Feb 16 2006Mary-Kate & Ashley Olsen model for Badgley Mischka

Here are Mary-Kate & Ashley Olsen, wandering through the halls of the Overlook Hotel. They're supposedly modeling something. Perhaps anorexia. Definitely not breast implants. Remember that big countdown to their eighteenth birthday, when everyone thought they were going to be so gorgeous? And then the birthday came and the world collectively scratched their heads, because screwing them seems about as pleasant as screwing the vacuum cleaner. At least the vacuum doesn't complain when you use a marker to draw boobs on it.

Reader Comments
1. Georgia - February 16, 2006 3:16 PM
I don't get these girls. They are just rich. I see better looking girls walking down the street.
And they are defenitely not sexy, unless you are a pedophile of course.
2. Nikk The Templar - February 16, 2006 3:17 PM
I said....Goddamn, those are some seriously airbrushed hobbits.
3. Juliette - February 16, 2006 3:21 PM
I never understood people who say they are pretty or hot. They have about as much appeal as a broomstick. On top of that they have zero personality and always look like spoiled bitches.
And I hate that stupid duck smile they always do.
4. Jacq - February 16, 2006 3:28 PM
The best comparison to make between the Olsens and a vaccum cleaner is that they all suck at life
5. suzy - February 16, 2006 3:28 PM
their dresses are ok, but their makeup is HIDEOUS!!!! They're clothing line has better clothes than they actually wear... that's sad when a 5 year old can dress better than you
6. Zanna - February 16, 2006 3:28 PM
Get a load of the picture in the url: Heyyyy, this is a nice big mirror to do lines on!!!!! I've seen healthier hair on homeless people coming out of a dumpster.
http://www.olsen-twins-news.com/newsimages/feb2006/mary-kate-ashley-olsen-badgley-mischka-ad-hq-01.jpg
7. Binky - February 16, 2006 3:30 PM
From their facial expressions - it looks like they'll both have to put 'bodily functions' on their wish list for next Christmas.
8. krahe - February 16, 2006 3:31 PM
*Are* we certain that they're still actually, you know, alive?
9. outfoxed - February 16, 2006 3:32 PM
#3...I don't know about that, broomsticks are pretty sexy.
10. Zanna - February 16, 2006 3:33 PM
You think the makeup is bad on that, Suzy? Check this out:
http://www.olsen-twins-news.com/newsimages/feb2006/mary-kate-ashley-olsen-badgley-mischka-show-feb-7-2006-05.jpg
It reminds me of silly putty. Tell me when you see this picture you don't want to press her face on some newspaper.
11. LaydeeBug - February 16, 2006 3:34 PM
Great dresses, but why are there two five-year-olds wearing them? Bedknobs and Broomsticks comes to mind.
12. Devil Is Chrome - February 16, 2006 3:38 PM
#10 pictures - She's starting to look like the Lioness of New York...
whawhaawha!
I wish it were possible to fast forward thirty years.
13. tits_on_snack - February 16, 2006 3:41 PM
http://searchviews.com/archives/shining_twins.jpg
14. pookiedoo - February 16, 2006 3:42 PM
They look like a Buy-One-Get-One-Free special at Heidi Fleiss's House Of Whores!
15. SAPPY14 - February 16, 2006 3:45 PM
is it bad that i think they look really pretty? my only problem is marykate's eyebrows, they looks like melted crayons.
#13 probably the funniest thing i've ever seen i love it
16. SAPPY14 - February 16, 2006 3:46 PM
also, why does ashley have two purses??
17. xavierout - February 16, 2006 3:48 PM
They're creepy now, they've been creepy for years and they'll be creepy forevermore. The vacancy of the expression that is always on their faces makes Paris Hilton look contemplative in comparison. Did I mention that they're really creepy? I did? Well they are.
18. Havet - February 16, 2006 3:51 PM
I don't care about the twins much... I just really like those dresses!! esp the ones in #10.
the twins just look wierd... But well, even when they were in 'full house' i never thought they were that cute.
and how can u hav such HUGE eyes?! it doesnt look normal!
19. elvindeath - February 16, 2006 3:52 PM
I'd fuck 'em.
