husbands winkie check over your life insurance policy carefully...
2.#41 Hafaball- Connery wanted bond dead ALOOONGG time ago. He'd be the 1st one to dance on the grave of this tired franchise.
44. Posted by LoneWolf on March 21, 2006 11:20 AM
And, if I may add one more:
Penis-o Royale
I'm finished.
45. Posted by Sassy on March 21, 2006 11:32 AM
Casino Royale was a legendary flop the first time they made it. The guy who played Bond in it never worked again.
You'd think a lesson would have been learned.
46. Posted by Spindoc on March 21, 2006 12:16 PM
In the 1967 Version of Casino royal James Bond was played by Peter Sellers, actually he did work again, but you're right, the movie sucked.
I'm curious if this one will suck as bad as the HUGE suck-fest Bond movies from the past. My votes for worst go to View to a Kill, The one with Halle Berry in it, Moonraker, and Licence to Kill. I'd rather go to a Kevin Federline concert than sit through any of those again.
47. Posted by PG Barnum on March 21, 2006 12:36 PM
Not to defend the film, producers or actors, but the character of James Bond WILL drive an Aston Martin in "Casino Royale". Just mentioning this again, because it was removed this morning. I love this blog, please let me at least put my two cents in! Thanks!
48. Posted by Swordman on March 21, 2006 12:46 PM
SURPRISE! My fists make housecalls, you flaming simp!
49. Posted by newbondsux on March 21, 2006 1:11 PM
OMG! I love this site, but it is infotainment, people...do your freakin homework. Casino Royale was a spoof. It starred David Niven as James Bond, Woody Allen as Jimmy Bond, Ursula Andress as Vesper Lynd. Also Orson Welles, Joanna Pettet, Deborah Kerr, William Holden, Charles Boyer, John Huston, George Raft, and Jacqueline Bisset
All of those people "worked again", nimrod...
the point is that emasculating Bond now, or turning him into a Visual Marketing rep for Ford is ugly business.
50. Posted by gogoboots on March 21, 2006 1:39 PM
I'm not sure why Daniel Craig keeps on coming up on here, but I would really prefer to see something else. Like maybe a Linday Lohan OD or something...
51. Posted by lysistrata11 on March 21, 2006 2:34 PM
#43- If Connery wanted Bond to die so badly, then why did he run off to Warner Brothers after quitting the series to do a remake of Thunderball with that skank, Kim Basinger?
#49- Casino Royale was the television debut of James (Jimmy) Bond in 1954 on CBS. It was broadcast live as part of the "Climax Mystery Theater." Barry Nelson played Bond in this one. You're thinking of the 1967 spoof.
"Do your freakin homework".
52. Posted by bunnyhugger on March 21, 2006 3:00 PM
#51, please remember the details behind that film. sir sean said he would NEVER do bond again. thus the title, "never say never again"
and spindoc, i'm surprised at you, mixing up your silly british actors (don't flame me, i'm fragile!). david niven!!
but yes, he definitely continued to work.
53. Posted by newbondsux on March 21, 2006 3:11 PM
Nice work, #52. But you'll note I was commenting specifically about the 1967 version and the casting comment made by spindoc - not discounting other versions like the book, or the tv show.
54. Posted by hafaball on March 21, 2006 5:40 PM
Connery doesn't want the franchise to die...'.';;
If he did he wouldn't have excepted his face be on the videogame From Russia with Love. Unless he just wanted the check...
55. Posted by DivaG81 on March 21, 2006 5:56 PM
Does this guy even have any hair? oy - I'm pretty sure he's on the very BOTTOM of the list of guys I'd like to see naked. Couldn't they have picked Colin Farrell? I think full frontal male nudity is the last taboo to break in terms of main stream film, but it just seems out of character for Bond...I picture him in a tux or a bathrobe...not naked with his man-parts being tortured - nastay.
56. Posted by thegabi on March 21, 2006 6:55 PM
I remember thinking he was sexy in that shower scene in Tombraider but sexy in a potato-faced dwarf kinda way.
57. Posted by bunnyhugger on March 21, 2006 8:22 PM
#53, sorry, that comment should have been split in two.
i was responding to the peter sellers comment, also lightly toasting spindoc (who is my hero), no flames here. and heaven help me, i don't remember the tv show.
i should also note that as far as i can remember, wasn't
"get smart" loosely based on the bond franchise?
58. Posted by tikivixen on March 22, 2006 5:16 AM
Have any of you complainers actually seen him in a film?
I don't know if he'll do even an adequate James Bond per se, but he's been a terrific character actor in other films, intense and edgy. Like Connery, he has very expressive eyes. He is certainly not lacking in acting ability. Who the fuck cares about the stick shift?!? That is so ridiculous.
I think y'all oughta wait till AFTER you see the film to decide if he sucks or not.
I'd rather see an interesting actor--even if, OFFSCREEN, he's not the soul of machismo--than another goddamned stupid male model or pompous wanna-be Olivier (and no, I don't mean Pierce Brosnan, he's lovely and firing him was evil.)
As far as nudity goes...heh heh. No problem. Although I'd rather it'd been Sean. He IS Bond. Still. Period. *sigh*
But anyway, if they can reinvent this series in a more modern, original, offbeat mode, it might just save the cinematic Bond. They can't go on the way they've been; man, that formula is just sooo tired. That's my theory as to why they hired Craig: they wanted a character actor, someone not so mainstream and predictable and dull.
Maybe it'll work.
I'm going to wait and see.
59. Posted by bunnyhugger on March 22, 2006 2:30 PM
tiki-
no, i haven't seen him in a film and that's part of my point. once again i beg of y'all, give me a frame of reference!
pierce wasn't bond, but at least he had some sex appeal.
sean will always be bond (and a star in some of my dreams). and damn, i can talk to a scotsman all day long and be happy, be it sir sean or billy conolly. that accent, whooo-boy.
60. Posted by HollywoodSnark on January 9, 2007 4:40 PM
lol, man dangle...