20. LaydeeBug - February 16, 2006 3:53 PM
#16, ones a purse the other is her big assed bumble bee sunglasses.
21. PinkRose - February 16, 2006 3:53 PM
That picture reminds me of that scene from The Shining, where the twins are at the end of the hallway calling out to the son.
Creepy..creepy...creepy.
22. Spindoc - February 16, 2006 3:58 PM
Who knew Olive Oil had a twin sister? Anyway, Superficial guy, or whoever it is who writes this blog...I just gotta say that your comment about the vacuum not complaining when you draw boobs on it was just about the funniest damn thing I've read. Thanks for that "Almost gonna pee" feeling.
23. baltogirl - February 16, 2006 4:05 PM
which one is which?
24. PostAcidYouth - February 16, 2006 4:08 PM
I dunno, the Olsen on the left is quite a pretty little thing. I don't care for the twins much, but they're not ugly
25. MeganHarris - February 16, 2006 4:09 PM
I think they are just great.
Mary-kate is the red-head.
26. suzy - February 16, 2006 4:19 PM
Posted by Zanna on February 16, 2006 03:28 PM
"Get a load of the picture in the url: Heyyyy, this is a nice big mirror to do lines on!!!!! I've seen healthier hair on homeless people coming out of a dumpster.
http://www.olsen-twins-news.com/newsimages/feb2006/mary-kate-ashley-olsen-badgley-mischka-ad-hq-01.jpg"
IS THAT A NIP SLIP I SEE IN THE MIRROR???????
27. memichelle77 - February 16, 2006 4:22 PM
I scanned the picture for a nip slip, and i don't think there is one. however, even more shocking is that when you look at Ashley from the side (not at her reflection), it actually looks like she has boobs. what the hell?
28. LaydeeBug - February 16, 2006 4:27 PM
26 & 27, it's the strapless, push-up bra she's wearing. They are made for boob-challenged people like her (and me).
29. em167 - February 16, 2006 4:30 PM
Psh, I think they look great. Mary-Kate looks healthier than she has in a while, and Ashley is just beautiful. I mean, I think this site is hilarious, but, come on, there's no story here. Post some more stuff on Tom Nutso Cruise
30. ShanDourdan - February 16, 2006 4:33 PM
Forget just boobs, it actually looks like she may actually be female, she's got an arse too?. I guess that must be real since most photographers try to airbrush that stuff *out* not in...
I love the dresses, I think they're stunning and dare I say it, I actually think Ashley looks good in the first one. But I just wish she'd quit with the 'deer caught in a head light with exceedingly pouty lips' look. Ecch.
31. playahater101 - February 16, 2006 4:35 PM
I think they look pretty good, too. The makeup's a little too much. They look kinda like those little girls that mothers put in beauty pageants when they are like 5 years old.
#1, "I don't get these girls. They are just rich. I see better looking girls walking down the street"
What's the difference between them and any other celeb? Paris isn't any better. All any of them are is rich.
32. suzy - February 16, 2006 4:36 PM
eh, you never know.. it woulda been funny i was only shocked cuz i know they dont have boobies lol....
still... funny
33. Phil - February 16, 2006 4:36 PM
"Hello Danny. Come and play with us. Come and play with us, Danny. Forever... and ever... and ever.
34. maiira - February 16, 2006 4:45 PM
AHHHHH!!
.....
Holy christ, for a second there I thought I was watching a twisted version of The Shining. Or some weird Japanese horror flick. They seriously look like they're going to reach through my screen and pull me into some dark underworld. And then they would turn their heads slowly to look at me and whisper "you are one of usssssss."
35. J. Te - February 16, 2006 4:48 PM
Was that picture, by any chance, inspired by THIS picture: http://www.archiviokubrick.it/film/shining/foto/twins02.jpg
36. tits_on_snack - February 16, 2006 4:56 PM
i posted the Shining picture first, so, neener neener.
Anyway these two have always weirded me out. When they were little kids, their faces looked like those good luck troll dolls.
37. cibby - February 16, 2006 4:57 PM
I don't like the current style of overloading the dark makeup on the eyes.
When that first came out in the magazines, I remember thinking 'why would you want to make women look like ghouls?'
Now, it's all over the place, and it's revolting.
38. TheRedInk - February 16, 2006 5:10 PM
History's Mysteries: Haunted Hotels
39. dimestoredetective - February 16, 2006 5:11 PM
I love it when celebs complain about how hard it is to be in the limelight etc. att the time. When, after one semester at college crushes them, sends them packing. And these bitches don't have to worry about rent, and food as we all did. I really feel for these girls. It's so hard to be filthy rich and gnomish. Gnome gnome gnome.
40. alicat - February 16, 2006 5:15 PM
I'm starting to wonder what is wrong with their mouths. Has anyone seen them smile since Full House? Did they catch some horrible disease that transformed their teeth and tongues into something only Beetlejuice would touch? Or Stavros...which isn't saying much since he has moved on to Paris.
41. HughJorganthethird - February 16, 2006 5:19 PM
This fucking picture is freaking me out. It looks like a scene shot from "The Others 2"
42. Lavis - February 16, 2006 5:26 PM
Remeber the movie "The Shining" and those evil twins that kept showing up in the hallways of the haunted hotel? Yeah, scary!
43. eatyourfeedback - February 16, 2006 5:37 PM
Good God, the likeness to the Overlook Hotel is amazing! At any moment they will be saying "Come play with us Danny...forever and ever and ever!" All they need are matching dresses.
I've never found anything particularly attractive about the Olsen twins and, for that matter, I don't know any men who find them to be anything extraordinary either. There is something distinctly monkey-ish about their facial features.
44. SMF121490 - February 16, 2006 5:42 PM
21 That is exactly what I thought when I first saw the photo. REDRUM REDRUM
45. downshine - February 16, 2006 5:47 PM
the duck smile makes me want to slit my wrists! and since when did 5foot2inch pre-pubescent girls become models?
46. HollyJ - February 16, 2006 5:53 PM
I hate to say it...but I think they look very pretty in this particular shot. The blonde has the prettiest face but her hair sucks. Dark hair is better.
I haven't seen them look this "feminine" in...well...ever... Despite the complete titlessness.
47. kuennen sux - February 16, 2006 6:06 PM
Are these chicks happy?
48. MP$40 - February 16, 2006 6:26 PM
They look like coked out prom whores!
49. manunited - February 16, 2006 6:26 PM
One monkey carries 2 handbags...one with 12 candy bars inside... the other bag to throw up into once candy bars have been inhaled.
50. MP$40 - February 16, 2006 6:26 PM
Courtney Love's secret love twins! ROFL...
51. Jayne - February 16, 2006 6:27 PM
How awful.
Just...gah..
and that picture from #10..
wow.
52. ~S.Starr~ - February 16, 2006 6:30 PM
OMG...you people are retarded. It is a photoshoot...there make-up and hair was done for them (so knocking their make-up and hair is pointless).
I am starting to get the impression that a lot of you just come on here to bash celebrities...regardless of who it is or what they have done. Given it is a celebrity bashing website...But HEY...give credit where credit is deserved!! THEY LOOK BEAUTIFUL!! Always have and always will...
~S
53. hafaball - February 16, 2006 6:39 PM
Great, now every fanatasy I have of them will involve Jack Nicholson putting an axe in my ass...thanks Superficial! Very funny though hehe
54. Go Sip - February 16, 2006 6:50 PM
I have been drawing these two "stick figures" since kindergarten.
55. HughJorganthethird - February 16, 2006 7:01 PM
Yeah S. Starr WE'RE retarded. Actually I have to give you credit, your post is the most unintentionaly hilarious thing I have ever read. I don't think I've ever come across anything or anyone so devoid of irony.
It's the fucking Olsen twins you moron! They get bashed becuase they are talentless, souless, corporate robots who's entire purpose in life is to take money from idiots like yourself. Give credit were it is deserved? For what? Walking with clothes on?
You better shut off the computer now and run along, I think I just heard the short bus pull up outside your place.
56. Zanna - February 16, 2006 7:27 PM
S. Starr, honey...we got some 'esplainin to do.....this site IS about bashing celebrities. We come here and we rant and we rave because it's an outlet and it's FUN. Here is a nice site for you to enjoy: http://www.babyanimalz.com/index.htm
57. spamnews - February 16, 2006 7:34 PM
Excuse the fuck out of me but all you haters bashing that picture would probably come in your pants if those two were walking down to your hotel room lookin' like that.
58. Ing - February 16, 2006 7:43 PM
I think these girls are smarter then they seem..they have made money for themselves from a young age and have ALWAYS worked at something or other. Unlike useless morons like Paris who were born into money..but dam they have 300mil in the bank they cld at least fake a smile..
They have always been CUTE bt they try too hard to look grown up and sexy. That stupid pout of Ashleys and duck smile of MaryKates is sooo old already..just smile goddammit is it so hard!
I dont think they look so alike now they are becoming more and more different with age..MaryKate is a lot smaller and has a way different face shape and thinner lips..
59. Manderoni - February 16, 2006 7:47 PM
#56 - Zanna....I agree with the fact that we all come here to bash on celebs...believe me, I love thesuperficial. BUT you just made my day with the baby animal website!! HA!! I love it!! Now I have a new site to look at everyday....hehe, so cute!! I'm a dork, I know...
60. amma - February 16, 2006 7:57 PM
...I agree, the one on the left has a prettier face, but the dark hair looks better. Is there any way to meld them into one regular size person?
I totally think they are cute...and should be taken that way. Glamour vamps they aint, trying to market them that way is doomed.
At least we don't see them falling down drunk in public or on sex vids. They made their money working and have tried to further their education.
Definitely heads above some of their mini-dog weilding peers.
61. The Devil - February 16, 2006 7:57 PM
Beauty is self-evident to the beholder and these two are beautiful, IMHO.
62. JediKnight437 - February 16, 2006 8:07 PM
Can someone say 'Jean-Bennet Ramsey" ? Ugh. Someone order them a double burger, STAT!
63. Binky - February 16, 2006 8:08 PM
I agree - # 56 Thanks for the link.
A walk in the park...
64. Binky - February 16, 2006 8:20 PM
...well at least those animals get your mind off those new Abu Ghraib pix and these Dawn of the Dead pix for a while..
65. Binky - February 16, 2006 8:28 PM
and no I'm not actually that crazy guy on Survivor - but tanx for asking x
66. M@ce - February 16, 2006 8:32 PM
I thought I saw Mary-Kate and Ashley at my doctor's office today. Boy was I embarrassed when the police arrived and pried my naked thrusting ass off of the doctor's skeleton and his coat rack. Still, that coat rack sort of had it coming...it wanted it.
67. a concerned fan - February 16, 2006 8:48 PM
They are gremlins!! Check it out:
http://www.robotjohnny.com/2005/06/09/brightlight/
68. Toby - February 16, 2006 8:51 PM
Not an awesome picture but Mary-Kate looks better than Ashley. Why is she always pouting like that?!? Not sexy. #56 Thanks for the website!! Hilarious!
69. Kg - February 16, 2006 9:06 PM
maybe if you taped them together...
70. ESQ - February 16, 2006 9:16 PM
Twins: Look Mommy we went in your closet and tried on your dresses and put on your make-up, don't we look beautiful?
Mom: It looks nice girls, but I think you are a little too young to be dressing up in Mommys things. You don't want to look like that Paris Hilton tramp, now do you? Go get dressed back in your clothes and wipe off that make-up.
71. LaydeeBug - February 16, 2006 9:24 PM
#56 - Awwwwwwwwwww!
72. Dash Riprock - February 16, 2006 10:06 PM
You'd have to sleep with both of these midgets (as opposed to sleeping with just one of them) to have anything resembling a sexual experience. But I'd still end up unsatsisfied, longing for something more. Sigh.
73. TaiTai - February 16, 2006 10:20 PM
Um, does anybody else notice that the Lemur on the fifth row on #56's link looks exactly like one of the twins?
74. the beast - February 16, 2006 11:17 PM
i don't know. i think they look beautiful. and besides...when's the last time you saw a model that DIDN'T look vacant or for that matter a chick who didn't wish she looked as slender as they did. they're no nicole richie skeleton but they're also no fat fuck britney spears either.
75. Fatty Boom-Batty - February 16, 2006 11:49 PM
I just know that Uncle Joey is masterbating to these pictures.
76. Dee - February 17, 2006 12:16 AM
I never got what all the hype over these two was about, i guess because there are two of them. They look like little girls who got loose in someones closet most of the time. They don't come off as very interesting or bright either.
77. Aimtrue - February 17, 2006 12:21 AM
Ok-I'ld bang them-but only if it was a threesome.
78. ~S.Starr~ - February 17, 2006 12:48 AM
HughJorganthethird:
You know what...you are right. Hell, you have even inspired me to join the bashing! Ummm, where should I start....OMG, they are joint CEO's of a multi-million dollar corporation...what morons! And they are worth a reported $150 million dollars each...stupid bitches! They scored a Badgly Mischka modeling contract that probably made them more money than most people make in 5 years time...what fools!!!!
And speaking of being a dumbass...Ashly is the queen od morons...what with her being a college student at well known New York University...god will this girl ever grow up!?!?!?
Seriously people...I think it is time we go back to bashing the real morons of the entertainment industry...Like Paris Hilton and Nicole Ritchie...
79. TheLusciousDeluxe - February 17, 2006 1:16 AM
43 - Yeah, LOL, gotta love that Overlook reference. The twins in The Shining, LOL! So funny!
80. flamarkel - February 17, 2006 1:32 AM
You all are so harsh! I think they're beautiful. Their eyes are the most captivating I've seen in some time. I could stare into those eyes for days. I'd do them in the bushes any day! Me? I'm just an ordinary raccoon.
81. Bo_Smith - February 17, 2006 2:08 AM
Oh come on they look good. And the clothing is like aimed at little girls isn't it?
82. eyespy27 - February 17, 2006 2:48 AM
i thought jon benet ramsey was dead. and now there are two of them.
83. Rochford - February 17, 2006 2:50 AM
Hardly, spamnews. I'm a woman that likes girls just as much as any red-blooded American boy but I'd never touch those two.
84. billabong021 - February 17, 2006 3:28 AM
Looks like dakota fanning and natalie portman have finally got sme competition.
85. christee - February 17, 2006 3:46 AM
damn...is it halloween already?
just because they have made oodles of money from sitcoms and children's clothes, it doesn't mean they have earned it through talent. and what they earned from "full house," or any of their pre-18 acting jobs, for that matter, could be justified with "oh, but actors work such long hours." granted, most of the shows they've been on aren't marketed to age groups that actually notice any acting ability. they are just a novelty act that has gotten very lucky, and stayed very lucky. a friend of mine used to say "wait until they hit 20...you know one of them at least is bound to make a porn flick!" and it's probably for the best they don't hang w/that hooker, paris. (well, she is an example in how NOT to do porn, so take note, olsens).
86. Hara - February 17, 2006 3:47 AM
First off, the main reason they look so freakish is because this photo has been airbrushed to the point where it might as well be a watercolor. The gremlin picture someone posted is a lot closer to 'real'. The original shot, not the green one.... I guess.
And second, could we PLEASE stop comparing the girls to those twins from the Shining? That is so uncalled for an insulting. The Shining girls are fat cows next to the Olsens. And they have bigger boobs. (look closely)
87. christee - February 17, 2006 3:47 AM
*that was supposed to be "could not be justified." oops*
88. Evangelia - February 17, 2006 4:08 AM
I honestly believe that they have no teeth. The Olson twins' teeth are like Sasquatch or the Loch Ness monster - mythical rumors. I can understand it in Mary-Kate's case; throwing up 7 times a day can cause your enamel to wear away. But what excuse does Ashley have? Maybe Hilary Duff can lend them some of her toothage.
89. Lavinia the Vainglorious - February 17, 2006 8:12 AM
Hey I have Sims that look like this. But they are vampires...and they dress much much better and I would save them from a kitchen fire before lifting a finger to help any Olsen in mortal peril.
90. TeamLacheyRools - February 17, 2006 8:37 AM
So fucking airburshed, everyone knows they dont have any tits. oh and they sure are ugly. I thought models were meant to be good looking?
91. A Nobody - February 17, 2006 9:06 AM
Woah, they're still alive? After 3 months of hearing nothing from them, I thought they died of starvation.
Why won't they just leave already. They were never talented, don't even mention attractive. They were the ones who influenced hundreds of young girls to start throwing up. Why the hell are they even rich? Bimbo body wreckers.
92. popcornsuite - February 17, 2006 11:52 AM
Quick, someone get the garlic and the stakes.
93. Kelly617 - February 17, 2006 12:01 PM
Honestly? I think Ashley looks really pretty. Even in the other one that was posted with the mirror. She's got a nice face shape and her body looks like it has some curves.
MK just looks bad and frazzled.
94. funnygator - February 17, 2006 12:54 PM
Smart? Yes. Rich? HELL yes. Come in my pants if they're in my hotel room? Repeatedly. but, come on, Ashley's obvioulsy too young to know that whoever did her makeup is a huge 'Bride of Frankenstein' fan... and this was an homage...
95. archyros - February 17, 2006 1:52 PM
#92, that's the first thing I thought of. They don't go out during the day anymore, do they?
Thought so.
Haven't been seen eating solid food?
Thought so.
Never show their teeth?
Thought not.
96. Jazsawa - February 17, 2006 3:00 PM
http://www.slipknot-metal.com/gallery/videostills/spititout/images/spiitout-05.jpg
creepy
97. Maeve97 - February 17, 2006 3:26 PM
I think they look awesome. They have been working since they were babies. People should give them more credit.
98. Moksha - February 17, 2006 4:02 PM
Fat cows...
99. kuennen sux - February 17, 2006 4:36 PM
Zanna, can I enjoy the baby animals AND the celebrity bashing??
100. bluecanary - February 17, 2006 4:41 PM
The blonde one looks like a blow-up doll, should be good spank material for perverts. Love the blue dress on the other one, though. I don't keep up with them enough to remember their names, I just go with Hobo girl and non-hobo sister. but without their street attire, I can't remember which is which.
101. HughJorganthethird - February 17, 2006 6:12 PM
Your right S Starr. They are both geniuses. I'm sure they handle the day to day routine of there various business interests. In fact I bet they both get up and give lenghty speeches concerning shareholders dividends and profit margins etc. at the anuual meetings. College eh? You know what they were majoring in? Acting! Wow what a stretch! Fucking brilliant! Never mind the fact that they have both dropped out. And we all know how smart and talented you have to be to MODEL. Being rich becuase you were a cute kid doesn't make you talented or smart. And like I said before the only reason these two trolls are wealthy is because of dumb fucks like yourself.
102. hermanita - February 17, 2006 6:44 PM
The brunette (yeah I'm bad with names too) is just much prettier then her sister. If she's the one who was anorexic, then she doesn't look nearly as bad as she used to.
#3 Juliette, I never heard one of them say they think they're hot. And I don't think they do. They seem very insecure.
103. Maeve97 - February 17, 2006 7:58 PM
Zanna/#56: thanks for that baby animals website. i now have a baby elephant as my screen saver.
104. monkeyballs - February 17, 2006 9:02 PM
Whoever said that about the weird duck lip smile?
THANK YOU!!! OMG I ****HATE***** THAT WEIRD THING one of them does when she smiles. It's like The Constipated Look.
And just while I'm on the subject, I can't stand how Renee Zellwhatever does that pursed lips thing when she's just sitting there. Like, WTF is that? Who DOES that? No one. It's so distracting and stupid and I want to smack her every time she does it.
Ok thanks for letting me get that out.
105. The_Photoman - February 17, 2006 11:24 PM
These 2 would be fun to work with....got some sweet sci-fi concepts in mind.
106. knittykitty - February 18, 2006 1:59 AM
Redrum! Redrum!!!!
This is totally the twins from The Shining. Everyone who doesn't agree is too young. Truly.
107. Erienne - February 18, 2006 2:40 AM
This is the first time I've been to this site, and I am close to tears. You people are bloody hilarious.
Ashley is definetely the hotter of the two, but I can't say I disagree with the gnome/hobbit/gremlin comments by everyone.
And Evangelia, you so right about Hilary Duff. For anyone who hasn't seen the horror of Duff's smile: http://www.thesuperficial.com/archives/2006/02/10/hilary_duff_has_a_pretty_smile_1.html
Thanks for making my day a lot better everyone.
108. A Nobody - February 18, 2006 8:32 AM
Remember, just because they acted since they were born doesn't make them talented in any way. Have you seen fullhouse? Most people just didn't judge because they were so little, but all they did was basically read lines emotionlessly. What's so special about them? Just another overrated Paris Hilton wannabes.
109. Aliceis_obsessed - February 18, 2006 8:03 PM
no one ever said they were talented, but i don't think they or ugly little monsters everyone makes them out to be, the dresses are beautiful and if they weren't modeling it some other over hyped coked out teen queen would be
110. susie-q - February 18, 2006 8:42 PM
Those are some scary bitches. The hair is out of control - could that have really been the look they were going for? And their brains have the appearance of being, well, devoid of function.
They do pull off the red lipstick better than Anne Hathaway does.
111. gogoboots - February 18, 2006 10:14 PM
I think I preferred them when they were babies, now they look like anorexic zombies trying to take over our minds with their overdone eye make-up and all growed up clothes. Ugh, let me go hide under my bed before the twins decide to eat my brains out and puke him up again!
112. jon - February 19, 2006 10:07 AM
Strange people. I'd fucking hit them. Both.
113. A Nobody - February 20, 2006 12:44 AM
You'd hit everybody.
114. christee - February 20, 2006 2:24 AM
maybe this is really a poster for "lord of the rings-revenge of the hobbits." yeah..that makes sense.
115. deyanira_spain - February 20, 2006 6:25 AM
when i first saw this pic I thought i was staring at 2 ghosts. 2 skinny ghosts.
116. boshea - February 20, 2006 12:17 PM
The both look like Jon Benet Ramsey or the scary twins in the Shining.
117. liqurice_fish - March 18, 2006 5:03 AM
ok guys, u r all dumb, ok!
the oslen twins r the most hottest chicks eva.
how can u say such mean things about them when you dont even no them?
you do not no that when you r putting other people down its becouse you fell uncomfortable about yourself?
i bet u r all ugly and really you wish that you r that hot......... but ur not!
so fuking off! fat ugly bitches!
118. liqurice_fish - March 18, 2006 5:03 AM
ok guys, u r all dumb, ok!
the oslen twins r the most hottest chicks eva.
how can u say such mean things about them when you dont even no them?
you do not no that when you r putting other people down its becouse you fell uncomfortable about yourself?
i bet u r all ugly and really you wish that you r that hot......... but ur not!
so fuking off! fat ugly bitches!
119. ker - March 20, 2006 5:41 AM
wow!!! im 119th commented....
anyway marykate and ashley is hott! i said HOT! there u go number 102, somebody said they are hot...
the irony here, people always says ashley is supposed to be beautiful one, and is actually taller than mary-kate... the irony is marykate is more of a recongized fashionista-er and they make her pretty than her sister ashley-- and make marykate looks taller than her, and more distinct features im glad they make mary-kate prettier than ashley...
but nevertheless, how can they be ugly??---------
http://www.absolutenow.com/photos/Olsen_JS17208265.html
http://img107.imagevenue.com/img.php?loc=loc24&image=27940_olsen_twins_050207_06.jpg
120. Vikktar - April 11, 2006 4:50 AM
Sounds like a whole lot of jealousy here to me. These girls are stunningly beautiful, and a woman needn't be an amazon or have huge, pedulous, fat-bags hanging off her chest to be attractive. There is absolutely NOTHING wrong with being petite, slender, and small breasted - if fact, it's preferable. Females look beautiful and more feminine when they are petite. I cannot believe anyone would bitch because a young woman is petite. Should she be big and masculine instead? I'm guessing we have a lot of overweight, enormous, unattractive women and "chubby chaser" men commenting here.
121. meisa - April 19, 2006 1:01 PM
Come on guys, I get that your sick little weakness is you like to bash celebs, but consider the fact that what you are viewing is an ad!! they modeled for it, that's not what they look like on a day to day basis. They have people like you trashing them everyday, and I don't think I'd smile a lot in public either.
I think Ashley is gorgeous and MK can be pretty when she's not doing the trash bag look. Give them a break, they make a living just like you do..only they've been doing since they were six months old.
122. oldgrandpa - July 16, 2006 3:13 PM
Personally, I think the twins are pretty, especially when they smile. Don't forget that there is a market for "small" size clothing too, and since these two seem to be in the fashion business in a big way-that's BBBBillion$, they can and should do a fine job of carrying that banner. They can buy and sell women with larger to extravagant boobs. Also it occurs to me that not all women, (actresses, models, housewives, schoolgirls, executives) are even interested in being public sex show-offs.
123. omerta - August 9, 2006 10:41 PM
1. They didn't style themselves, so bashing what they wear in photos is far from insulting. If I got paid as much as they do to wear ridiculous hair-dos and whatnot, I’m pretty sure I’d go for it, as I’m sure most of you would too.
2. There is nothing wrong with being petite. I’m quite glad that there are famous people willing to brave nasty remarks and not succumb to the bursting-at-the-seams silicon mountains or sun-shriveled-fat-bags-hanging-from-their-chest look, especially since they are so young.
Obviously anorexia isn’t a positive message to send out to young girls, but it’s hardly like Mary-Kate chose to become unwell. Saying cruel things about someone suffering with an eating disorder isn’t funny, it’s sad for you because if you really have nothing better to do with your time than insult someone for being unwell, then you are fucked up in a much more permanent and pathetic way than Mary-Kate is.
3. I personally agree that the duck smile is ridiculous (who cares!?) but if you all hate it so much why do you insist they should smile more in photos? They are probably told not to be really smiley in pictures such as the ones shown here anyway.
I think spending time bashing other people is a little bit pathetic, especially when most of the things you've bashed them over aren't their fault. In a sense they're just doing their job. If you people have such a sad life that you feel the need to fill it with insulting other people for no real reason, why not try bashing people that do make really stupid judgments, like politicians. At least it would show some sort of brain power.
124. omerta - August 9, 2006 10:44 PM
1. They didn't style themselves, so bashing what they wear in photos is far from insulting. If I got paid as much as they do to wear ridiculous hair-dos and whatnot, I’m pretty sure I’d go for it, as I’m sure most of you would.
2. There is nothing wrong with being petite. I’m quite glad that there are famous people willing to brave nasty remarks and not succumb to the bursting-at-the-seams silicon mountains or sun-shriveled-fat-bags-hanging-from-their-chest look, especially since they are so young.
Obviously anorexia isn’t a positive message to send out to young girls, but it’s hardly like Mary-Kate chose to become unwell. Saying cruel things about someone suffering with an eating disorder isn’t funny, it’s sad for you because if you really have nothing better to do with your time than insult someone for being unwell, then you are fucked up in a much more permanent and pathetic way than Mary-Kate is.
3. I personally agree that the duck smile is ridiculous (who cares!?) but if you all hate it so much why do you insist they should smile more in photos? They are probably told not to be really smiley in pictures such as the ones shown here anyway.
I think spending time bashing other people is a little bit pathetic, especially when most of the things you've bashed them over aren't their fault. In a sense they're just doing their job. If you people have such a sad life that you feel the need to fill it with insulting other people for no real reason, why not try bashing people that make really stupid judgments, like politicians. At least it would show some sort of brain power.
125. luvagurl - October 6, 2006 7:05 AM
hi
126. luvagurl - October 6, 2006 7:10 AM
I say we leave these girls alone... how would you like to be critisized for how you look, or how bad your make-up is? I mean COME ON seriously, it's their lives and that's just the people they are. Life is about having fun, The Olsen's look totally HOT and I really don't care what you all say because they do!
Being famous would be sooo annoying!! They get judged and compared to other celebs, no wonder they get pressured into eating disorders. What make's it worse is that they get looked wrongly upon for that, and that is rude.
They are just normal people, and should not be judged just because they are "expected" to stand out with amzing beauty and perfection. The girls aren't perfect, who cares!!! NO BODY IS PERFECT....
they are famous for having good personalities, and the ability to make people laugh. You don't have to be perfect, to be a good icon.
127. juego de casino - July 6, 2007 11:46 AM
I am wondering what do they think about them self?
they had (I think) everything since they were born?
128. borin - October 1, 2007 5:10 PM
okay are u stupid? these girls are beautiful!! they are like perfect, like any of you have a patch on them really? stop hating u stuuuupid mofo